Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

So How Will The MX-5 Par Up To This?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-20-2006, 04:39 AM
  #26  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ yeah. DIY then... might be cheaper, but this comes fully fabbed/tested, suspension mods, AND a two year warranty. About $40k for the whole thing... not a bad deal. It'll toast just about anything you put up against it. Handling wise... dunno, but this setup does have 50/50 according to the article.
Old 03-20-2006, 04:48 AM
  #27  
Registered
 
Mazdaspeed RX8 ver2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 2,336
Received 46 Likes on 41 Posts
Personal preference, mx5 for me. Those cars are really really nice though but my loyalty is with those little japanses cars and mainly mazda... But i have to admit, the saturn and pontiac are really really nice..
Old 03-20-2006, 11:08 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
j-apex rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the opel roaster is also the same car .
Old 03-21-2006, 09:42 AM
  #29  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thoughts...

I think the MX-5 has them beat as far as looks. But the interior gos to Pontiac.
First, I personally think that's backwards in my opinion...^

I think the Solstice looks pretty sexy and GM did a fine job on it, it didn't beat the MX-5 because it's a bit slower and has less fun to drive factor. (well, a bit less fit and finish and daily driver capability also)

The Saturn looks even nicer and has a better interior than the Pontiac so it should sell pretty good also.

With the GXP version (260HP) the Solstice should be faster than our 8's considering it weighs less and makes more power. So the MX-5, unless Mazda has something up and coming, is going to have a serious threat to it's kingship.

Personally, I'm happy for GM (they need this)...and maybe Mazda will get a kick in their butt to make them realize that HP...is not a bad thing (lol).

Sadly...our 8's keep getting slower and slower, even within Mazda, compared to similar cars in it's price range (while I'm one of the customers that need back seats) and Mazda seems to be asleep at the wheel with the future of our 8.

Maybe Ford want's them to kill the idea of a better 8 considering they fought it to begin with. Hmmm...where is Bascho...should I consider Ford the evil selfish monster that does not want any competition for it's Mustang. Help me Bascho...I don't want to be a Ford hater...lol
Old 03-21-2006, 09:53 AM
  #30  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone explain what this guy said here...

And with almost 500 pounds less heft curbside than the bow-tied beast, the LS2’s 400 horses and 395 lb-ft of torque make for one monstrously fast little roadster.
If he is claiming the Mallett Solstice weighs 500 pounds less than the Vette he is WAY OFF. The Mallett Solstice comes in at 3010 and the Vette comes in at 310something or 3200 tops so that's just 190 pound of difference.

I actually think the power to weight ratio should make this Mallett Solstice faster, but this car and the Mustang have me scratching my head on all this power to weight ratio in estimating what a car can run. I know there is more to it than p/w ratio...but still, I would think the Mallett Solstice could do better considering we have a Turbo RX8 here making 300whp and it get's a 13.1 in the 1/4 mile.

That's only .3 sec off the Mallett Solstice and it weighs a bit less and has significantly more power??????

Anyone care to reflect on this...???
Old 03-21-2006, 11:32 AM
  #31  
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like someone mentioned before when I was comparing the Solstice and Vette, part of the reason is the difficulty in actually putting down that power to the pavement in such a light car.
Old 03-21-2006, 11:36 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like Sky alot--for me its between the MX5 and Sky. Id expect the mazdaspeed mx5 to be about 200-220 boosted HP max.
Old 03-21-2006, 11:48 AM
  #33  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^If I were you, I'd get the Sky with the 260HP...it looks better and is bigger. But...either way you will have a fine car!
Old 03-21-2006, 11:49 AM
  #34  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
snizzle...true, I forget about that...
Old 03-21-2006, 01:15 PM
  #35  
.
 
bascho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Maybe Ford want's them to kill the idea of a better 8 considering they fought it to begin with. Hmmm...where is Bascho...should I consider Ford the evil selfish monster that does not want any competition for it's Mustang. Help me Bascho...I don't want to be a Ford hater...lol

Here to help

Don't be a Ford hater!!! Ford has nothing to do with the demise of the RX8.....the rotary engine does. Anything RX has to have a rotary......and the rotary has some serious limitations in the eyes of manufacturers who would like their cars to last at least 100,000 miles. This is not a problem if the Renesis remains N/A......but Mazda has already reached the limits of a 2-rotor engine N/A. Hell, 232 hp from 1.3L is unbelievable.......no production piston engine can touch that. But 232 hp is not very much anymore. The only way for Mazda to get more power out of a N/A rotary engine is more displacement. From what I've heard, there is no way to make the rotary economical. Adding rotors just makes the fuel economy worse. Sure the Renesis engines can be powerful with FI....but at the cost of fuel economy and durability......not to mention a higher price. This is a fuel conscience world and the rotary may not be able to compete in it.......at least not for a competitive price vs the competitions piston engine offerings. I don't think its much of a surprise that the Mazda 3, 6 and most likely the new MX5 were offered in MazdaSpeed form and not the RX8. Piston engines are easy to mod to achieve reliable, economical power.
Old 03-21-2006, 01:18 PM
  #36  
.
 
bascho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a comparo between the MX5, Sky and Solstice......I would take the Sky without a doubt. Even that new Aura looks good. I am impressed with Saturn's new offerings....at least looks wise.
Old 03-21-2006, 01:45 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "demise of the RX-8" is a bit harsh.
Old 03-21-2006, 01:55 PM
  #38  
.
 
bascho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Devil
The "demise of the RX-8" is a bit harsh.

A little. Sorry.....but I really don't think the rotary engine has a viable future. Gas prices are going to continue to inflate. In two years we'll be begging for gas at $2.75 per gallon. In five years we'll be begging for gas at $3.10 per gallon or more. A car getting 15mpg mixed driving will have no place in the next decade. Mazda would be smart to develop the next sports coupe with a piston engine. If Honda can bring 200hp Civics with 35/40 mpg city/hwy in 2006......what do you think they will have in 2010.....2015?
Old 03-21-2006, 02:39 PM
  #39  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Honda can bring 200hp Civics with 35/40 mpg city/hwy in 2006......what do you think they will have in 2010.....2015?
That is impressive and I don't know if the "demise of the RX8" is a done deal, but I can't argue that at the power levels we have and fuel economy...as gas prices continue to go higher...the rotary might be dead in the water.

It did servive the last fuel problems in the 70's....we will see.

Bascho, while I know you don't think they hit this, the Chevy's V8 hitting 30mpg in the highway with their big V8 is even more impressive than what Honda did in my opinion.

If I own one...one day, I'll let you know if the EPA numbers are true or not. lol
Old 03-21-2006, 02:58 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everything as far as gas prices go is somewhat speculation. And there is still a lot of oil left in the world. Most abandoned oil wells are still above 80% capacity, they simply have not been further tapped because it was cheaper to move to the next well instead. With concerns to economic viability, there is more oil available today than there was 30 or 50 years ago.

Personally, I think the price of oil will eventually fall. To what it was before, no. But it will be substantially less than it is now.

I think the rotary will survive, but it will never be main stream. One option for Mazda may be to offer a sports car that is piston based, but has a rotary option for high performance applications.
Old 03-21-2006, 03:39 PM
  #41  
Bah! Who needs a redline?
 
LiveToRev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Flooriduh
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DOMINION
I think the MX-5 has them beat as far as looks. But the interior gos to Pontiac.
Although the interior fit and finish of Pontiac has improved over their previous products, the quality of the materials used in the Solstice still doesn't compare to MX-5's.
Old 03-21-2006, 03:50 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
9291150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those of you that haven't, I suggest that you sit in a Solstace, I'd guess the Sky should be the same. Both are “sitting in a plastic bathtub” cars, which completely ruin the roadster experience. The 350Z ragtop has the same door sills at your ear feel. Add in other nuisance features, like a top you can't operate from within the car, no trunk, etc., and why would you pick it over a new MX5?

Also, I'm guessing the GXP turbo will come in at nearly 3000 pounds, nearly at new Vette levels. Plain stupid! And a turbo? Always a makeshift solution.

GM, Ford, etc. certainly have good designers, but good engineers? Forgetaboudit!
Old 03-21-2006, 04:34 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9291150
Also, I'm guessing the GXP turbo will come in at nearly 3000 pounds, nearly at new Vette levels. Plain stupid! And a turbo? Always a makeshift solution.
The Ecotec was actually designed to be a turbo engine from the start, which is part of the reason why it's block is so strong. It's not like they're just slapping a low pressure turbo on an engine designed for NA application to get a few more ponies out of it. Besides, with nothing stopping Mazda from dropping their DI I4 turbo engine in the Miata, GM'd have to be absolutely clueless to not respond in kind. Personally, I'd rather see an aluminum pushrod V6 (or V8) in there because displacement and a good power:weight ratio is always nice to have (but then you'd have people saying "Well why didn't they use a 4 cylinder like the Miata to get that kind of power? Stupid GM and their lack of technology"), but if they make a Sky Redline Coupe I just might have to pick one up after I graduate.
Old 03-21-2006, 04:50 PM
  #44  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^yeah...you can't please everyone...
Old 03-21-2006, 05:02 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
rodrigo67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What mazda needs to do is "displacement on demand". Chrysler is currently putting out 8 cy. engines that work on 4 cy. under normal acceleration and highway, giving them great gas mileage, but when you step on the pedal, all 8 cy. come alive and give you your full 300+ hp for quick accelerations.

Now if mazda can give us a larger eng that would use one rotor for every day driving and kick in 2 under hard accelerations, that just might take care of the MPG issues...

Pretty smart of chrysler...
Old 03-21-2006, 06:21 PM
  #46  
Mr. T is my copilot
 
captain mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: los angeles
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that Saturn and the Solstice are looking pretty good.
but then i scrolled down a couple more posts, and i think the Mazda might be prettier. It might just be the intrigue of a little heritage behind a car. or maybe i'm just biased.
Old 03-21-2006, 06:42 PM
  #47  
Registered
 
BunnyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,327
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DOMINION
I think the MX-5 has them beat as far as looks. But the interior gos to Pontiac.

I sat in them both at the auto show and they way everything is positioned in the Solstice it is pretty awkward for me. The Miata was better. I was reading somewhere how Mazda used all these high-tech sensors and stuff to make the car ergonomically desiged for the driver. I don't know what size of person they used since it would vary person to person for where stuff should be optimally positioned but it was a much better fit for me.
Old 03-21-2006, 07:00 PM
  #48  
Registered
 
BunnyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,327
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by needmorerotors
Im pretty sure the pontiac and saturn are the same.Just like a GMC vs chevy.
Years ago when my stepdad was buying a new GMC truck there was a truck on the showroom floor that said GMC on three sides of it and had a Chevy logo on the other side.
Old 03-21-2006, 08:46 PM
  #49  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Everything as far as gas prices go is somewhat speculation. And there is still a lot of oil left in the world. Most abandoned oil wells are still above 80% capacity, they simply have not been further tapped because it was cheaper to move to the next well instead. With concerns to economic viability, there is more oil available today than there was 30 or 50 years ago.

Personally, I think the price of oil will eventually fall. To what it was before, no. But it will be substantially less than it is now.

I think the rotary will survive, but it will never be main stream. One option for Mazda may be to offer a sports car that is piston based, but has a rotary option for high performance applications.

I agree. And there was recently a drop in wholesale food and enegery prices last month. The future of energy prices is pretty much a crap shoot though... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060321/...NqBHNlYwM3NDk-

People are also forgetting about things like shale oil and tar sands... something that there is plenty of in Canada and a supply in the US as well. When oil was cheap (and old technology), it wasn't cost-effective to extract the oil, but now... between the rising oil prices and improvements in technology it's starting to reach the sweet spot. We've still got oil to go...
Old 03-21-2006, 08:50 PM
  #50  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BunnyGirl
I sat in them both at the auto show and they way everything is positioned in the Solstice it is pretty awkward for me. The Miata was better. I was reading somewhere how Mazda used all these high-tech sensors and stuff to make the car ergonomically desiged for the driver. I don't know what size of person they used since it would vary person to person for where stuff should be optimally positioned but it was a much better fit for me.

I thought that the Miata's interior was very nice. Sat in a MS outfitted one at the past Tokyo Motorshow. Only problem... at 6' and not skinny... the damn car is a bit cramped and honestly a bit too low for me.

Haven't seen the Solstice or Sky in person, but from the pics... the Sky's interior looks good... real good. If I was into two seater convertibles... I'd definitely check one out... especially the GXP/Redline model (or get the V8 engine swap ).


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: So How Will The MX-5 Par Up To This?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.