Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Getting faster with time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-26-2004, 11:32 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
RX-Hachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Would hope that Mazda did their homework on the Renesis such as making sure it would pass emissions at port, making sure the oilpan was correct, making sure the HP was correct at 250, then at 247, then at 238, I could list more but I think you get the point...
I don't disagree with your statement about Mazda doing their homework. However, for the record, Mazda Japan had stated that the high power Renesis was 250 ps, which is 247 hp. Mazda USA only "officially" down graded the advertised hp once (not twice as you imply), from 247 to 238.
Old 09-26-2004, 11:55 PM
  #27  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX-Hachi
I don't disagree with your statement about Mazda doing their homework. However, for the record, Mazda Japan had stated that the high power Renesis was 250 ps, which is 247 hp. Mazda USA only "officially" down graded the advertised hp once (not twice as you imply), from 247 to 238.
Actually initial reports were 280hp, then for a while it was 250hp, it was introduced at autoshows as having 250hp and that 250hp (not ps) number stuck until shortly before release I believe.
Old 09-27-2004, 01:24 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
RX-Hachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Actually initial reports were 280hp, then for a while it was 250hp, it was introduced at autoshows as having 250hp and that 250hp (not ps) number stuck until shortly before release I believe.
Nope, you are mistaken. 280 hp was never "officially" published by Mazda, I challenge you to produce any "official" document showing that 280 hp figure. That figure was just wishful thinking and internet conjecture.

250 ps was "officially" announced in Japan, and remains their "official" figure. The US marketing folks blundered and may have published 250 hp (taking "ps" to equal "hp" too loosely ) in some early advertising before the car was "officially" released. This was a "marketing" error by Mazda USA, not an "engineering" one by the Hiroshima R&D team. However, once the car was "officially" released, all Mazda USA documents stated 247 hp (= 250 ps), until the figure was revised to 238 hp.
Old 09-27-2004, 08:40 AM
  #29  
VW coulda had it...
 
KKMmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crystal, Minnesota
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ike sez: “So just passing off a potential problem as nonsense simply because you think Mazda did a lot of testing might not be a good idea. At this point the engine issue (or lack thereof) is really not worth debating further until more is known and more RX8s start to get up there in miles.”

Indeed! Mr. Port & Polish brings up some interesting points on his side seal thread, and undoubtedly has good familiarity with the internals of the rotary. Even Yamaguchi’s RX8 book has mention of early prototypes swallowing side seals, (solved by adopting a keystone seal cross-section) so we know issues caused by the large port area and/or shape have been looked at. I like to think (of course!) Mazda would have worked out major engine flaws before production. I mean look, these guys must know rotary engines inside-out, it’s what they do, and have done since the ‘60’s! And they wouldn’t want to alienate a whole community of rotor heads (or potential new owners) and ****-off Ford, would they?

There must be some good reason engineers arrived at this solution rather than re-shaping the port edge or adding a bridge. Perhaps all engines are supposed to have a chamfer on the port edge (a common two-stroke practice) but some don’t? The subject does concern me a bit, because I had hoped to drive the car at least 150,000 miles without noticeable power loss or excessive oil usage, given my kind of driving and maintenance, without having the internals of my engine examined to determine some engineering or assembly flaw.

At this point, I am going to just try to ignore the potential problem and enjoy driving the car as I have; if any problem should rear its ugly head, I’ll deal with it then. (hopefully, contestable, or under warranty!)
Old 09-27-2004, 08:59 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Ellar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you look at the subject line and re-read the first post, it's really weird what this thread has become.
Old 09-27-2004, 02:11 PM
  #31  
VW coulda had it...
 
KKMmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crystal, Minnesota
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My apologies to Frank Patrick and others for getting off topic!

Anyway, it is very possible your car is getting faster. I haven't noticed this in my case, but my oil consumption and fuel economy have improved. (at about 15,000 miles)

I would guess the seals get broken-in to the point where they seal more effectively.
Old 09-28-2004, 05:27 PM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Frank Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definetly not losing power-I detect some NONE 8 owners -doubting the lasting power of the 8-sorry folks- it continues to be a great car
Old 09-28-2004, 06:09 PM
  #33  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KKMmaniac
My apologies to Frank Patrick and others for getting off topic!

Anyway, it is very possible your car is getting faster. I haven't noticed this in my case, but my oil consumption and fuel economy have improved. (at about 15,000 miles)

I would guess the seals get broken-in to the point where they seal more effectively.

I agree - I'm around 13k miles now and my gas milage has steadily increased from about 18mpg in the beginning to 21.5mpg lately on my same home-work-home driving loop.
Old 09-28-2004, 07:24 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
Shamblerock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to deviate a bit from the purpose of this tread, but the dreaded HP issue came up here as well and I wanted to give you my 2 cents worth. I read that the 8 was 247 HP and is still inside our engines. My understanding is that the reason for dropping the hp rating from 247 to 238 was because the US emmissions standard was raised and catalytic converters had to last 120k miles instead of the previous 80 K or something like that. And that change in emmissions law was right in the middle of production or the RX-8. Therefore as a result they had to quickly back peddle and find a way to meet this new standard and therefore changed the catalytic coverters and/or tuned down the engine. I guess they wanted to make the cat last longer or not heat up so quickly so they would burn up, because of the high heat rotaries produce. Makes sense I guess.

I have a copy of a staement I found on the web from Mazda explaining this. I think i got it from another thread here. In any event they make it sound like we never get to see all 238hp anyway for one reason or anotrher. Bummer.

The real concern is that if you found a way to max out your engine through the ECU, will you destroy the cat as well? Then what?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
escapedan
RX-8 Racing
58
02-10-2020 06:11 PM
IamFodi
Series II Interior, Audio, and Electronics
28
10-31-2018 06:37 AM
M RX 8
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
08-05-2015 06:45 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Getting faster with time



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.