Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Horsepower And Mileage Problem Solved!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 4.17 average.
 
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 10:16 PM
  #226  
garynjr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JRichter
I've read this same thing many times in car magazines, but I probably wouldn't take it to 9000 rpm until it has had a minute or three to warm up.
Actually you can't... I know because it freaked me the hell out this morning!
I was late for work and didn't let it sit for very long before I took off.

As I went down the street in first gear, i hit 6.5K and the engine cut out like it does if you redline it. I was shocked! I tried it again and the same thing hapened. About ten min later when the car had warmed up I tried it again and it had no problem at all. So this car is so smart it won't let you over rev a cold engine! Now that's pretty sweet.
G
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #227  
DarkBrew's Avatar
Extraordinary Engineering
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 14
From: Burls On
Originally Posted by garynjr
Actually you can't... I know because it freaked me the hell out this morning!
I was late for work and didn't let it sit for very long before I took off.

As I went down the street in first gear, i hit 6.5K and the engine cut out like it does if you redline it. I was shocked! I tried it again and the same thing hapened. About ten min later when the car had warmed up I tried it again and it had no problem at all. So this car is so smart it won't let you over rev a cold engine! Now that's pretty sweet.
G
This feature is explained in the owner's manual.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 06:25 PM
  #228  
Bruiser1255's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
This is very interesting and I certainly will try it. Another trick you may try is removing the engine cover. A few weeks back I was in a hurry and after putting in some oil I failed to put the cover back on. Result...my overall milage jumped from 16/17 to 21/22. Not sure why, maybe better air flow. At first I thought maybe it was a fluke, but i've driving it now this way through at least 6 tanks and it has yet to drop. Try it out and let me know if it works for you. Goodluck.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #229  
Budweiser8Jr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
I have no engine cover on mine, doesn't seem to help any, in fact it seems to take longer for my engine to warm up. However, I will try disabling system to see how that does.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #230  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Removing the engine cover reduces the airflow through the engine compartment and raises engine compartment temps. It also exposes your hood to higher temps. This is not advisable for anyone in hot climates for sure.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 06:42 PM
  #231  
Big_Mike_4488's Avatar
350Z Killer
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Bruiser1255
This is very interesting and I certainly will try it. Another trick you may try is removing the engine cover. A few weeks back I was in a hurry and after putting in some oil I failed to put the cover back on. Result...my overall milage jumped from 16/17 to 21/22. Not sure why, maybe better air flow. At first I thought maybe it was a fluke, but i've driving it now this way through at least 6 tanks and it has yet to drop. Try it out and let me know if it works for you. Goodluck.
very interesting
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #232  
Beodude123's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Ely, UK
I just can't really see that happening MazdaManiac.... But who knows... A lot of things on the RX-8 serve a purpose.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #233  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Originally Posted by Bruiser1255
This is very interesting and I certainly will try it. Another trick you may try is removing the engine cover. A few weeks back I was in a hurry and after putting in some oil I failed to put the cover back on. Result...my overall mileage jumped from 16/17 to 21/22. Not sure why, maybe better air flow. At first I thought maybe it was a fluke, but I've driving it now this way through at least 6 tanks and it has yet to drop. Try it out and let me know if it works for you. Goodluck.
Bruiser wins the inaugural Gomez Award. This award will be e-presented annually to the most ridiculous claim made on this forum.

Congratulations Bruiser1255......
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #234  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Gomez
Bruiser wins the inaugural Gomez Award. This award will be e-presented annually to the most ridiculous claim made on this forum.

Congratulations Bruiser1255......
That's nothing. I once forgot to fasten my seatbelt and managed to get 24 miles per gallon, instead of the usual 18.

I dare you to doubt my claim.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 08:31 PM
  #235  
Exegeses's Avatar
Exegeses of the Renesis
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
My milage improves when I fart...

Extra "gas" I suppose...
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #236  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Originally Posted by mysql101
That's nothing. I once forgot to fasten my seatbelt and managed to get 24 miles per gallon, instead of the usual 18.

I dare you to doubt my claim.
OK JH, in honour of your momentous achievement in fuel conservation, I'll implement a change in the frequency of the award e-ceremony.

You win the Gomez Award for the hour of 0200 UTC, 18 Jan 2006. It's probably a good thing I give these awards out hourly, there are quite a lot of bullshit claims on the forum

Cheers,
Gomez.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #237  
garynjr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mysql101
That's nothing. I once forgot to fasten my seatbelt and managed to get 24 miles per gallon, instead of the usual 18.

I dare you to doubt my claim.
I wish I got18 MPG!! I've been in the 13 - 14 MPG range! And i don't even drive her that hard!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #238  
Krankor's Avatar
Klingon Grammarian
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by Exegeses
My milage improves when I fart...

Extra "gas" I suppose...
The *weird* thing is... MY mileage improves when you fart!
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 01:40 AM
  #239  
PIGBAIT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
I have yet to break the 200 mile mark to a tank of gas. My tank is bone dry at the 198 mile mark. When I fill it the pump shuts off at 14.3 gallons. So I'm getting 14MPG. Thats just about all city driving. Don't understand how people are getting 18MPG city driving...I dont drive the car hard

I'll try turning off DSC/TC on my next tank and see what happens....
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 04:53 AM
  #240  
Imidazole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
I swear, the only reason people will see an improvement is because they're being more careful with DSC/Trac off.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 05:42 AM
  #241  
Exegeses's Avatar
Exegeses of the Renesis
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
The *weird* thing is... MY mileage improves when you fart!



Glad to be of service...
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 05:44 AM
  #242  
Exegeses's Avatar
Exegeses of the Renesis
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
BTW, turning off DSC/TC sounds like a BAD way to save gas...
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 06:47 AM
  #243  
RichardK's Avatar
Another Filthy Mac User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Hawick, Scotland, United States of Blairland.
I'm looking forward to seeing how the UK model behaves in these circumstances. First, any MPG figures I report will be based on Imperial, not US, measurements - to compare I multiply the US figures x 1.2, which certainly gives me hope for getting reasonable consumption from my car.

EDIT: Before anyone says "the multiplication won't change the consumption" - I know. I mean, that if I got around 23mpg in UK terms I'd be happy - so 23mp(US)g looks like a good figure to me.

Secondly... I haven't driven a powerful RWD car for some time. My Supra may have claimed to have 200bhp, but it was a lardy automatic thing, and quite old - I very much doubt it was really generating that much power. I'm torn on whether or not I will have the reactions/connection to drive enthusiastically with the DSC off, but I also think that learning the car's handling with DSC off is the way to go. I drove my X1/9 enthusiastically without any driver aids, same goes for my 924S, Manta and other cars.

My Beetle has traction and stability controls. With them off, it really does handle like a pig, which makes me think that in fact, they are only intrusive when you do something it interprets as silly, but are doing something all the time.

Gah, this is going to be the longest month EVER.

Last edited by RichardK; Jan 18, 2006 at 06:50 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 09:42 PM
  #244  
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Riverview FL
Well gents, I find this thread very interesting. We have two 8s both are base model 6 speed units. My wife and I both get 20-22 mpg regularly. While we do not get the chance to run curves alot, we do drive on the high side of 80, a l o t.... As stated, both cars are the base model units so neither have DSC or TCS. I have always wondered why our mileage was above the norm. I think that there should be some additional research done on these systems.

Lastly, we don't miss having them.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 01:41 AM
  #245  
RotaryNoob's Avatar
Hi
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I have a base 8 and I get 14-16 MPG...
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #246  
toca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: rialto ca
the dealer asked me if i wanted one with tcs i said f no my right foot is my tcs.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #247  
brothervoodoo's Avatar
RainMan is Back
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by toca
the dealer asked me if i wanted one with tcs i said f no my right foot is my tcs.
Please post the inevitable pic.. thanks..
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #248  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Twin 8's --
My GT gets 21-22 mpg consistantly, and just leave the DSC on all the time. That's using 87 Shell.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #249  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
I cant believe this useless thread is still alive

It was established ages back that turning off your DSC has no impact on your MPG.

Mods, please lock this thread...!! Die thread, Die.....
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #250  
garynjr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rxeightr
Twin 8's --
My GT gets 21-22 mpg consistantly, and just leave the DSC on all the time. That's using 87 Shell.
Probably because you are using the not recomended lower Octaine gass.

87 will not burn as fast as 92/93 there for you will certainly get better gas milage.
That's still pretty high and hard to believe but you probably do a lot of highway driving and not so heavy on the gas.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 4.17 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.