Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Automatic RX8!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 12:29 PM
  #51  
pelucidor's Avatar
Pure Gold
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, PA
An uncharacteristic mistake on Wakeech's part saying that all 5 speed autos are SMT. Tut, tut .

Having driven many 5-speed autos with 'manual controls' I will say that cars like my IS300 (5 speed auto with e-shift - buttons for up/down on wheel) and G35, Acura CL, Audi A6, Chrysler 300M (gearstick with separate plane for up/down changes) are a long way from an SMT gearbox. A 'real' auto loses significant power to the torque convertor, and takes 0.5-1.0 seconds to make a shift (no matter where the manual controls are - paddles, buttons or gear lever). A clutchless manual (as in BMW M3, Ferraris, Porsches, Maseratis, MR-2) has no power loss and can shift very quickly (perhaps under 0.1 secs) - faster than a human can with a true manual. Usually they cost a lot ($2k - $10k).

The initial RX-8 auto will have paddle controls and be a regular 4 speed auto (I read somewhere because Mazda does not have a 5-speed in house (but what about 5-speed auto in Mazda 6s?), and they will not source one externally for the RX-8). One day Mazda MAY produce a clutchless manual gearbox (SMT) which will have no problems working with the higher-revving 247HP engine, but no dates have been set yet.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 12:40 PM
  #52  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally posted by pelucidor

The initial RX-8 auto will have paddle controls and be a regular 4 speed auto (I read somewhere because Mazda does not have a 5-speed in house (but what about 5-speed auto in Mazda 6s?), and they will not source one externally for the RX-8). One day Mazda MAY produce a clutchless manual gearbox (SMT) which will have no problems working with the higher-revving 247HP engine, but no dates have been set yet.
i read somewhere that the 5speed auto from the mazda6 didn't fit right. but the japanes market seems to have it ( or another) as an option so now i'm at a loss to explain it.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #53  
Hercules's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
Originally posted by JeffNY
>>Wrong. The automatic offered with the 2004 RX8 is a tiptronic automatic.<<

Thanks for the blunt reply, but what am I missing? I though Mazda was only going to offer an hydraulic automatic or manual gear box in 2004? I thought the "tiptronics" like you find in Porche or Audi are basically a manual (sequental) tranny controlled by fast solenoids...that can also be controlled by computer to act like an "auto". Humm....but maybe I am wrong...

Someone please enlighten me...

So you WILL be able to shift the auto tranny yourself? Like I can now in my TL? They call the tranny in a Boxter a "tiptronic"...is that hydraulic? Guess I misunderstood "tiptronic"
Exactly like your TL now. Except that the RX-8 will be slower due to the fact the engine is detuned.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #54  
justinm2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: atlanta, ga
The 5 speed auto from mazda 6 doesn't fit because it's fwd, the rx8 is rwd. The Japanese market 5 speed is a manual transmission, not an automatic.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 02:42 PM
  #55  
chenpin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
Originally posted by JeffNY
>>Wrong. The automatic offered with the 2004 RX8 is a tiptronic automatic.<<

Thanks for the blunt reply, but what am I missing? I though Mazda was only going to offer an hydraulic automatic or manual gear box in 2004? I thought the "tiptronics" like you find in Porche or Audi are basically a manual (sequental) tranny controlled by fast solenoids...that can also be controlled by computer to act like an "auto". Humm....but maybe I am wrong...

Someone please enlighten me...

So you WILL be able to shift the auto tranny yourself? Like I can now in my TL? They call the tranny in a Boxter a "tiptronic"...is that hydraulic? Guess I misunderstood "tiptronic"
Look here for all the info you need:

http://www.edmunds.com/news/innovati...3/article.html
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 04:08 PM
  #56  
JeffNY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Wynantskill, NY
Thanks for the info and web site guys...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #57  
gusmahler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
The difference between auto and SMT

Originally posted by JeffNY

Thanks for the blunt reply, but what am I missing? I though Mazda was only going to offer an hydraulic automatic or manual gear box in 2004? I thought the "tiptronics" like you find in Porche or Audi are basically a manual (sequental) tranny controlled by fast solenoids...that can also be controlled by computer to act like an "auto". Humm....but maybe I am wrong...

Someone please enlighten me...

So you WILL be able to shift the auto tranny yourself? Like I can now in my TL? They call the tranny in a Boxter a "tiptronic"...is that hydraulic? Guess I misunderstood "tiptronic"
This whole area is confusing because everyone uses different terminology (or worse, the same word to mean two different things: the Edmunds article listed above uses the word semi-automatic to mean something completely different from the way Formula 1 uses the word. I'll try to briefly summarize the differences:

Manual: uses a clutch and a gear shift selector that is manually operated by hand to change gears

Automatic: uses a torque converter to couple the engine with the transmission and the transmission automatically changes gears.

Tiptronic: This is the name Porsche uses for its system, but is sometimes generally applied to similar systems by different manufacturers. This uses a torque converter to couple the engine to the transmission. Thus, IT IS AN AUTOMATIC. The difference: there are levers, sometimes placed on or behind the steering wheel, sometimes by moving the gear selector **** to a different place. The levers allow you to change the gear of the transmission. But, make no mistake, IT IS AN AUTOMATIC TRANNY, with the associated power losses and long shift times. IMO, they are a useless gimmick.

SMT (Sequentiual Manual Transmission) or SMG (Sequential Manual Gearbox). This device uses a clutch to couple an engine with the transmission. However, there is no clutch pedal. You shift gears by pulling a lever behind the steering wheel. When you pull the lever, a computer controls the use of the clutch and the shifting of the gear. This is the system used in the Ferrari 360 and the BMW M3. The system is also used in Formula 1 cars (where it is typically called a semi-automatic transmission). The gear shifts are faster than any human can possibly do. Race drivers love it because you can't miss gears. In passenger cars, there is typically an automatic mode, where the gears are shifted automatically.

In summary, if a system uses a clutch, it is a manual. If it uses a torque converter, it is an automatic. That is how you can tell the difference, and not by the presence of buttons on the steering wheel.

As for the cars you discuss, the TL has a "Tiptronic" style shifter, but is an automatic, as are the Porsche and Audi systems you discuss.

What does this have to do with the RX-8? The RX-8 will have a manual and an automatic, but the automatic will have Tiptronic style shifting available. It appears that there are rumors of an SMT style gearbox, but it hasn't been confirmed.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 04:38 PM
  #58  
Cylo's Avatar
'04 RX-8 GT Silver R/B
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
From when the RX-8 was still in concept stage:
"The transmission is a true 6-speed clutch style manual transmission. Its wing shifter system merely throws the shift lever and actuates the clutch must faster than humans can do it. The automatic option on the center console just allows a computer to send the same shift signal to the transmission that the wing shifters would have if you flipped them manually. The transmission shift system should be famial to Drag Racers and also Ferrari enthusiasts. "

source: rotarynews.com

From what I have read elsewhere, this shift system was NOT implemented.

Last edited by Cylo; Feb 21, 2003 at 04:40 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 04:39 PM
  #59  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Originally posted by pelucidor
An uncharacteristic mistake on Wakeech's part saying that all 5 speed autos are SMT. Tut, tut
:p like i said, as far as i knew... i've never seen or had explained to me how a 5 or 6 speed slush box works, until Mike linked me (but that was hardly enough for me i want to know more!!)
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2003 | 06:53 AM
  #60  
JeffNY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Wynantskill, NY
Thanks for the additional input guys. It was my understanding Mazda had decided to NOT offer the auto-manual ("Tiptronic") initially. That's why I asked. But I guess they will.

>>IMO, they are a useless gimmick.<<

Gus, well, maybe my TL tranny is a "usless gimmick" (for racing 300+ HP cars)...but it can still be fun Sorta like a Pet Rock I guess. Sometimes usless gimmicks help sell things. And my usless gimmick can still blow the doors off 90% of the cars out there LOL!

I always wondered why car makers never really pursued SMTs more. They are similar to the (simpler) sequental gear boxes on motorcycles. They would seem to be so much less complicated (and smaller and lighter) and cheaper to make than a hydraulic tranny. Maybe because the electronics now available weren't ready for such applications 10 or 20 years ago?

Jeff
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2003 | 02:01 PM
  #61  
gusmahler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by JeffNY
Thanks for the additional input guys. It was my understanding Mazda had decided to NOT offer the auto-manual ("Tiptronic") initially. That's why I asked. But I guess they will.

>>IMO, they are a useless gimmick.<<

Gus, well, maybe my TL tranny is a "usless gimmick" (for racing 300+ HP cars)...but it can still be fun Sorta like a Pet Rock I guess. Sometimes usless gimmicks help sell things. And my usless gimmick can still blow the doors off 90% of the cars out there LOL!

OK, useless was probably a bit harsh. For pure acceleration, a Tiptronic style automatic is useless. When you floor a car with an auto, it will shift at the redline anyway, so "manually" doing so adds no performance. If you are in a highway passing situation, flooring an automatic will will put the car in an optimum gear already. No need for a Tiptronic.

It probably helps on twisty roads, though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quato_jr
New Member Forum
4
Aug 4, 2015 09:22 AM
ShadowGryphon
New Member Forum
0
Jul 29, 2015 05:40 PM
marc2820
New Member Forum
6
Jul 26, 2015 10:47 PM
Bamaham
New Member Forum
2
Jul 23, 2015 08:08 AM
Thechosen1
New Member Forum
12
Jul 22, 2015 11:17 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.