Notices
New Member Forum A place for new members to get their feet wet

Cumulative Gas Mileage (Gas MPG) Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #526  
Ledfoot's Avatar
...Hello again Officer...
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Thanks for the heads-up Go48! I haven't gotten through all the TSB reports yet, but I'm certainly trying. It's a lot easier learning about them here than when I had to go through the same deal with the S2000.... The reports for the first two model years of that car look like something a NASA computer might spit out... No joke!

Looking forward to my first brand new car!
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #527  
Go48's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 3
From: Fayetteville, PA
Originally Posted by Ledfoot
Thanks for the heads-up Go48! I haven't gotten through all the TSB reports yet, but I'm certainly trying. It's a lot easier learning about them here than when I had to go through the same deal with the S2000.... The reports for the first two model years of that car look like something a NASA computer might spit out... No joke!

Looking forward to my first brand new car!
You're certainly welcome. And when you do get the car, you might consider joining us at the Mazda Sportscar Club of Washington (www.mscw.com or maybe it's org). It's a great club with a variety of activities ranging from autocross to scenic tours to shows.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #528  
Ledfoot's Avatar
...Hello again Officer...
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Wow...checked out MSCW... I'll definitely join! Your next couple of meets are at Tysons....five minutes from my front door!
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #529  
Go48's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 3
From: Fayetteville, PA
Originally Posted by Ledfoot
Wow...checked out MSCW... I'll definitely join! Your next couple of meets are at Tysons....five minutes from my front door!
Yeah, that's why I suggested that you check them out. Unfortunately, I'm nearly 2 hours away from Tysons so I don't attend the meetings.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #530  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
I have a new 05 (8/05 build date) with about 400 miles on it. With 90% city driving I get about 12.5 mpg. Very poor, was expecting 15 to 17mpg. I have been doing a lot of reading and feel the most likely cause of some RX-8s that rate so poor could be as follows.

1) Thermostat: could cause trouble but I think it would be rare.
2) Catalytic converter clogged: Maybe but I would expect poor performance to go with it.
3) Engine Compression: Easy check and performance would suffer
4) Bad MAFs: This I feel holds real promise, I understand that the MAFs in the RX-8 can have a wide difference in voltage from car to car. If the air density is miss reported so would the gas delivery…true?

Has any one here with bad mpg ever switched their MAF with a RX-8 with good mileage to see the effect on both cars?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #531  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
ive seen 2 bad tstats and only one bad MAF. lots of dirty MAFs tho.. the voltage difference is highly overstated and not something to even bother about. we're talking a difference of .01v between some (not many) cars(less than a oily dirty MAF) which could be a result of inaccurate rpm readings. that will not translate into a huge mpg disparity.

what will is 1 car staying in open loop while others are in closed loop. this makes the car look at a table for its AFR and will keep the AFR in the 12s or 13s instead of hunting for 14.7 like it does in closed loop.

compression dropping may not be felt at all. might show in a dyno if you dyno often. but it could cause mpg losses well before its felt in performance.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:06 PM
  #532  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by zoom44
ive seen 2 bad tstats and only one bad MAF. lots of dirty MAFs tho.. the voltage difference is highly overstated and not something to even bother about. we're talking a difference of .01v between some (not many) cars(less than a oily dirty MAF) which could be a result of inaccurate rpm readings. that will not translate into a huge mpg disparity.

what will is 1 car staying in open loop while others are in closed loop. this makes the car look at a table for its AFR and will keep the AFR in the 12s or 13s instead of hunting for 14.7 like it does in closed loop.
What is the tstats?

I thought open and close loop transition was at a preset event (rmp/ throttle setting etc...) would not all cars transition the same. If not what controls the transition?

Also how dose the car determine what the accrual real time AFR is, I believe the 02 sensors tell the computer this. If this is the case could there be discrepancies between 02 sensors misreporting the AFR?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #533  
agoodcave's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Raptor,
How much time is spent sitting at lights/traffic. To improve your milage, take a long trek by freeway or better yet, back roads. I get 17-18 mpg in the city but its not a lot of sitting in traffic. What shocked me was country road mountain driving I got over 20mpg and never let the tach fall below 4K. Idling just sucks gas on this engine.

Mike
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #534  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Thermostat. when you start the engine the car stay in Open Loop until it is warmed up. It then switches to Closed Loop until the Load/RPM transition that is programmed into the PCM. If you have a bad T(hermo)stat then the PCM never goes into Closed Loop.

If there was an issue with your O2 sensor your PCM would tell you by lighting a CEL. It compares BOTH O2 sensors against other information to determine if they are working correctly.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #535  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
My city driving is suburban city driving. Drive for 2 to 5 blocks sit at a light for about 7 miles to work then back home another 7 miles. Chicago weather 32 lately. I’ll be doing a long Highway drive soon.

Zoom44,
What would be signs of a stuck t-stat? My car takes about 7 minutes to warm up but the inside of the car take over 15 minutes to start getting warm air. Is this normal? My temp gauge reads a notch below half way once warmed up.

What is your gut feeling as to the large discrepancy between cars?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 11:10 PM
  #536  
Cooder's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Raptor75
I have a new 05 (8/05 build date) with about 400 miles on it. With 90% city driving I get about 12.5 mpg. Very poor, was expecting 15 to 17mpg. I have been doing a lot of reading and feel the most likely cause of some RX-8s that rate so poor could be as follows.

1) Thermostat: could cause trouble but I think it would be rare.
2) Catalytic converter clogged: Maybe but I would expect poor performance to go with it.
3) Engine Compression: Easy check and performance would suffer
4) Bad MAFs: This I feel holds real promise, I understand that the MAFs in the RX-8 can have a wide difference in voltage from car to car. If the air density is miss reported so would the gas delivery…true?

Has any one here with bad mpg ever switched their MAF with a RX-8 with good mileage to see the effect on both cars?
Are you warming up the car in the mornings?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #537  
RX8PDX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: St. Helens, OR
Originally Posted by Cooder
Are you warming up the car in the mornings?
This I have noticed has been killing mine lately.

I can almost watch the needle go down as I sit there and shiver.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 08:38 AM
  #538  
Cooder's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Exactly, if it's "only" around 30 degrees F, don't bother warming up. Start it for 15 seconds and go, but go real light on the throttle until the car warms up in about 5 minutes.

Raptor, you said you were doing mostly city driving. That tells me you are doing many, many startups over a single tank (as opposed to doing one or a couple of startups for a long distance trip at least 300 miles). As I mentioned before, the more startups you do, the lower your mpg. This is a factor that no one else has really mentioned. In fact, mpg falls quickly over many startups, even if you don't warm up the car. Now imagine what it would do to someone who is warming his car during all those startups! Even 10 to 15 startups will bring you down real good. I bet you are doing at least twice as many for city driving over one tank of gas.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #539  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Cooder
Are you warming up the car in the mornings?
Only about a minute then driving below 4k till warmed up. Engine warms up in about 6-7 min.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #540  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Cooder
Raptor, you said you were doing mostly city driving. That tells me you are doing many, many startups over a single tank (as opposed to doing one or a couple of startups for a long distance trip at least 300 miles). As I mentioned before, the more startups you do, the lower your mpg. This is a factor that no one else has really mentioned. In fact, mpg falls quickly over many startups, even if you don't warm up the car. Now imagine what it would do to someone who is warming his car during all those startups! Even 10 to 15 startups will bring you down real good. I bet you are doing at least twice as many for city driving over one tank of gas.
I think you are right cooder but based on what I'm reading there are other who do similar driving and are getting much better mileage. I'm looking into setting up a mpg tracking web site that will go into far more detail on driving habits, temp, distances then is possible with the simple pole method here. I hope to get a clearer picture of the RX-8 gas consumption.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #541  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by Raptor75
Zoom44,
What would be signs of a stuck t-stat?
What is your gut feeling as to the large discrepancy between cars?
ONE IS BAD GAS MILEAGE

My gut feeling is the disparity is caused by 3 things-

1. amount of short trips. those trips around the block for lunch KILL mpg
2. short mileage/long time daily trips. going 7miles sounds short but if it takes 30 minuted thats alot of time not going anywhere. car gulps gas at idle
3. not shifting. people spend alot of time in 2nd and 3rd gear whenthey should be in 5th and 6th. you can be in 6th at 42mph. for fuel efficiencey you should be. thats why the shift points suggested in the owners manual are the way they are.

then there are the people who actually have a problem my gut on these is

1.bad Tstat
2.bad plugs
3. bad cat

warming and not moving for more than a minute is a waste of time and fuel
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:48 AM
  #542  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by Raptor75
I'm looking into setting up a mpg tracking web site that will go into far more detail on driving habits, temp, distances then is possible with the simple pole method here. I hope to get a clearer picture of the RX-8 gas consumption.
data gathering https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...ht=statistical


results

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...ht=statistical
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #543  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
This is just what I was looking for, There should be an area on this board that holds all this related info. A lot of what I was looking for I find exists but it is not always easily found on searches.

Thanks agian, you've been very helpful.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 01:14 PM
  #544  
Animagix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
mazda techs are driving my car around right now because i complained about poor gas mileage (13mpg) to see for themselves. =/

Not sure if anything could possibly done but, I've gotten those figures with fairly conservative driving all year round. =/
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #545  
willsrx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn/Roosevelt, LI/Rosedale, NY
I am averaging a little less than 10 mpg, I have less than 600 miles on my car and I am shifting before 3,750 rpms to try to conserve fuel. I hope the mileage gets better, I was hoping to get between 17-20 mpgs. I was getting that on my wrx that I traded in.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 07:00 PM
  #546  
zenmoused's Avatar
the stig is my hero
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: NC
Yeah I hear you guys. I'm at 2300 miles, and the best I've averaged has been 14 mpg. I have driven conservatively for a couple tanks, and have gotten no more than 200 miles before the empty light. I haven't done my inaugeral oil and tranny/diff fluid change yet, so perhaps that will help a little. I dunno, I keep hoping the saying about rotarys getting better as they age is true, but right now I'm filling up every couple days. Ouch.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #547  
zenmoused's Avatar
the stig is my hero
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: NC
Is there any kind of formal complaint customers can make to Mazda for their 18/24 estimates? I've spent two entire tanks on a 400 mile trip, with cruise control on, no a/c. I would say those estimates are a tad bogus.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 09:37 PM
  #548  
Animagix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
so my gas light came on after 200 miles of driving, I go fill it up and only managed to put in 12.8 gallons to fill it up... is the car that paranoid of the fuel tank despite having 3.1 gallons left? i should theoretically get 40-60 more miles of driving. would be nice to break 200 with all city driving without having the fear of running out of fuel so soon.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 07:43 AM
  #549  
willsrx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn/Roosevelt, LI/Rosedale, NY
my empty light went on at 195 then I could only get 13.25 gallons in, I guess there was about 2.65 gallons left. Anyway I tried 89 octane this fillup and I am at 122.5 at my half tank line. I am usually at 100 miles with premium, plus my tailpipes are not black. I did not really notice a change in performance when I got on it.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #550  
jammiman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 1
From: Orange County
Unhappy really bad mileage!

Ok,

I just filled up my tank this morning, and I got 114.5 miles on the last tank! If this is a 14 gallon tank, then I am getting 8.1 MPG! This is the lowest that I have seen on any thread? What should I do? Also, does downshifting or "engine braking" burn gas in a rotary? I can't see what I am doing wrong. The car has 32000 on it, and they are all city miles. I drive it moderately hard, but nothing crazy?! Whats up mazda? I love the car, but my Ram 3200 gets better mileage!
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.