End turbo discussion. Please
#2
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not a turbo fan but because the exhaust manifold passes through some sort of engine mount does not close the case. Most race turbos are mounted onto fabricated manifolds/headers that look much more like the common N/A spaghetti header. With one of these one does not need to mount the turbo along the central axis of the engine.
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It sounds like Mazda/MazdaSpeed doesn't think the turbo is a viable option, but they are going for a hydraulic supercharger instead.
This is from a Mazda tech guy that was at their Rev It Up event along with the RX-8.
This is from a Mazda tech guy that was at their Rev It Up event along with the RX-8.
#4
I like superchargers better . i got a twin turbo rx7 and supercharge mellinia and i love the superchager way better .isay yes to the superchager less trouble and less heating problems.:D
#6
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[moderator voice] we don't need another duplicate "turbo vs. supercharger" thread. use the search function and add on to existing one(s)... the answer is not a simple one[/moderator voice]
...in any case, MikeW you think you could provide us with a little more information regarding the situation of the logmeister in regards to the engine mounts?? then we could have a proper discussion.
...in any case, MikeW you think you could provide us with a little more information regarding the situation of the logmeister in regards to the engine mounts?? then we could have a proper discussion.
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MikeW
The exhaust manifold passes between the engine mount. Turbocharger isn't going to fit. Case closed.
The exhaust manifold passes between the engine mount. Turbocharger isn't going to fit. Case closed.
Originally posted by gazita123
It sounds like Mazda/MazdaSpeed doesn't think the turbo is a viable option, but they are going for a hydraulic supercharger instead...
It sounds like Mazda/MazdaSpeed doesn't think the turbo is a viable option, but they are going for a hydraulic supercharger instead...
---jps
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you are worried about the engine mount being in the way in an RX-8, what you could do is buy a RX-7 with no motor then buy the first totaled RX-8 there is (i perdict 3 hours) and slap that renesis in your RX-7 and Turbo away! Also you might want to tear down the renesis and put the RX-7 rotors in (lower compression) just for detonation saftey reasons. Thats my plan. Probally won't happen right away because you got to figure out engine mounts and all that stuffs (would have to wait for pettit racing to do it). Engine management will be easy with a haltech or PFC.
#10
Senior Rotor Router
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regardless of the possible design constraints of the engine bay, given the inherent power attributes of the RENESIS and rotarys in general I think a supercharger would work better than a turbo for overall driveability and emissions reasons.
If a supercharged version is eventually released, I hope Mazda doesn't forget about all of us upfront buyers and makes a Mazdaspeed "kit" available that can be installed without voiding our warranty.
If a supercharged version is eventually released, I hope Mazda doesn't forget about all of us upfront buyers and makes a Mazdaspeed "kit" available that can be installed without voiding our warranty.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Sputnik
Sh'yeah, right. Mazdaspeed is going to put an untried and untested setup on a car and put a warranty on it? Think about it. I highly suspect your "source".
---jps
Sh'yeah, right. Mazdaspeed is going to put an untried and untested setup on a car and put a warranty on it? Think about it. I highly suspect your "source".
---jps
I understand the doubt, since no one is currently using this setup, but it makes a lot of sense.
1. A hydraulic setup makes up for the shortcomings of a direct drive pulley system, since the pump can work in a broader range of speeds and the output can be completely buffered from the input, so the output of the SC would be much more constant or could be variably controllable.
2. It is probably more efficient than an electric one if done correctly, since you have less lossy places where energy conversion is happening.
a. mechanical (engine) to mechanical (pump) to mechanical (hydraulics) to mechanical (hydraulic motor) to mechanical (SC)
b. vs. mechanical (engine) to electromechanical (generator) to electrical (wires) to electromechanical (electric motor) to mechanical (SC)
It may be a long shot, but it seems like a good solution to me from a technical stand point.
Besides, isn't the Renesis a brand new design that they are waranteeing?
#12
You are sleeepppyyyy.....
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rubidoux, CA
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It really wouldn't add any more efficiency to the setup, no more than the electric at least. Just because it is a mechanical to mechanical conversion, does not mean it is less lossy than a mecanical to electric conversion. The rev range has no impact whatsoever on a positive displacement supercharger because it pumps the same amount of air per revolution at low revs as it does at high revs. Then advantage of a hydraulic system would not be efficiency (as a direct drive system is the most efficient) but it would be to allow a variable pully rate for the supercharger. This would allow more tuning, by being able to vary the boost at certain points in the rev range. This is an awefully complex system, and it seems to go against the inherrent simplicity of a rotary engine. I'm still all for a simple intercooled pos. disp. blower (three more moving parts - two screws, and a water pump).
As a side note, there are superchargers out there that use a planetary gear set up to vary the pully rate as well. This would keep the efficiency of the direct drive, but allow for some tuning of the boost over the rev range.
As a side note, there are superchargers out there that use a planetary gear set up to vary the pully rate as well. This would keep the efficiency of the direct drive, but allow for some tuning of the boost over the rev range.
#13
rx-8 converted 2 evo.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: california
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If a supercharged version is eventually released, I hope Mazda doesn't forget about all of us upfront buyers and makes a Mazdaspeed "kit" available that can be installed without voiding our warranty.
Also hope XS, or turbonetics can put out turbo kit by this year, I have high hopes that they can.
#14
Senior Rotor Router
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by moogle
I hope so 2, I hate to lose my warranty over a body kit.
Also hope XS, or turbonetics can put out turbo kit by this year, I have high hopes that they can.
I hope so 2, I hate to lose my warranty over a body kit.
Also hope XS, or turbonetics can put out turbo kit by this year, I have high hopes that they can.
#16
Senior Rotor Router
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A hydraulic supercharger uses fluid under pressure through a hydraulic actuator in order to engage and disengage the compressor / the effects of the supercharger depending on when the boost is desired or programmed. At least that's my understanding.
#17
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL
No and NO !
I've already told you what the MPS will be :P
No and NO !
I've already told you what the MPS will be :P
Originally posted by gazita123
It sounds like Mazda/MazdaSpeed doesn't think the turbo is a viable option, but they are going for a hydraulic supercharger instead.
This is from a Mazda tech guy that was at their Rev It Up event along with the RX-8.
It sounds like Mazda/MazdaSpeed doesn't think the turbo is a viable option, but they are going for a hydraulic supercharger instead.
This is from a Mazda tech guy that was at their Rev It Up event along with the RX-8.
#18
rx-8 converted 2 evo.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: california
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the hydraulic supercharger better than a regular supercharger??? "hp,reliability, and so on."
I still prefer a turbo... if it's missing the whoosh its missing the magic.
I still prefer a turbo... if it's missing the whoosh its missing the magic.
Last edited by moogle; 03-31-2003 at 01:15 AM.
#19
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, like i was saying... let's NOT have a superchargervs.turbovs.NOx thread...
in any case, as Maestro said, it's not going to have forced induction, and as Sputnik pointed out, it wouldn't be with such a radical system.
...and for gazita, the RENESIS isnt' a brand new design, even though it's never been in a production car before, the side-port layout has been around since the MSP-RE in the Evolv. testing and design have been going on for years and years and years...
in anycase, i still want to see this big problem caused by the engine mounts....
in any case, as Maestro said, it's not going to have forced induction, and as Sputnik pointed out, it wouldn't be with such a radical system.
...and for gazita, the RENESIS isnt' a brand new design, even though it's never been in a production car before, the side-port layout has been around since the MSP-RE in the Evolv. testing and design have been going on for years and years and years...
in anycase, i still want to see this big problem caused by the engine mounts....
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gazita123
1. A hydraulic setup makes up for the shortcomings of a direct drive pulley system, since the pump can work in a broader range of speeds and the output can be completely buffered from the input, so the output of the SC would be much more constant or could be variably controllable.
1. A hydraulic setup makes up for the shortcomings of a direct drive pulley system, since the pump can work in a broader range of speeds and the output can be completely buffered from the input, so the output of the SC would be much more constant or could be variably controllable.
2. It is probably more efficient than an electric one if done correctly, since you have less lossy places where energy conversion is happening.
Besides, isn't the Renesis a brand new design that they are waranteeing?
Originally posted by neit_jnf
...Excuse my ignorance but I what is a "hydraulic supercharger"?? I thought all superchargers were pulley driven...
...Excuse my ignorance but I what is a "hydraulic supercharger"?? I thought all superchargers were pulley driven...
---jps
#21
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the original MSP-RE came out in the RX-01 (220hp) concept back when the FD was released :D
This should also answer any questions about reliability. In theory this engine (its concept ) anyway as been tested for over 10 years.
And Mazda Engineers are always extremly good at designing new technology.
I mean they are the only manufacturer to build something other than the conventional piston engine (Primitive Boinger)
Think of the MSP-RE as the i-Mac new and innovative and doesn't crash (breakdown) every 5 minutes.
The piston engine is the grumpy old PC that chucks a sad and crashes ever 5 minutes (Cambelts, etc etc)
Maybe Mazda should start using this slogan.....
Mazda....... think different :D
This should also answer any questions about reliability. In theory this engine (its concept ) anyway as been tested for over 10 years.
And Mazda Engineers are always extremly good at designing new technology.
I mean they are the only manufacturer to build something other than the conventional piston engine (Primitive Boinger)
Think of the MSP-RE as the i-Mac new and innovative and doesn't crash (breakdown) every 5 minutes.
The piston engine is the grumpy old PC that chucks a sad and crashes ever 5 minutes (Cambelts, etc etc)
Maybe Mazda should start using this slogan.....
Mazda....... think different :D
Originally posted by wakeech
ok, like i was saying... let's NOT have a superchargervs.turbovs.NOx thread...
in any case, as Maestro said, it's not going to have forced induction, and as Sputnik pointed out, it wouldn't be with such a radical system.
...and for gazita, the RENESIS isnt' a brand new design, even though it's never been in a production car before, the side-port layout has been around since the MSP-RE in the Evolv. testing and design have been going on for years and years and years...
in anycase, i still want to see this big problem caused by the engine mounts....
ok, like i was saying... let's NOT have a superchargervs.turbovs.NOx thread...
in any case, as Maestro said, it's not going to have forced induction, and as Sputnik pointed out, it wouldn't be with such a radical system.
...and for gazita, the RENESIS isnt' a brand new design, even though it's never been in a production car before, the side-port layout has been around since the MSP-RE in the Evolv. testing and design have been going on for years and years and years...
in anycase, i still want to see this big problem caused by the engine mounts....
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you all know my veiws on this subject (tuuuuuurboooooo). But guessing has just gotten old, so i say we all wait until may when they finally get here, then wait another month to see who is really gonna dig into this issue, until then let look at pretty pictures :D
#23
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Maestro
Actually the original MSP-RE came out in the RX-01 (220hp) concept back when the FD was released :D
Actually the original MSP-RE came out in the RX-01 (220hp) concept back when the FD was released :D
#24
Hey, I'm not sure it's relevant but i just saw a local performance magazine with a TURBOcharged s2000. 12.6s @ 115 mph 1/4 mile, stock weels and tires, 380 rwhp @ 13psi boost. The interesting thing is that it has a modified exhaust manifold that relocates the turbine to the front of the engine, thus a turbo system for the rx8 is possible. I think it may lose some thermal efficiency from the longer path of the exhaust to the turbine but it was all wrapped in thermal insulation. What do you think??