Rotor material/weight
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rotor material/weight
Among my collection of conversation pieces sitting on the back of my bench here at work (pistons, hard drives, etc.) is a rotor from an early Wankle engine. It measures 60mm in width so I believe (not sure) that it's from the 1.0L 10A engine. The rotor appears to made of cast iron and is surprisingly heavy. Are the rotors in the new 13B made of iron, or are they made of something a bit lighter such as an aluminum alloy, or what?
1.3L
1.3L
#3
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IRON...really, gosh is it the high temp, high RPM...or why would they have to be iron?
Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.
Teach me please...
Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.
Teach me please...
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
IRON...really, gosh is it the high temp, high RPM...or why would they have to be iron?
Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.
Teach me please...
Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.
Teach me please...
#5
I got this on searching the web:
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
An example of Mazda's advanced use of digital technology can be found in the machining of the engine's rotors. Three dimensional design data is received from the engine development team and employed to create 3-D data for a metal die for casting. Based on this 3-D data, computer simulations are used to analyze and check the precision, quality and efficiency in the rotor casting and machining. Also, with regard to cutting and other machining processes, 3-D simulations are used to optimize the design of cutting tools and jigs throughout the entire manufacturing process.
They reduced rotor weight by 11%. I think its iron still.
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
An example of Mazda's advanced use of digital technology can be found in the machining of the engine's rotors. Three dimensional design data is received from the engine development team and employed to create 3-D data for a metal die for casting. Based on this 3-D data, computer simulations are used to analyze and check the precision, quality and efficiency in the rotor casting and machining. Also, with regard to cutting and other machining processes, 3-D simulations are used to optimize the design of cutting tools and jigs throughout the entire manufacturing process.
They reduced rotor weight by 11%. I think its iron still.
#6
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by 1.3L
Among my collection of conversation pieces sitting on the back of my bench here at work (pistons, hard drives, etc.) is a rotor from an early Wankle engine. It measures 60mm in width so I believe (not sure) that it's from the 1.0L 10A engine. The rotor appears to made of cast iron and is surprisingly heavy. Are the rotors in the new 13B made of iron, or are they made of something a bit lighter such as an aluminum alloy, or what?
1.3L
1.3L
#7
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
IRON...really, gosh is it the high temp, high RPM...or why would they have to be iron?
Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.
Teach me please...
Also, does anyone know the weight of the Renesis? I just heard someone say that its weight is very close to the LS2...if so, the Rotary engine is loseing some of it's reason of exsistance...and I'm begining to understand why alot of car companies don't make it.
Teach me please...
#9
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by StewC625
I thought they were made of Rotanium ...
#10
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Renesis weighs in at 303lbs while the LS2 weighs in at 445lbs, so it is a good deal heavier than the Renesis. For camparison's sake, a Honda F20C (S2000's 2.0L) weighs in at 326 lbs, and the VQ35DE out of the 350Z/Altima/F35/... weighs about 420lbs, so you can see that the Renesis is lighter in terms of absolute weight than all of these engines. The Renesis is also a good deal smaller than these piston engines, which is another of its appealing features. However, its gas mileage is noticeably worse than these more powerful engines (going by reports from people on this forum and the forums for the other cars mentioned) and it also doesn't quite have power:weight ratios of these engines, although it is very close to the VQ's and the F20C's.
Dang, the VQ is a fat V6 (or is the LS2 very light)…or is it me? Yeah, I heard the Renesis was small and that it helps with it’s balance N stuff.
Thanks for the information!
Now, I wonder why they cant make it out of something else other the OLD TECH IRON?
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
...Now, I wonder why they cant make it out of something else other the OLD TECH IRON?
#12
My personal preference with the Renesis and the Rx-8 happens to be more about engine performance (overall). If it didn't have a rotary engine or back seats I would have never bought it.
Curb Weight (lbs.) 2835 for the s2000
Curb weight lb. (minimum w\ popular options) 3,053 for the RX-8
I suspect the size of the engine/type of engine plays a role in the cars styling/balancing/performance/ and yes, ability of dropping rear side in the back and not losing significant performance figures.
Curb Weight (lbs.) 2835 for the s2000
Curb weight lb. (minimum w\ popular options) 3,053 for the RX-8
I suspect the size of the engine/type of engine plays a role in the cars styling/balancing/performance/ and yes, ability of dropping rear side in the back and not losing significant performance figures.
#14
Free Autographed Pictures
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Yes, 145 pounds is significant…wow...I forgot that 220 pounds or so is not typical weight for an engine (my NX2000’s 2L weighed about that)
Dang, the VQ is a fat V6 (or is the LS2 very light)…or is it me? Yeah, I heard the Renesis was small and that it helps with it’s balance N stuff.
Dang, the VQ is a fat V6 (or is the LS2 very light)…or is it me? Yeah, I heard the Renesis was small and that it helps with it’s balance N stuff.
#15
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Now, I wonder why they cant make it out of something else other the OLD TECH IRON?
the next step in manufacturing these pieces for mazda, i believe, would be to design a process where you could a high rate of production with a forging element (reducing mass, increasing strength, all that good stuff). casting the rotors with less material is just not good enough for the next generation.
#16
Raccoons SUCK!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i thought mazda had a patent on the wankle engine or somethin like that so thats why other companies dont make a rotary..... does anyone know if that may be true?
#17
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wakeech
...iron isn't old tech, it's "low" cost (at scrap rates, iron's way more expensive than aluminum) and high strength. the reason that they can't go to aluminum is that i just don't think they're strong enough for a turbo , and maybe not even an all motor application.
the next step in manufacturing these pieces for mazda, i believe, would be to design a process where you could a high rate of production with a forging element (reducing mass, increasing strength, all that good stuff). casting the rotors with less material is just not good enough for the next generation.
the next step in manufacturing these pieces for mazda, i believe, would be to design a process where you could a high rate of production with a forging element (reducing mass, increasing strength, all that good stuff). casting the rotors with less material is just not good enough for the next generation.
i suppose now, thinking about it again, that the rotor of the future will be comprised of more than one piece (two, possibly three) for optimum strength and low mass. dang, tha'd be one helluva piece.
(basically, considering the design of the internals of a rotor, it's rather impossible to forge one knowing now the kind of forces required for forging)
#18
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks everyone for their Rotary wisdom.
Has the LS ever won an award cause I agree, I think its one of the best engines in the world.
I wonder what's next for the Rotary...what are the things that are holding it back, how can they get better fuel economy from it, more torque...etc etc...
I'm new, actually not official yet, but it's a very interesting engine to say the least. I wonder...
The LS series has had excellent power to weight ratios, some of the best among engines.
I wonder what's next for the Rotary...what are the things that are holding it back, how can they get better fuel economy from it, more torque...etc etc...
I'm new, actually not official yet, but it's a very interesting engine to say the least. I wonder...
#19
Free Autographed Pictures
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Thanks everyone for their Rotary wisdom.
Has the LS ever won an award cause I agree, I think its one of the best engines in the world.
I wonder what's next for the Rotary...what are the things that are holding it back, how can they get better fuel economy from it, more torque...etc etc...
Has the LS ever won an award cause I agree, I think its one of the best engines in the world.
I wonder what's next for the Rotary...what are the things that are holding it back, how can they get better fuel economy from it, more torque...etc etc...
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, for the Renesis, the housings are made of AL, but I believe the end plates are still cast iron. Switching those to AL could reduce weight maybe as much as another 35lbs. Anyone can confirm this?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jamespond24
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
11
12-01-2015 11:11 PM
coolcars44
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
09-24-2015 05:47 PM