Is You Other Vehicle a V-8?
03-18-2010, 09:13 PM
#26
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo? old Acura Vigor?
Datsun Z?
Datsun Z?
Last edited by RufusVonStorm; 03-18-2010 at 09:14 PM. Reason: Whoops I mean Vigor, not Legend
03-18-2010, 10:01 PM
#27
CCastlefly05
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Samammish
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My second out of three is a 2000 M5 gets about 19mpg in stop and go in the city and 23 on the highway on a good day. Its fast but its a saloon. The rx8 is much more fun....
03-18-2010, 11:54 PM
#28
It's a Cavalier
YaXMaNGTO
I don't know why you are confused, it was a simple question. I asked if anyone owned a V-8 as their other vehicle(s). I didn't specify what type, because I just wanted to know if RX-8 owners drive V-8's also. It really didn't matter if it was a domestic or foreign V-8. I guess the reason I'm asking is because RX-8 owners love their cars and it's a special type of car so I wanted to know if they would also own a V-8 vehicle. I just became curious because I own four other vehicles besides the RX-8, and they are all V-8's
I don't know why you are confused, it was a simple question. I asked if anyone owned a V-8 as their other vehicle(s). I didn't specify what type, because I just wanted to know if RX-8 owners drive V-8's also. It really didn't matter if it was a domestic or foreign V-8. I guess the reason I'm asking is because RX-8 owners love their cars and it's a special type of car so I wanted to know if they would also own a V-8 vehicle. I just became curious because I own four other vehicles besides the RX-8, and they are all V-8's
03-20-2010, 08:02 AM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rowlett, Tx
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 1980 Silverado stepside inline 6 w/ 3 on the tree. Has an *** ton of torque, but a different kind of fun to drive. Its my project thats past thrumy family but I've it the last 10 years just trying to keep it alive and away from the wife. Why can't they just leave our toys alone?
04-10-2010, 05:28 PM
#31
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I have always said I will never, ever buy a GM vehicle, but I have to admit the new camaro impresses me and I am considering it. This might only be due to the fact that I am used to driving my 8 but I test drove the V-6 Camaro and that thing felt pretty damn fast and even the handling was a ton better than I would have ever thought for a car that is on the heavy side. I would even argue the V-6 Camaro (25-30k) would be a much better value for what you get than opting for the V-8 which gets you close to 40k for the 2SS. Is it really worth almost 10k extra for an additional 100hp you can't even use in everyday driving? Pretty much the only other car I am considering is the 370z and around here they are a pain in the *** to find and I'm sure I will be irritated to no end with Nissans **** poor paint quality. If Im spending over 30k on a car I don't expect the whole front end to be chipped to hell after only a few months of ownership. You should see the complaints on the Nissan board about the paint quality. I've had my 8 for over 6 years and with the exception of a few dings on the front bumper and a couple of small chips on the hood the paint is pretty much flawless and I drive it year-round.
Last edited by 77mjd; 04-10-2010 at 05:33 PM.
04-10-2010, 10:14 PM
#32
It's a Cavalier
HELL YES it's worth the money!!!
If you don't stomp on it at least a couple of times during your commute, you're a little girly man. 422hp is NOT that much. You might be able to get to tires to snake around from a roll in first gear, but that's not enough power to vaporize them in second or third. It's just not going to happen. It's not... that... much... power.
You'll get that V6 and then get tired of it and want more. The Camaro is only really fun if you're in a power drift going sideways.
Get the SS... at least test drive it.
04-10-2010, 10:29 PM
#33
I used to own a 1977 f-250 with a 460 CID (7.5 L) 385 V8.
I think i got 3 mpg.
Probably why I never get phazed by the rx-8's thirst.
I will probably never own another V8
I have since owned a Ranger with a 2.3l turbo i4 out of a mustang, a 94 rx-7 R2, and a VW r32, and obviously the 8-Renesis. Still not sure what one I like more.
I think i got 3 mpg.
Probably why I never get phazed by the rx-8's thirst.
I will probably never own another V8
I have since owned a Ranger with a 2.3l turbo i4 out of a mustang, a 94 rx-7 R2, and a VW r32, and obviously the 8-Renesis. Still not sure what one I like more.
05-07-2010, 11:42 AM
#35
suck my smog
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Windsor, Califorina
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My other car is a 1967 mustang with a proline 347 stroker kit I get about 10-12mpg with it haven't been on the dyno with it but I should have around 400-450whp
05-07-2010, 12:08 PM
#36
This is my other car, it has a 502, 700R4:
as for how it compares, the vette has insane torque and the back end tries to pass the front end every time you nail the gas, even at speed. I've beefed the suspension up greatly, but the handling is no where near as good as the RX. the vette has no a/c, so between that and the side pipes when I drive it I arrive at my destination sweaty and smelling of exhaust. they are both great cars in their own way, but I think of the RX as the go cart I always wanted when I was a kid and more. It's comfortable, fun to drive, gets good mileage (compared to the vette) and I still smell good when I get where I'm going.
as for how it compares, the vette has insane torque and the back end tries to pass the front end every time you nail the gas, even at speed. I've beefed the suspension up greatly, but the handling is no where near as good as the RX. the vette has no a/c, so between that and the side pipes when I drive it I arrive at my destination sweaty and smelling of exhaust. they are both great cars in their own way, but I think of the RX as the go cart I always wanted when I was a kid and more. It's comfortable, fun to drive, gets good mileage (compared to the vette) and I still smell good when I get where I'm going.
05-07-2010, 12:33 PM
#37
Registered
Old muscle cars aside, I actually don't see why V8's still exist outside of the truck market. There is no justification for one anymore as power from small engines has really moved up. Turbo technology is really good now so a smaller boosted engine makes larger non boosted engines functionally obsolete. I have never owned a V8 and probably never will. I don't even buy a 6 cyl option over a 4 cyl.
05-07-2010, 01:34 PM
#39
^+1. Not diggin the hood, but other than that, great looking car.
I agree in essence with RG but, anytime an American muscle car comes out nowadays, if it doesn't have at least a V8 it's not a muscle car IMO. Other than that genre and trucks, a V6 or 4 cyl should be used.
It's like some people with the rotary, poor power for the cost and mpg the engine takes but offers high revs and unique sound. Is why a lot like the V8's, torque crazy that with a tc or sc will still overwhelm a smaller engine and the sound alone is a beast not to mention alike mpg as the rotary.. Different strokes for different folks
I agree in essence with RG but, anytime an American muscle car comes out nowadays, if it doesn't have at least a V8 it's not a muscle car IMO. Other than that genre and trucks, a V6 or 4 cyl should be used.
It's like some people with the rotary, poor power for the cost and mpg the engine takes but offers high revs and unique sound. Is why a lot like the V8's, torque crazy that with a tc or sc will still overwhelm a smaller engine and the sound alone is a beast not to mention alike mpg as the rotary.. Different strokes for different folks
05-07-2010, 02:19 PM
#40
1994 Caprice with Police Package (LT-1 and beefy suspension). Black with white roof and spot-light.
- It's got a Cop motor...cop tires...cop suspension...cop shocks
She's a beast with ridiculous street presence...I haven't the heart to let her go.
- It's got a Cop motor...cop tires...cop suspension...cop shocks
She's a beast with ridiculous street presence...I haven't the heart to let her go.
05-07-2010, 02:28 PM
#41
And I'll poke my head in here with the other old ford truck guys. 95 Bronco like in my sig. 176k miles on the original not rebuilt 351W. Its nice to be able to pretty much ignore weather reports in an Ohio winter. 4x4 + snow tires = never shoveling my driveway. Ever.
Last edited by Vyndictive; 05-07-2010 at 02:31 PM.
05-07-2010, 03:28 PM
#42
suck my smog
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Windsor, Califorina
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^+1. Not diggin the hood, but other than that, great looking car.
I agree in essence with RG but, anytime an American muscle car comes out nowadays, if it doesn't have at least a V8 it's not a muscle car IMO. Other than that genre and trucks, a V6 or 4 cyl should be used.
It's like some people with the rotary, poor power for the cost and mpg the engine takes but offers high revs and unique sound. Is why a lot like the V8's, torque crazy that with a tc or sc will still overwhelm a smaller engine and the sound alone is a beast not to mention alike mpg as the rotary.. Different strokes for different folks
I agree in essence with RG but, anytime an American muscle car comes out nowadays, if it doesn't have at least a V8 it's not a muscle car IMO. Other than that genre and trucks, a V6 or 4 cyl should be used.
It's like some people with the rotary, poor power for the cost and mpg the engine takes but offers high revs and unique sound. Is why a lot like the V8's, torque crazy that with a tc or sc will still overwhelm a smaller engine and the sound alone is a beast not to mention alike mpg as the rotary.. Different strokes for different folks
05-07-2010, 03:33 PM
#43
suck my smog
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Windsor, Califorina
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^+1. Not diggin the hood, but other than that, great looking car.
I agree in essence with RG but, anytime an American muscle car comes out nowadays, if it doesn't have at least a V8 it's not a muscle car IMO. Other than that genre and trucks, a V6 or 4 cyl should be used.
It's like some people with the rotary, poor power for the cost and mpg the engine takes but offers high revs and unique sound. Is why a lot like the V8's, torque crazy that with a tc or sc will still overwhelm a smaller engine and the sound alone is a beast not to mention alike mpg as the rotary.. Different strokes for different folks
I agree in essence with RG but, anytime an American muscle car comes out nowadays, if it doesn't have at least a V8 it's not a muscle car IMO. Other than that genre and trucks, a V6 or 4 cyl should be used.
It's like some people with the rotary, poor power for the cost and mpg the engine takes but offers high revs and unique sound. Is why a lot like the V8's, torque crazy that with a tc or sc will still overwhelm a smaller engine and the sound alone is a beast not to mention alike mpg as the rotary.. Different strokes for different folks
05-07-2010, 05:01 PM
#46
I haven't run the car at the track, but considering the traction issues with that much torque it wouldn't pull very good times on those tires, it's really just a play toy for me.
05-07-2010, 06:19 PM
#47
Low is a lifestyle
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 mercedes ML320 4.2L V8
2002 mercedes S500 6.0L V12
2004 Mazda RX8 1.3L 13B Renesis
besides that, its all good MPG cars such as (when i say good gas milage , i mean above 20 till 30MPG):
1986 Toyota corolla 1.3L E80 4door sedan
2003 Toyota Altis 1.6 E120
2003 Honda Accoard 3.0L V6 4 door sedan
2004 Produa Kenari 1.0 DOHC in-line-V3
2004 Mercedes C320 2.5L V6
2010 Toyota Camry 3.5L 2GR-FE V6
2002 mercedes S500 6.0L V12
2004 Mazda RX8 1.3L 13B Renesis
besides that, its all good MPG cars such as (when i say good gas milage , i mean above 20 till 30MPG):
1986 Toyota corolla 1.3L E80 4door sedan
2003 Toyota Altis 1.6 E120
2003 Honda Accoard 3.0L V6 4 door sedan
2004 Produa Kenari 1.0 DOHC in-line-V3
2004 Mercedes C320 2.5L V6
2010 Toyota Camry 3.5L 2GR-FE V6
05-08-2010, 07:52 AM
#50
It's not rebuild 'cause it's a Windsor, not a Cleveland block 
(I worked at Windsor Casting until it got closed down, and did much QC in Cleveland.)
Fate, all those trucks are huge, I loved my 460 in the mud, hated it on the highway (I had three on the tree).
(I worked at Windsor Casting until it got closed down, and did much QC in Cleveland.)Fate, all those trucks are huge, I loved my 460 in the mud, hated it on the highway (I had three on the tree).