View Poll Results: 944 or 240SX?
Get a 944
18
51.43%
Go for a 240SX
17
48.57%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll
Porsche 944 Or Nissan 240sx
#1
I don't buy Kool-Aid
Thread Starter
Porsche 944 Or Nissan 240sx
Thinking of picking up a 1989 - 1997 hatch or not 240sx but I have been looking around on ebay and other sites and for less I can get a 1984 - 1987 944. The price range I'm looking at is around $3,000.
Just wanted to know what some of your thoughts are on these cars?
This would be a daily driver and project car.
Thanks for the input and comments.
Just wanted to know what some of your thoughts are on these cars?
This would be a daily driver and project car.
Thanks for the input and comments.
#2
Front engine Porsches are beautiful cars, and they're a blast to drive. The only problems I have with them is the sheer cost of parts and the need for some special tools.
#4
I have a 924S, which is a 924 with the complete 944 drivetrain and my trans went at just before 40,000 miles. But, one of my friends has a 944 that had 162,000 miles before anything major happened to it. It's currently down with a blown head gasket.
#5
interesting 4 against 4. i am with the 240sx though. the porsche is just a pain the *** when it is broken. the price for their parts is just too high and not many aftermarket susbstitude. compared to the 240sx, which is simply a rear wheel drive civic, the 240sx has a numberous of parts availible in cheaper price. and the turning is much easier on a 240sx.
but the like civics, they are just not unique unlike rx8s and porsches. why not buy a rx7 second gen T2.
but the like civics, they are just not unique unlike rx8s and porsches. why not buy a rx7 second gen T2.
#6
Another Filthy Mac User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hawick, Scotland, United States of Blairland.
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by White87FC
I have a 924S, which is a 924 with the complete 944 drivetrain and my trans went at just before 40,000 miles. But, one of my friends has a 944 that had 162,000 miles before anything major happened to it. It's currently down with a blown head gasket.
Mine had done well over 130,000 last I heard, no problems. Used to service it myself but had the cambelt done by specialists.
I didn't like the power delivery of the 2.4 straight six in my Laurel (same basic engine), but I have a soft spot for 240s. As an ownership experience I'd say the Porsche wins every time though. Especially if you live somewhere that cars rust.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Liberty Hill, TX (Austin)
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless you are skilled in the ways of fixing German cars, and have lots of spare cash I'd go with the Nissan. It may still cost some $ to maintain, but I think it would be cheaper.
#8
I owned an 86 944 for many years. It was , no question, the best handling car I have driven. It takes corners just as good or better then the 8 without all of the computerized assistence the 8 use's. It also gives you that connected feeling to the road like the 8. I sold it with 142,000 miles on it and the only thing I ever had to replace was the alternator. I have heard the turbo's have engine issues, but was told by a porshe mech, that the non turbo engines last forever if taken care of. A very solid built car. 20 years old and still looked new.
That said, parts are expensive, but there is an aftermarket for it. The dealer wanted $585 for a new alternator. I have freinds in the car business which could get it for $385, but I found an aftermarket one for $185. Installed it myself, and hasn't had an issue since.
I also was worried about how hard it would be to work on this car and bought a do it yourself manual. This car was one of the easiest cars I have ever had to work on. Everything was easy to get too, it made sense on how it came together, and most systems have a backup manual override. For instance, if your headlight motor went out and the lights were stuck in the up or down postion, you could popped the hood and with a screw driver manually move the light up or down ( not that this is the permanant fix, but it gives you a quick fix until repaired). Same with the roof and many others on this car. You will need some special tools, but nothing most foreign cars wouldn't need.
I never owned a 240. Nice looking car with decent performance. If you think Nissan parts are cheap, your in for a surprise, but there is a huge aftermarket for it.
If in good condition, I would go with the 944
That said, parts are expensive, but there is an aftermarket for it. The dealer wanted $585 for a new alternator. I have freinds in the car business which could get it for $385, but I found an aftermarket one for $185. Installed it myself, and hasn't had an issue since.
I also was worried about how hard it would be to work on this car and bought a do it yourself manual. This car was one of the easiest cars I have ever had to work on. Everything was easy to get too, it made sense on how it came together, and most systems have a backup manual override. For instance, if your headlight motor went out and the lights were stuck in the up or down postion, you could popped the hood and with a screw driver manually move the light up or down ( not that this is the permanant fix, but it gives you a quick fix until repaired). Same with the roof and many others on this car. You will need some special tools, but nothing most foreign cars wouldn't need.
I never owned a 240. Nice looking car with decent performance. If you think Nissan parts are cheap, your in for a surprise, but there is a huge aftermarket for it.
If in good condition, I would go with the 944
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Apalachin, NY
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RichardK
Heee, I used to have a 924S as well.
Mine had done well over 130,000 last I heard, no problems. Used to service it myself but had the cambelt done by specialists.
I didn't like the power delivery of the 2.4 straight six in my Laurel (same basic engine), but I have a soft spot for 240s. As an ownership experience I'd say the Porsche wins every time though. Especially if you live somewhere that cars rust.
Mine had done well over 130,000 last I heard, no problems. Used to service it myself but had the cambelt done by specialists.
I didn't like the power delivery of the 2.4 straight six in my Laurel (same basic engine), but I have a soft spot for 240s. As an ownership experience I'd say the Porsche wins every time though. Especially if you live somewhere that cars rust.
Agree with what has been said here - the 944 is an extremely fun car to drive, but expensive to maintain. If that concerns you, go with the 240.
BTW, Guards Red 951 = dead sexy
#10
1 Savior, CTHULU
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rodrigo67
I have heard the turbo's have engine issues, but was told by a porshe mech, that the non turbo engines last forever if taken care of.
All of them have issues with rattling / leaking of the rear hatch glass.
That said, parts are expensive, but there is an aftermarket for it.
If in good condition, I would go with the 944
Last edited by Hyperborea; 01-20-2006 at 06:48 PM.
#11
I voted for the 944 but before I read your post if you are only looking to spend 3,000 dollars almost any 944 you find will need a lot of work and will be expensive to work on. Like has been said before if you do buy one records are a huge blessing but one that has been well taken care off with records will be more expensive than $3,000.
Another issue with the 944T that happened twice on mine was the heat transfer gasket where the oil cooler meets the coolent and the two can trade fluid and you end up with coolent in your engine. Im not sure if thats a problem both turbo and non turbo models have.
Another issue with the 944T that happened twice on mine was the heat transfer gasket where the oil cooler meets the coolent and the two can trade fluid and you end up with coolent in your engine. Im not sure if thats a problem both turbo and non turbo models have.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I voted for the 240sx because I own one. The car is a blast to drive, easy to work on, parts are fairly cheap, and it has a huge aftermarket. The motor of the car is bullet-proof too as its been used for over a decade (Stanza, Altima, 240sx, Hardbody, and Frontier) in various forms.
#13
A $3000 Porsche 944 will cost you $15,000. If you want a Porsche, don't buy a beater. Which is what you'll get for $3000. Porsches can be very realiable. My 911 is 26 years old. I'll take it anywhere. But if you don't have some extra $$$ don't buy one unless you don't mind working on cars. The last thing we need a another Porsche rotting away because it's owner couldn't afford to fix it. When it needs repair, as any car of that age will, labor will be expensive. Parts you can find at resonable prices, but good labor is expensive. The cars themselves are a blast.
Last edited by 911SC; 01-20-2006 at 10:26 PM.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
^^^i see youre still bitter and holding a grudge , I dont have any interest in letting this escalade in someone else's thread. if you want to act childish go post in my thread, thanks
#17
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've driven both, and actually a friends of mine has owned both... the 944 is a completely superior drivers car then the 240SX. However, once it breaks (and it will break) it will be your worst nightmare.
If you go with a 240 check for rust... it will be everywhere, just hopefully not bad in structural spots
If you go with a 240 check for rust... it will be everywhere, just hopefully not bad in structural spots
#18
I don't buy Kool-Aid
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by s13lover
I voted for the 240sx because I own one. The car is a blast to drive, easy to work on, parts are fairly cheap, and it has a huge aftermarket. The motor of the car is bullet-proof too as its been used for over a decade (Stanza, Altima, 240sx, Hardbody, and Frontier) in various forms.
#19
Another Filthy Mac User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hawick, Scotland, United States of Blairland.
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 911SC
A $3000 Porsche 944 will cost you $15,000. If you want a Porsche, don't buy a beater. Which is what you'll get for $3000. Porsches can be very realiable. My 911 is 26 years old. I'll take it anywhere. But if you don't have some extra $$$ don't buy one unless you don't mind working on cars. The last thing we need a another Porsche rotting away because it's owner couldn't afford to fix it. When it needs repair, as any car of that age will, labor will be expensive. Parts you can find at resonable prices, but good labor is expensive. The cars themselves are a blast.
They really are NOT expensive to run. Only the timing belt, and regular servicing made it more complex to run than say, a Golf GTI. Oh, and the tyres were expensive.
Porsches are bulletproof if looked after, but the unloved 924 is budget money.
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DOMINION
I like the sound of this. I figured the 944 would be to expensive to maintain. The 240sx would not only be my project car but a daily driver. Thanks everyone for the advice on the 2 cars. I look foward to being a 240sx owner very soon.
Oh, and for the comment about the 944 being a "completely superior drivers car," I would just like to note that the IRS and AWS (if equipped) of the 240sx is shared with the 300ZX and Skyline.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post