Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Next MX-5 to be SUB 2,000 lbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-10-2008, 12:22 PM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Next MX-5 to be SUB 2,000 lbs

From Autocar this morning http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...a-MX-5/235339/
The next-generation Mazda MX-5 will be re-engineered as a lightweight, sub-one tonne two-seater, most likely powered by a down-sized petrol engine.

"The next MX-5 needs to be much lighter," said program manager Takao Kijima. "And we also need to get CO2 levels down to the B-car [Mazda 2] level."

Kijima said the next MX-5 must weigh less than 1000kg, a cut of around 120kg compared to today's 1120kg car. That's a similar weight to the original MX-5, which weighed in at 945kg.

Mazda's target is a 10 per cent "minimum" weight reduction, which will also apply to all of its new models from 2011.

The MX-5 will stick with its front-engine/rear-drive layout and a steel body and platform. "Alloy is out of the question, as it's too expensive," said Kijima.

Mazda is also targeting a dramatic reduction in tailpipe emissions of carbon and is aiming for 120g/km, a 40g/km cut on today's 160g/km.

As well as the weight saving, more efficient engines are part of Mazda's plan. "I am sure a downsized engine will be necessary," said Kijima.

That most likely means 1.6 and 1.8 engines in place of today's 1.8 and 2.0 units, although it could also mean a highly efficient, possibly turbocharged, 1.4-litre unit.

Julian Rendell
I cant remember where now but i remember reading some other article about possible 1.4 or 1.6 litre turbo engines.

that going to be un-fing believably fun to toss around
Old 10-10-2008, 12:27 PM
  #2  
on his 3rd rx8
iTrader: (3)
 
dozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: santa ana, ca
Posts: 6,034
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
dude thatll be like a go kart...
Old 10-10-2008, 12:31 PM
  #3  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow, thats lotus terrain
Old 10-10-2008, 12:36 PM
  #4  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
That would be lighter than the NA. I'll believe it when I see it.
Old 10-10-2008, 12:53 PM
  #5  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can't wait to see this.
Old 10-10-2008, 01:35 PM
  #6  
Void Where Prohibited
 
JRichter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by delhi
That would be lighter than the NA. I'll believe it when I see it.
A related article I read has its dimensions going back to being close to the NA.

http://www.motorauthority.com/major-...x-5-miata.html

As for the car’s styling and proportions, the Japanese exec revealed that it would be closer in size to the original 1989 model. However, interior space and safety will be better than the current car due to improved engineering and clever packaging.
Kijima admits he gets “many requests to make MX-5 bigger and more powerful”, mainly from the United States, but that the character of the car is built on its compact dimensions and light weight. “We must balance these requests with nimble and light weight,” he explained.
LOL - typical
Old 10-10-2008, 02:01 PM
  #7  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
PICS ! or it never happened !
Old 10-10-2008, 02:48 PM
  #8  
The Slow and the Serious
 
kvndoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kijima admits he gets “many requests to make MX-5 bigger (to accommodate my fat ***) and more powerful (to carry my fat ***)”, mainly from the United States, but that the character of the car is built on its compact dimensions and light weight. “We must balance these requests with nimble and light weight (unlike my fat ***),” he explained.
Old 10-10-2008, 02:58 PM
  #9  
Future Rotary User
 
lone_wolf025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kvndoom
Yea that sums it up pretty well I think...
Old 10-10-2008, 03:09 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
ILoveFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So they want a 1.3L ish range eh? turbo charge eh?

Now, what kind engine does Mazda have in that category that when turbocharged could make for a ****-ton of fun?
Old 10-10-2008, 04:18 PM
  #11  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ILoveFI
So they want a 1.3L ish range eh? turbo charge eh?

Now, what kind engine does Mazda have in that category that when turbocharged could make for a ****-ton of fun?
That would probably be one of the funniest things ever.....and awesome.
Old 10-10-2008, 04:47 PM
  #12  
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
 
bose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ILoveFI
So they want a 1.3L ish range eh? turbo charge eh?

Now, what kind engine does Mazda have in that category that when turbocharged could make for a ****-ton of fun?
Now that's a car that would be hard to resist.
Old 10-10-2008, 05:10 PM
  #13  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i can has?

pics or it never happened.
Old 10-10-2008, 05:17 PM
  #14  
Curves Ahead
 
RXLogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
From Autocar this morning http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...a-MX-5/235339/


I cant remember where now but i remember reading some other article about possible 1.4 or 1.6 litre turbo engines.

that going to be un-fing believably fun to toss around

1 tonne (metric) is equal to 2,204.62 pounds.
Old 10-10-2008, 06:25 PM
  #15  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sold!
Old 10-10-2008, 06:27 PM
  #16  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
yeah i realized after i made the thread that they meant metric tonne . im glad someone finally caught on.

the story says less than 1000 kilos - so - less than 2204.62
Old 10-10-2008, 06:34 PM
  #17  
whines all the way home
iTrader: (2)
 
Rotr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Towson/Baltimore, MD
Posts: 7,402
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I was gonna say there hasnt been a massly produced car under 2K lbs for decades maybe all the way back to pre-WW era
Old 10-10-2008, 10:04 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
dynamho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwood, NJ
Posts: 1,963
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Noice!!
Old 10-10-2008, 11:51 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wow, looks like Mazda is taking away our diet of twinkies and giving us celery
Old 10-18-2008, 10:03 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
jdoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RX-5 please!!!
Old 10-18-2008, 10:47 PM
  #21  
Cone Abuser
 
Anijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI, the article says "less than 1000kg". 1000kg = 2204lbs


Still can't wait for it
Old 10-19-2008, 08:01 AM
  #22  
Registered
 
bulletproof21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2200 lbs is still pretty freakin light!!!
Old 10-19-2008, 08:46 AM
  #23  
Registered Drifter
 
drifter_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't wait for the artists's rendition and spy shots on this one.
Old 10-19-2008, 10:59 AM
  #24  
Registered
 
yushinrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Zealand rotorua
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
under 1000kg and 1.6 turbo motor insane .

look like Mazda is going to the weight to power ratio now.

now all they need to do is rx8 with 16x with 1100kg
Old 10-19-2008, 12:37 PM
  #25  
Rx8_4eVeR
 
Ever Hernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Jose, Cali
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^That would put the Rx car on porsche territory, performance wise anyway.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Next MX-5 to be SUB 2,000 lbs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.