Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Nissan to launch 400 hp V8 Z

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:30 AM
  #1  
TALAN7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, NJ
Nissan to launch 400 hp V8 Z

Hope this hasn't already been discussed. Maybe now Mazda will double their efforts with a Mazdaspeed 8. What do you think?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #2  
TALAN7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, NJ
Forgot the link

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=108154
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
If they're bringing the GT-R over, I have a hard time seeing them bringing an AWD, 400hp, Z car. Since when is 400 hp uncontrollable with only RWD? I don't like the whole idea.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #4  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Since when is 400 hp uncontrollable with only RWD? I don't like the whole idea.
So this would be a whole new model... the 450Z? or would it be the same 350Z visually with the V8 dumped in? Hmmm....


Yeah I don't get that either about the control.... C6 anyone?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #5  
TALAN7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, NJ
It's not uncontrollable, but imagine 400 hp with awd, that'd be fast. Nissan may be responding to a new Supra before Toyota can finish it. If and when the Supra comes out and if there is a 450Z then Mazda would be hard pressed to do something. What do you do when your category takes it up a couple a notches.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
If they bring this out, it would have to be fairly cheap. The GT-R is rumored to be in the 70k range, this would have to be around 40, I would think. The car would be just as fast with RWD, and arguably, more fun. This obsession with AWD is starting to wear thin with me. I wonder if it would eat some sales from the GTR.

Shoehorning a V8 in the 350 and adjusting the price accordingly isn't having your category taking it up a couple nothces, it's nissan moving to a new category.

Last edited by BlueEyes; Nov 29, 2005 at 11:57 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #7  
Pkskull77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
I'd be interested in this car. All wheel drive would allow for better 1/4 mile and corner exit times.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:01 PM
  #8  
Sephiroth's Avatar
lurking
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
^ and add to the weight. Its probably going to be a special edition car or something.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #9  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Yeah screw AWD. A new Z car should be RWD.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #10  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by TALAN7
Maybe now Mazda will double their efforts with a Mazdaspeed 8. What do you think?
Any Renesis based Mspd RX8 could not possibly touch a 350 w/400HP... unless Mazda is keeping a HUGE secret.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
rx8wannahave's Avatar
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Weight distribution...they will have to figure something out here since their V8 will add more weight to the front. (That's the stating the obvious comment...lol)

If they can actually reduce some of the weight AND make the Z better looking (it looks good now but my GOD that butt has to go) while giving us another sports car within reach (NOT 70K...not that I would spend or could afford such a car, but for the greater sports car world good) that would be sweet.

Mazda...that's it, it's time for the "RETURN OF THE 3-ROTOR".

Anyway, I’m in the 22K price range so while I'll be happy there will be another sports car out there I really don't care since I got my 8 and I can't afford it anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #12  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
Oh yeah, and good luck competing with porsche. Unless you're talking maybe blowing the Cayman/boxster away in a straight line.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Honestly this sounds bogus. More than likely this IS the Skyline GTR they are talking about. 450Z is all smoke and mirrors folks--especially if it hasn't been announced like the article says. Edmunds isn't exactly at the forefront of uncovering automotive news.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #14  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Oh yeah, and good luck competing with porsche. Unless you're talking maybe blowing the Cayman/boxster away in a straight line.
haha

Yes, it would be tough for nissan to compete with porsche.

If they go with this car, they should really keep it rwd. let the skyline take the awd factor.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:29 PM
  #15  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by DreRX8
Honestly this sounds bogus. More than likely this IS the Skyline GTR they are talking about. 450Z is all smoke and mirrors folks--especially if it hasn't been announced like the article says. Edmunds isn't exactly at the forefront of uncovering automotive news.
The GT-R had better come with more than 400 ponies.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #16  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Not sure--the GTR will probably be 420-450HP. Especially considering the last one was rated at JDM 280HP which in reality was in excess of 320HP
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #17  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
well, if they're going to charge Z06 prices, I better get Z06 performance. That's all I know.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #18  
s13lover's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
I'm not too familure with the 350z, but is there even room in the engine bay for a V8? If not, I guess they could move to a rear mounted transaxle like is on the Vette (which would also help with weight distribution).
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #19  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
well, if they're going to charge Z06 prices, I better get Z06 performance. That's all I know.
Well--since its AWD it will be near Z06. Remember the last 911 Turbo has been clocked to 60 in 3.8 seconds WITH the AUTOMATIC with much less than 450HP, but it is all-wheel drive. Hopefully they keep this car a Nissan and not guise it up as an Infiniti. I'm hoping that it comes in at not $70K but upper $50K like the last GTR. At $70K I think it'lll be a hard sell--considering the cult following for this car is composed of a much much younger crowd.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #20  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
0-60 is non sense. If it gets dusted on a roll, when their AWD advantage is negated, it will be hard to justify at 70k, at 50k, well that's easier to swallow. I guess we'll have to wait for it to come out.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #21  
playdoh43's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
this article smells like a lot of BS, nissan isnt stupid. it wouldnt sell too well. The credibility of the source is also pretty questionable, seems like they are just trying to stir up something out of nothing to me, theres no mention of where this UK magazine got the news from. Id have to call it bogus.

anywho the 4.5L V8 should fit IMO. The Z is a front midship car, with the engine placed behind the front axel to achieve mid engined car like handling. In my G35 coupe there is plenty of empty space right behind the front grill, i believe its the same case with the Z. The weight distribution would probably take a pretty big compromise with a V8 though, but id imagine theres ways to make it work. either way, to me its just pipe dreams just like the rumored twin turbo Z.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #22  
MadDog's Avatar
Consiglieri
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: yourI'mgirl
Originally Posted by snizzle
Any Renesis based Mspd RX8 could not possibly touch a 350 w/400HP...

No? Tell that to those guys in PR who are putting 350HP to the ground. That's more than 400HP at the crank of the Renesis
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #23  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
The 350Z already weighs way too much for a coupe its size. Could you imagine how much extra weight a 4.5liter V8, and an AWD system would add? Unless they plan on making the body panels out of carbon fiber or fiberglass, I don't see it happening. And if they were to do that, look for prices to start in M3 territory.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #24  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by MadDog
No? Tell that to those guys in PR who are putting 350HP to the ground. That's more than 400HP at the crank of the Renesis
I'd be interested in reading about this.... explain to me the pathetic white mspd prototype? and why the aftermarket for the car is abysmal? You've gotta admit that tuning this engine is incredibly difficult and is probably the reason Mazda hasn't released an Mspd version yet.... the mods that would make the Mspd version worthwhile probably aren't cost effective for a production car, at least not yet.

I hope i'm wrong....

I guess this a topic for another thread though, back on track
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #25  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by snizzle
I'd be interested in reading about this.... explain to me the pathetic white mspd prototype? and why the aftermarket for the car is abysmal? You've gotta admit that tuning this engine is incredibly difficult and is probably the reason Mazda hasn't released an Mspd version yet.... the mods that would make the Mspd version worthwhile probably aren't cost effective for a production car, at least not yet.

I hope i'm wrong....

I guess this a topic for another thread though, back on track
The white car put down 276 at the wheels. The blue car put down 304. I got those numbers from the dyno charts of the cars themselves. They were both very very conservatively tuned and the blue car used an extremely small turbo with an FMIC. The white car was supercharged with a TMIC (turbo 2 style).

Tuning isnt an issue for mazda. They just tune the ECU. Beyond mazda, there are very few people who can say the same.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.