Using Laquer Thinner To Fix Cat
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Using Laquer Thinner To Fix Cat
Hello everyone,
I am here in the Cayman Islands with 2 beloved family RX-8's and I have been a loyal reader of these forums.
This site has helped me greatly and was wondering about a popular YouTube mechanic Scotty Kilmer who suggests to use 1 gallon of lacquer thinner in half a tank of gas to help clear up catalytic converters.
Has anyone ever tried this on an RX8 and could it be harmful to the rotary engine? Having an issue with my cat that it is still detecting errors from brand new O2 sensors. I don't know if the new sensors are working or that the cat is clogged. The car is a 2004 automatic with 80k kilometers. Car is in fine working order and everything works superb except for this one thing.
I'm tempted to try this method but am unsure if it will damage anything by attempting it. It is petroleum based so it should burn through fine with premium gas. Should I go for it?
I am here in the Cayman Islands with 2 beloved family RX-8's and I have been a loyal reader of these forums.
This site has helped me greatly and was wondering about a popular YouTube mechanic Scotty Kilmer who suggests to use 1 gallon of lacquer thinner in half a tank of gas to help clear up catalytic converters.
Has anyone ever tried this on an RX8 and could it be harmful to the rotary engine? Having an issue with my cat that it is still detecting errors from brand new O2 sensors. I don't know if the new sensors are working or that the cat is clogged. The car is a 2004 automatic with 80k kilometers. Car is in fine working order and everything works superb except for this one thing.
I'm tempted to try this method but am unsure if it will damage anything by attempting it. It is petroleum based so it should burn through fine with premium gas. Should I go for it?
#2
Registered
iTrader: (1)
You're welcome to try to discover for yourself. I'm more than a little skeptical. Here's the thing: RX8 cats often fail structurally. Thinner isn't going to put it back together. If you do try it, report back.
So I would take the cat down, examine it and go from there. P0420 is pretty conclusively the cat, and not the sensor, and you've already replaced the sensor, so it might be time to face the music. Cats die due to failing ignition, and it's often the first symptom of failing ignition coils, so get that checked out also.
So I would take the cat down, examine it and go from there. P0420 is pretty conclusively the cat, and not the sensor, and you've already replaced the sensor, so it might be time to face the music. Cats die due to failing ignition, and it's often the first symptom of failing ignition coils, so get that checked out also.
#3
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
a big pry bar will fix your cat, save you money, engine health, and gain power all for free
#4
Smoking turbo yay
If you suspect a blockage in the cat, take it off and inspect it physically.
It likely has melted or damaged otherwise if it's throwing a code.
And like mentioned, change your ignition components if the history is not known.
It likely has melted or damaged otherwise if it's throwing a code.
And like mentioned, change your ignition components if the history is not known.
#5
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
when in doubt smash it out. cats are only good for chinese food and baiting coyotes
#6
Smoking turbo yay
It's all fun and games with popping flames until the smell gets lame.
Also, you gotta have something on hand for places with inspections.
Also, you gotta have something on hand for places with inspections.
#7
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
#8
What am I doing here?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes
on
510 Posts
Adding additional flammable hydrocarbons to a flammable hydrocarbon is not going to do much in the exhaust stream.
Assuming any of the laquer thinner makes it to the cat uncombusted, whether it does anything will depend on the cause of the problem. If your cat is clogged because the matrix is mechanically failing (disintegrating, melting, etc) then it's not going to help (and may even accelerate the failure process). In theory, it could help if the cat is just coked up with ash but I really doubt it.
Assuming any of the laquer thinner makes it to the cat uncombusted, whether it does anything will depend on the cause of the problem. If your cat is clogged because the matrix is mechanically failing (disintegrating, melting, etc) then it's not going to help (and may even accelerate the failure process). In theory, it could help if the cat is just coked up with ash but I really doubt it.
#9
Registered
#11
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
seriously i hate those ********
#12
Smoking turbo yay
Ignorance is bliss.
#13
Registered
Thread Starter
Just an update. Turned out to actually be a fault in the brand new O2 sensors so have to get a new set shipped back for me (Sigh... another $300...). The cat is actually in great condition surprisingly my mechanic referred it as one of the best cats hes seen on a used RX8. So, not gonna try it but if someone does, I would like to know how it goes because I am premixing in the other RX8 (Only 4oz per 10 gallon fillup because still has Cat). If it ever became clogged would like to know if it works. Thanks for the help everyone!
Last edited by CaymanRotary; 09-21-2018 at 09:18 AM. Reason: typo
#14
Registered
iTrader: (1)
That doesn't super add up. What is the actual error code you're seeing, and why do BOTH sensors need to be replaced? One of them is before the cat and has nothing to do with most cat codes.
On top of that, if replacing the O2 sensors didn't fix the problem, I would bet dollars to donuts that the O2 sensors are not the problem.
Further, is it possible what's actually failing are your ignition coils and you're getting an emissions code because you're not burning most of the fuel?
"One of the best cats" is a very strange statement. It's like saying "one of the best frying pans". It's fine and looks fine, until it's not. There is nothing to indicate that it's in exceptionally good shape, unless the ones he's comparing to are destroyed.
On top of that, if replacing the O2 sensors didn't fix the problem, I would bet dollars to donuts that the O2 sensors are not the problem.
Further, is it possible what's actually failing are your ignition coils and you're getting an emissions code because you're not burning most of the fuel?
"One of the best cats" is a very strange statement. It's like saying "one of the best frying pans". It's fine and looks fine, until it's not. There is nothing to indicate that it's in exceptionally good shape, unless the ones he's comparing to are destroyed.
Last edited by Loki; 09-21-2018 at 10:54 AM.
The following users liked this post:
CaymanRotary (09-21-2018)
#15
Smoking turbo yay
Another thing worth asking then: is it an OEM cat in there?
OEM looks like this:
Rust on the outside is normal, but the shape should be the same.
OEM looks like this:
Rust on the outside is normal, but the shape should be the same.
#16
Registered
Thread Starter
Loki,
"That doesn't super add up. What is the actual error code you're seeing, and why do BOTH sensors need to be replaced? One of them is before the cat and has nothing to do with most cat codes."
The O2 Sensors I had tested and they came back with bad readings. The code shows an error in both Bank 1 and 2 and both sensors when tested were throwing unusual readings.
"Further, is it possible what's actually failing are your ignition coils and you're getting an emissions code because you're not burning most of the fuel?"
Impossible, compression is bang on after they were replaced 3 months ago (replaced coils, spark plugs and wires) and the car freely revs to redline and provides as much power as it should be providing. Car fuel milage bang on 17 MPG (city) and no codes for any ignition problems just a code for Bank 1 and 2 Sensors.
"One of the best cats" is a very strange statement. It's like saying "one of the best frying pans". It's fine and looks fine, until it's not. There is nothing to indicate that it's in exceptionally good shape, unless the ones he's comparing to are destroyed."
I think he meant just physical condition. Not a speck of rust or even a scratch. Cat looks like it just rolled out of the factory from Mazda. Yes it is OEM.
"That doesn't super add up. What is the actual error code you're seeing, and why do BOTH sensors need to be replaced? One of them is before the cat and has nothing to do with most cat codes."
The O2 Sensors I had tested and they came back with bad readings. The code shows an error in both Bank 1 and 2 and both sensors when tested were throwing unusual readings.
"Further, is it possible what's actually failing are your ignition coils and you're getting an emissions code because you're not burning most of the fuel?"
Impossible, compression is bang on after they were replaced 3 months ago (replaced coils, spark plugs and wires) and the car freely revs to redline and provides as much power as it should be providing. Car fuel milage bang on 17 MPG (city) and no codes for any ignition problems just a code for Bank 1 and 2 Sensors.
"One of the best cats" is a very strange statement. It's like saying "one of the best frying pans". It's fine and looks fine, until it's not. There is nothing to indicate that it's in exceptionally good shape, unless the ones he's comparing to are destroyed."
I think he meant just physical condition. Not a speck of rust or even a scratch. Cat looks like it just rolled out of the factory from Mazda. Yes it is OEM.
#17
Registered
Thread Starter
@Loki,
"That doesn't super add up. What is the actual error code you're seeing, and why do BOTH sensors need to be replaced? One of them is before the cat and has nothing to do with most cat codes."
The O2 Sensors I had tested and they came back with bad readings. The code shows an error in both Bank 1 and 2 and both sensors when tested were throwing unusual readings.
"Further, is it possible what's actually failing are your ignition coils and you're getting an emissions code because you're not burning most of the fuel?"
Impossible, compression is bang on after they were replaced 3 months ago (replaced coils, spark plugs and wires) and the car freely revs to redline and provides as much power as it should be providing. Car fuel milage bang on 17 MPG (city) and no codes for any ignition problems just a code for Bank 1 and 2 Sensors.
"One of the best cats" is a very strange statement. It's like saying "one of the best frying pans". It's fine and looks fine, until it's not. There is nothing to indicate that it's in exceptionally good shape, unless the ones he's comparing to are destroyed."
I think he meant just physical condition. Not a speck of rust or even a scratch. Cat looks like it just rolled out of the factory from Mazda. @UnknownjinX Yes it is OEM.
"That doesn't super add up. What is the actual error code you're seeing, and why do BOTH sensors need to be replaced? One of them is before the cat and has nothing to do with most cat codes."
The O2 Sensors I had tested and they came back with bad readings. The code shows an error in both Bank 1 and 2 and both sensors when tested were throwing unusual readings.
"Further, is it possible what's actually failing are your ignition coils and you're getting an emissions code because you're not burning most of the fuel?"
Impossible, compression is bang on after they were replaced 3 months ago (replaced coils, spark plugs and wires) and the car freely revs to redline and provides as much power as it should be providing. Car fuel milage bang on 17 MPG (city) and no codes for any ignition problems just a code for Bank 1 and 2 Sensors.
"One of the best cats" is a very strange statement. It's like saying "one of the best frying pans". It's fine and looks fine, until it's not. There is nothing to indicate that it's in exceptionally good shape, unless the ones he's comparing to are destroyed."
I think he meant just physical condition. Not a speck of rust or even a scratch. Cat looks like it just rolled out of the factory from Mazda. @UnknownjinX Yes it is OEM.
#18
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Alright... I'm not convinced because there isn't really a bench test for O2 sensors (outside of a manufacturer's lab). I don't see how they could be tested. If they're showing irregular readings, it's possible the readings actually are irregular. And the odds that both of the old ones and both of the new ones are bad are pretty miniscule. More likely something common to both those sensors is causing this.
Can you share what the actual code is/are?
About the cat... he inspected the inside of it, right? Right?
Can you share what the actual code is/are?
About the cat... he inspected the inside of it, right? Right?
#19
Registered
Thread Starter
Alright... I'm not convinced because there isn't really a bench test for O2 sensors (outside of a manufacturer's lab). I don't see how they could be tested. If they're showing irregular readings, it's possible the readings actually are irregular. And the odds that both of the old ones and both of the new ones are bad are pretty miniscule. More likely something common to both those sensors is causing this.
Can you share what the actual code is/are?
About the cat... he inspected the inside of it, right? Right?
Can you share what the actual code is/are?
About the cat... he inspected the inside of it, right? Right?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post