Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Did I just get under 13 MPG on my 1st tank of gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-21-2003, 09:41 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
-=Zeqs=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Goleta, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotary Nut? How many miles do you have on your car now? I'm curious as if there is a significant correlation between miles driven and gas milage.
Old 11-21-2003, 09:56 AM
  #27  
"...I'm a Dapper Dan man"
 
Rotary Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
869 miles and still lovin' it!
Old 11-21-2003, 10:24 AM
  #28  
Registered
 
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have two RX-8s. Both are base model 6MT... no frills. I have 5100 miles on mine and my wife has 3450. I get 275 to 300 per tank and normally pump in 14 to 14.5 gallons. My wife gets slightly lower mileage. I have noticed that she stays in 2nd, and 3rd longer than I do.

Both of us drive 60/40 highway/city... highway speeds are 80+ 6th gear at 80mph is just over 4k.
Old 11-21-2003, 01:03 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
sazebac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Literatii
I think that's a bit harsh -- most people aren't expecting "30mpg". They simply want the hard numbers to come close to what was advertised. Can't blame them for that.
Agreed. The advertised numbers are not even close to the real world numbers. Is this common among manufacturers?
Old 11-21-2003, 01:46 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
mikestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lower than advertised HP, lower than advertised MPG... geez I think I'll sell my 350Z and pick up one of these mean machines.
Old 11-21-2003, 02:30 PM
  #31  
Registered
 
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always good to hear from the Z mafia....

Everyone wants to compare these cars and they are built for completely different demographics groups. Interesting how I do not see many BMW 325 owners bad mouthing the 8.

If we have to continue to listen to Z-whining can you all just let me know when you figure out
- where your two missing passengers are going to sit
- why you have to pay for upgraded brakes and wheels
- why you have a smaller less usable trunk
- why you have to pay extra for a limited slip rear end
- why you have to pay extra for front side air bags
- why you have to pay extra for Side Head Curtain Airbags
- why your basic warranty is less
- why your 0.86 skidpad grip is worse
- why your 163-foot 60-0 stopping is worse
- why Car and Driver picked the RX-8 over the 350Z

And finally, why your car is just not as cool?


:D

Last edited by Twin 8s!; 11-21-2003 at 04:26 PM.
Old 11-21-2003, 02:42 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
mikestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jeez, is that all you got? More expensive options and stopping distance? Bigger trunk? Are you serious?

None of those things were even on the radar when I picked out my Z. I wanted a bitching sports car, not a series of lame compromises.
Old 11-21-2003, 02:44 PM
  #33  
Registered
 
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just let me know when you and three friend get back from taking your bitching sports car down a nice winding road. Gonna be damn cramped and hard to shift... but maybe you are one of those wannbe Z drivers with an automatic...

and I don't see better stopping and better as a compromise... I just see it as better.

Last edited by Twin 8s!; 11-22-2003 at 07:28 AM.
Old 11-21-2003, 03:03 PM
  #34  
my other car is blue
 
bluesunlion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't feed the trolls!
Old 11-21-2003, 03:05 PM
  #35  
Registered
 
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Sooorrry.... sometimes ya just want to toss them crumbs....

I promise not to tap on the glass.

Old 11-21-2003, 03:12 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
cruzdreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Algonquin, Il....west of Chicago
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok...just was chatting with an older gent(about 60ish) while i was getting gas. Conversation went like this......"I bet your having fun in that car" I said yes I am. He said, ah, the rotary engine, great car! I said yes but it's a gas guzzler. He said yea, it's all about performance. And then he said "well, it will get better...the engine has to break in a bit....it may take as much as 12,000 miles before it breaks in." I said, well I will have the car for longer than that! He went on to explain to me why it is getting poor gas mileage right now and how the gas is lost through this and that and through the exhaust system, etc. And so as he admired the car I felt a lot better about it all. He seemed to know a lot about the rotary engine....thinking he must have had one or read up on one in his past. He was driving an old Olds Toronado. Ok...just thought I'd share the story for all who are worried about the mpg!
Old 11-21-2003, 03:54 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
cruzdreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Algonquin, Il....west of Chicago
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good for you 8er4lunch!! Man, I hope to get that kind of mileage soon!
Old 11-21-2003, 04:09 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
RX8Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by mikestro
Lower than advertised HP, lower than advertised MPG... geez I think I'll sell my 350Z and pick up one of these mean machines.
wow, nissan quality, harsh ride, room for 2. geez, I think I'll sell my 8 and pick up one of these.

honestly, you're a tool. :D
Old 11-21-2003, 04:09 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
ptiemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by sazebac
Agreed. The advertised numbers are not even close to the real world numbers. Is this common among manufacturers?
As far as I know: The 'advertised' mpg numbers were determined by EPA, not by Mazda!

18-23 right? 23 would be under ideal conditions, downhill with the wind pushing you :-)

Just kidding, I'd think that there is a definition of what is normal. That definition would include air temparature, wind (absence of..), and probably even altitude.


That said.. my previous car was a 2000 Firebird. Advertised with 19/29 and I usually got 26 or 27. My gf had no problem getting the advertised 29 and even more, simply by following the speed limit. The automatic transmission in that car allows going 65 mph at a smooth 2000 rpm.

--> EPAs numbers can be achieved in real life.

--> Mazda definitely is not to blame. It's our driving style.

-Peter
Old 11-21-2003, 04:12 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
ptiemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by mikestro
jeez, is that all you got? More expensive options and stopping distance? Bigger trunk? Are you serious?

None of those things were even on the radar when I picked out my Z. I wanted a bitching sports car, not a series of lame compromises.

*click* <---- sound of my mouse blocking a user

Last edited by ptiemann; 11-21-2003 at 04:14 PM.
Old 11-21-2003, 04:18 PM
  #42  
M0D Squad -charter member
 
rxeightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I routinely get 21-22 mpg, driving 80 miles daily, with 80% Highway. Interstate driving I get the 24 mpg that EPA estimated for the RX-8.

Octane between 93 to 89 offers negligible difference in mileage. 87 octane seems to give a little better mileage (+1 mpg), but prefer to use higher octane to reduce knock potential, since I regulary load the RENESIS with quick starts & high revs.
Old 11-21-2003, 05:23 PM
  #43  
Back in the family
 
Psylence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philly 'burbs
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I routinely get 12-13mpg and don't give a flaming crap. 90% of my driving is local, short commutes.

In a WRX, I get 13-15mpg.. in my STi V, I get 11. My friends who drive new STi's in the same conditions? 14-15mpg.

However, once you get the car on the highway? I can easily pull 20mpg.
Old 11-22-2003, 06:14 AM
  #44  
Registered
 
emailists's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY NY
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Claude-

gald you got your car. BTW that was your silver with tinted windows I saw parked on 74th street, a week ago?


ANyway I am convinced that NYC area driving is unlike many other areas, and that the car just gets bad milage with short trips, ideling, stop and go , etc. I am still in the process of getting my 8 fixed up and sent back to Mazda. I am thinking using my Probe GT for the winter months and getting a new 8 in march. WHo knows, maybe by that time they're will be some new factory issues they improve upon. If not, I guess I'll have to focus on making more money to pay for gas and the smiles the 8 brings- even though she is one thirsty beast!

Last edited by emailists; 11-22-2003 at 06:17 AM.
Old 11-22-2003, 06:46 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
Scottsdale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All-

Sorry for being the bearer of bad news, but I have never averaged more than 14 mog, have nearly 6,000 on the car and ahve complained to Mazda 8 times. Yes, 8 times.

Got a response yesterday after sending a certified letter to Mazda NA. They said - sue us under the Lemon Law becuase we will not reconsider.

I should have taken the buyback. I feel like I have been totally screwed.
Old 11-22-2003, 08:29 AM
  #46  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
claude4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi emailists,

No my car is Titanium with no tint. I have nauticcal code flags on the rear quarter panel with my initials.

I love this car and only hope the MPG improves.

This car seems so right in SO MANY WAYS!

Who knows, maybe Mazda will release an ECU upgrade soon that will correct, amongst other things, the MPG issue.

Any rumors you hear to this fact?

Claude H.
Old 11-22-2003, 01:17 PM
  #47  
M0D Squad -charter member
 
rxeightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should have taken the buyback. I feel like I have been totally screwed.
Mazda gave you your out. Too bad you are unhappy with the path you chose.
Old 11-22-2003, 06:59 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Goldenhue22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Highway 20 possible. No highway, you' get 14-16. That isn't close to what was advertised and I think there needs to be a recall.
Old 11-23-2003, 07:31 AM
  #49  
Registered
 
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Highway 20 possible. No highway, you' get 14-16. That isn't close to what was advertised and I think there needs to be a recall.
Ya know this just never stops. I do not know why some folks are getting lousy mileage. Whether it is their driving style, the type of route taken (city/stop and go...), the gas sold in a particular area, or maybe the ECU and gas mapping out of adjustment.... obviously there is something wrong. Having read several responses, there are a lot of folks that do not drive their cars the same way it would be driven in a mileage test. I also note that a lot of the mileage problems are in California and the northeast. Both these areas sell reformulated gas and corn gas.

Whatever the root problem, I think Mazda should be more open and work with the customer. But until you can show a design flaw that can cause some to have a problem and others to function perfectly well. There is no basis for a recall.

Lastly with two 8s, we do a lot of comparison and if memory serves me, the mileage advertised was 18/24 well that would average to 21mpg with a wimpy driver. I drive more aggressively than most of my friends and getting 20.5 to 22 on most tanks. There are times when I screw up and sit in 5th at 85 and this will knock the mileage down. My wife drives in 3rd and 4th more than I do and here mileage is slightly worse. With this said, there is no way I could justify a recall.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
10-04-2023 05:24 PM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 05:16 PM
dezau
RX-8 Racing
10
03-09-2016 09:50 AM
Eliseo Esquivel
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 08:28 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
09-30-2015 12:57 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 1.00 average.

Quick Reply: Did I just get under 13 MPG on my 1st tank of gas



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.