Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Test drove an RX8 :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-09-2006, 01:26 AM
  #26  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by kw1k
......... you're joking right

yep,
wtf this whole thing is shot to hell.

beers
Old 04-09-2006, 02:41 AM
  #27  
the giant tastetickles
 
yiksing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
You're welcome, someone around here has to know what they're talking about and we all know it sure as hell isn't going to be you.
Ok Ike, the S2000 is faster than the 8 because of the hp or is it because of the lighter weight and the gear ratio?
Old 04-09-2006, 02:46 AM
  #28  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by yiksing
Ok Ike, the S2000 is faster than the 8 because of the hp or is it because of the lighter weight and the gear ratio?
i would go with the honda hp is closer to the ad than mazdas.

check my sig. i love my car. the truth hurts sometimes.

and notice the thread starter is gone. it is one of THOSE THREADS... stir the coals.

beers
Old 04-09-2006, 02:52 AM
  #29  
Club Marbles Member
 
Raptor2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S2000s get a consistent 15-20 more whp than an rx8's dyno, and it's about 200 lbs less, so it's a combination. Not sure about the gear ratios.

Now if Mazda would make a 2500-2700 lb roadster with a Renesis...
Old 04-09-2006, 03:01 AM
  #30  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What Raptor said, gearing plays a small part as well. Mostly it's just good ole wheel horsepower.
Old 04-09-2006, 03:04 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
kw1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: cali baby
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor2k
S2000s get a consistent 15-20 more whp than an rx8's dyno, and it's about 200 lbs less, so it's a combination. Not sure about the gear ratios.

Now if Mazda would make a 2500-2700 lb roadster with a Renesis...

the gearing is 4.10s
Old 04-09-2006, 03:11 AM
  #32  
93.5 octane
 
mmats69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Elise?
Old 04-09-2006, 10:04 AM
  #33  
CAW CAW
 
TODreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do people insist on comparing the NA 8 to the FI FD?

Apparently the final drive ratio is 4.44
Old 04-09-2006, 10:23 AM
  #34  
i pwn therefore i am
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Well you're wrong. I think the original poster is saying just that—and I can assure you that I'm not "insane or retarded". (You have a real gift for words, by the way.) Sounds to me like the original poster is disappointed the 8 is not a 7:

"I started another thread about the differences between the RX8 and the FD that I sold… my favorite experience in driving my FD was the jump from 20mph to 60mph (turning onto the highway). I just couldn't get that 'kick in the pants' feel that I was hoping for. I tried it several times in different gear/rpm ranges and just couldn't get the feel…*sigh*. I really wanted a rotary rocket in the stable."
There's too many people that are too defensive about their cars. This guy isn't flaming the 8 or anything or the sort. Sounded like he had a great car, was encouraged to go test drive one, did, realized that the 8 just didn't live up to his expectations in the "kick in the pants" department, and then came here to get some advice from some people that would hopefully know more than he does about where the 8 is headed or some alternative cars. What is wrong with that?

You shouldn't have to be a certified expert on the 8 to have expectations and thoughts about the 8. Comparing it to the FD is probably apples to oranges in some ways, but there's nothing wrong with someone trying to do so when they're early in the game and don't know a ton about the 8.
Old 04-09-2006, 10:28 AM
  #35  
the more things change
 
scremn8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You shouldn't have to be a certified expert on the 8 to have expectations and thoughts about the 8. Comparing it to the FD is probably apples to oranges in some ways, but there's nothing wrong with someone trying to do so when they're early in the game and don't know a ton about the 8.[/QUOTE]


what he said..
Old 04-09-2006, 10:37 AM
  #36  
Registered
 
9291150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
You're welcome, someone around here has to know what they're talking about and we all know it sure as hell isn't going to be you.
Hey Ike, I'll paste this from a spam I just got;
-Sensattional revolution in medicine!
-Enlarge your ***** up to 10 cm or up to 4 inches!
-It's herbal solution what hasn't side effect, but has 100% guaranted results!
-Don't lose your chance and but know wihtout doubts, you will be i`mpressed with results!
-Clcsk here: http://nologonobrand.info

...see, if you do this, than maybe you'll stop hanging here and playing the "your car slow, my car fast" game. ...just want to save you some time
Old 04-09-2006, 10:38 AM
  #37  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by kw1k
the gearing is 4.10s
Final drive...but the 6spd's ratios on the S2000 are shorter and closer than the 8's.
Old 04-09-2006, 11:32 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
sti_eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Apalachin, NY
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX26b
To get the kick-in-the-pants feel you need torque. Plain and simple. Knowing that, you can now cross all small displacement motors off your list (unless they're blown). S2000s, Elises, Boxsters (unless it's an "S") will NOT give you what your FD did.
Wow, that's got to be one of the most ignorant posts I've read on this forum. And that's saying a lot with the likes of roaddemon, 9291150, rotorocket, and wantan8 posting here. Obiviously you have never driven an Elise. I can assure you that it gives you that kick-in-the-pants feel in any gear. I'm sure the Ariel Atom (a car suggested in this thread) gives you that kick-in-the-pants feel even though it "only" has a wee little 2.0 liter engine and "only" 220 hp. And, I'm guessing that the 2.4 liter N/A engines being used in F1 cars just may give a little bit of a kick in the pants.

To the OP -
Z06, Boxster S, MB SLK, Cobra GT500, Ariel Atom, XK8, Z4 M, and M3 either already have an MSRP over your $50K limit, or adding ANY options will put you over $50K.

If you are looking for a car that is actually under $50K and will give you a kick in the pants, you have plenty to choose from, including: STi, Evo, base Corvette, GTO, just about any of the SRT vehicles (SRT4, Crossfire SRT6, 300C SRT8, Charger SRT8, Magnum SRT8, Cherokee SRT8), Crustang GT, IS350, 350Z. And, one that I am keeping an eye on is the soon-to-be released twin turbo BMW 335i.

Don't hold your breath on a FI RX-8.
Old 04-09-2006, 12:28 PM
  #39  
CAW CAW
 
TODreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I highly highly doubt that there will be an FI RX8 (mazdaspeed or whatever...)
Old 04-09-2006, 12:55 PM
  #40  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9291150
Hey Ike, I'll paste this from a spam I just got;
-Sensattional revolution in medicine!
-Enlarge your ***** up to 10 cm or up to 4 inches!
-It's herbal solution what hasn't side effect, but has 100% guaranted results!
-Don't lose your chance and but know wihtout doubts, you will be i`mpressed with results!
-Clcsk here: http://nologonobrand.info

...see, if you do this, than maybe you'll stop hanging here and playing the "your car slow, my car fast" game. ...just want to save you some time
Awwww doers the poor widdle fanboi not wike it when I don't talk about the RX-8 like it's a wocket ship.
Old 04-09-2006, 02:03 PM
  #41  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BoB-O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
i would go with the honda hp is closer to the ad than mazdas.

check my sig. i love my car. the truth hurts sometimes.

and notice the thread starter is gone. it is one of THOSE THREADS... stir the coals.

beers
I'm not gone. I'm reading carefully. Nobody asked me a question and I'm not trying to get into flame wars. Just trying to get info.

BoB
Old 04-09-2006, 02:18 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
BunnyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,327
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Raptor2k
S2000s get a consistent 15-20 more whp than an rx8's dyno, and it's about 200 lbs less, so it's a combination. Not sure about the gear ratios.

Now if Mazda would make a 2500-2700 lb roadster with a Renesis...
The sticker in the door of my car says the weight is 3810. It would be pretty amazing if they dropped 1000 pounds.
Old 04-09-2006, 02:27 PM
  #43  
i pwn therefore i am
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BunnyGirl
The sticker in the door of my car says the weight is 3810. It would be pretty amazing if they dropped 1000 pounds.
That's the GVW (Gross Vehicle Weight). That's the maximum recommended total weight of your car including passengers and cargo. The actual weight of the 8 is right about 3,000 lbs depending on options.
Old 04-09-2006, 02:29 PM
  #44  
Club Marbles Member
 
Raptor2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^

silly bunny
Old 04-09-2006, 02:30 PM
  #45  
Registered
 
BunnyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,327
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guess I'd better do more than just glance at my sticker next time. LOL
Old 04-09-2006, 02:32 PM
  #46  
Registered
 
BunnyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,327
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by saturn
That's the GVW (Gross Vehicle Weight). That's the maximum recommended total weight of your car including passengers and cargo. The actual weight of the 8 is right about 3,000 lbs depending on options.

I thought I heard the around 3000 pounds weight before and then I happened to notice the 3800 on the sticker but was getting out of my car at the time to get somewhere so I didn't actually stop and read it over carefully.

I know I have a ton of options packed in there but I didn't think I had that much extra weight. Guess I was right in thinking that sounded a little off. LOL
Old 04-09-2006, 03:00 PM
  #47  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by TODreamer
I highly highly doubt that there will be an FI RX8 (mazdaspeed or whatever...)
I'm right there with you.
My feeling is that the only FI RX-8s we will see are going to be the aftermarket ones. I really hope I'll have to eat my words sometime - alas, that doesn't seem to be likely.
Oh well - I still like my car. A lot, actually.
Old 04-09-2006, 07:55 PM
  #48  
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Rootski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Awwww doers the poor widdle fanboi not wike it when I don't talk about the RX-8 like it's a wocket ship.
We just don't like it when you talk. Especially when you come on like you're America's answer to Jeremy Clarkson because you've test-driven a few cars.
Old 04-09-2006, 08:01 PM
  #49  
Registered
 
RX26b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 444
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sti_eric
Wow, that's got to be one of the most ignorant posts I've read on this forum. And that's saying a lot with the likes of roaddemon, 9291150, rotorocket, and wantan8 posting here. Obiviously you have never driven an Elise. I can assure you that it gives you that kick-in-the-pants feel in any gear. I'm sure the Ariel Atom (a car suggested in this thread) gives you that kick-in-the-pants feel even though it "only" has a wee little 2.0 liter engine and "only" 220 hp. And, I'm guessing that the 2.4 liter N/A engines being used in F1 cars just may give a little bit of a kick in the pants.

I never said the Elise wasn't quick. Of course it will be; that Yamaha mill only has to move 19xx pounds. Doesn't mean it slams you back in your seat like a Viper; which is exactly the feel that Bob was seeking.

As for the 2.4s in F1 cars, nope they don't kick. Ask any of the drivers in the field whether they jump out of corners like the 3.0s or 3.5s did years back. They rev to 19K and make their 700 hp at the top of the rev band.

Why don't you learn a little something before you go criticizing those more knowledgeable than you, you dumbass. Put that in your sig ********.
Old 04-09-2006, 08:08 PM
  #50  
Club Marbles Member
 
Raptor2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL

it's time


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Test drove an RX8 :(



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.