anyone live in the bay area and have get together's would really love to come
#1
anyone live in the bay area and have get together's would really love to come
where is a meeting in the bay area and do u guys go to tracks pls let me know if anyone wants to start meeting every month or something.
#3
hukbong himpapawid
#11
Klingon Grammarian
Originally Posted by NoTears316
prove it
Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step.
Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new.
Q.E.D.
#14
Shock and Awe
Originally Posted by Krankor
Alright.
Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step.
Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new.
Q.E.D.
Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step.
Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new.
Q.E.D.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yankeepicker
Series I Trouble Shooting
3
09-11-2015 05:42 PM