Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Twin Turbo Mazda 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-13-2004, 11:00 PM
  #26  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
yeah see in this thread from 2002 we talk about the mps 6 and that it was green lighted. i have a link there which goes to an article with the quotes from the mazda folks about the awd. however the article is on wardsauto and is apparently in their subscribers only area. someone who is will have to log in and grab the story if they want to read it.
Old 07-14-2004, 02:24 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
T.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: No. VA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man...I love Mazda.
Old 07-14-2004, 08:21 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DonVito
6 Cylinder would be too much for Twin-Turbo for a car like the 6.

Anyways, STI and Evo have nothing on this car.
It's not all about power, it has to have the handling as well.
Old 07-14-2004, 08:29 AM
  #29  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by m477
Twin-turbo has got to be a typo here, perhaps they meant "twin-scroll turbocharger".

Also, using the 4-cyl makes sense not just because of the weight, but also because the Mazdaspeed 3 and Mazdaspeed NC Miata will most likely use the same engine (albeit in detuned versions). This way, Mazda can afford to engineer and test the crap out of the engine since the cost will be amoritized across several models.
A twin-turbo setup is useless for a 4-cylinder setup. This Mazda 6/Atenza is going to be pretty insane if and when they do sell it. I hope it doesn't turn out to be like the Accord Type R . Move over 4G63 :D!!
Old 07-14-2004, 08:31 AM
  #30  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Mazda 6 already has some upper-echelon handling. Hooray for independent suspensions!
Old 07-14-2004, 08:51 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Racer Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep nasty 4wd (too much weight) and give me RWD only!!
Old 07-14-2004, 09:30 AM
  #32  
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it looks pretty good, the 6-cylinder is already faster than the RX8.

Ok well not really, but it did run a faster street start (5-60 which is supposed to simulate general driving conditions unlike a 8k rpm clutch drop) than the RX8 did according to C&D.
Old 07-14-2004, 10:05 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shelleys_man_06
A twin-turbo setup is useless for a 4-cylinder setup. This Mazda 6/Atenza is going to be pretty insane if and when they do sell it. I hope it doesn't turn out to be like the Accord Type R . Move over 4G63 :D!!
A good sequential turbo setup could reduce lag. Something that's very apparrent on a 4 cyclinder.

I'd also hold off on the "move over 4g63" until we actually see this engine and what it's capable of. The 4g63 has been out for over 10 years and is still the king of hp/L.
Old 07-14-2004, 10:49 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shelleys_man_06
A twin-turbo setup is useless for a 4-cylinder setup. This Mazda 6/Atenza is going to be pretty insane if and when they do sell it. I hope it doesn't turn out to be like the Accord Type R . Move over 4G63 :D!!
4G64 is a 2.0 L not 2.3 L.

Last edited by Hanzo; 07-14-2004 at 10:52 AM.
Old 07-14-2004, 12:36 PM
  #35  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AbusiveWombat
A good sequential turbo setup could reduce lag. Something that's very apparrent on a 4 cyclinder.

I'd also hold off on the "move over 4g63" until we actually see this engine and what it's capable of. The 4g63 has been out for over 10 years and is still the king of hp/L.
First of all, I would be an idiot if I said the 4G63 was a 2.3 litre engine. Second of all, who cares about the horsepower-per-liter ratio? Seriously, it's a cry the Honda kids use to conceal the fact that their car is slow. The ratio is a subject of bench engineers and bench racers. I hate to sound like a [w]itch, but people, especially in the United States, think everything is power this and power that. Give it a rest. The Mitsubishi 4G63 is the king of turbocharged four-cylinder engines. I can't wait until MHI comes out with its 4G63 gasoline stratified charge direct injection motor. Hooray for ultra-lean combustion :D!
Old 07-14-2004, 12:39 PM
  #36  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After I made some observations, it seems that people enjoy flocking to threads that have the words, turbocharger, nitrous, supercharger, and of course Kari. But hey, don't be insulted, I'm always in these threads too :D.
Old 07-14-2004, 01:44 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shelleys_man_06
First of all, I would be an idiot if I said the 4G63 was a 2.3 litre engine. Second of all, who cares about the horsepower-per-liter ratio?
#1, I never quoted you as saying the 4g63 was a 2.3L...nore was that anywhere in my post.

#2, I only brought up hp/L because it's well known that the 4g63 can easily handle 400+ hp on stock internals and block. Delivering over 200+ hp/L....now we'll have to wait and see if this new 2.3L engine is as friendly before we talk about the 4g63 moving over.

Now don't take this the wrong way...I'm very pro MS Mazda6 but I'm also very hesitant on jumping for joy until it's actually here. Hell, if the MPS Mazda6 was out when I bought the EVO, there is a very good possibility that I'd have two Mazda 6's in the garage.
Old 07-14-2004, 02:12 PM
  #38  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry about that. I was quoting Hanzo for informing me that the 4G63 was a 2.0 liter engine. We're all friends here .
Old 07-14-2004, 02:24 PM
  #39  
Registered
 
ALMOST8IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vegas/Henderson - NV
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember reading in the automotive news a while back that Mazda licensed Nissan's four wheel drive technology for use in a version of the 6 that will compete with the STI and Evo. I remember the article because I thought it was strange that Mazda would go to Nissan for the system rather than relying on something from the Ford group. Anyone else remember reading this?
Old 07-14-2004, 03:10 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A system like the new G35 or Skyline would be amazing!

It's a bit off topic but I read in the latest Automobile Mag that Audi may be getting into this same segment with the AWD RS A3 (kinda like the VW R32) with 350 hp out of a 3.2L turbocharged V6. Should be an interested market in a few years.

Last edited by AbusiveWombat; 07-14-2004 at 03:15 PM.
Old 07-14-2004, 03:34 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ALMOST8IT
I remember reading in the automotive news a while back that Mazda licensed Nissan's four wheel drive technology for use in a version of the 6 that will compete with the STI and Evo. I remember the article because I thought it was strange that Mazda would go to Nissan for the system rather than relying on something from the Ford group. Anyone else remember reading this?

That would be strange because Nissan/Renault has no ties with Mazda at all.
Old 07-14-2004, 07:38 PM
  #42  
Your Member
 
Truss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$29,000 is optimistic. I'm betting it's closer to $32-33k. It will be interesting ot see how Mazda positions the RX-8 in light of the MS6. All this thinking about an electric turbo for the rotary might be spot-on. Add in the new Miata and MS versions of that and the 3 and suddenly Mazda is absolutely smoking the competition (with the possible exception of Subaru, whose new Legacy GT and STi are VERY nice cars). It's nice to see a Japanese car company that doesn't want to be Honda or Toyota.

T.
Old 07-14-2004, 08:28 PM
  #43  
USAF
 
doubleohsmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hurlburt Air Field FL, Richland WA, Spokane WA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is proof that Mazda is that A-10 pulling out of its huge performance nosedive. Its slowly coming, but when the bombs hit it will be awesome. Its all about gettin away from Ford. Remember Ford doesnt own Mazda, just has controlling interest/stock ownership. The 3, 6, and 8 are Mazda platforms, all new and all now ready for performance development. Those plats hopefully shouldnt be shared with Ford, while the MPV and Tribute, and maybe 2600 will be replaced down the road, hopefully they will be Ford free as well. Who would like to see some Mazda SUV's like the BMW x5, x3, or the Chevy Avalanche? And who would like to see FI 8 and/or 4th gen 7???
Old 07-14-2004, 08:39 PM
  #44  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
the 3 is on a platform developed in europe by - ahh damn i forget, i wanna say volvo but i know that isn't right. ike or someone will remember- but anyway it isn't a mazda paltform. and it will be shared with ford as the new platform for the focus. also i understand ford is developing several cars and possibly an suv on the 6 platform.
Old 07-14-2004, 08:43 PM
  #45  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
hell i was right- it's a volvo platform for the new s40
Old 07-14-2004, 09:29 PM
  #46  
USAF
 
doubleohsmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hurlburt Air Field FL, Richland WA, Spokane WA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oops, youre right. the plat the 3 uses was developed in part by ford europe division. i forgot cus i recalled that the one i test drove said 94% (or close to it) japanese made on the window sticker. i didnt think that any other cars out there were using that platform though...oh well thats too bad. but still, everything that mazda developes on its own helps mazda in the long run, not ford.
Old 07-14-2004, 09:36 PM
  #47  
Registered
 
cueball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the platform was developed by mazda and volvo with ford providing the money, so that is why the focus gets to use it.


Edit:

I just read Zoom44's link and realize what I said isn't exactly right.

Last edited by cueball; 07-14-2004 at 09:39 PM.
Old 07-14-2004, 10:13 PM
  #48  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
the Mazda3 chassis is shared with the new Volvo S40 and the 2005 EURO Focus
Old 07-15-2004, 09:25 AM
  #49  
Registered
 
ALMOST8IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vegas/Henderson - NV
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by doubleohsmurf
Its all about gettin away from Ford.
I don't think so since the 3, Volvo S40 and next Focus are all on the same platform. The 6, Lincoln Zephyr, and Ford Futura (or what ever Ford will name it) are all on a common platform. Rather than getting away from Ford, they seem to be integrating more with the Ford family.

Zephyr

Futura

Focus/S40

Ford Family Plan
Old 07-15-2004, 10:22 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Haris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, no way mazda will ever get away from ford. I dont see a good reason to do so either. Ford has alot of money for many projects that mazda has in mind. (cough*RX7*hopefully). So right now the only car on the market that's 100% made from mazda parts is miata. At least that's what they told me. Can't wait for this MPS 6 to be released. It should be a beautiful beast.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Twin Turbo Mazda 6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 AM.