Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Is SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control killing gas mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 08:34 AM
  #1  
Bladecutter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rockie Mountain Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 29
From: Denver, CO
Is SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control killing gas mileage?

I have a question for you guys in the know that I haven't seen answered anywhere.

I have noticed that the new Mazda 3 and Mazda 6 that were released with the SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control have shown a large decrease in fuel mileage.

Examples:

2016 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 40 mpg
Combined - 33 mpg

2017 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 27 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg

2016 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg

2017 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 30 mpg

2016 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 30 mpg
Highway - 41 mpg
Combined - 35 mpg

2017 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 32 mpg

So, anyone know what's going on?
The cars haven't gained weight, hp, or changed gearing in any way that I can see, but their fantastic fuel mileage has dropped noticeably.

BC.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 08:50 AM
  #2  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 66
That's weird. Are these figures all from Mazda or EPA?

Paul
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 03:57 PM
  #3  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
I think I remember there were big changes in the way they tested mpg...........so the #'s changed to reflect that

more real world #'s likely
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
NotAPreppie's Avatar
What am I doing here?
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 652
From: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Originally Posted by dannobre
I think I remember there were big changes in the way they tested mpg...........so the #'s changed to reflect that

more real world #'s likely
Yes:
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ratings.shtml
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2016 | 03:29 PM
  #5  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
change in testing methodology. different test = different answers
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2016 | 08:05 AM
  #6  
Bladecutter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rockie Mountain Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 29
From: Denver, CO
Thanks guys.
I just couldn't understand why the numbers were so different between 16 and 17.
It not like it says it anywhere, at all.

BC.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 10:51 AM
  #7  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 339
From: Australia
no, and yes to different testing method.
Reply



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.