RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   RX-8 Discussion (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/)
-   -   anyone live in the bay area and have get together's would really love to come (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/anyone-live-bay-area-have-get-togethers-would-really-love-come-112976/)

sunshineRX8 03-30-2007 09:40 PM

anyone live in the bay area and have get together's would really love to come
 
:) where is a meeting in the bay area and do u guys go to tracks pls let me know if anyone wants to start meeting every month or something.

Krankor 03-30-2007 10:11 PM

This belongs in the appropriate regional forum.

d j 03-30-2007 10:43 PM

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...12#post1806712

NoTears316 03-30-2007 10:51 PM

Dude, the meeting is IN the bay... really... drive on in...

CarAndDriver 03-30-2007 11:09 PM

U really dont search well do u.

sunshineRX8 03-31-2007 11:58 PM

sorry guys new to these forums.

d j 04-01-2007 01:16 AM


Originally Posted by NoTears316
Dude, the meeting is IN the bay... really... drive on in...

good job!

NoTears316 04-01-2007 02:15 AM


Originally Posted by d j
good job!

thanks

Krankor 04-01-2007 03:42 AM


Originally Posted by sunshineRX8
sorry guys new to these forums.

No problem. We were all new once. Though too many refuse to acknowledge that.

NoTears316 04-01-2007 10:10 AM


Originally Posted by Krankor
We were all new once.

prove it

Krankor 04-01-2007 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by NoTears316
prove it

Alright.

Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step.

Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new.

Q.E.D.

N rider89 04-01-2007 04:40 PM

@.@

CarAndDriver 04-01-2007 10:52 PM

Check the West Forum and the OP is an idiot.

NoTears316 04-01-2007 11:32 PM


Originally Posted by Krankor
Alright.

Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step.

Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new.

Q.E.D.

meh

Krankor 04-02-2007 12:41 AM


Originally Posted by NoTears316
meh

Oh I'm so crushed not to have impressed you. :rolleyes:

NoTears316 04-02-2007 08:23 AM


Originally Posted by Krankor
Oh I'm so crushed not to have impressed you. :rolleyes:

meh

SDRX8CHICK 04-02-2007 02:18 PM

lol

N rider89 04-02-2007 06:27 PM


Originally Posted by NoTears316
meh

good job

d j 04-02-2007 06:58 PM

Lol^^^

NoTears316 04-03-2007 08:19 AM

good job^^^

d j 04-03-2007 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by NoTears316
good job^^^


Thanks!

NoTears316 04-03-2007 11:45 PM

you're welcome


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands