Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

New 1.3 l. Civic Hybrid 2006 Beats RX8 on Torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-09-2005, 07:31 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New 1.3 l. Civic Hybrid 2006 Beats RX8 on Torque

While HP is only 115 (PS), the torque is 167 (Nm).
Old 07-09-2005, 07:53 AM
  #2  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That may be true but the 8 will make you more friends at esso
Old 07-09-2005, 07:55 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Rasputin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque of the Standard Power RX8 in Europe is 222 Nm!!! How is it lower???
Old 07-09-2005, 10:57 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
charleybull33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mill Creek, WA
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gord boyd
While HP is only 115 (PS), the torque is 167 (Nm).
Does it really matter?! No! Unless you're worried about stoplight wars or pulling tree trunks.
Old 07-09-2005, 11:41 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Aseras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dunno they killed the civic HX off for the hybrids. I got a 2001 hx and I get 45 ( commute )-52 ( roadtrip ) mpg avg over the last 160,000 miles. Guys at work who bought 2002 hybrids only get about 45 mpg on their trip to work, and paid about 7,000 more for their car than I did. Mine was 12,700 out the door taxes and all. with AC installed. ( ac is addon for hx's )
Old 07-09-2005, 11:44 AM
  #6  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
yeah you missed the mark there im afraid. 167 NM is less than the rx-8s rated ft/lbs

167nm = 123.2 ft/lbs
Old 07-09-2005, 12:04 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see my mistake. Sorry.
The article today puts ft-lbs at 135, not 123.2 but you may be correct.
Old 07-09-2005, 07:15 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
globi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However the Mazda 3 1.6 MZ-CD has indeed more torque (240 Nm). Which btw gets between 46 and 66 mpg.
http://www.mazda.co.uk/sycomax/pictu..._tech_uk_5.gif
Old 07-09-2005, 07:17 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 2,390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by globi
However the Mazda 3 1.6 MZ-CD has indeed more torque (240 Nm). Which btw gets between 46 and 66 mpg.
http://www.mazda.co.uk/sycomax/pictu..._tech_uk_5.gif
High torque and high mileage?! Wait.. what's that I smell?? It's diesel! :b
Old 07-09-2005, 09:43 PM
  #10  
Senor Carnegrande
 
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque means Jack and ****, and Jack left town. Torque (or RPM's) can be amplified to nearly infinite levels with gearing. The RX8 makes decent torque...at the wheels.
Old 07-10-2005, 05:09 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Rasputin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any half-decent turbo-diesel will make more torque. But due to much smaller engine speed operating range, it needs a much longer gearing. And you're back to what the Baron just said above.
And as Paul Frère mentions in Yamagushi's book, the RX8 HP has as much torque at the wheels as the Boxter S 986.
Old 07-10-2005, 09:31 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hybrid still higher to about 4000 rpm

The thing about this almost 400 lb lighter vehicle is that urban use will be satisfying--the peak torque is there at 1000, 2000, and 3,000 rpm vs. 5500 for RX8.
Old 07-10-2005, 09:34 AM
  #13  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^^Who cares?
Old 07-10-2005, 10:29 AM
  #14  
Mentalhealth is overrated
 
rotten42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
^exactly....for all those people who bitch about HP and torgue.....you bought the wrong car and you should have known better before you bought it. There is so much more to this car unless all you care about is racing street light to street light.
Old 07-10-2005, 10:30 AM
  #15  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
i doubt that driving it in an urban setting will satify me more than my 8 take a look at the gearing my friend
Old 07-10-2005, 10:31 AM
  #16  
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
guy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tractors also have more torque than the 8. You don't see many on the streets (unless you live in WYoming or montanna)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ugafan97
SE For Sale/Wanted
3
04-28-2016 03:35 PM
avidiom
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
1
04-07-2008 12:50 PM
avidiom
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
4
02-21-2008 02:28 AM
DonG35Miata
General Automotive
15
06-10-2003 09:24 PM
DonG35Miata
RX-8 Discussion
41
03-21-2003 01:40 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New 1.3 l. Civic Hybrid 2006 Beats RX8 on Torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.