RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   General Automotive (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/)
-   -   Official GT-R info (pricing!) (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/official-gt-r-info-pricing-127849/)

nycgps 10-17-2007 12:07 PM

its stock for stock. as always.

3 laps run. I think it was the tsubaka(spelling) track.

tajabaho1 10-17-2007 12:10 PM


Originally Posted by nycgps (Post 2099830)
I know it doesnt make sense to some.

but a win is a win, it doesnt have to make sense. right ?

if its a straight line .... I swear my life the z06 will win (if the drivers are serious lol)

congrats, you keep your life lol

playdoh43 10-17-2007 12:44 PM

i watch every episode of best motoring i dont remember any episode of best motoring or hot version that has z06 vs sti, but unless its raining like crazy, i dont see how its possible the sti would even come close to the z06's lap time at tsukuba.

it dosnt make sense because they usually pit cars of the same performance class together, its highly unlikely theyd have stock z06 vs sti on best motoring or hot version in the same race.

Ike 10-17-2007 01:23 PM


Originally Posted by playdoh43 (Post 2099954)
i watch every episode of best motoring i dont remember any episode of best motoring or hot version that has z06 vs sti, but unless its raining like crazy, i dont see how its possible the sti would even come close to the z06's lap time at tsukuba.

it dosnt make sense because they usually pit cars of the same performance class together, its highly unlikely theyd have stock z06 vs sti on best motoring or hot version in the same race.


It was the S204 STI and it was the slowest of all the cars on the track in the time attack. The Suby held up the pack for 3 laps so it got the win.

BlueEyes 10-17-2007 01:28 PM


Originally Posted by Ike (Post 2100015)
It was the S204 STI and it was the slowest of all the cars on the track in the time attack. The Suby held up the pack for 3 laps so it got the win.

haha, I guess by nycgps' logic, this thing could smoke a Z06 too...
http://www.rakemag.com/today/yoivanh...ay%20wagon.jpg

nycgps 10-17-2007 02:14 PM


Originally Posted by Ike (Post 2100015)
It was the S204 STI and it was the slowest of all the cars on the track in the time attack. The Suby held up the pack for 3 laps so it got the win.

A win is a win, right ? :)

nycgps 10-17-2007 02:15 PM


Originally Posted by BlueEyes (Post 2100023)
haha, I guess by nycgps' logic, this thing could smoke a Z06 too...
http://www.rakemag.com/today/yoivanh...ay%20wagon.jpg

it could be. if the Z06 is not moving. :Eyecrazy:

Aspire705 10-17-2007 03:03 PM

Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. :yesnod: Has any1 seen this?

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065

Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.

Red Devil 10-17-2007 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by Aspire705 (Post 2100209)
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. :yesnod: Has any1 seen this?

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065

Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.

Not surprised considering the portliness of the Z/G35c...

playdoh43 10-17-2007 03:27 PM


Originally Posted by Aspire705 (Post 2100209)
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. :yesnod: Has any1 seen this?

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065

Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.

link not working

Aspire705 10-17-2007 03:30 PM

^ Try it now.

playdoh43 10-17-2007 04:00 PM


Originally Posted by Aspire705 (Post 2100272)
^ Try it now.

We're sorry, but the page you requested is no longer available or not found on our server.

We apologize for any inconvenience.

>> CLICK HERE FOR THE AUTOWEEK.COM HOME PAGE >>

playdoh43 10-17-2007 04:02 PM

found the
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065

Renesis_8 10-17-2007 04:05 PM

man.. just go to the homepage and click on it yourself
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage

its got a transaxle mounted on the back, interesting, but how did they make it so heavy? But that just means more potential for a lighter GTR. There are awful lots of gadgets in the GTR, aluminium trim, power seats, etc etc.

it pulls 0.99g too!
________
Live Sex

playdoh43 10-17-2007 04:48 PM

the R-34 is 3672.9 lbs, seems they were never nimble, but this new one really is porky
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/3...e-R34-GTR.html
on best motoring they've said that what really makes good handling is linear and predictable progression, what made them not like the c6 vette was due to its unpredictable handling near the limit.

faboo 10-17-2007 05:07 PM

The thing about best motoring is that the results are almost ALWAYS off. In 75% of the races Tsuchiya wins or that one old guy...no matter what car they drive..
type r civic vs STI....civic wins
modded rx8 vs modded civic...civic wins

I love best motoring..but i dont take their results to mean anything

nycgps 10-17-2007 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by faboo (Post 2100414)
The thing about best motoring is that the results are almost ALWAYS off. In 75% of the races Tsuchiya wins or that one old guy...no matter what car they drive..
type r civic vs STI....civic wins
modded rx8 vs modded civic...civic wins

I love best motoring..but i dont take their results to mean anything

off topic : which ep shows type r civic beat STI?

On topic : GT-R was never light, but its potential keep it on the top of the list. and with all the luxury stuff they have in there ... maybe if you take all the stuff out like leather seats and stuff. not hard to get 100 lbs off.

Mech_head 10-17-2007 09:55 PM


Originally Posted by Aspire705 (Post 2100209)
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. :yesnod: Has any1 seen this?

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065

Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.

My worst fears have been confirmed. Nissan just could not keep the weight down.

But still thats just more car to love! :evil_laug

Ike 10-17-2007 10:38 PM


Originally Posted by nycgps (Post 2100455)
off topic : which ep shows type r civic beat STI?


None of them... The WRX and Type R's are neck and neck though.

CnnmnSchnpps 10-17-2007 10:55 PM

Woww... 3800lbs? That's like sticking 5 extra people in the 8 (not including the driver)... Porker is right... I'm hoping alot of that is luxury stuff that can be gutted...

nycgps 10-17-2007 11:27 PM


Originally Posted by CnnmnSchnpps (Post 2100951)
Woww... 3800lbs? That's like sticking 5 extra people in the 8 (not including the driver)... Porker is right... I'm hoping alot of that is luxury stuff that can be gutted...

except that the GT-R still has the horse to run.

While the 8 .... it could move but, dont expect it to *shine*

delhi 10-17-2007 11:49 PM


Originally Posted by nycgps (Post 2100988)
except that the GT-R still has the horse to run.

While the 8 .... it could move but, dont expect it to *shine*

you can hide weight by heaping more hp and tq. but you cannot escape physics when it comes to driving dynamics. I bet the Elise will school this GTR around Col de Turini.
that is why cars these days are getting more powerful - to offset its increased weight.

toxin440 10-18-2007 12:22 AM

yeah the 3792lbs weight just made me give up on the GTR. Hello Z06! with its quite lean 3132lb weight...

600lbs Lighter! You can't tell me that all wheel drive and LESS power is going to help makeup for that are you?

The unmasking of it... makes me want them to put the mask back on it as well. I'm rather disappointed. Even if they came out with a version thats 300lbs lighter with all fancy carbon fiber this and that - for the price you would pay for all that extra you could buy the Z06 and buy some insane mods and get into 600+HP territory and STILL have money left over.

kinchu007 10-18-2007 05:01 AM


Originally Posted by Daemos (Post 2095309)
SMG (BMW) is 80-120ms (depending on generation), DSG (for VWAG) is around the 50ms mark. Just wanted to correct your numbers a bit

Remember 1000ms makes a second :) so if anyone claims they can shift in 0.1 seconds let me know :)


A good driver takes 100 (absolute minimum) to 200 milliseconds to complete each shift, and longer as the race wears down and he gets tired.

A lot slower than an F1 gear box at 30-50 milliseconds but a lot faster than me!

kinchu007 10-18-2007 05:06 AM


Originally Posted by CnnmnSchnpps (Post 2097695)
As for the shifting speed debate... 100ms shift on a manual trans is not that outrageous. And no you will not be shifting 10 times in 1 second. There is no reason to do this since you need to wait for the car to speed up or slow down enough to need a gear change.... Any physically, it is much easier to make one 0.1s shift every half a second or so, than 10 0.1s shifts in a row... Once you get the action into "muscle memory" I'm sure 0.1s can be possible, maybe a little less even. Personally I think I am somewhere around 0.3 (and am working on getting that number down...).

What he said...but I'm not a fast shifter at all.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands