Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Rotor material/weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-19-2004, 03:57 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
1.3L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotor material/weight

Among my collection of conversation pieces sitting on the back of my bench here at work (pistons, hard drives, etc.) is a rotor from an early Wankle engine. It measures 60mm in width so I believe (not sure) that it's from the 1.0L 10A engine. The rotor appears to made of cast iron and is surprisingly heavy. Are the rotors in the new 13B made of iron, or are they made of something a bit lighter such as an aluminum alloy, or what?

1.3L
Old 11-19-2004, 04:10 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to say that they are still iron, but I'm not completely sure about that.
Old 11-19-2004, 04:24 PM
  #3  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IRON...really, gosh is it the high temp, high RPM...or why would they have to be iron?

Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.

Teach me please...
Old 11-19-2004, 04:48 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
IRON...really, gosh is it the high temp, high RPM...or why would they have to be iron?

Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.

Teach me please...
The Renesis weighs in at 303lbs while the LS2 weighs in at 445lbs, so it is a good deal heavier than the Renesis. For camparison's sake, a Honda F20C (S2000's 2.0L) weighs in at 326 lbs, and the VQ35DE out of the 350Z/Altima/F35/... weighs about 420lbs, so you can see that the Renesis is lighter in terms of absolute weight than all of these engines. The Renesis is also a good deal smaller than these piston engines, which is another of its appealing features. However, its gas mileage is noticeably worse than these more powerful engines (going by reports from people on this forum and the forums for the other cars mentioned) and it also doesn't quite have power:weight ratios of these engines, although it is very close to the VQ's and the F20C's.
Old 11-19-2004, 04:48 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Tayninh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got this on searching the web:

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY

An example of Mazda's advanced use of digital technology can be found in the machining of the engine's rotors. Three dimensional design data is received from the engine development team and employed to create 3-D data for a metal die for casting. Based on this 3-D data, computer simulations are used to analyze and check the precision, quality and efficiency in the rotor casting and machining. Also, with regard to cutting and other machining processes, 3-D simulations are used to optimize the design of cutting tools and jigs throughout the entire manufacturing process.

They reduced rotor weight by 11%. I think its iron still.
Old 11-19-2004, 04:54 PM
  #6  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 1.3L
Among my collection of conversation pieces sitting on the back of my bench here at work (pistons, hard drives, etc.) is a rotor from an early Wankle engine. It measures 60mm in width so I believe (not sure) that it's from the 1.0L 10A engine. The rotor appears to made of cast iron and is surprisingly heavy. Are the rotors in the new 13B made of iron, or are they made of something a bit lighter such as an aluminum alloy, or what?

1.3L
They are still cast iron... the rotors in the FC's 13B weighed 9.6lbs, the rotors in the FD weighed 9.0lbs, and in the Renesis they weigh 8.6lbs. I think you're right about your rotor being a 10a- I think the 13B's are 80mm wide. Not sure about the 12A...
Old 11-19-2004, 04:57 PM
  #7  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
IRON...really, gosh is it the high temp, high RPM...or why would they have to be iron?

Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.

Teach me please...
It's still lighter than the LS2, and considerably smaller packaging. That's a huge benefit in building a balanced car, being able to position motor behind the front axle, as is the RX-8. Other companies don't make it because they haven't had the years and years of RD that Mazda has... a few have dabbled though.
Old 11-19-2004, 05:08 PM
  #8  
Insanely Yellow
 
StewC625's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I thought they were made of Rotanium ...
Old 11-19-2004, 07:39 PM
  #9  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by StewC625
I thought they were made of Rotanium ...
I have it on good authority that the next RX7's rotors will be made out of unobtainium :D
Old 11-19-2004, 08:05 PM
  #10  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Renesis weighs in at 303lbs while the LS2 weighs in at 445lbs, so it is a good deal heavier than the Renesis. For camparison's sake, a Honda F20C (S2000's 2.0L) weighs in at 326 lbs, and the VQ35DE out of the 350Z/Altima/F35/... weighs about 420lbs, so you can see that the Renesis is lighter in terms of absolute weight than all of these engines. The Renesis is also a good deal smaller than these piston engines, which is another of its appealing features. However, its gas mileage is noticeably worse than these more powerful engines (going by reports from people on this forum and the forums for the other cars mentioned) and it also doesn't quite have power:weight ratios of these engines, although it is very close to the VQ's and the F20C's.
Yes, 145 pounds is significant…wow...I forgot that 220 pounds or so is not typical weight for an engine (my NX2000’s 2L weighed about that)

Dang, the VQ is a fat V6 (or is the LS2 very light)…or is it me? Yeah, I heard the Renesis was small and that it helps with it’s balance N stuff.

Thanks for the information!

Now, I wonder why they cant make it out of something else other the OLD TECH IRON?
Old 11-19-2004, 08:12 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
jsh1120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
...Now, I wonder why they cant make it out of something else other the OLD TECH IRON?
How about carbon fiber? I'm sure someone on e-bay will be selling carbon fiber decals for the rotor before long. :D
Old 11-19-2004, 08:22 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
EandGWZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My personal preference with the Renesis and the Rx-8 happens to be more about engine performance (overall). If it didn't have a rotary engine or back seats I would have never bought it.


Curb Weight (lbs.) 2835 for the s2000


Curb weight lb. (minimum w\ popular options) 3,053 for the RX-8


I suspect the size of the engine/type of engine plays a role in the cars styling/balancing/performance/ and yes, ability of dropping rear side in the back and not losing significant performance figures.
Old 11-19-2004, 09:28 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
dkelly3854's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StewC625
I thought they were made of Rotanium ...
HAHAHAHAHAHA :D
Old 11-19-2004, 09:34 PM
  #14  
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Yes, 145 pounds is significant…wow...I forgot that 220 pounds or so is not typical weight for an engine (my NX2000’s 2L weighed about that)

Dang, the VQ is a fat V6 (or is the LS2 very light)…or is it me? Yeah, I heard the Renesis was small and that it helps with it’s balance N stuff.
The LS series has had excellent power to weight ratios, some of the best among engines.
Old 11-20-2004, 02:23 AM
  #15  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Now, I wonder why they cant make it out of something else other the OLD TECH IRON?
...iron isn't old tech, it's "low" cost (at scrap rates, iron's way more expensive than aluminum) and high strength. the reason that they can't go to aluminum is that i just don't think they're strong enough for a turbo , and maybe not even an all motor application.

the next step in manufacturing these pieces for mazda, i believe, would be to design a process where you could a high rate of production with a forging element (reducing mass, increasing strength, all that good stuff). casting the rotors with less material is just not good enough for the next generation.
Old 11-20-2004, 02:49 AM
  #16  
Raccoons SUCK!
 
SantozRx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought mazda had a patent on the wankle engine or somethin like that so thats why other companies dont make a rotary..... does anyone know if that may be true?
Old 11-20-2004, 01:46 PM
  #17  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wakeech
...iron isn't old tech, it's "low" cost (at scrap rates, iron's way more expensive than aluminum) and high strength. the reason that they can't go to aluminum is that i just don't think they're strong enough for a turbo , and maybe not even an all motor application.

the next step in manufacturing these pieces for mazda, i believe, would be to design a process where you could a high rate of production with a forging element (reducing mass, increasing strength, all that good stuff). casting the rotors with less material is just not good enough for the next generation.
damned rotors.

i suppose now, thinking about it again, that the rotor of the future will be comprised of more than one piece (two, possibly three) for optimum strength and low mass. dang, tha'd be one helluva piece.

(basically, considering the design of the internals of a rotor, it's rather impossible to forge one knowing now the kind of forces required for forging)
Old 11-20-2004, 07:01 PM
  #18  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for their Rotary wisdom.

The LS series has had excellent power to weight ratios, some of the best among engines.
Has the LS ever won an award cause I agree, I think its one of the best engines in the world.


I wonder what's next for the Rotary...what are the things that are holding it back, how can they get better fuel economy from it, more torque...etc etc...

I'm new, actually not official yet, but it's a very interesting engine to say the least. I wonder...
Old 11-20-2004, 07:42 PM
  #19  
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Thanks everyone for their Rotary wisdom.



Has the LS ever won an award cause I agree, I think its one of the best engines in the world.


I wonder what's next for the Rotary...what are the things that are holding it back, how can they get better fuel economy from it, more torque...etc etc...
Lack of R&D and a proper aluminum bonding procedure to make a 3 rotor weigh 400lbs with accesories. I think a 4 rotor with smaller displacement for each rotor would be better, more balanced.
Old 11-22-2004, 03:37 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, for the Renesis, the housings are made of AL, but I believe the end plates are still cast iron. Switching those to AL could reduce weight maybe as much as another 35lbs. Anyone can confirm this?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jamespond24
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
11
12-01-2015 11:11 PM
TotalAutoPerformance
Vendor Classifieds
3
10-14-2015 12:29 PM
Eliseo Esquivel
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 08:28 PM
pjwermuth
RX-8 Discussion
5
09-28-2015 11:36 PM
coolcars44
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
09-24-2015 05:47 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Rotor material/weight



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.