Mazda to design Ford subcompact
#26
Originally Posted by nycgps
Oh bascho ... I think even big Corporation like Microsoft, have employees that "hates/dislike" their own company. So what excatly is your point? Microsoft is still the #1 software company in the world. Bill Gates still the richest dude on earth.
BTW, are you sure Bill Gates is still the richest man on earth? I know he was 5 years ago, but things may have changed. I honestly don't know the answer, I just wonder if he is still the richest man in the world.
#27
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
Yes he is. The Microsoft shares on his hands .... can .... put him .... on the richest ...
forbes Can show ya that, I looked at it a month or 2 ago, I think it was like 46 billion and second was Warren Buffett with 44 billion
http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/2...hisSpeed=20000
10th - 14th Place are owned by Walton's family, AKA WAL-MART (Yea, made in china stuff got them rich ...)
forbes Can show ya that, I looked at it a month or 2 ago, I think it was like 46 billion and second was Warren Buffett with 44 billion
http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/2...hisSpeed=20000
10th - 14th Place are owned by Walton's family, AKA WAL-MART (Yea, made in china stuff got them rich ...)
Last edited by nycgps; 02-08-2006 at 10:26 AM.
#28
Originally Posted by nycgps
I understand what you're trying to say, but the thing is that.
Ford made alot of stupid mistakes, but the question should be.
*When will they learn their lessons ?*
It's been a while that these BC and C cars are doing very well in the market. but why Ford still doing stupid stuff? Maybe u're right about they still hired alot of Americans and thinks that "Bigger = better" kind of theory.
*off topic, MS6 is a great car but ... its nowhere near STi/Evo level ... imo*
Ford made alot of stupid mistakes, but the question should be.
*When will they learn their lessons ?*
It's been a while that these BC and C cars are doing very well in the market. but why Ford still doing stupid stuff? Maybe u're right about they still hired alot of Americans and thinks that "Bigger = better" kind of theory.
*off topic, MS6 is a great car but ... its nowhere near STi/Evo level ... imo*
I agree that Ford has made mistakes and big companies are lousy for that. The real question is can they learn from them? Talking to my dad, who's been through this several times during his 3 decade tenure, he says yes and no. He says that Ford will learn to do some things better.....but eventually get caught in the same cycles all over again. I am relatively new to the business, so I am optimistic that Ford is changing and hope that we can sustain that mindset.
I really feel like Ford needs more people like me out there defending the our Company and helping change mindsets. I know many of you dismiss most of what I have to say about Ford because you have already given up on them. Unfortunately that is not going to stop me from trying to change your mind about Ford
I know the MS6 does not compete with the STI or EVO.....but it's close enough for most people.
#29
Originally Posted by nycgps
Yes he is. The Microsoft shares on his hands .... can .... put him .... on the richest ...
forbes Can show ya that, I looked at it a month or 2 ago, I think it was like 46 billion and second was Warren Buffett with 44 billion
http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/2...hisSpeed=20000
10th - 14th Place are owned by Walton's family, AKA WAL-MART (Yea, made in china stuff got them rich ...)
forbes Can show ya that, I looked at it a month or 2 ago, I think it was like 46 billion and second was Warren Buffett with 44 billion
http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/2...hisSpeed=20000
10th - 14th Place are owned by Walton's family, AKA WAL-MART (Yea, made in china stuff got them rich ...)
#30
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
I used to like Ford alot, I mean its still a big company with lots of great people.
but I mean , its still always the exec who will determine a company's future.
Ford gotta work on that. Well at some point I gotta thank you to Ford, I cant get my 8 without them :-P
*off topic talk*
Oh by the way, Hmm Im sorta confused the relation between Mazda and Ford all the time. Its a little off topic , however. :-(
Nah, As long as people use computers and Windows is here, Mr. Gates gonna stay. Microsoft shares dropped alot for the past few years. well should I say the whole market ? So when the market goes up, his $$$ goes up.
but I mean , its still always the exec who will determine a company's future.
Ford gotta work on that. Well at some point I gotta thank you to Ford, I cant get my 8 without them :-P
*off topic talk*
Oh by the way, Hmm Im sorta confused the relation between Mazda and Ford all the time. Its a little off topic , however. :-(
Nah, As long as people use computers and Windows is here, Mr. Gates gonna stay. Microsoft shares dropped alot for the past few years. well should I say the whole market ? So when the market goes up, his $$$ goes up.
#31
Originally Posted by nycgps
*off topic talk*
Oh by the way, Hmm Im sorta confused the relation between Mazda and Ford all the time. Its a little off topic , however. :-( .
Oh by the way, Hmm Im sorta confused the relation between Mazda and Ford all the time. Its a little off topic , however. :-( .
#34
Super Moderator
Originally Posted by bascho
This has been discussed before....but I'll give you a quick summary. Ford holds 30% of Mazda's shares (stock). 30% makes Ford the majority shareholder of Mazda and thus occupies more seats on Mazda's board of directors. But the relationship is more integrated than that, almost as much as the relationship with Ford's wholly-owned subsidiaries.
After the death of Mr.Matsuda the last main surviving executive and family founder of Mazda, financial constraints occurred over the fuel crisis of 1973/74/75, Mazda invested heavily in the RX-4 and all rotaries, but, sales slumped DRAMATICALLY, the Sumitomo Bank took control.(as far as I know are still to this day the MAJORITY financial share holder of MAZDA, more than the 30% or Ford US).
After the Sumitomo Banks rescued Mazda from bankruptcy, Ford Australia (which is US owned..dah), actually bought 25% of the share from the bank, and had one(1) Australian board member.
Ford US realised Mazda's worth and purchased another 5% about 10 years later, and another 2 board members to 3, add "Booth" as president that brings the total to 4 out of the 14 board members.
Later a US CEO was installed to represent their 30% share more "appropriately".
In the US you may view it differently, but here in Australia and the UK 51% is a majority share and controlling interest/ownership, and the same applies in Japan.
Out of a total of 46 executives at Mazda Japan, 12 are American, 1 Australian, and the remaining 33 are Japanese.
Last edited by ASH8; 02-08-2006 at 02:33 PM.
#35
Super Moderator
If you purchase 30% of anything, do you really think you own it?
Yes, by agreement Lewis Booth is the president, and yes, Ford US can hire or fire executives, Ford US has managerial control of Mazda Japan, but they do not have total ownership/control of Mazda Motor Corporation.
A Japanese owned Bank has the largest slice of the cake, do you really think a bank owned by other shareholders are going to give complete control, of an asset that they own a financial majority in to another company?, they are not going to expose themselves by giving Ford a free reign.
What net profit share do you think Ford US gets from Mazda, more than it owns, of course not, get real you guys please.
If and when Ford buys more that 50% you can then say that they have a controlling interest/ownership of Mazda.
Yes, by agreement Lewis Booth is the president, and yes, Ford US can hire or fire executives, Ford US has managerial control of Mazda Japan, but they do not have total ownership/control of Mazda Motor Corporation.
A Japanese owned Bank has the largest slice of the cake, do you really think a bank owned by other shareholders are going to give complete control, of an asset that they own a financial majority in to another company?, they are not going to expose themselves by giving Ford a free reign.
What net profit share do you think Ford US gets from Mazda, more than it owns, of course not, get real you guys please.
If and when Ford buys more that 50% you can then say that they have a controlling interest/ownership of Mazda.
#37
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
What percentage does this bank own?
Exactly......good question BlueEyes. I've never heard of any other company owning more shares of Mazda then Ford Motor Company. Also, you don't need to have 51% of the shares to have majority control.......you just have to have more than the second largest shareholder. If Ford had a 51% stake in Mazda, then they would have absolute control of Mazda and could make every decision in the board room.
I am really interested in this bank owning more shares of Mazda then Ford.....
#38
Super Moderator
Bascho...
The real reason that Japanese/Asian made cars (small) cars have done so well in the US like Australia since the early 1970's is because they offered a superior build quality and reliability when compared the the locally made product, to this day they continue to maintain a strong customer base.
All the import brands you mentioned earlier may only still have a small share of your market, however, without them GM and Ford all those years ago would have continued to make unreliable and poorly made/finished cars.
Thanks to these imports the local manufacturers had to change production tooling and equipment and "improve" the quality of their labour and work practices...which still have some way to go.....by your own admissions.
Americans like Australians will continue to buy large cars as the 'majority' of unit sales as you can not comfortably fit a large family in a small class car's.
The real reason that Japanese/Asian made cars (small) cars have done so well in the US like Australia since the early 1970's is because they offered a superior build quality and reliability when compared the the locally made product, to this day they continue to maintain a strong customer base.
All the import brands you mentioned earlier may only still have a small share of your market, however, without them GM and Ford all those years ago would have continued to make unreliable and poorly made/finished cars.
Thanks to these imports the local manufacturers had to change production tooling and equipment and "improve" the quality of their labour and work practices...which still have some way to go.....by your own admissions.
Americans like Australians will continue to buy large cars as the 'majority' of unit sales as you can not comfortably fit a large family in a small class car's.
#39
Super Moderator
As I said originally the Sumitomo bank(Japanese) bought 100% of Mazda.. it is still around 60%...
Who do you think makes up the other 70% that Ford does not own?
Who do you think makes up the other 70% that Ford does not own?
#40
Administrator
Thread Starter
Ford owns the majority of shares . you dont need 50 percent to have a majority. everyone else just has to have less than you.
brand history
http://www.fordmotorcompany.co.za/co...tory/mazda.asp
article on the sumitomo bank interest
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/MAZDA/tokusyu4/e980526.html
brand history
http://www.fordmotorcompany.co.za/co...tory/mazda.asp
article on the sumitomo bank interest
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/MAZDA/tokusyu4/e980526.html
#41
Super Moderator
Bascho....
You work at Ford US, you should be able to find the exact shareholder split of Mazda Japan.
I agree with you if Ford US is the largest stake holder (30%) then they have control of Mazda, I am very sure that the Sumitomo bank has a larger share, can you find out?
As far as I can recall, I don't remember the bank completely divesting themselves from MMC.
You work at Ford US, you should be able to find the exact shareholder split of Mazda Japan.
I agree with you if Ford US is the largest stake holder (30%) then they have control of Mazda, I am very sure that the Sumitomo bank has a larger share, can you find out?
As far as I can recall, I don't remember the bank completely divesting themselves from MMC.
#42
Super Moderator
Yeah Zoom, that South African link, says what I said from my memory...in 1996
"Mazda and Ford enter into a closer tie-up with Ford increasing its equity share from 25% to 33.4%. "
I was out by 3.4%.
I agree with what you said, I want to be convinced that there is not another stakeholder that has more than 33.4%, as I said I think and are sure that the Sumitomo Bank has more...If Basco can get the actual share split, I will agree to it...
Edit:... Thanks Zoom, I have just had a quick read of the link you supplied, I will have another look later as I have to go...
It still appears though that as of 1997, 58.8% is still owned bu another identity, I presume the Sumitiomo Bank...catch you later, thanks again Zoom!
"Mazda and Ford enter into a closer tie-up with Ford increasing its equity share from 25% to 33.4%. "
I was out by 3.4%.
I agree with what you said, I want to be convinced that there is not another stakeholder that has more than 33.4%, as I said I think and are sure that the Sumitomo Bank has more...If Basco can get the actual share split, I will agree to it...
Edit:... Thanks Zoom, I have just had a quick read of the link you supplied, I will have another look later as I have to go...
It still appears though that as of 1997, 58.8% is still owned bu another identity, I presume the Sumitiomo Bank...catch you later, thanks again Zoom!
Last edited by ASH8; 02-08-2006 at 03:58 PM.
#43
Originally Posted by ASH8
Yeah Zoom, that South African link, says what I said from my memory...in 1996
"Mazda and Ford enter into a closer tie-up with Ford increasing its equity share from 25% to 33.4%. "
I was out by 3.4%.
I agree with what you said, I want to be convinced that there is not another stakeholder that has more than 33.4%, as I said I think and are sure that the Sumitomo Bank has more...If Basco can get the actual share split, I will agree to it...
"Mazda and Ford enter into a closer tie-up with Ford increasing its equity share from 25% to 33.4%. "
I was out by 3.4%.
I agree with what you said, I want to be convinced that there is not another stakeholder that has more than 33.4%, as I said I think and are sure that the Sumitomo Bank has more...If Basco can get the actual share split, I will agree to it...
I don't know if I can. I'll try though. Isn't Mazda a publicly traded company with shares traded in open stock markets? I am not sure. I knew Ford had 33.4%.....I just say 30% percent because it's easier. I didn't realize that Ford had offered to buy 51% at one point in time (thanks for the article Zoom). Based on the article I am not totally convinced that the Sumitomo had actually owned Mazda at all......they may have bailed Mazda out with large corporate loans and that is why they had so much interest in Ford getting involved. I am really going to research this topic now....both for this discussion and for my own personal knowledge.
#45
Administrator
Thread Starter
Ford now has 33.7%
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/index.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st1.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st2.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/index.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st1.htm
Shareholder No. of Shares Owned -------------------- --------Ratio (%)
Ford Automotive International Holding, S.L. 408,175,800 ------------ ----- 30.70
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust) 112,084,000 --------------- 8.43
The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd.(Trust) 84,396,000 ---------------- 6.35
FLP Canada 42,483,660 ------------------3.19
Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co.,Ltd. 40,410,500 ----------------3.04
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. 37,624,500 --------------------2.83
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co.,Ltd. 32,483,250 -------------- -------------------2.44
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc. 20,210,000 -------------- ------------------1.52
Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd(Trust B) 17,945,000 ----------------------1.35
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust4) 17,487,000 ------------1.32
Ford Automotive International Holding, S.L. 408,175,800 ------------ ----- 30.70
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust) 112,084,000 --------------- 8.43
The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd.(Trust) 84,396,000 ---------------- 6.35
FLP Canada 42,483,660 ------------------3.19
Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co.,Ltd. 40,410,500 ----------------3.04
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. 37,624,500 --------------------2.83
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co.,Ltd. 32,483,250 -------------- -------------------2.44
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc. 20,210,000 -------------- ------------------1.52
Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd(Trust B) 17,945,000 ----------------------1.35
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust4) 17,487,000 ------------1.32
#46
Super Moderator
Originally Posted by bascho
I don't know if I can. I'll try though. Isn't Mazda a publicly traded company with shares traded in open stock markets? I am not sure. I knew Ford had 33.4%.....I just say 30% percent because it's easier. I didn't realize that Ford had offered to buy 51% at one point in time (thanks for the article Zoom). Based on the article I am not totally convinced that the Sumitomo had actually owned Mazda at all......they may have bailed Mazda out with large corporate loans and that is why they had so much interest in Ford getting involved. I am really going to research this topic now....both for this discussion and for my own personal knowledge.
Cheers..
Have to go..
#48
Administrator
Thread Starter
here it is again for folks using the normal posts per page like myself
Ford now has 33.89%
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/index.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st1.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st2.htm
Ford now has 33.89%
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/index.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st1.htm
Shareholder No. of Shares Owned -------------------- --------Ratio (%)
Ford Automotive International Holding, S.L. 408,175,800 ------------ ----- 30.70
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust) 112,084,000 --------------- 8.43
The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd.(Trust) 84,396,000 ---------------- 6.35
FLP Canada 42,483,660 ------------------3.19
Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co.,Ltd. 40,410,500 ----------------3.04
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. 37,624,500 --------------------2.83
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co.,Ltd. 32,483,250 -------------- -------------------2.44
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc. 20,210,000 -------------- ------------------1.52
Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd(Trust B) 17,945,000 ----------------------1.35
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust4) 17,487,000 ------------1.32
Ford Automotive International Holding, S.L. 408,175,800 ------------ ----- 30.70
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust) 112,084,000 --------------- 8.43
The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd.(Trust) 84,396,000 ---------------- 6.35
FLP Canada 42,483,660 ------------------3.19
Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co.,Ltd. 40,410,500 ----------------3.04
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. 37,624,500 --------------------2.83
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co.,Ltd. 32,483,250 -------------- -------------------2.44
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc. 20,210,000 -------------- ------------------1.52
Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd(Trust B) 17,945,000 ----------------------1.35
Japan Trustee Services Bank,Ltd.(Trust4) 17,487,000 ------------1.32
#49
I found this in a Google search:
About Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda Motor Corporation (TSE: 7261) started manufacturing tools in 1929 and soon branched out into production of trucks for commercial use. In the early 1960s, Mazda launched its first passenger car models and began developing rotary engines. Still headquartered in Hiroshima in western Japan, Mazda today ranks as one of Japan's leading automakers, and exports cars to the United States and Europe for over 30 years. Overseas sales account for more than half of total turnover. Mazda has two main production sites in Japan and 19 overseas facilities. Overseas sites include joint ventures based in the United States, and in Thailand with Ford Motor Company, Mazda's largest shareholder.
Contact:
Mazda Motor Corporation
Mr K. Yoshitake
yoshitake.k@tky.mazda.co.jp
+81-82-282-1111
About Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda Motor Corporation (TSE: 7261) started manufacturing tools in 1929 and soon branched out into production of trucks for commercial use. In the early 1960s, Mazda launched its first passenger car models and began developing rotary engines. Still headquartered in Hiroshima in western Japan, Mazda today ranks as one of Japan's leading automakers, and exports cars to the United States and Europe for over 30 years. Overseas sales account for more than half of total turnover. Mazda has two main production sites in Japan and 19 overseas facilities. Overseas sites include joint ventures based in the United States, and in Thailand with Ford Motor Company, Mazda's largest shareholder.
Contact:
Mazda Motor Corporation
Mr K. Yoshitake
yoshitake.k@tky.mazda.co.jp
+81-82-282-1111
#50
Originally Posted by zoom44
here it is again for folks using the normal posts per page like myself
Ford now has 33.7%
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/index.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st1.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st2.htm
Ford now has 33.7%
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/index.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st1.htm
http://www.mazda.com/investors/03kabu/st2.htm
Nice post Zoom That's why you da boss of this shiiiit