Did I just read this right?
01-11-2003, 10:51 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would be nice, but the mazdarx-8.com site says 164 (auto) or 159 (manual), and that is much closer to what has been reported in the past. I tend to believe the 160 numbers.
The last RX-7 had 217 lb-ft of torque, so perhaps the sheet just has some of the old numbers. Or they saw 255/217 and only knew the HP in the marketing department, so they listed it as 250/216. Anyway, it is almost certain to be a mistake.
-Max
The last RX-7 had 217 lb-ft of torque, so perhaps the sheet just has some of the old numbers. Or they saw 255/217 and only knew the HP in the marketing department, so they listed it as 250/216. Anyway, it is almost certain to be a mistake.
-Max
01-12-2003, 03:24 PM
#8
Love to rev!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SpreeGuy
Doesn't the SAE standards for engine Torque get measured in Ft Lbs?
Doesn't the SAE standards for engine Torque get measured in Ft Lbs?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM