Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

rx8 over the fd

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #126  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Back to the comparo...as much as I love the FD ( imo best looking car available under $90K, never had the pleasure of driving one though)...

I can fit an entire 5 piece drum kit in my 8, including 22" bass drum, three toms, snare, cymbal bag, and all hardware incl. cymbal stands!!! Good luck getting even the bass drum in any other sports car on the market.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #127  
chickenwafer's Avatar
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Denver
I can add my 2 cents. I breifly owned a '94 FD Touring pack and it was a nice car, but had too many issues to be fun. Everytime I had to go someplace I would close my eyes and clench my teeth praying my 7 would start. Not to mention I rarely got boost from the second turbo above 4500 rpm (due to a vacuum issue) and my never-rebuilt 13B was approaching 87,xxx miles so I was going to need the apex seals replaced pretty soon. The 8 is lightyears ahead in reliabitly, and a lot more comfortable (I don't have kidney bruises anymore!) and so on.
And yes, I know FD's can be made to be reliable, I had a buddy with a '93 with a single turbo conversion and a few other tweaks and it was fine, but those all take thousands of dollars just to get it to that point.


Oh, and Mitsubishi doesn't design a better intake or Nissan a better ECU because of Emissions regulations by the EPA and because of fuel mileage requirements. Did you know the EPA regulates intake noise? It also regulates exhaust noise, engine noise, gear noise, and interior noise, not just exhaust gas emissions. So if Mitsu was to make a better intake, it still wouldn't be as good as the non-street legal versions. The only way AEM and other companies get away with it is when you get your car inspected, they don't test your intake noise, or gear noise, or other stuff that is tested on a brand new car going through production.
But the other poster who said the stuff about the "trickle down" effect, as in if you get a better intake it's useless without a better exhaust, so then a reprogrammed ECU, and then you need a better clutch to support the power, then better brakes because you're going faster, etc.......is completely right. SO then we would have a 500+bhp EVO for over $60,000. The Evo or the Z or whatever is tuned within EPA regs and to get the best fuel mileage.


Dave
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #128  
AirlockRX's Avatar
Upsilon Sigma Mu Chi
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 20
From: Anywhere I Have To Be
Originally Posted by Rhythmic
Back to the comparo...as much as I love the FD ( imo best looking car available under $90K, never had the pleasure of driving one though)...

I can fit an entire 5 piece drum kit in my 8, including 22" bass drum, three toms, snare, cymbal bag, and all hardware incl. cymbal stands!!! Good luck getting even the bass drum in any other sports car on the market.
Funny you mention the 5pc Kit /w 22" Bass Drum, I got a 5pc DW kit for my daughter and I need to take it to PA. Is that without cases?

Sorry about regressing...
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #129  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by chickenwafer
I can add my 2 cents. I breifly owned a '94 FD Touring pack and it was a nice car, but had too many issues to be fun. Everytime I had to go someplace I would close my eyes and clench my teeth praying my 7 would start. Not to mention I rarely got boost from the second turbo above 4500 rpm (due to a vacuum issue) and my never-rebuilt 13B was approaching 87,xxx miles so I was going to need the apex seals replaced pretty soon. The 8 is lightyears ahead in reliabitly, and a lot more comfortable (I don't have kidney bruises anymore!) and so on.
And yes, I know FD's can be made to be reliable, I had a buddy with a '93 with a single turbo conversion and a few other tweaks and it was fine, but those all take thousands of dollars just to get it to that point.


Oh, and Mitsubishi doesn't design a better intake or Nissan a better ECU because of Emissions regulations by the EPA and because of fuel mileage requirements. Did you know the EPA regulates intake noise? It also regulates exhaust noise, engine noise, gear noise, and interior noise, not just exhaust gas emissions. So if Mitsu was to make a better intake, it still wouldn't be as good as the non-street legal versions. The only way AEM and other companies get away with it is when you get your car inspected, they don't test your intake noise, or gear noise, or other stuff that is tested on a brand new car going through production.
But the other poster who said the stuff about the "trickle down" effect, as in if you get a better intake it's useless without a better exhaust, so then a reprogrammed ECU, and then you need a better clutch to support the power, then better brakes because you're going faster, etc.......is completely right. SO then we would have a 500+bhp EVO for over $60,000. The Evo or the Z or whatever is tuned within EPA regs and to get the best fuel mileage.


Dave
As far as the intakes go you're not quite getting it right. Many cars today have very free flowing and efficient intakes, the RX-8, Evo, and WRX are 3 sporty cars that are good examples. With those cars you just won't get much added performance with an aftermarket intake and in some cases you'll lose power because the extra more turbulent air is messing with the maf sensor. Even with a tune those cars won't benefit much from an intake because of how well designed and efficient the intake systems are in OEM form. So in the end an intake on many modern cars is nothing more than an expensive noisemaker.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #130  
Skiptomylue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock Ontario
Originally Posted by Rootski
. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "highly moddable" seems to be another word for "poorly designed."
ill correcet you.... any LSx engine is "Highly moddable" and none of them are "poorly designed"
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #131  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Originally Posted by AirlockRX
Funny you mention the 5pc Kit /w 22" Bass Drum, I got a 5pc DW kit for my daughter and I need to take it to PA. Is that without cases?

Sorry about regressing...
I had cases for my snare and toms, and cymbals, but not the bass drum. I put the bass drum in the front passenger seat, other drums + cymbal bag in the back seats, and all hardware in the trunk w/ cymbal stands going through the pass through (and I've got 2 amps and a sub in the trunk too!!)

Make sure you lay down some towels or something as to not damage the leather or door panels, especially the bass drum up front. I learned that the hard way one night after a gig I was quick (and drunk) about getting the bass drum in there and I slightly damaged the door panel with some of the hardware on the bass drum.

Anyway, it sure is nice to have a car with the performance characteristics of the 8 and still drive it to gigs!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #132  
dbb's Avatar
dbb
DSC Disabling Officer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia
Originally Posted by Skiptomylue
ill correcet you.... any LSx engine is "Highly moddable" and none of them are "poorly designed"
"correcet" : I'm not familiar with that word, although it does seem perfectly croumlent.

Judging by the context it was used in, it seems to mean " make falses absolutist statements ".
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:49 PM
  #133  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
The LSx engines are nice but they REALLY benefit from better intakes and exhausts. We really saw this on my friend's Z28 and his brother's Z06. The new 600 hp Viper has stainless steel headers and everything seems to be pretty well optimized so they are unlikely to get anymore power from just bolt ons. Of course they've also got 600hp but the point is that the better the factory does with the total package and not just the engine itself, the less simple mods such as intakes and exhausts will do to it.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 04:36 PM
  #134  
Umbra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Ultimately it's pointless to make these comparisons. Every single car show I go to I have the smallest engine producing the most horsepower per displacement. And yes, saying a twin rotary 1.3 is really a 3 liter v6 is a bunch of BS. So when the factory z produces about 450hp stock then we can call it better.

If you want to tinker get an FD, if you want to drive get an 8.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #135  
AirlockRX's Avatar
Upsilon Sigma Mu Chi
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 20
From: Anywhere I Have To Be
Originally Posted by Rhythmic
I had cases for my snare and toms, and cymbals, but not the bass drum. I put the bass drum in the front passenger seat, other drums + cymbal bag in the back seats, and all hardware in the trunk w/ cymbal stands going through the pass through (and I've got 2 amps and a sub in the trunk too!!)

Make sure you lay down some towels or something as to not damage the leather or door panels, especially the bass drum up front. I learned that the hard way one night after a gig I was quick (and drunk) about getting the bass drum in there and I slightly damaged the door panel with some of the hardware on the bass drum.

Anyway, it sure is nice to have a car with the performance characteristics of the 8 and still drive it to gigs!
Ill remember that, thanks!
I'm probably stripping off all the spurs & legs too...

Again, apologies for digressing.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #136  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,856
Likes: 1,807
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Umbra
Ultimately it's pointless to make these comparisons. Every single car show I go to I have the smallest engine producing the most horsepower per displacement. And yes, saying a twin rotary 1.3 is really a 3 liter v6 is a bunch of BS. So when the factory z produces about 450hp stock then we can call it better.

.
Are you saying that our engine should be compared to a 1.3L N/A piston engine ?

I think the displacement is irrelevant . One should look at

Power to weight ratio
Fuel consumption
Power across the rev range

On this basis our engine is comparable with most 3L N/A or 2L turbos .
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #137  
AdRoCK3217's Avatar
Rotary Superstar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Brettus
Are you saying that our engine should be compared to a 1.3L N/A piston engine ?

I think the displacement is irrelevant . One should look at

Power to weight ratio
Fuel consumption
Power across the rev range

On this basis our engine is comparable with most 3L N/A or 2L turbos .

Power to weight ratio. On this basis, our RX8 is comparable with most economy cars.

Fuel consumption. On this basis, our RX8 is comparable with most 350+HP V8's, or trucks/SUV's.

Power across the rev range. On this basis, our engine is comparable to Honda's. I can't think of any other engine that doesn't make any power until near redline.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 12:29 AM
  #138  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,856
Likes: 1,807
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by AdRoCK3217
Power to weight ratio. On this basis, our RX8 is comparable with most economy cars.

Fuel consumption. On this basis, our RX8 is comparable with most 350+HP V8's, or trucks/SUV's.

Power across the rev range. On this basis, our engine is comparable to Honda's. I can't think of any other engine that doesn't make any power until near redline.
Agree with this except for the economy car thing . How many 2L economy cars put out over 200 hp ?

I suppose the closest engine to compare in most respects would be the S2000 engine

Similar weight
Similar power
Better fuel economy
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 06:14 AM
  #139  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by Brettus
Are you saying that our engine should be compared to a 1.3L N/A piston engine ?

I think the displacement is irrelevant . One should look at

Power to weight ratio
Fuel consumption
Power across the rev range

On this basis our engine is comparable with most 3L N/A or 2L turbos .
AMEN
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #140  
AdRoCK3217's Avatar
Rotary Superstar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I don't see how 2.0L turbo'd can be classed the same as our engine in any respects. They kill our gas mileage (REAL gas mileage -- not EPA sticker), they made tons more power to weight, and they make power from 1/3 of the RPM to redline! Completely different from our engines...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #141  
Joe_914's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
If I were to get an FD it would be with an LS-6 engine in it. My buddy has one and it is "all that" and more.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05TR1CH
New Member Forum
14
Apr 18, 2023 04:56 AM
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
Dec 2, 2019 04:51 PM
SupraG
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Sep 21, 2015 12:09 AM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
14
Jul 25, 2015 11:43 AM
RX7.9
New Member Forum
0
Jul 20, 2015 12:01 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.