Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Race Motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-09-2007, 11:04 AM
  #1  
Needs A Rotary!
Thread Starter
 
bcmzr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Valley, VA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Race Motor

Is'nt the Renesis basically a race motor, or an application from Mazda's racing cars? Besides being a rotary, this is why it loves to be beat on and rev'd all the time correct? Also would explain some of the lackluster MPG. Looking at that and then having the 350Z drivers laugh at the lack of torque, another bragging right 8 drivers have is they have an actual racing motor in their daily driver 'Cause basically the Z is the same VQ found in the Altima/Maxima, just tweeked a little bit. Just some stuff I was thinkin about
Old 07-09-2007, 11:10 AM
  #2  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, this motor is used in the Star Mazda series. Most other series use 3-rotors, though.
Old 07-09-2007, 11:20 AM
  #3  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the Renny used in the Star Mazda's isn't stock, but not too far from it. As far as I know they have custom PCM's, tweaked intakes and exhaust- but that's about it. They claim 250-whp which isn't too far off with their sequential transmissions and short power delivery path.

Most other Mazda racing vehicles, however, use a 3-rotor 20B or the new 4-cylinder MZR engine.
Old 07-09-2007, 01:04 PM
  #4  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just realized I've owned two of Mazda's race engines! ^_^

First with the 8, now with my Speed 3.
Old 07-09-2007, 02:09 PM
  #5  
Needs A Rotary!
Thread Starter
 
bcmzr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Valley, VA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhawb
Just realized I've owned two of Mazda's race engines! ^_^

First with the 8, now with my Speed 3.
Lucky
Old 07-09-2007, 02:42 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Your engine has nothing in common with the MZR race engine. It's an AER designed and built 4 cylinder. It is basically one half of their V8 race engine which shares nothing in common with the Mazda engine. It was also designed for direct injection too which again is not a Mazda design. When the direct injection finally gets put on the race car, it will be basically the direct injection system from the street car with some tweaking but that's it. That's akin to a race car using the same fule injectors and claiming it's a shared platform. Nope. Totally different animal.

At least the 3 rotor that was in last years Courage had Renesis rotors in it so it did share something. The Speedsource 3 rotor engines use 9.7:1 RX-7 rotors. They may have changed to the Renesis rotors but when they talked about the details of that engine at last years Sevenstock, it had no Renesis components in it either. Basically you have none of their race engines.

The Star Mazda cars use stock Renesis engines. We don't have race engines adapted for the street. They use street engines set up for the track. New intakes and exhausts are used which doesn't amount to much. They do run Motec ecus though. Basically it's no more than anything anyone else can do to their street engine.
Old 07-09-2007, 09:00 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
One thing you can brag about is the advantage of racing in the Mazda Star is that the rotary engines run for the whole season without a tear down. Piston engines would need at least one tear down and probably more. The engines hold up very well which lowers the cost of operation.
Old 07-09-2007, 11:51 PM
  #8  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear RG,

Please stop tearing down and subsequently crapping on my dreams.

Love,
Rob

Old 07-10-2007, 02:21 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
machfive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans, LA - formerly El Segundo, CA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have but one thing to say:

Rotarygod has spoken!
Old 07-10-2007, 12:42 PM
  #10  
DEVILMAN
iTrader: (1)
 
Bastage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 1,094
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
and he did it without insulting anyone. All hail RG!
Old 07-11-2007, 08:48 PM
  #11  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhawb
Dear RG,

Please stop tearing down and subsequently crapping on my dreams.

Love,
Rob

^ ^ What does a cave man know anyhow?
Old 07-11-2007, 10:52 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
8 Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aki City, Japan
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
kinda on topic question: what's the highest revving rotary that's been used? and what was it's rev limit?
Old 07-12-2007, 12:27 AM
  #13  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
dont quote me, but i think it was the 4 rotor le mans engine.

14k rings a loud bell...

beers
Old 07-12-2007, 12:58 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
DMRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
At least the 3 rotor that was in last years Courage had Renesis rotors in it so it did share something. The Speedsource 3 rotor engines use 9.7:1 RX-7 rotors. They may have changed to the Renesis rotors but when they talked about the details of that engine at last years Sevenstock, it had no Renesis components in it either. Basically you have none of their race engines.
I cant see how MSP rotors would work in a non-MSP engine. Dont they have additional O-rings to prevent gas leakage.

Traditionally, the series-5 (89-91) N/A rotors have been the go with their 9.7 compression but the 10.0 compression of the MSP rotors would be enticing......

REgards
Old 07-12-2007, 01:02 AM
  #15  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Bastage
and he did it without insulting anyone. All hail RG!
I was deeply insulted. I am going to put RG in the hospital next time I see him. His head is too large.
Something like that.

Fred - have you any info on the Motec setup as it is employed in the Star cars?
Old 07-12-2007, 02:03 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
8 Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aki City, Japan
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by swoope
dont quote me
oops

Originally Posted by swoope
but i think it was the 4 rotor le mans engine.

14k rings a loud bell...

beers
cool, thanks. I figured it would have to have been a race built engine (or someone with a lot of money and time on their hands). Not to go off topic too much, but would a 13B have more potential or less for rpms? I thought with more rotors the eccentric shaft loses reliability? or is it just more difficult to design, but still as reliable?
Old 07-12-2007, 11:06 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
The R26B in the 787B was shifted at 9000 rpm. There was a comment made that if they could have revved it up higher, they would have seen more power. They held the rpm's down for reliability reasons. Bearing stress goes up with the square of rpm and after 7000 rpm, it really starts to take off. You'll do your bearings a favor by keeping rpms down and concentrating on making more power lower down. Most bearing stress is rpm related. Most seal stress is combustion pressure related. When you design around helping one, you usually end up doing the opposite for the other.

The Renesis rotors physically fit in the 13B. Yes they have an additional seal called the cutoff seal. This is there to protect the oil control rings from the hot exhaust gasses in the Renesis. When running Renesis rotors in older engines, you don't necessarily need to use the cutoff seals. However the race teams that do run the Renesis rotors do use the cutoff seals in the 13B. This is because it actually helps in an unexpected way. It also cuts off any carbon from having a path to the oil control rings. It also helps with blowby so it does do more than just merely cutoff a path for hot gasses.

If using Renesis rotors in a 13B, it is advisable to also use Renesis stationary gears and eccentric shaft as well as the tolerances are slightly different. The eccentric shafts aren't even the same between the 4 port and 6 port Renesis engines. Someone at Mazda must have been bored.

The early attempts at using Renesis rotors in 13B engines showed no improvement in power over the 9.7:1 RX-7 rotors. This was due to the overly excessive side seal clearances that the Renesis uses to account for thermal expansion from the hot exhaust gasses. Now you can buy oversized side seals for the Renesis and clearance them to earlier tolerances which should help them seal better. I've seen no definitive proof that they work any better though. Speedsource was running RX-7 rotors and the Courage ran Renesis rotors so go figure.
Old 07-12-2007, 11:17 AM
  #18  
The "other RX8" owner
 
Ben98gs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: McCordsville, IN
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
dont quote me, but i think it was the 4 rotor le mans engine.

14k rings a loud bell...

beers
But most of the high revving ones like that are in Drag Racing applications and I guarantee they do not last that long at that high and RPM.
Old 07-17-2007, 12:04 PM
  #19  
WW8P6OLBJD?
 
baseballgenius80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the words of Ricky Bobby, "I wanna go fast!"
Old 07-17-2007, 04:50 PM
  #20  
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Rootski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
The R26B in the 787B was shifted at 9000 rpm. There was a comment made that if they could have revved it up higher, they would have seen more power. They held the rpm's down for reliability reasons. Bearing stress goes up with the square of rpm and after 7000 rpm, it really starts to take off. You'll do your bearings a favor by keeping rpms down and concentrating on making more power lower down. Most bearing stress is rpm related. Most seal stress is combustion pressure related. When you design around helping one, you usually end up doing the opposite for the other.

The Renesis rotors physically fit in the 13B. Yes they have an additional seal called the cutoff seal. This is there to protect the oil control rings from the hot exhaust gasses in the Renesis. When running Renesis rotors in older engines, you don't necessarily need to use the cutoff seals. However the race teams that do run the Renesis rotors do use the cutoff seals in the 13B. This is because it actually helps in an unexpected way. It also cuts off any carbon from having a path to the oil control rings. It also helps with blowby so it does do more than just merely cutoff a path for hot gasses.

If using Renesis rotors in a 13B, it is advisable to also use Renesis stationary gears and eccentric shaft as well as the tolerances are slightly different. The eccentric shafts aren't even the same between the 4 port and 6 port Renesis engines. Someone at Mazda must have been bored.

The early attempts at using Renesis rotors in 13B engines showed no improvement in power over the 9.7:1 RX-7 rotors. This was due to the overly excessive side seal clearances that the Renesis uses to account for thermal expansion from the hot exhaust gasses. Now you can buy oversized side seals for the Renesis and clearance them to earlier tolerances which should help them seal better. I've seen no definitive proof that they work any better though. Speedsource was running RX-7 rotors and the Courage ran Renesis rotors so go figure.

How the hell do you know so much? Teach me your ways.
Old 07-17-2007, 04:59 PM
  #21  
stop flooding ur engines
 
RoXanneBlack8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the star mazda 13b msp also have larger throttle bodies and a dry sump (no oil pan underneath the engine) and its 250 crank hp, not wheel.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
05rx8mazda
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
18
11-28-2015 09:42 AM
#1Hoochie
New Member Forum
10
10-16-2015 10:35 PM
r-enzyme
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
4
10-01-2015 01:27 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Race Motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.