Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Horsepower And Mileage Problem Solved!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 4.17 average.
 
Old May 28, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #126  
HollywoodHall's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
holy shiznit! im going to try this. i get a consistant 13-15 mpg tank in... tank out.. and i have even driven like my mother through entire tanks. shifting between 3-4 every time. never taking it above 4.5. and i still cant break 15 mpg. i will do an entire tank. with tsc / dsc off completely and compare it to the mpg when it is on.
Reply
Old May 28, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #127  
stanfordcole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
I have done nothing special to mine, left DSC/TSC on, horse around with it off sometimes. I now have 5500 miles on it and the more I drive it the better gas mileage I get. I think the engine just gets better mileage as it gets broken in. I averaged about 16 to 17 when I first purchased it and now I am more around 21/22. Mixed driving of course. in both cases.
Reply
Old May 28, 2004 | 07:25 PM
  #128  
doc.marx8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
interesting thread, I am contemplating on testing this out, but at the current rate of premiuim gasoline in california, it was 2.65 last night, Ill switch to my rx7 for awhile until the price per gallon stabilizes.

happy rotoring!
Reply
Old May 28, 2004 | 07:48 PM
  #129  
Twinturbo2800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
sounds good, im gunna try it
Reply
Old May 28, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #130  
Todd Green's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Shreveport, LA
Originally posted by RodsterinFL
using regular gas made mine run better (smoother) the first tank of regular I DROPPED to 14 mpg. but it quickly improved. I know I cannot MAKE any of you switch to regular gas but I cannot emphasize enough the difference it made on my engine. THe thing acted like it was choking before on 91. Like it was bogged down all the time. Then with regular it was as if it became free rolling (emergency brake off!!!) I keep reading where people used regular and their engines would barely run or started knocking hard, etc. I have a difficult time with that with all having the same engine and all.
im having a hard time following this... ur saying that 87 octane gas is giving you better performance along with better mileage as opposed to 91 octane?
Reply
Old May 28, 2004 | 09:33 PM
  #131  
RXGr8's Avatar
Not Your Average User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, VA
Better gas mileage when driving like a bat outta' hell? Yeah right! Read how fuel gauges work first:

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-gauge.htm
Reply
Old May 30, 2004 | 03:00 AM
  #132  
GiN's Avatar
GiN
ロンリードライバー
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: LA/OC/LV
Originally posted by doc.marx8
interesting thread, I am contemplating on testing this out, but at the current rate of premiuim gasoline in california, it was 2.65 last night, Ill switch to my rx7 for awhile until the price per gallon stabilizes.

happy rotoring!
Your RX-7 gets better gas mileage than the RX-8? My TurboII gets about 15mpg in comparison to my 8's 21mpg..
Reply
Old May 30, 2004 | 03:42 AM
  #133  
Rupes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Columbus Ohio
I don't have traction control, and still can't get over 15 MPG in my hilly area.

-RUpes
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:04 AM
  #134  
RandyP's Avatar
Free Your Mind
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
I tried turning off DSC/TSC last night, and was pleased to find even more performance than before. Thanks for the tip!

Last edited by RandyP; Jun 29, 2004 at 05:15 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 10:15 AM
  #135  
MTLbroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
DSC/TCS off can't boost hp. The car's hp is what it is. Spinning tires doesn't mean more hp, just that the electronics aren't applying the brakes in low traction conditions.
Also played around with it on and off, doesn't seem to be an appreciable difference in mpg. I leave it on these days - probably saved my butt a couple of times and I didn't even realize it....
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 08:49 PM
  #136  
RandyP's Avatar
Free Your Mind
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
DSC/TCS off can't boost hp. The car's hp is what it is.
There are a number of sources of replacement ECUs and control chips that boost engine performance. You can invalidate your warranty by swapping control chips and producing too much power. People spend good money to buy canzoomer's ECU mods. Obviously, "the car's hp is what it is" isn't correct.

The ECU is in control of everything, and it gets data from DSC/TCS sensors. There are any number of ways the systems could interact... even a bug in the firmware could be in play.

It would be nice if people with access to performance measurement equipment could do some testing. People here have documented improved performance by timing their cars; it's worth examining in more detail.

Last edited by RandyP; Jul 5, 2004 at 09:51 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #137  
DRx's Avatar
DRx
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Nowadays, with drive-by-wire throttle systems, the DSC and TC systems DO reduce throttle and possibly also timing to reduce power going to the rear wheels. The RX-8 DSC and TC systems DO use throttle and timing control in addition to brakes.
Amen,

I got stuck in a snowstorm in Seattle about 1 week after buying my 8 last year (yes it actually snowed 6" here).

I got stuck going up a steep hill, not because I was spinning but because the TC system was cutting off throttle. Go stick some grease on a dyno and try it if you want to reproduce the effect of a snowpacked road

Anyway, it seems kind of odd though that at normal moving speed without any turning or rapid accelleration/braking that DSC or TC would have any effect on fuel mileage. But since my only real qualm with my 8 is that it doesnt even come close to living up to that sticker estimated MPG, I too will be trying this theory for the sake of argument.

Right now I get right around 245-255 miles to the tank with 70hwy/30city driving. I also just got the 'M' chip flash so we'll see if the 2 combined make any difference. :o
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 11:48 AM
  #138  
aruffell's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: PLEASE DELETE MY ACCOUNT
DSC Demo Video

I found this video somewhere on the web... although it is in some Asian language that I do not understand, you can clearly see the benefit of keeping DSC switched on... performance and fuel efficiency is way less important than your own safety (and the safety of those driving around you). Although I would love to get more mileage out of my car I do not think disabling safety feature a viable option.... just my 2 cents... check the video out!

http://www.alexruffell.com/rx8/DSC_demo.wmv
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 01:32 PM
  #139  
f1michel's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
our GS model here in Canada has no traction control at all and the car drives very nicely and is very predictable in any circomstances. I think the DSC thingy is great but it makes the driver feel he can do no wrong, hence the false sense of security.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #140  
TALAN7's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, NJ
This is all interesting. I have a 6 spd but no traction control or DSC. Has anyone tested a base 6 spd against a loaded one? I literally bought the 1st one off the lot like last july and it wasn't loaded. I had to have it. How much lighter is it compared to the loaded versions? I don't think you can find one now that isn't loaded down.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #141  
f1michel's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
here in Canada you can... base GS model and loaded GT model !! Only 2 to chose from. You can add nav and roof on the GT, only roof on GS i think
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #142  
RX8MN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
My 8 has TC & DSC a feature that I like for overall safety. I've tried turning it off and really did not notice a difference in performance or mileage. However, the system works by both cutting the throttle and applying the brakes so it may be possible that a malfunctioning system could hurt performance by creating brake drag, a condition that would also hurt mileage! So switching off DSC probably cannot give the engine more power, but it would feel that way if it eliminated brake drag! Also if the DSC was preventing full throttle, a performanc reduction may occur, but this should not affect mileage.

Having said all that, I find that my 8 feels like is does not roll as freely as my other cars. If you coast to a stop without touching the brakes, it has a little lurch like the brakes were applied. It also seems to decelerate very quickly if put in neutral and allowed to coast. Turning off DSC has no effect on this condition and I wonder if I am getting brake drag or if it's drivline friction. Any one else have this impression? I'll try to do some experiments to see if I can verify the drag.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #143  
RandyP's Avatar
Free Your Mind
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
I wonder if I am getting brake drag or if it's drivline friction. Any one else have this impression? I'll try to do some experiments to see if I can verify the drag.
I took mine for a drive... I ended up finding out how many intersections are not really level! No problem here, but it's only got 540 miles on it.

Could there be build-up on your rotors, perhaps? The pads contact the rotors even if your foot is off the brake.

Last edited by RandyP; Jul 5, 2004 at 08:24 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 08:53 PM
  #144  
affenage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
I did a test of the DSC off today. Noticed the pitch of the engine hum seemed to be a bit lower. Didn't have any chance to check the hp, got stuck behind a slow moving smelly dump truck

Last edited by affenage; Jun 30, 2004 at 09:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 10:34 PM
  #145  
RandyP's Avatar
Free Your Mind
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
I'm getting a theory on what's up with HP vs. DSC, and I think it's how hard you hit the car. I do curvy roads, and with it off, I've been drifting two curves and on the edge of a few others. That couldn't happen at all with DSC on... so...

I think everyone is right. Those who hit hard feel the full performance capability when DSC is off, those who don't, don't. It may not be an increase in HP, but it could be HP available for the slightly insane, that they can't have with DSC on.


[7/5/04] Another thought occurred to me. I'm running the L-Flash. Is it possible that those who feel no change are running the M-Flash?

Last edited by RandyP; Jul 5, 2004 at 08:28 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #146  
RandyP's Avatar
Free Your Mind
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Thumbs down It makes no difference

I try to keep an open mind about things, and I've tried to be fair about the concepts in this thread. I discounted the original claim of "50% increase in mileage" as that's too large to be real. After reading several users test times, I thought there might be something to the claim of increased performance.

I felt it when driving curvy roads on the threshold of traction, and others have reported better results in drag-race type testing. Both of these induce wheelspin, which could definitely result in improved overall performance with DSC/TCS turned off.

I wanted to isolate any real increase in performance (or horsepower, if you will). I came up with a test that removed wheelspin: rolling start in 2nd at 20, measure 25-50... rolling start in 3rd at 30, measure 35-60. Here are the results:

DSC/TCS: ON ... OFF
25-50 #1: 4.02 .. 4.01
25-50 #2: 3.42 .. 3.45

35-60 #1: 5.31 .. 5.31
35-60 #2: 5.28 .. 5.31

I put a Philips ToUCam in the car, capturing tach, speedo and view. These results have been determined using a video editor to choose the first and last frames based on the digital speedo. As you can see, there is no difference at all. If your tires aren't losing grip, running with DSC/TCS fully off does nothing to improve your car's performance. Increased performance only comes when you are inducing wheelspin and have the tires and pavement to take advantage of it.

This book is closed, for me.

Last edited by RandyP; Jul 12, 2004 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #147  
greyhound's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Gaithersburg, MD
Originally Posted by RandyP
I try to keep an open mind about things, and I've tried to be fair about the concepts in this thread. I discounted the original claim of "50% increase in mileage" as that's too large to be real. After reading several users test times, I thought there might be something to the claim of increased performance.

I felt it when driving curvy roads on the threshold of traction, and others have reported better results in drag-race type testing. Both of these induce wheelspin, which could definitely result in improved overall performance with DSC/TCS turned off.

I wanted to isolate any real increase in performance (or horsepower, if you will). I came up with a test that removed wheelspin: rolling start in 2nd at 20, measure 25-50... rolling start in 3rd at 30, measure 35-60. Here are the results:

DSC/TCS: ON ... OFF
25-50 #1: 4.02 .. 4.01
25-50 #2: 3.42 .. 3.45

35-60 #1: 5.31 .. 5.31
35-60 #2: 5.28 .. 5.31

I put a Philips ToUCam in the car, capturing tach, speedo and view. These results have been determined using a video editor to choose the first and last frames based on the digital speedo. As you can see, there is no difference at all. If your tires aren't losing grip, running with DSC/TCS fully off does nothing to improve your car's performance. Increased performance only comes when you are inducing wheelspin and have the tires and pavement to take advantage of it.

This book is closed, for me.
Interesting. Did your tests involve any gear changes? I read in another thread that with the DSC/TCS enabled it seems like it takes a fraction of a second longer for power to kick in just after a gear change. (I have to admit that although I keep thinking about trying this myself, I have never even tried turning the DSC/TCS off! What a loser... :p )

Thanks for the information.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #148  
RandyP's Avatar
Free Your Mind
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by greyhound
Interesting. Did your tests involve any gear changes? I read in another thread that with the DSC/TCS enabled it seems like it takes a fraction of a second longer for power to kick in just after a gear change. (I have to admit that although I keep thinking about trying this myself, I have never even tried turning the DSC/TCS off! What a loser... :p )

Thanks for the information.
No, they didn't. I intentionally tested without shifting to eliminate subtle changes between shifts in different tests, as well as possible wheelspin in the 1/2 shift. I know that when I want to play, and have visibility and room for things to go wrong, I can turn the systems off.

I almost hit a deer about an hour ago doing some "athletic" driving. It happened just past the apex of a curve as I was accelerating, and I instinctively nailed the brakes. The DSC/TCS systems did their job - I stayed in my lane under hard breaking that threw the weight to the outside front tire in a fraction of a second. Those late-night tests may have saved the deer and my brand new car, so I think I'll have it on 99% of the time and get CZ Stage 1 and high-flow catback exhaust to get some extra kick.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #149  
NoPistonsHere's Avatar
RevBeeper
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Cucamonga
Talking

I have read the thread from start to finish. In the begining this dude solved the problem of performance/MPG. Then in the middle of the thread you only get performance, and then in the end of the thread you get NOTHING (BOO), dang I feel robbed. I was hopping to get performance at least. Well I am still going to try it and see how the placebo effect feels like. I have gotten 300 to the tank (89-92 octain) with the L flash and dsc/tcs on, currently have 12000 miles on my 8. I have just upgraded to the M flash, and to make sure I have the m Flash, I did the tap the break 20 times with car off and watched the temp gauge go up and down. I still have to test the car with the M flash with the dsc/tcs on. Well looks like I have another test to due with it off, but thats going to be at least 5 fillups down the road. :D

Last edited by NoPistonsHere; Jul 12, 2004 at 04:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #150  
Like Whoa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
I Have the 2004 RX-8 with the Grand Touring Package. I kno i havet he DSC but do i have the TCS?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 4.17 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.