Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Porsche 911 oil consumption - worst than RX-8?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #1  
opus_opus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Porsche 911 oil consumption - worst than RX-8?

Porsche spec is 1.6 quarts per 622 miles (for the 997 M96 motor)

Keep an eye on your rear bumper and exhaust tips for heavy soot build-up.



http://forums.rennlist.com/
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #2  
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
It's a Cavalier
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
Yah. That would be worst-er... damn near the worstest-est oil consumption I've heard about.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #3  
911SC's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Where did you get this info? My 30 year old 911 goes through 3 qts./5k miles. And one of those qts. is on my garage floor. You do have to realise that it holds 12 qts.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #4  
rodjonathan's Avatar
silent assasin
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,398
Likes: 1
From: Houston
^+1 it holda alot more oil than the 8 so its worse consumption but it doesnt need as much monitoring
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #5  
MattMPS's Avatar
Wiseguy
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 37
From: Italy
997 engine is complete CRAP....... don't buy one......you'll be ALWAYS into "risk area"....

Liquid cooling it was "alien tech" in Stuttgart
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 08:09 AM
  #6  
911SC's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MattMPS
997 engine is complete CRAP....... don't buy one......you'll be ALWAYS into "risk area"....

Liquid cooling it was "alien tech" in Stuttgart
"alien tech", odd considering how many watercooled cars they've built since the 1970's 924, 928, 968, 944, Boxster, Cayenne, Carrera GT. Plus we're not talking about cooling problems. It's oil consumption. There is much talk about the 997 camshaft and rear seal failure, but it's the internet, just like the RX8 engine replacement you'll hear more about the ones that fail than the ones that don't.
I'd still like to know where the OP got the oil consumption info from. Not that I don't believe it, I'd just like to read up on it.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #7  
renesisgenesis's Avatar
mod edit
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
I honestly don't get why spending 10 dollars every couple months on motor oil is even on anyone's radar screen for things to give half a sh#t about. As long as the oil loss is intentional, (not due to engine problems) then there is no worry. I plan on spending 20 dollars tonight on a dinner that's way nicer than what I actually need..so, why would I care about 5 bucks a month to upkeep a sports car?

re.dick.u.lus
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #8  
rodjonathan's Avatar
silent assasin
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,398
Likes: 1
From: Houston
^ very well said and your right 100%
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #9  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
I've often wondered why people will complain about an $8 bottle of synthetic oil compared to a $4 bottle of conventional when it comes to not being worth it. Let's say in 3000 miles you went through 7 quarts. That's $56 vs $28 which is a $28 difference in oil. Then these same people instead of filling up with regular 87 octane fuel at $2.45 a gallon will fill up with 92 octane at $2.75. If you average 20 mpg, over that 3000 miles that's a difference of $45 in gasoline. Heck even going to 89 octane as opposed to 87 would roughly break even with the difference in oil prices. The difference of course is that oil is responsible for increasing the life of the engine. Gasoline tries to kill it and is the single dirtiest element entering the engine. Some people are willing to spend more to kill their engines than they are to protect it based on financial reasons. Go figure.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #10  
Krazed_Rx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, California
^ Well said
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #11  
ou_joshua's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Texas
agreed, but probably because you can see the instant 4 dollar difference, rather than the 20 cents.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #12  
newguy's Avatar
zoom fuckin zoom
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: PA, USA
a qt of castrol gtx is about $2.50 at wal mart.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ouimetnick
Series I Tech Garage
25
Sep 14, 2023 01:44 PM
drebbrnator
Series I Trouble Shooting
11
Dec 27, 2018 07:02 PM
uZu
New Member Forum
13
Dec 30, 2015 12:35 PM
JakeKaminskisRacing
New Member Forum
13
Aug 23, 2015 01:10 AM
vssystemluba
New Member Forum
3
Jul 19, 2015 04:16 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.