Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

is it true the average life-span of the rx-8 is only about 70,000-80,000 miles?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 11:15 AM
  #101  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
The disagreement was with claiming that more helicopters have them than not. The jet engine is the preferred engine for helicopters, hands down.

There was no engine recall. The recall sticker will be for emissions, MSP16, etc... THere were 5 recalls for the RX-8, none of them recalled "the engine". 3 of them were just reflash updates for emissions or engine health. You kept the same hardware installed.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 11:16 AM
  #102  
Tailicus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
I cant post it since I'm on my phone but it reads this way

Mazda Authorized Modification

recall 4206f

Part # N322-18881(or 9 cant tell)-T
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #103  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Owner Letter:

Mazda North American Operations
August 2006
2004-2006 RX-8 Voluntary Emission Recall Campaign 4206F

Dear Mazda Owner:
Mazda Motor Corporation has decided to conduct an Emission Recall Campaign to reprogram the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) and replace the spark plugs on certain 2004-2006 RX-8 vehicles produced from April 10, 2003 through June 1, 2006.

If you are a recipient of this notice, your vehicle is included in this recall.

What is the problem?
Due to PCM software calibration issues, the following conditions may result:
i) The oil-injection metering system may be inaccurate causing poor engine sealing of the combustion chambers resulting in drivability or emissions problems.
ii) Too much fuel may be injected at the time of engine start causing carbon to be deposited on spark plugs or plugs may be flooded, causing a difficult start condition. In addition, the catalytic converter may be degraded on some vehicles.
iii) (Only 2006 RX-8 vehicles are affected.) A test value indicating engine coolant temperature may be incorrectly shown on the service tool when a diagnostic function test is performed at dealership.

What will Mazda do?
Your Mazda dealer will reprogram the PCM to include the latest calibration. In addition, the following components will be inspected and repaired or replaced if necessary: spark plugs, engine, and catalytic converter. All of these inspection/repairs are carried out free of charge
.
The repair should take approximately 1 hour to complete at minimum. However, it may take longer depending on the necessary repairs and service workload at your Mazda dealership. Mazda is offering a Daily Rental Program to provide alternate transportation when your vehicle is at an authorized Mazda dealership for this recall. Ask your dealer for details about this program.

What should you do?
We encourage you to make an appointment with any authorized Mazda dealer to have the PCM reprogrammed and if necessary, have the spark plugs, engine, and/or catalytic converter replaced, at your earliest convenience. You do not need to bring this notice to the dealer, but it may assist in the check-in process.
Dealer Letter:
TO:
Mazda Dealership General Managers, Service Managers, and Parts Managers
DATE: April 2008 (Original August 2006)

SUBJECT:
2004-2006 RX-8 Voluntary Emission Recall Campaign 4206F

Revised Parts and Warranty Information

Dear Mazda Dealer:
Mazda Motor Corporation has decided to conduct an Emission Recall Campaign to reprogram the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) and replace the spark plugs on certain 2004-2006 RX-8 vehicles produced from April 10, 2003 through June 1, 2006.

Due to PCM software calibration issues, the following conditions may result:
i) The oil-injection metering system may be inaccurate causing poor engine sealing of the combustion chambers resulting in drivability or emissions problems.
ii) Too much fuel may be injected at the time of engine start causing carbon to be deposited on spark plugs or plugs may be flooded, causing a difficult start condition. In addition, the catalytic converter may be degraded on some vehicles.
iii) (Only 2006 RX-8 vehicles are affected.) A test value indicating engine coolant temperature may be incorrectly shown on the service tool when a diagnostic function test is performed at dealership.

Owners of affected vehicles will be notified by first class mail beginning August 31, 2006.

This package contains important information about emission recall campaign 4206F:
Attachment I Dealer Service and Parts information
Attachment II Repair procedures
Attachment III Owner notification letter

Important notice: California Department of Motor Vehicles, Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, in conjunction with the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency for the State of Massachusetts and Vermont, have implemented the Registration Renewal/Recall Tie-In Program, which requires the completion of Emission Recalls prior to registration renewal. Mazda dealers must provide a Vehicle Emission Recall – Proof of Correction Certificate upon completion of the recall. Instruct owners to keep the certificate until needed for registration renewal.
Failure to perform applicable recalls before delivery can result in extensive dealer fines and penalties from the Federal Government. Therefore, you must complete this recall for all affected vehicles in your inventory prior to delivery.

Last edited by RIWWP; Apr 26, 2014 at 11:22 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 11:24 AM
  #104  
Tailicus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
But I didn't say helicopters used them more than jet engines. I said Helicopters wouldn't use them if they weren't reliable.

I can understand the confusion though. I tend to do that to most of my friends as well.

I am not here to pick fights, or argue. I'm not saying none of you knew what you were talking about, but I did not post anything that I did not know. Any more replies about this confusion will not revoke a response thank you.

RIWWP - I respect you, and am very well aware that you know more about rotary engines than I
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 11:28 AM
  #105  
Tailicus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Owner Letter:



Dealer Letter:
Thanks. I believe I remember reading this when I first saw it at the gas station. By that I mean I looked it up. And my buddy told me it wasn't a big deal.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #106  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
One thing about the internet and 100% of communication in text, using the wrong words conveys an incorrect meaning that isn't easily corrected.

Example:
Originally Posted by Tailicus
Otherwise, I don't think that would be the primary engine for helicopters...
That's the point contradicted.

Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 12:47 PM
  #107  
Tailicus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
hmmm. I'm trying to think why I said primary.

I know that turbine gas engines are preferred in aviation. Rolls Royce's Allison model 250 series is the most commonly used engine for helicopters (turbine gas).

If that's what I said, (which obviously is since it's typed there) then by all means slap me with a stupid stick.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 01:02 PM
  #108  
Tailicus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Also by that, I meant to say that exact sentence you quoted earlier.

But I talked with a mechanical engineer at my university and he was even talking about the turbine gas engine (as well as some weird thing about cows). So I'm not sure why I said that sentence since I knew better.

Does that make sense, or should I keep digging a larger more confusing hole?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 01:03 PM
  #109  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest



Feel free to trade the shovel for a ladder at any point.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 01:55 PM
  #110  
Tailicus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
I'll do that. And then trade the ladder for a jet pack since the ladder might not quite make it. :D
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 07:02 PM
  #111  
ken-x8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 5
From: Northern Virginia
recall 4206f
Since this has been mentioned, I've got a question for the engine builders.

Have you seen the innards of enough Renesises (Renesi?) from before and after 4206f to form an opinion as to whether it helped the way Mazda thought it would?

Ken
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2016 | 06:36 PM
  #112  
BMF's Avatar
BMF
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
I've been looking into buying a used RX8. It's a 2004 with 45,535 miles on it. I own a Dodge Neon right now and haven't decided fly if I want to make the jump to the RX8. Any suggeations?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2016 | 09:07 PM
  #113  
RX8Soldier's Avatar
Time for boost...
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 17
From: Canada
Originally Posted by BMF
I've been looking into buying a used RX8. It's a 2004 with 45,535 miles on it. I own a Dodge Neon right now and haven't decided fly if I want to make the jump to the RX8. Any suggeations?
I suggest reading the new and potential owners thread found in the new members forum.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 01:58 AM
  #114  
Barbusix's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Croatia Zagreb
Hy guys, just bought RX8 with low compression (it run on 5 bar and less - had hot start problem) and drove it for 1000miles. It started cranking and destroyed stationary bearing. So 100000miles on first engine. Now dead! If i could get it with second engine I would be happy as a baby!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 01:56 PM
  #115  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2019 | 03:49 AM
  #116  
Barbusix's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Croatia Zagreb
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
Two years later and this still holds true in my experience. I am now doing one rx8 every week or 2 at this point.
I have done two rebuilds on rx8 with 80k miles and all You say it's true!
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2019 | 12:40 PM
  #117  
1300CC's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
From: Cary, NC
155K on original motor. Owned it since a hair over 100k, 2006MY. Aside from usual maintenance (plugs,wires,coils) All it has is a midpipe I installed. I also run Royal Purple 10W30 and have been running a custom tune from VersaTune for about 20k~ which has slight increased OMP output. Occasional premix.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2019 | 08:01 PM
  #118  
Ethanrx8's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
My 06 rx8 has over 160kms on the original motor and still going strong. I know someone who’s didn’t last 6 months brand new off the lot. If you take care of it it’ll take care of you
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2019 | 06:21 PM
  #119  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
It’s not that simple, it’s more a throw of the dice. In typical casino tradition, seems like more people are losing than winning, including the House (Mazda).
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2020 | 05:04 PM
  #120  
apex1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 231
Likes: 26
So anything past 80k I’d off peak performance.
Anything past 100k is tired
Anything past 140k is dead?

it seems like many well designed piston engines loosen up for the first 60k and are in their prime 60-120k and make great power after that.

rotary engines seem to decline in compression and performance linearly compared to mileage. If they are well taken care of they can go 150k, but make their best power when new. Is this right?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2020 | 05:09 PM
  #121  
Loki's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 1,107
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by apex1
So anything past 80k I’d off peak performance.
Anything past 100k is tired
Anything past 140k is dead?

it seems like many well designed piston engines loosen up for the first 60k and are in their prime 60-120k and make great power after that.

rotary engines seem to decline in compression and performance linearly compared to mileage. If they are well taken care of they can go 150k, but make their best power when new. Is this right?
It's unrelated. There are people who have made it to 200k+ on one engine. There are people whose engine lasted 20k.
On average those benchmarks are right-ish, but the average doesn't always hold true for any one individual case.
So it depends what you want to do with this information.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2020 | 11:18 AM
  #122  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
and 2011 models getting a new engine before 100k

https://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/cto...055447412.html

the lifespan of the RX8 is great, but it could need an engine sooner than most, or not ... today though most people act like the rest of the car is disposable once the engine needs replacement. Kind of sad and wasteful.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2020 | 11:50 AM
  #123  
apex1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 231
Likes: 26
It does seem the cars are almost disposable. I can only assume the engine is what drags the book value down on these cars. It seems a bit overblown though.

I just ran the NADA on a clean retail 2005 GT with 20k miles, and it came up with $4200!!!? $4200!!!? That's it???

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2020 | 12:30 PM
  #124  
Loki's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 1,107
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by apex1
It does seem the cars are almost disposable. I can only assume the engine is what drags the book value down on these cars. It seems a bit overblown though.

I just ran the NADA on a clean retail 2005 GT with 20k miles, and it came up with $4200!!!? $4200!!!? That's it???
Perception of the engine drags it down.
Though... a 2005 is now 15 years old.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2020 | 12:40 PM
  #125  
UnknownJinX's Avatar
Smoking turbo yay
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 674
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by apex1
It does seem the cars are almost disposable. I can only assume the engine is what drags the book value down on these cars. It seems a bit overblown though.

I just ran the NADA on a clean retail 2005 GT with 20k miles, and it came up with $4200!!!? $4200!!!? That's it???

Like Loki said, it's an old car. Mazda in general also doesn't hold value as well as Toyota or Honda.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.