I have looked at many logs posted by people bragging about their MAF numbers only to quickly recognize they jacked the curve up. If I have the log less the volt readings it is easy to pick up by just looking at the acceleration data.
The MAF diameter is a different story. I know what Nem has so it's not a factor. My point was that you can make 4.06V MAF reading display 300 g/s or 150 g/s all else being equal so that displayed figure is not really relevant to me. You can do the same thing with the volt output by running a non-factory MAF diameter, but again what's the point of having impressive numbers if the car is obviously not living up to them? . |
Originally Posted by dannobre
(Post 4324104)
If you read between the lines there is always information there...just have to filter the delivery ;)
As for the other thing....Dude...gotta work on the self esteem...who cares what anyone thinks :)
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
(Post 4324111)
I have looked at many logs posted by people bragging about their MAF numbers only to quickly recognize they jacked the curve up. If I have the log less the volt readings it is easy to pick up by just looking at the acceleration data.
The MAF diameter is a different story. I know what Nem has so it's not a factor. My point was that you can make 4.06V MAF reading display 300 g/s or 150 g/s all else being equal so that displayed figure is not really relevant to me. You can do the same thing with the volt output by running a non-factory MAF diameter, but again what's the point of having impressive numbers if the car is obviously not living up to them? . |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands