Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Automatic RX8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-19-2009, 05:26 PM
  #101  
I'll snap his neck.
 
mdw1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EVOLV-Chicago
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Easy_E1
What inability to shift? Sometimes 2nd to 3rd spins up between actual shift. But 9 out of 10 times, not.
I was on the track doing over 90+ in second down the straight away and all the shifts to 3rd worked flawlessly.
I've had it raised about a year now.
I thought Phil had problems with shifting when he raised his redline.

Did you do anything besides the BHR radiator to help the trans handle the increased stress?
mdw1000 is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 05:43 PM
  #102  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Red Rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manuals can be more fun. They're more involved and you get more "wow" factor I suppose. Autos are great for cruising though. I'm 20 years old and have times where I don't really want to row through the gears. Imagine in another 10 years. It sounds like Easy E1 has a sick auto. The market is full of used auto RX8's begging to be sold for dirt cheap. The money you save you could easily dump back into the RX8 with Easy's mods (neither dangerous nor expensive) and be just as fast (with faster shifts) than a 6 port manual RX8. No biggy. Get what you want. Don't be worried about what everyone else thinks. Not much advice to be had in this area, just comes down to preference. Drive them around. This isn't a drag car, so while the manual RX8's may pick on you they're still SOL if a Mustang GT lines up against them. And again, a 4 port auto rigged to 9K RPM while gulping down a 75 shot?

Daaayum.
Red Rex is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 05:45 PM
  #103  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Red Rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh and BTW my old man's C5 LS1 vette has a 4-speed auto in it. It must be ***** slow too huh?
Red Rex is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 09:45 PM
  #104  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Easy_E1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellevue WA
Posts: 7,675
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mdw1000
I thought Phil had problems with shifting when he raised his redline.

Did you do anything besides the BHR radiator to help the trans handle the increased stress?
Phil I believe went a little higher on the rpm's that I did. I think Phil was also having the same issues as I.
2nd to 3rd shift after sustained high rpms can "slip" or just not catch right away and spin the rpm's to 10,000 easily. But as I said this doesn't happen all the time. Only under a certain set of drive circumstances.

Oh and I don't have the BHR radiator ,,, yet.
Easy_E1 is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 07:05 AM
  #105  
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
 
Phil's 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy_E1
Phil I believe went a little higher on the rpm's that I did. I think Phil was also having the same issues as I.
2nd to 3rd shift after sustained high rpms can "slip" or just not catch right away and spin the rpm's to 10,000 easily. But as I said this doesn't happen all the time. Only under a certain set of drive circumstances.

Oh and I don't have the BHR radiator ,,, yet.
I had my RPMs raised to 10,000. I find that currently at about 8700 to 9000 RPM is my "power curve" shift point and the tranny performs very well at that point. I had some issues before MM raised my redline limit to 10,000 rpm in the ecu. Yes I am having the same issue with the 2nd to 3rd shift after an extended period of high RPMs. At first I took it as a refusal to shift and since have realized it is another problem that needs to be addressed. This is under investigation by Easy and Ray (BHR). Yes I do have a BHR radiator.
Phil's 8 is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:43 AM
  #106  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
is the problem present with the 6 speed auto?
kersh4w is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:07 PM
  #107  
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
 
Phil's 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by kersh4w
is the problem present with the 6 speed auto?
Since mine is a four speed, others will have to help you here. The "problem" is an occasional thing and if you wait for the same period that it would take to manually shift it will correct itself and shift nicely. It's a nusance since it should happen on demand.
Phil's 8 is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:25 PM
  #108  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
don't take this as a sarcastic diss or anything, but I was under the impression that the AT's were equipped with a lower redline mainly because the automatic transmission can't safely deal with the flywheel/clutch input shafts revving to 9000 rpm.

If revving the at to 9000+ is fine for the transmission, then why did Mazda produce it with a 7500 redline?
Are these issues related to over revving the at transmission?

Again, not a diss, just a legitimate question.
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:32 PM
  #109  
wipe me down
iTrader: (1)
 
exsequor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From my understanding it's because of transmission cooling issues and the torque converter. That's why we're limited to 7.5k stock.
exsequor is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:36 PM
  #110  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by renesisgenesis
don't take this as a sarcastic diss or anything, but I was under the impression that the AT's were equipped with a lower redline mainly because the automatic transmission can't safely deal with the flywheel/clutch input shafts revving to 9000 rpm.
I think the word you are looking for is Torque Converter.

Originally Posted by renesisgenesis
If revving the at to 9000+ is fine for the transmission, then why did Mazda produce it with a 7500 redline?
Are these issues related to over revving the at transmission?

Again, not a diss, just a legitimate question.
It is most likely set at 7500 for a safety margin. When you go above that you have to know you may be taking some risk at damage. If you are performing mods to your car, you are willing to accept some risk. It is up to you to decide just how far you go.
alnielsen is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:38 PM
  #111  
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Rootski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the "SHOULD I BUY AN AUTOMATIC RX8 QUIZ"

Question 1:

Can I drive a manual?

If NO, buy an AUTOMATIC.

If YES, go to question 2.

Question 2:

Will my significant other who cannot drive a manual cease sleeping with me if I buy one?

If YES, buy an AUTOMATIC.

If NO, buy a MANUAL.

Now, is there really a need for these threads?
Rootski is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:43 PM
  #112  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rootski
the "SHOULD I BUY AN AUTOMATIC RX8 QUIZ"

Question 1:

Can I drive a manual?

If NO, buy an AUTOMATIC.

If YES, go to question 2.

Question 2:

Will my significant other who cannot drive a manual cease sleeping with me if I buy one?

If YES, buy an AUTOMATIC.



If NO, buy a MANUAL.

Now, is there really a need for these threads?

haha yes
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:45 PM
  #113  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by renesisgenesis
don't take this as a sarcastic diss or anything, but I was under the impression that the AT's were equipped with a lower redline mainly because the automatic transmission can't safely deal with the flywheel/clutch input shafts revving to 9000 rpm.

If revving the at to 9000+ is fine for the transmission, then why did Mazda produce it with a 7500 redline?
Are these issues related to over revving the at transmission?

Again, not a diss, just a legitimate question.

haha wow obviously I was not thinking considering auto's don't have a clutch...but ya still the same question really.


I guess I just naturally found it hard to get my brain around a sports car with no actual clutch mechanism. weird....
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:45 PM
  #114  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by Rootski
the "SHOULD I BUY AN AUTOMATIC RX8 QUIZ"...

Actually, this thread was getting along well by this point, with people discussing the differences civily. Please help keep it that way.

There are other reasons for automatics, such as injuries, sicknesses, or disabilities that prevent use of hip muscles or the left leg, ankle, foot, etc... My wife for example, loves MT and hates AT, but can no longer drive MT because of hip problems. Then you have people like the guy in a wheel chair at Skip Barber's free day at Lime Rock 2 weeks ago. He was gleefully hopping in the AT Mazda3s for the autocross course.

There are completely valid reasons to get a world class handling car as an automatic, and their choices should be respected.
RIWWP is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 12:51 PM
  #115  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
My wife used to drive and autocross cars with MT's. She doesn't want to put up with a clutch in traffic.
alnielsen is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:07 PM
  #116  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Actually, this thread was getting along well by this point, with people discussing the differences civily. Please help keep it that way.

There are other reasons for automatics, such as injuries, sicknesses, or disabilities that prevent use of hip muscles or the left leg, ankle, foot, etc... My wife for example, loves MT and hates AT, but can no longer drive MT because of hip problems. Then you have people like the guy in a wheel chair at Skip Barber's free day at Lime Rock 2 weeks ago. He was gleefully hopping in the AT Mazda3s for the autocross course.

There are completely valid reasons to get a world class handling car as an automatic, and their choices should be respected.

only problem is that i think most of the at owners here did not get theirs based on the "valid reasons" you have mentioned.


Probly the number one reason is something like this: "well hey thats a cool car, and yeah it's an automatic but I don't really care about shifting, and it's cheaper so I can modify it anyway.." Or something to this effect.



still a poor choice though, and i still like the "do you need an auto' selt test. It actually covers all bases pretty nicely.

Last edited by renesisgenesis; 04-20-2009 at 01:09 PM.
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:10 PM
  #117  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by renesisgenesis
only problem is that i think most of the at owners here did not get theirs based on the "valid reasons" you have mentioned.

Probly the number one reason is something like this: "well hey thats a cool car, and yeah it's an automatic but I don't really care about shifting, and it's cheaper so I can modify it anyway.." Or something to this effect.

still a poor choice though, and i still like the "do you need an auto' selt test.
Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. It's still their car, their choice. Different people value different aspects of a car differently. They didn't force their choice on you, no need to look down on them for it. It's not like they are driving riced out Civics.

And Mazda did make them. Would prefer all of the AT's to be crushed? I wouldn't. Still a great car.
RIWWP is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:15 PM
  #118  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. It's still their car, their choice. Different people value different aspects of a car differently. They didn't force their choice on you, no need to look down on them for it. It's not like they are driving riced out Civics.

And Mazda did make them. Would prefer all of the AT's to be crushed? I wouldn't. Still a great car.


Yes, sadly, Mazda did make them. Almost a sad as, but quite as sad, as when Honda made the automatic NSX.....yuuukkkk
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:20 PM
  #119  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Easy_E1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellevue WA
Posts: 7,675
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Why don't you guy's quit beating a dead horse.
We have AT's We like the AT. And we're going to mod the AT. I have a ball driving my AT.
I have a great time whipping my friends on the Autocross course with their manual 8's. I just leave it in first and drive. Throttle modulation at it''s best.
Easy_E1 is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:28 PM
  #120  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
There are going to be noobs that come on here with a strong MT bias. If you don't work with them you aren't going to correct that and they will begin the bashing.
alnielsen is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:33 PM
  #121  
Registered
 
Soaring Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlemont, MA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. It's still their car, their choice. Different people value different aspects of a car differently. They didn't force their choice on you, no need to look down on them for it. It's not like they are driving riced out Civics.

And Mazda did make them. Would prefer all of the AT's to be crushed? I wouldn't. Still a great car.
I agree with RIWWP. I don't think anybody should assume the reasons someone buys an AT. I've been driving for 50 years, and nearly all of my cars were MT's. But when I decided to buy my latest, I made a decision that at this point I "didn't need" a MT to satisfy my fun factor, or "cool" factor, or whatever reason people want an MT. And for me, the power was adequate. Commuting to work in traffic with an MT can get old after awhile, and now I can relax in my drive, and if I do feel like shifting, I can! I do not miss the MT!
Soaring Eagle is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:40 PM
  #122  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
post deleted. alnielsen

Last edited by alnielsen; 04-20-2009 at 01:44 PM.
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 02:13 PM
  #123  
Zoom-Freakin-Zoom!
iTrader: (2)
 
RxMadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by renesisgenesis
still a poor choice though, and i still like the "do you need an auto' selt test. It actually covers all bases pretty nicely.
Here's the "should you care" self-test:
Are you paying for it?
no: stop whining about my "poor choice", while I enjoy my car.
yes: continue to be a judgemental and *****-hurt, while I enjoy my car.

This bickering is really quite ridiculous, your transmission choice is an option just like a sunroof or nav, and like every other option available on the car it boils down to personal preference. Why do you care what other people choose when it doesn't affect you in any way? I for one love my 6 speed auto.
RxMadness is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 02:26 PM
  #124  
mod edit
 
renesisgenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RxMadness
Here's the "should you care" self-test:
Are you paying for it?
no: stop whining about my "poor choice", while I enjoy my car.
yes: continue to be a judgemental and *****-hurt, while I enjoy my car.

This bickering is really quite ridiculous, your transmission choice is an option just like a sunroof or nav, and like every other option available on the car it boils down to personal preference. Why do you care what other people choose when it doesn't affect you in any way? I for one love my 6 speed auto.


1. the transmission choice isn't so much an option like a sunroof or Nav, but more like a fundamental aspect of a car. Selecting auto or manual is absolutely critical, and comparing it to a sunroof is completely ludicrous.

2. Don't worry about personally insulting me with the "***** hurt" comment. You probably won't be reprimanded, since you own an AT.

3. This is a thread titled "automatic rx8", so any comments regarding the auto should be welcome here....even if they are...oh dear brace yourself....NEGATIVE!!!
renesisgenesis is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 02:43 PM
  #125  
Turbo
 
RXheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Renesis, you seem to hate automatics with a passion. Why spend your time hating something that much? We need to stop this RX-8 on RX-8 violence.
RXheart is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Automatic RX8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.