anyone live in the bay area and have get together's would really love to come
:) where is a meeting in the bay area and do u guys go to tracks pls let me know if anyone wants to start meeting every month or something.
|
This belongs in the appropriate regional forum.
|
|
Dude, the meeting is IN the bay... really... drive on in...
|
U really dont search well do u.
|
sorry guys new to these forums.
|
Originally Posted by NoTears316
Dude, the meeting is IN the bay... really... drive on in...
|
Originally Posted by d j
good job!
|
Originally Posted by sunshineRX8
sorry guys new to these forums.
|
Originally Posted by Krankor
We were all new once.
|
Originally Posted by NoTears316
prove it
Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step. Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new. Q.E.D. |
@.@
|
Check the West Forum and the OP is an idiot.
|
Originally Posted by Krankor
Alright.
Nothing has ever been demonstrated to be eternal. Therefore, rx8club.com is not eternal. Therefore, it had a beginning. At that beginning, it was, by definition, new. As a new board, it, by definition, had no posts in it. By empirical evidence, it has posts in it today. Therefore, at some point, somebody added the first post to it. Because it was the first post in a new board, the post was, by definition, new. Because the poster was making the first post in a new board, he was, by definition, new. So we have a base step. Now the inductive step: Given that poster N was once new, we show that poster N+1 was once new. By definition, N+1's first post came chronologically after N was already participating in the board. Axiomatically, when someone posts their first post on rx8club, all people already participating necessarily post back some variant of "Search, noob!" or "Good job." Therefore, when N+1's first post appears, N will post "Search noob!" or "Good job." Which irrefutably demonstrates that N+1 is a noob, at that moment in time. Which means that, thereafter, even after N+1 posts something about pie, it remains true that N+1 was once new. Q.E.D. |
Originally Posted by NoTears316
meh
|
Originally Posted by Krankor
Oh I'm so crushed not to have impressed you. :rolleyes:
|
lol
|
Originally Posted by NoTears316
meh
|
Lol^^^
|
good job^^^
|
Originally Posted by NoTears316
good job^^^
Thanks! |
you're welcome
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands