RX8 Turbo
02-26-2002, 08:50 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RX8 Turbo
I've read about it....
I've saw pictures of it......
Mazda Dealship said something about it.......
Rotary News in Japan reported on it....
Anybody got defent confirmation on it?
I WANT A TURBO EDITION!
I've saw pictures of it......
Mazda Dealship said something about it.......
Rotary News in Japan reported on it....
Anybody got defent confirmation on it?
I WANT A TURBO EDITION!
02-26-2002, 09:52 PM
#2
Moderatin this biznatch
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-26-2002, 11:01 PM
#3
I Am Rotary Powered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not so sure that's correct:
http://auto.ascii24.com/auto24/e/200...999_21.html?sm
Towards the end it says:
Mazda product development chief Philip Martens also confirmed that his team were working on a more powerful turbocharged RX-8 that would pump out in excess of 250kW and be available in around 2004. That's in addition to word from inside Mazda that the next generation two-door RX-7 will also be based on the RX-8's platform but not appear in showrooms until 2004 at the earliest..
Thats 335hp. I don't know how accurate this is, but it is out there....
http://auto.ascii24.com/auto24/e/200...999_21.html?sm
Towards the end it says:
Mazda product development chief Philip Martens also confirmed that his team were working on a more powerful turbocharged RX-8 that would pump out in excess of 250kW and be available in around 2004. That's in addition to word from inside Mazda that the next generation two-door RX-7 will also be based on the RX-8's platform but not appear in showrooms until 2004 at the earliest..
Thats 335hp. I don't know how accurate this is, but it is out there....
02-26-2002, 11:04 PM
#4
Moderatin this biznatch
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The article that I posted is a bit more recent, I dont doubt it at all, but thats what the president said. I just regurgitate info.
What we may be seeing here is a confirmation on a prototype RX8 Turbo. Where as the article I posted dealt with the production RX8's. I am looking to add turbos to my RX8 sooner or later, and look for other companies and mazda and bathurst to do it as well in the future.
What we may be seeing here is a confirmation on a prototype RX8 Turbo. Where as the article I posted dealt with the production RX8's. I am looking to add turbos to my RX8 sooner or later, and look for other companies and mazda and bathurst to do it as well in the future.
02-28-2002, 08:08 AM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RX8 Turbo
Here is what I am wondering, would Mazda keep the plans for a RX8 turbo secret. I mean think about it we all know that there will be a new Rx7, and if fact why would Mazda put out a car way before the new Rx7 that will be turbo? I mean why not just have a RX8 with a lot of power Sedan, and then throw it threw the roof and introduce a TT new RENSIS in the new RX7 for those race enthusats. I mean basicaly why are they going to tell us about the RX8 going turbo in the new RENSIS, so later they can compete with themselves in the 8 and 7?
02-28-2002, 11:11 AM
#6
Moderatin this biznatch
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont know why they would Mazda may be trying to build all NA cars specs on the new RX7 are going to more in the air than the RX8 specs. Just look to the future to see what the answer is.
02-28-2002, 11:51 AM
#7
Will trade kids for RX-8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: RX8 Turbo
Originally posted by Phyre
I mean why not just have a RX8 with a lot of power Sedan, and then throw it threw the roof and introduce a TT new RENSIS in the new RX7 for those race enthusats.
I mean why not just have a RX8 with a lot of power Sedan, and then throw it threw the roof and introduce a TT new RENSIS in the new RX7 for those race enthusats.
Mazda, if they are smart, will leave the turbo RX-8 options for the aftermarket. Turbos, IMHO, were nearly the death of the rotary engine as a viable power plant. I think Mazda realizes this too, which is why all the actual Mazda quotes I have seen or heard are "we're not doing turbos this time" quotes.
No matter how much NA power they end up producing, there will always be some die-hard maniacs that want more, and will strap a turbo to anything to get it. Those enthusiasts that will turbo their NA (see 1st gen RX-7 options - no factory turbo, but MANY aftermarket turbo options when they were new), but the way to sell cars (object of the RX-8 since it is a "family" sports sedan and not the flagship sportscar) is to skip the pitfalls of all out performance, and go for trouble free performance with good mileage and insurance rates.
Mazda as a corporation is looking to sell cars to turn a profit to stay in business. They are not looking to satisfy a very small minority in the audience (power mad enthusiasts) with this car. That's the marketing position the RX-7 has evolved into...If you seek factory turbo, simply support those you know who plan on buying the NA RX-8. If the 8 is successful, the RX-7 will follow. Of course with the additional years for research into the rotary, I would not be surprised to find they can produce the big power without turbo(s). I'm hoping for a Renisis 20B NA.
So in essence, I guess I am agreeing that they should leave the factory turbo setup for the next RX-7, if they do it at all. I'd rather see a 500 hp NA 20B RX-7 than a 13B TT RX-7. :D
02-28-2002, 12:39 PM
#8
I Am Rotary Powered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was it really the turbo that made the 3rd gen so unreliable? There was a Turbo II on the second generation cars, did it have big reliability problems like the 3rd gen?
My understanding was that the sequential turbo on the FD3S, with its 75 tubes running beween turbos and engines, combined with the extremely high heat and lack of adequate cooling was the biggest problem with FD3S reliability, no?
I'm not a huge turbo fan in the first place. Would I like to see turbo as an option to get more power? Yes. Would I rather see a normally aspirated 3 rotor instead of turbo. You bet.
My understanding was that the sequential turbo on the FD3S, with its 75 tubes running beween turbos and engines, combined with the extremely high heat and lack of adequate cooling was the biggest problem with FD3S reliability, no?
I'm not a huge turbo fan in the first place. Would I like to see turbo as an option to get more power? Yes. Would I rather see a normally aspirated 3 rotor instead of turbo. You bet.
02-28-2002, 05:49 PM
#9
Will trade kids for RX-8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have the RX-7 Sportscar Color History book, check out the numbers sold at the end. They started making the factory turbo models in 1986, and shortly thereafter, the sales trend went right into the gutter. The problem was only exacerbated by the FD.
What it comes down to is this: Turbo = more power + less reliability + more heat, which is a whole mess of stuff the average car buyer not only doesn't want, but doesn't understand. Bring all that together, and the only people who give a hoot about turbo are people like us. :D Problem is, if you want to sell cars, how many will be bought by people like us? Just 7 years ago, I think we proved that the American public in general was not ready for turbo, twin turbo, or any high tech sportscar stuff from Japan. Have we changed that much in 7 years? IMHO, no.
I know, you know, and I'll bet just about everyone else here knows that turbo is fun, and a great way to keep weight down while adding GOBS of power, but the RX-8 is a family sportscar, not the flagship sportscar. It would be very unwise of Mazda to repeat THIS history, especially on the family car.
I'm looking for the gobs of power form the next RX-7. And I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that they aren't going to turbo that for gobs of power either. I'd rather see a reliable NA 20B Renisis that will give the rotary a good reputation outside of our little rotary corner of the internet...
What it comes down to is this: Turbo = more power + less reliability + more heat, which is a whole mess of stuff the average car buyer not only doesn't want, but doesn't understand. Bring all that together, and the only people who give a hoot about turbo are people like us. :D Problem is, if you want to sell cars, how many will be bought by people like us? Just 7 years ago, I think we proved that the American public in general was not ready for turbo, twin turbo, or any high tech sportscar stuff from Japan. Have we changed that much in 7 years? IMHO, no.
I know, you know, and I'll bet just about everyone else here knows that turbo is fun, and a great way to keep weight down while adding GOBS of power, but the RX-8 is a family sportscar, not the flagship sportscar. It would be very unwise of Mazda to repeat THIS history, especially on the family car.
I'm looking for the gobs of power form the next RX-7. And I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that they aren't going to turbo that for gobs of power either. I'd rather see a reliable NA 20B Renisis that will give the rotary a good reputation outside of our little rotary corner of the internet...
03-01-2002, 07:10 AM
#10
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Stanwood, Washington
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree with NOTA V6. Keep the RX8 design simple and reliable. If you do this and price it right sales success will follow IMHO. If the RX8 is successful the RX7 has a much better chance of seeing the light of day on American shores.
03-02-2002, 05:28 AM
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wounder how long its going to take the guys in NZ to build a eshaft to make 3 or 4 rotor setup for this car
now that would kick major butt
take a 4 rotor ver to Le Manes again and take home the victory agian.
now that would kick major butt
take a 4 rotor ver to Le Manes again and take home the victory agian.
03-02-2002, 07:32 AM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with the RENESIS, like that of the S2000, is a lack of torque. Sure, a sky-high redline is fun, but are most people going to buy a "family" car that you have to drive like you're mad at, just to get around? I think not. Granted, it purports to be a sports car, but in reality, it probably will not reach its intended mark without the addition of some torque. At least Honda doesn't pretend their car is something it isn't.
Proof? Go drive an S2000, or better yet, try driving a 7 that's got a bridge-ported or PP motor. Not too fun for daily driving, especially in stop-and-go traffic. Torque helps get the car moving, and the heavier the car (remember, passengers and luggage add weight, too), the more torque it needs to be driveable.
There are many ways you can build torque, but the easiest and most effective is to increase displacement. We really can't be helped in that department without adding more rotors to the engine. Given a limited displacement, the next best way to build big torque is to add something to increase the engine's compression, whether static or dynamic. Turbos are especially useful in this area because they are more or less an on-demand torque (and horsepower) builder. This is one of the reasons the TII's and FD's are as streetable as they are, for being so powerful.
I think it would be folly to introduce a family-type vehicle and not give you a product with enough torque to make driving it enjoyable. I hope I'm wrong on this point. Don't misunderstand me, I like the RX-8 and hope it sells well, mainly so that we can get another 7 here. I love rotaries. I just don't think that Mazda is going to sell as many of these as they think they are, without some type of increased useable power.
Think of it this way, would you rather drive a Miata or a vert 7? Which is honestly the more fun-to-drive car in stock form? Most would say the Miata, emotional input aside. Why? Among other points, it has an appropriate amount of useable power for its size. Stock vert 7's feel bulky and underpowered by comparison. I think this is how many potential buyers will view the RX-8.
So, what's my point? Bring on the turbo. Just one is fine, but if two, something has to be done to make the sequencer reliable. Sad to say, but I think Mazda needs to take some lessons from Toyota.
Ren
Proof? Go drive an S2000, or better yet, try driving a 7 that's got a bridge-ported or PP motor. Not too fun for daily driving, especially in stop-and-go traffic. Torque helps get the car moving, and the heavier the car (remember, passengers and luggage add weight, too), the more torque it needs to be driveable.
There are many ways you can build torque, but the easiest and most effective is to increase displacement. We really can't be helped in that department without adding more rotors to the engine. Given a limited displacement, the next best way to build big torque is to add something to increase the engine's compression, whether static or dynamic. Turbos are especially useful in this area because they are more or less an on-demand torque (and horsepower) builder. This is one of the reasons the TII's and FD's are as streetable as they are, for being so powerful.
I think it would be folly to introduce a family-type vehicle and not give you a product with enough torque to make driving it enjoyable. I hope I'm wrong on this point. Don't misunderstand me, I like the RX-8 and hope it sells well, mainly so that we can get another 7 here. I love rotaries. I just don't think that Mazda is going to sell as many of these as they think they are, without some type of increased useable power.
Think of it this way, would you rather drive a Miata or a vert 7? Which is honestly the more fun-to-drive car in stock form? Most would say the Miata, emotional input aside. Why? Among other points, it has an appropriate amount of useable power for its size. Stock vert 7's feel bulky and underpowered by comparison. I think this is how many potential buyers will view the RX-8.
So, what's my point? Bring on the turbo. Just one is fine, but if two, something has to be done to make the sequencer reliable. Sad to say, but I think Mazda needs to take some lessons from Toyota.
Ren
03-16-2012, 03:50 PM
#16
top 10 billboard songs in 2002
1. How You Remind Me, Nickelback
2. Foolish - Ashanti
3. Hot in Herre, Nelly
4. Dilemma, Nelly Featuring Kelly Rowland
5. Wherever You Will Go, The Calling
6. A Thousand Miles, Vanessa Carlton
7. In the End, Linkin Park
8. What's Luv?, Fat Joe Featuring Ashanti
9. U Got It Bad, Usher
10. Blurry, Puddle Of Mudd
...really??? nickelback was the #1 song?? gawd that makes me hate mainstream radio even more now...
1. How You Remind Me, Nickelback
2. Foolish - Ashanti
3. Hot in Herre, Nelly
4. Dilemma, Nelly Featuring Kelly Rowland
5. Wherever You Will Go, The Calling
6. A Thousand Miles, Vanessa Carlton
7. In the End, Linkin Park
8. What's Luv?, Fat Joe Featuring Ashanti
9. U Got It Bad, Usher
10. Blurry, Puddle Of Mudd
...really??? nickelback was the #1 song?? gawd that makes me hate mainstream radio even more now...
03-16-2012, 03:52 PM
#17
Phone Booth'd
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Cincinnasty
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At this time 10 years ago. I was drunk in a bar preparing for st.patty's bar opening the next morning. 
A pack of smokes then was ~$2.65 here it is now ~$6.50
A pack of smokes then was ~$2.65 here it is now ~$6.50
03-16-2012, 04:02 PM
#19
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
10 years ago I was smashing domestics in my Boosted Civic and bashing noobs and banning people on www.honda-acura.net
03-16-2012, 06:33 PM
#23
