Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

RX8 = Porsche Cayman @ 1/2 the Price

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #101  
tiltmode43's Avatar
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Originally Posted by Rootski
I know the RX8 is built to a price, but the car is as good as Mazda could make it at that price. They're not leaving any bits off to stop it competing with anything else. The Caymann's price, much like everyone else about it, is just supposed to be between two other figures.
I agree




The Cayman is just a filler that was detuned from its fullest potential. Some people like this, some dislike it - others just don't care.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #102  
RWagz's Avatar
Piston-free 07.11.2007
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
My rich bosses buy Porsches, Mercedes' and Ferraris as status symbols. I highly doubt any of the old bastards ever push their cars past 70, and they most definitely do not squeal through the twisties.

From what I see, it helps them attract girls 20-30 years younger than them. Until the Viagra runs out.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 02:33 AM
  #103  
alexisthemovie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: la crescenta, ca
Originally Posted by Rootski
His complaint with the Boxster was it was people too poor for a 911, but I don't agree with that because no Boxster in any trim has the the potential to out-perform a 911. A Caymann S, however, does if they just used the rear end they use in the 911 (the marginal cost of making those on the assembly line is low, so don't try and tell me it would add to the price. The car is overpriced anyway). A Caymann S, which was released BEFORE the base Caymann, is more than a Boxster with a fixed roof - it's got a slightly larger engine as well, and therefore performs better... about halfway between the Boxster S and Carrera S, actually.

I know the RX8 is built to a price, but the car is as good as Mazda could make it at that price. They're not leaving any bits off to stop it competing with anything else. The Caymann's price, much like everyone else about it, is just supposed to be between two other figures.
Half of your sentences don't make sense...

But you DO know that the Boxster and Cayman share the same engines, right? No idea where you got your "slightly larger engine" from.

I'll say it again...the Cayman is nothing more than a Boxster with a fixed roof. Why don't they throw in the LSD and larger 911 engines into a Boxster? Why didn't anyone complain about this before the Cayman came out?

This is like expecting BMW to make the Z4 M coupe much better than the Z4 M roadster. The only difference is the fixed roof. I bet if Porsche didn't give the Cayman it's own name, and just called it a Boxster coupe, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

The Cayman's MSRP is only $3000 more than a Boxster's. This is like the difference between an S2000 CR and normal S2000, not S2000 vs NSX or Porsche Cayman S vs 911 S (as you say).

Last edited by alexisthemovie; Mar 12, 2008 at 02:43 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #104  
ODDDOOD's Avatar
The DOOD abides.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by alexisthemovie
It's called having an intellectual discussion, not trolling. I LOVE the RX-8, I just happen to know a lot of people who don't feel the same way.
An intellectual discussion should involve facts and intelligent opinions. Facts are easy to prove, i.e. provide reference. Opinions are a little tougher but you can support them if you provide data. I saw no data for your "95%" and therefore you pulled it out of thin air. If you want to be taken seriously and consider this an "intellectual discussion," please do not provide "data" that cannot be supported or even worse, provide data that is blatently false and offensive to some when backing up your opinion.

So lets assume that this is an intellecual discussion and that 95% of people thought the RX-8 was a disappointment. Then, please explain how it made the Car & Driver's 10-best list for three consecutive years, 2004-2006. And Car & Driver also "declared this the Best RX ever."

References:
2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_and...en_Best_Cars_4
2005 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_and...en_Best_Cars_5
2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_and...en_Best_Cars_6

Best RX Ever http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/..._8_10best_cars

I think the word "disappointment" does not mean what you think it means.

Peace
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:13 AM
  #105  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Originally Posted by ODDDOOD
Can anyone confirm this? I'm 6'9" and fit comfortably (read snugly) in my 8.
It all depends on how you're built and whether you like to drive with the seat tilted way back.

I'm a bit under 6' 1 and do not fit in an RX-8 with a sunroof - my head hits the roof. (For that matter, I had the same problem in a Gen III RX-7.)

I do fit in a Sport model without the sunroof, but then just barely.

Headroom isn't an issue for me in a Cayman.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #106  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Originally Posted by NaarLeven
typo! there is no e90, only a e92 m3.
That is incorrect.

The E90 M3 is the new M3 Sedan.

The E92 M3 is the new M3 Coupe.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:19 AM
  #107  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
ok so what about the other things you get with the porsche?

How is thier service support? Do you get equal service from Mazda for half the price?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #108  
ODDDOOD's Avatar
The DOOD abides.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by BillK
It all depends on how you're built and whether you like to drive with the seat tilted way back.

I'm a bit under 6' 1 and do not fit in an RX-8 with a sunroof - my head hits the roof. (For that matter, I had the same problem in a Gen III RX-7.)

I do fit in a Sport model without the sunroof, but then just barely.

Headroom isn't an issue for me in a Cayman.
Yeah, I guess my seat is tilted back further than most would enjoy, but my arms are pretty long so reaching the stick and stearing wheel feels quite natural.

Do you know if the seat in the Cayman is able to recline at all? If not, then I will most likely not fit. Either way, I am going to the Porsche dealer to find out!

Thanks for your input!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #109  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Originally Posted by Shoafb
ok so what about the other things you get with the porsche?

How is thier service support? Do you get equal service from Mazda for half the price?
It all depends on the individual dealership.

I've known some Mazda dealers who've given better service than some Porsche dealers, but the experience of many here with their dealers is quite different (and horrific) indeed.

Frankly, one of the biggest differences between the two vehicles, other than handling (IMHO a stock 8 handles exceptionally well but nowhere near as well as a stock Boxster or Cayman) is the interior; Mazda really needs to upgrade the interior a bit. Better plastics, less cheesy faux chrome bits, and improved seats.

You can also get around 18 city, 27 highway from a Boxster S.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #110  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Originally Posted by ODDDOOD
Do you know if the seat in the Cayman is able to recline at all? If not, then I will most likely not fit. Either way, I am going to the Porsche dealer to find out!
Of course it can, but there's a relationship between how far back the seat is in its track and how much it can recline. If you have the seat all the way back you can only recline so far as the engine's there.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #111  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BillK
It all depends on the individual dealership.

I've known some Mazda dealers who've given better service than some Porsche dealers, but the experience of many here with their dealers is quite different (and horrific) indeed.

Frankly, one of the biggest differences between the two vehicles, other than handling (IMHO a stock 8 handles exceptionally well but nowhere near as well as a stock Boxster or Cayman) is the interior; Mazda really needs to upgrade the interior a bit. Better plastics, less cheesy faux chrome bits, and improved seats.

You can also get around 18 city, 27 highway from a Boxster S.

hadn't even thought about the gas miealge difference.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #112  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by alexisthemovie
Half of your sentences don't make sense...

But you DO know that the Boxster and Cayman share the same engines, right? No idea where you got your "slightly larger engine" from.
Before the release of the base Cayman and the 2007 update to the Boxster, the Cayman S flat-6 did have slightly more displacement and power.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #113  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
I would say, for the money of getting a porsche Cayman (which I'll never buy, I'd rather have a Cayman S, especially if im gonna shell out that much money)

you'd be cross shopping m3, 350zs and alot of other cars..........the rx8 is the cheapest.... and 20k is WAY large of a gap for cross-shopping
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #114  
Huey52's Avatar
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 6
From: New England
For someone who always wished the Boxster had a hardtop cousin (beyond the Boxster's add-on hard top), the Cayman is very appealing to me; S-series of course. But I still have trouble justifying to myself the expense .
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #115  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
umm.........The Cayman is a little more than a boxster with a fixed roof

for one thing, the frame is much much more rigid, making it out perform the boxster

and also, the Cayman S goes around the 'ring faster than a 911 Carerra....... so go figure

thirdly, with every other f'ing car out there, its moddable

www.caymanclub.net

the usual mods for them are 911 axles, differentials, etc

ofcourse, they are richer than us, so its like us saying, oh, intake and exhaust....

honestly, I really think that the RX-8 can never compare to the Cayman S.

1. educationed people who value their money will buy an RX-8 over a Cayman S and be happy with it
2. Educated people who value their money and STATUS will buy a Cayman S and be happy with it (Porsche > Mazda in the eyes of the elite)
3. Rich people who value their money will buy an RX-8 and be happy with it for weekend occasional fun.
4. Rich people who doesn't mind shellin out more money for a higher tier car will buy the Cayman S
5. UBER rich people will just buy a Lambo

funny, I find this thread like the Corvette vs F430 thread on the vette forum

I lol

personally, for 20,000$ you can get 350+whp stable + new rims, bodykit, paintjob
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #116  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
and because the other post is f'ing huge, here's a breakdown of RETAIL PRICE
1. RX-8: Base = 28,000$ firm
GT full package = 33,000$ firm
2. Cayman: Base = 50,000$ firm
S model = 60,000$ firm
(out the door retail 1st hand prices)
1. 2005 Cayman S 2nd hand price = 40,000 - 50,000$
2. 2005 RX-8 2nd hand price = 16,000 - 22,000$

(The resale value makes the difference "IN PRICE" highly visible)

1. 2008 Porsche Cayman S @ 295hp (stock) will cost 60,000$ with full warranty (4 years)
2. 2008 Mazda RX-8 @ 295WHP (modified, assume stable condition) will cost:
33,000$ (GT package, for comparison with "S" model) + Greddy Turbo kit (4,000$) + MM Greddy Turbo Rebuild (2,000$) + Transmission Maintainance (3,000$), no warranty (all items listed are to the closest average price, includes shipping, installation charges) TOTAL: 41,000$

as you can see, even with maintainance charges and costs, the RX-8, with pretty much the same performance as a Porsche Cayman S, will cost about 19,000$ less for at least 2-3 years.

the two cars will not cost the same (with the same performance) until 6+ years (assuming you do not sell the car).

however, if you do sell the car, consider the resale value, and you will quickly find the RX-8 to be roughly about the same (with depreciation) to the Cayman S

however, you will need to be significantly richer to buy a Porsche Cayman S in the first place, as to the Mazda RX-8
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #117  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
yeah, but the Mazda RX-8 handles better than a Cayman S.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #118  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
honestly, I really think that the RX-8 can never compare to the Cayman S.
Good, go get one.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #119  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
and because the other post is f'ing huge, here's a breakdown of RETAIL PRICE
1. RX-8: Base = 28,000$ firm
GT full package = 33,000$ firm
2. Cayman: Base = 50,000$ firm
S model = 60,000$ firm
(out the door retail 1st hand prices)
1. 2005 Cayman S 2nd hand price = 40,000 - 50,000$
2. 2005 RX-8 2nd hand price = 16,000 - 22,000$

(The resale value makes the difference "IN PRICE" highly visible)

1. 2008 Porsche Cayman S @ 295hp (stock) will cost 60,000$ with full warranty (4 years)
2. 2008 Mazda RX-8 @ 295WHP (modified, assume stable condition) will cost:
33,000$ (GT package, for comparison with "S" model) + Greddy Turbo kit (4,000$) + MM Greddy Turbo Rebuild (2,000$) + Transmission Maintainance (3,000$), no warranty (all items listed are to the closest average price, includes shipping, installation charges) TOTAL: 41,000$

as you can see, even with maintainance charges and costs, the RX-8, with pretty much the same performance as a Porsche Cayman S, will cost about 19,000$ less for at least 2-3 years.

the two cars will not cost the same (with the same performance) until 6+ years (assuming you do not sell the car).

however, if you do sell the car, consider the resale value, and you will quickly find the RX-8 to be roughly about the same (with depreciation) to the Cayman S

however, you will need to be significantly richer to buy a Porsche Cayman S in the first place, as to the Mazda RX-8
Yea and how reliable is that 8 once you performe all of those upgrades? we all ready have a thread tracking how many "stock" engines have blown.... And you will also loose your but trying to sell the turboed 8 vs the stock Porsche.

Last edited by Shoafb; Mar 12, 2008 at 03:58 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 05:36 PM
  #120  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
I have covered all of tha, duhhhhhh

rootski, what I meant by cannot compare means, they are totally different classes, as I have pointed out in my post,

the rx8 no doubt is the best bang for it's price, which I have already posted.

seriously, wtf
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #121  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
^I was just hoping you'd go away.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #122  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
yeah, but the Mazda RX-8 handles better than a Cayman S.
Seriously, on what planet?

The RX-8 handles very well, but nowhere near as well as a Cayman or Boxster, at least partially because of their mid-engine design.

I'm in no way knocking the 8, but it's more of a question of physics than anything else.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #123  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by BillK
Seriously, on what planet?

The RX-8 handles very well, but nowhere near as well as a Cayman or Boxster, at least partially because of their mid-engine design.

I'm in no way knocking the 8, but it's more of a question of physics than anything else.
Since the RX8 is front-midship, I don't think that's it. "Mid-engine" can be either the front or the back, it doesn't matter, it's having the engine far from the end of the car and reducing the polar moment of inertia that matters. Not saying the Cayman doesn't handle better... thats just not the reason.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #124  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Hmmm, I said Mazda needed to work on the interior of the 8, and from this Mazda press release about the 8 facelift in Japan, it sounds like a substantial win should the "Type RS" come to America in some form:

RECARO bucket seats (front)
The exclusively designed RX-8 seats have fabric center sections (a black and grey combination), black genuine leather side supports and are accentuated with red stitching. They offer first-rate body support.

- Leather-wrapped steering wheel, shift lever and hand brake (with red stitching)
The red stitching on the leather matches the exclusive bucket seats.
Now if they've done something about the design of the front stack, which, while it looked neat in 2003, looks decidedly dated today.

Another interesting thing from that press release:

A five-speed manual transmission version of the RX-8 is due to go on sale in June 2008.
Why?

Last edited by BillK; Mar 12, 2008 at 06:12 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:13 PM
  #125  
BillK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO
Originally Posted by Rootski
Since the RX8 is front-midship, I don't think that's it. "Mid-engine" can be either the front or the back, it doesn't matter, it's having the engine far from the end of the car and reducing the polar moment of inertia that matters. Not saying the Cayman doesn't handle better... thats just not the reason.
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that's why the Cayman/Boxster outhandle the 8, but rather that's one reason why they handle as incredibly well as they do.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.