Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Got 29.3 mpg today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-15-2012, 01:39 PM
  #26  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
OD has as well, but he has different gearing changes and FI that changes the whole game entirely.

I know there is discussion about running super lean for low load cruising. OD makes reference of it here: https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-engine-tuning-forum-63/bank-2-o2-sensor-affect-command-f-table-230104/ and notes that someone else is getting 28mpg running in the 15:1 AFR range, also FI though. Can't find the thread he referenced though.
Old 03-15-2012, 01:41 PM
  #27  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
HiFlite999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Usually, spikes of good mpg are caused by underfilling on that single tank. What will happen then is your next tank will show below-average mpgs because you put in more than you started with. Sign up with fuelly.com and record over longer periods. Not many RX-8er's beat my mpg average over time.

Btw, better to be throttle off in gear than in neutral. In gear coast-down the fuel is completely shut off, neutral requires fuel to run.

Last edited by HiFlite999; 03-15-2012 at 01:43 PM.
Old 03-15-2012, 02:14 PM
  #28  
I’m back
 
Iluvrevs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 294
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
My MPG is starting to go up with warmer temps having the last 2 tanks at about 19mpg. But, that’s only 2 tanks so not enough to be meaningful. Over winter I averaged 17.3-18.5. The 2 times on the track so far I’ve gotten between 7.8 and 8.2mpg with 3 full tanks.
Old 03-16-2012, 12:05 AM
  #29  
New Rotor Head
 
cpenner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BC
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HiFlite999
Usually, spikes of good mpg are caused by underfilling on that single tank. What will happen then is your next tank will show below-average mpgs because you put in more than you started with. Sign up with fuelly.com and record over longer periods. Not many RX-8er's beat my mpg average over time.

Btw, better to be throttle off in gear than in neutral. In gear coast-down the fuel is completely shut off, neutral requires fuel to run.
This seems to make sense to me - but when I pulling the OBD2 data as I try this, the 6th gear coast down doesn't get nearly the mileage that a neutral coast does. By a factor of 3-5x, iirc.

Anybody else seen this? OBD2 fuel consumption data supporting neutral over "foot off pedal 6th gear coast"?
Old 03-16-2012, 01:33 AM
  #30  
Registered
 
Cvzrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow seeing all these high number is freaking crazy! I have a new engine bhr ignition new spark plugs new fuel pump and im still getting around 15-17 mpg :/ maybe an accessport will help..
Old 03-16-2012, 07:18 AM
  #31  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by cpenner
This seems to make sense to me - but when I pulling the OBD2 data as I try this, the 6th gear coast down doesn't get nearly the mileage that a neutral coast does. By a factor of 3-5x, iirc.

Anybody else seen this? OBD2 fuel consumption data supporting neutral over "foot off pedal 6th gear coast"?
ODB2 mileage data is theorized, not actual. The simple fact is that in neutral you are using a bit of fuel to keep the engine idling. If you are in gear with the revs higher than idle and do not have any throttle input, the ECU is not injecting any fuel at all. ODB2 mileage estimates are not really designed to account for this.

Originally Posted by Cvzrx8
wow seeing all these high number is freaking crazy! I have a new engine bhr ignition new spark plugs new fuel pump and im still getting around 15-17 mpg :/ maybe an accessport will help..
Low compression O2 sensor is failing, need transmission or diff fluid replaced, MAF sensor cleaned, etc... There is a laundry list of items that don't take much to kick you off the good mileage.
Old 03-16-2012, 08:02 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Ometta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a ScanGauge 2 from my old car that I tried on my RX8 for a while but I yanked it out of the car cause I was tired of seeing my crap gas mileage. I never measured a full tank of gas cause I do a lot of short distance driving but I did look to see what I was getting as I drove. I know it's not 100% accurate but it gives you a pretty good idea.

City Driving: 12-15 mpg

Highway Driving: 17-25 mpg

Short Distance Driving: 5-8 mpg (not a fully warmed car/ couple mile driving)

There have been a few unique times on the highway where I would hit around 30 mpg at a speed of about 70 mph but it wouldn't stay there for long. I also noticed I got better gas mileage around town when I shifted at about 3500-4000 RPM. Kinda wierd but you gotta take those ScanGauge's with a grain of salt.
Old 03-16-2012, 08:15 AM
  #33  
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
paimon.soror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Between Cones
Posts: 7,560
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
OBD2 data is calculated through a formula using MAF, AFR and VSS .... like RIWWP said, all theoretical.
Old 03-16-2012, 08:22 AM
  #34  
Angler of the Year
iTrader: (3)
 
slvrstreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: George-uhh
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
series 2 transmission would help a lot too
Old 03-16-2012, 08:53 AM
  #35  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
HiFlite999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RIWWP
ODB2 mileage data is theorized, not actual. The simple fact is that in neutral you are using a bit of fuel to keep the engine idling. If you are in gear with the revs higher than idle and do not have any throttle input, the ECU is not injecting any fuel at all. ODB2 mileage estimates are not really designed to account for this.
It's the math: .1 mile / 0 gallons = ?? Any system doing "instantaneous" mpg calculations has to handle divide-by-zeros as an exception. What the programmers decide to show varies. Manufacturer, in car displays tend to be optimistic (duh). The Scangauge allows calibration of their unit to match the car being measured, but few bother to go through the trouble.
Old 03-16-2012, 10:58 AM
  #36  
Strength/Confidence
 
Roidz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Name:  Homer.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  25.1 KB
Old 03-16-2012, 04:52 PM
  #37  
Registered
 
PeteInLongBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
there have been a few others that good REAL highway numbers of 27-28 mpg. elara for one on a couple of occasions when new . i forget the others.
I have a Scangauge, which is accurately calibrated, confirmed by manual calculations. During the week my regular 25 mile commute is very consistent, so I know what is normal for my car, conditions, and driving style. On a bad day (cold weather, driving too fast) I get 21-22 mpg. On a good day (warm weather, staying under 70 mph) I get 27-28 mpg. And, everything in-between, depending...

Yesterday was a "good day" !
Old 03-19-2012, 04:28 PM
  #38  
Registered
 
GTDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This one time at band camp.
Old 03-19-2012, 04:36 PM
  #39  
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
monchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Those are good numbers! But, in a real world, this doesn't cut it for 99% of us...lol
Old 03-19-2012, 04:37 PM
  #40  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Post counts don't mean anything to 99% of us either.
Old 03-20-2012, 12:33 PM
  #41  
Registered
 
PeteInLongBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by monchie
Those are good numbers! But, in a real world, this doesn't cut it for 99% of us...lol
I don't know what you mean (not that it matters to me).

My driving is not in some imagined controlled environment. It is real world commuting: 8 miles city, 20 miles freeway, one-way. Ocean Blvd / 2nd St / 405 fwy / Sand Canyon Ave. Usually 1 redline before entering the freeway, when conditions allow.
Old 03-20-2012, 03:13 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
GTDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wouldn't worry too much about what others think about getting 29 mpg in your 8. If you are sure you did all the calculations correctly then you have done something many would like to achieve. They don't believe it because they don't want to.
Old 03-20-2012, 06:31 PM
  #43  
SHINKA?
 
cooljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You probably looked at the wrong trip meter...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
9
08-21-2022 01:29 PM
Racingjunkie
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
2
09-29-2015 05:05 PM
yapakanichi
RX-8 Discussion
11
09-23-2015 02:14 PM
Juan Montenegro
New Member Forum
3
09-10-2015 06:28 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Got 29.3 mpg today



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.