Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

S2000, 350z or RX-8????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-28-2006, 10:45 PM
  #1  
Bring it on....
Thread Starter
 
jonyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Diamond Bar, Ca
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S2000, 350z or RX-8????

From those three, I bought the RX-8!!! Love the car....But had alot of doubts when peolple start telling me, 350zzs are better and all. So, need some insights about this issue....like performance wise, mod .......
Old 03-28-2006, 10:54 PM
  #2  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hrm...

Nah, too easy!
Old 03-28-2006, 10:56 PM
  #3  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^lol^^
since Ike won't, i'll say it nicely, you should've searched
performance wise, you got the wrong car
the s2000 is similiar, but better slightly better performance wise, but is not very practicle
the 350z is torquey, much faster in the straights, lacks a little bit in the turns, but again not as practicle
the rx8 likes to rev, has 4 decently usuable seats, does well in autoX's but will lack in straights
the 8 will not respond to mods as well and the only way to really get a noticeable performance gain is FI.
the end.
Old 03-28-2006, 10:57 PM
  #4  
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
guy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you dump your girlfriend if someone told you another girl was hotter??

BTW, .5 seconds is MUCH faster??
Old 03-28-2006, 10:57 PM
  #5  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by guy321
Would you dump your girlfriend if someone told you another girl was hotter??
Duh!
Old 03-28-2006, 10:58 PM
  #6  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Duh!
poor wrx... dumped by Ike for an evo..
Old 03-28-2006, 11:03 PM
  #7  
mine's better
 
zaglo6204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well, as you may know, the 8 is the "least fast" of the bunch in a straight line (not that important, though, but i guess that is subjective). however, it can be argued that the 8's handling/driver experience is superior to the other two. only having driven the 8 out of those 3, i ca't really attest to that statement, but i can tell you that after 2 years, i am still amazed by the feel of the car & love it more with each day.

that being said, the performance aftermarket for the 8 is not up to par with the Z or S2K, as the engine is unique, therefore a smaller market, not as easy to just fit already created systems to the car, etc. good luck, it certainly is an unbelievably fun car as it stands.
Old 03-28-2006, 11:09 PM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
the rx-8 is practical, unique, and smooth- compared to s2k and 350z

s2k- faster in both corners and straights but not by much

350z- faster in straight

but i still like my 8. if your issue is performance, then sorry dude. rx8 is quick, but modding for more will be tough.
Old 03-28-2006, 11:10 PM
  #9  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zaglo6204
however, it can be argued that the 8's handling/driver experience is superior to the other two.
there is a reason the s2000 is now AS
Old 03-28-2006, 11:28 PM
  #10  
mine's better
 
zaglo6204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AS?
Old 03-28-2006, 11:35 PM
  #11  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zaglo6204
AS?
Auto Superiority
Old 03-28-2006, 11:51 PM
  #12  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
c0ldf1ame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
s2000 - comptech supercharger, around 3000$ 340hp, factory warranty, BUT too small

350z - 300hp stock, with turbo can be easily up in 400 - 500hp range, BUT ugly n wierd interior

rx8 - 300hp with greddy turbo hopefully no blown apex seals with good tuning, but all round nicer car than both of the above, better looking too IMO
Old 03-28-2006, 11:51 PM
  #13  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Auto Superiority
-_-
Old 03-28-2006, 11:53 PM
  #14  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by c0ldf1ame
s2000 - comptech supercharger, around 3000$ 340hp, factory warranty, BUT too small

350z - 300hp stock, with turbo can be easily up in 400 - 500hp range, BUT ugly n wierd interior

rx8 - 300hp with greddy turbo hopefully no blown apex seals with good tuning, but all round nicer car than both of the above, better looking too IMO
s2000>rest in looks imo
Old 03-28-2006, 11:55 PM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
c0ldf1ame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but do we all agree that the 350z looks ugly?
Old 03-28-2006, 11:56 PM
  #16  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no
Old 03-28-2006, 11:56 PM
  #17  
the giant tastetickles
 
yiksing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Among the 3, the S2000 would be my first choice. Other than a bit more acceleration, the Z has nothing over it. The 8 is just slightly more practical with the 4 seat, sometimes I wished there was none so its lighter and smaller. Just my opinion though
Old 03-28-2006, 11:56 PM
  #18  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
c0ldf1ame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k fine
Old 03-28-2006, 11:57 PM
  #19  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by yiksing
Among the 3, the S2000 would be my first choice. Other than a bit more acceleration, the Z has nothing over it. The 8 is just slightly more practical with the 4 seat, sometimes I wished there was none so its lighter and smaller. Just my opinion though
agreed, except has one more thing, torque.
Old 03-29-2006, 12:01 AM
  #20  
the giant tastetickles
 
yiksing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that was implied with the better acceleration, No? U talking about the Z or the 8?
I'm lost.....
Old 03-29-2006, 12:01 AM
  #21  
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
RotoRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Are you any relation to BeefyJoe?

He couldn't wait to get rid of his 8 because he couldn't gun it during rush hour traffic.

Did you buy his?
Old 03-29-2006, 12:04 AM
  #22  
Bring it on....
Thread Starter
 
jonyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Diamond Bar, Ca
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=cjkim]s2000>rest in looks imo[/QUOTE

But do you think in the near future we gonna get better performance parts for the RX-8s...So we can kick some assssssssssssssss!!! (350z maybe??)
Old 03-29-2006, 12:04 AM
  #23  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by yiksing
I thought that was implied with the better acceleration, No? U talking about the Z or the 8?
I'm lost.....
torque doesn't necessarily mean better acceleration overall. let me rephrase that to "a lot more low-end"
Old 03-29-2006, 12:05 AM
  #24  
^noob
 
cjkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=jonyjoe]
Originally Posted by cjkim
s2000>rest in looks imo[/QUOTE

But do you think in the near future we gonna get better performance parts for the RX-8s...So we can kick some assssssssssssssss!!! (350z maybe??)
sure, FI
search the FI threads...
Old 03-29-2006, 12:17 AM
  #25  
the giant tastetickles
 
yiksing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cjkim
torque doesn't necessarily mean better acceleration overall. let me rephrase that to "a lot more low-end"
I know but which one were you referring to?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: S2000, 350z or RX-8????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.