Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

S2000, 350z or RX-8????

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:45 PM
  #1  
jonyjoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bring it on....
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, Ca
S2000, 350z or RX-8????

From those three, I bought the RX-8!!! Love the car....But had alot of doubts when peolple start telling me, 350zzs are better and all. So, need some insights about this issue....like performance wise, mod .......
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #2  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Hrm...

Nah, too easy!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #3  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
^^lol^^
since Ike won't, i'll say it nicely, you should've searched
performance wise, you got the wrong car
the s2000 is similiar, but better slightly better performance wise, but is not very practicle
the 350z is torquey, much faster in the straights, lacks a little bit in the turns, but again not as practicle
the rx8 likes to rev, has 4 decently usuable seats, does well in autoX's but will lack in straights
the 8 will not respond to mods as well and the only way to really get a noticeable performance gain is FI.
the end.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #4  
guy321's Avatar
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, Fl
Would you dump your girlfriend if someone told you another girl was hotter??

BTW, .5 seconds is MUCH faster??
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #5  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by guy321
Would you dump your girlfriend if someone told you another girl was hotter??
Duh!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #6  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
Originally Posted by Ike
Duh!
poor wrx... dumped by Ike for an evo..
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
zaglo6204's Avatar
mine's better
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Aiken, SC
well, as you may know, the 8 is the "least fast" of the bunch in a straight line (not that important, though, but i guess that is subjective). however, it can be argued that the 8's handling/driver experience is superior to the other two. only having driven the 8 out of those 3, i ca't really attest to that statement, but i can tell you that after 2 years, i am still amazed by the feel of the car & love it more with each day.

that being said, the performance aftermarket for the 8 is not up to par with the Z or S2K, as the engine is unique, therefore a smaller market, not as easy to just fit already created systems to the car, etc. good luck, it certainly is an unbelievably fun car as it stands.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
the rx-8 is practical, unique, and smooth- compared to s2k and 350z

s2k- faster in both corners and straights but not by much

350z- faster in straight

but i still like my 8. if your issue is performance, then sorry dude. rx8 is quick, but modding for more will be tough.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:10 PM
  #9  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
Originally Posted by zaglo6204
however, it can be argued that the 8's handling/driver experience is superior to the other two.
there is a reason the s2000 is now AS
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #10  
zaglo6204's Avatar
mine's better
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Aiken, SC
AS?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #11  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by zaglo6204
AS?
Auto Superiority
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #12  
c0ldf1ame's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
s2000 - comptech supercharger, around 3000$ 340hp, factory warranty, BUT too small

350z - 300hp stock, with turbo can be easily up in 400 - 500hp range, BUT ugly n wierd interior

rx8 - 300hp with greddy turbo hopefully no blown apex seals with good tuning, but all round nicer car than both of the above, better looking too IMO
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #13  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
Originally Posted by Ike
Auto Superiority
-_-
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:53 PM
  #14  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
Originally Posted by c0ldf1ame
s2000 - comptech supercharger, around 3000$ 340hp, factory warranty, BUT too small

350z - 300hp stock, with turbo can be easily up in 400 - 500hp range, BUT ugly n wierd interior

rx8 - 300hp with greddy turbo hopefully no blown apex seals with good tuning, but all round nicer car than both of the above, better looking too IMO
s2000>rest in looks imo
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #15  
c0ldf1ame's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
but do we all agree that the 350z looks ugly?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #16  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
no
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #17  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Among the 3, the S2000 would be my first choice. Other than a bit more acceleration, the Z has nothing over it. The 8 is just slightly more practical with the 4 seat, sometimes I wished there was none so its lighter and smaller. Just my opinion though
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #18  
c0ldf1ame's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: los angeles, ca
k fine
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:57 PM
  #19  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
Originally Posted by yiksing
Among the 3, the S2000 would be my first choice. Other than a bit more acceleration, the Z has nothing over it. The 8 is just slightly more practical with the 4 seat, sometimes I wished there was none so its lighter and smaller. Just my opinion though
agreed, except has one more thing, torque.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #20  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
I thought that was implied with the better acceleration, No? U talking about the Z or the 8?
I'm lost.....
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #21  
RotoRocket's Avatar
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 9
Are you any relation to BeefyJoe?

He couldn't wait to get rid of his 8 because he couldn't gun it during rush hour traffic.

Did you buy his?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #22  
jonyjoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bring it on....
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, Ca
[QUOTE=cjkim]s2000>rest in looks imo[/QUOTE

But do you think in the near future we gonna get better performance parts for the RX-8s...So we can kick some assssssssssssssss!!! (350z maybe??)
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #23  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
Originally Posted by yiksing
I thought that was implied with the better acceleration, No? U talking about the Z or the 8?
I'm lost.....
torque doesn't necessarily mean better acceleration overall. let me rephrase that to "a lot more low-end"
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #24  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 1
From: socal
[QUOTE=jonyjoe]
Originally Posted by cjkim
s2000>rest in looks imo[/QUOTE

But do you think in the near future we gonna get better performance parts for the RX-8s...So we can kick some assssssssssssssss!!! (350z maybe??)
sure, FI
search the FI threads...
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:17 AM
  #25  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Originally Posted by cjkim
torque doesn't necessarily mean better acceleration overall. let me rephrase that to "a lot more low-end"
I know but which one were you referring to?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.