Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Lancia Delta Integrale Evolution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-06-2005, 06:23 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Lancia Delta Integrale Evolution

Yeah, I posted it in another thread, but it's badass. I just found out that in Canada, a car 15 years old, or greater, doesn't have to meet or bumper/lights etc standards which usually thwart the importation of cool cars. So, now I could import this...

What the EVO and STi should be!!
Old 10-06-2005, 06:45 PM
  #2  
Rotary eXperimental-8
 
moRotorMotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gander, Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ultimate sleeper. This car won so many world championships - it was unstopable in its day.
Old 10-06-2005, 06:57 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
babylou's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Without spares it will be a mistake.
Old 10-06-2005, 08:14 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
MP3Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by babylou
Without spares it will be a mistake.

There are spares available, but you have to get them from Europe. There is a very reliable Lancia aftermarket and parts supplier in England known as Omicron.
Old 10-06-2005, 10:45 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it, Do it,
Old 10-07-2005, 12:04 AM
  #6  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get a Scorpion instead
Old 10-07-2005, 12:14 AM
  #7  
Stainless
 
AQA101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly one of the "must have owned one once in my life" cars. Get it.
Old 10-07-2005, 09:48 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
globi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're not exactly great in the reliability department.
I'd rather get a Mazda 323 GT-R:

Just as fast but more reliable. (I actually did have one and put 230,000 km on it without major issues, then lend it to a co-worker who then crashed it - never lend your car to anybody.)
Old 10-07-2005, 12:03 PM
  #9  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny you say that's "what the Evo and STi should be", they would absolutely eat the Delta alive on any surface, as would a regular WRX. Hell even a stock STi or Evo would probably give an old group B S4 a run for its money around a tight rally course like you see today in the WRC. They're cool cars and I respect rally history more than anyone, but don't make them out to be something they're not. For those not in the know, the death of Lancia driver Henri Toivonen is in large part what led to group B being being banned in 1986.

If you want the best car that was made as a result of homologation (besides the Sti and Evo of today), it's probably the Ford RS200 or Cosworth Escort.

Last edited by IkeWRX; 10-07-2005 at 12:09 PM.
Old 10-07-2005, 12:07 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I was speaking more to the hatchback, AWD issue. Not that I would want a car made in 2005 to be like a 15 year old car.
Old 10-07-2005, 12:11 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Didn't they sell the Cosworth over here under the name Xarati or something?

EDIT: haha, I was way off!! XR4Ti. Same thing?

Last edited by BlueEyes; 10-07-2005 at 12:53 PM.
Old 10-07-2005, 01:38 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
FFor those not in the know, the death of Lancia driver Henri Toivonen is in large part what led to group B being being banned in 1986.
There's a lot of drivers nowadays still complaining that the death of Group B was a knee-jerk reaction to Toivonen's death. I know he wasn't the first Group B driver to die in a crash, but I wonder if Toivonen had survived the crash would he blame himself or all the power under the hood.

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
If you want the best car that was made as a result of homologation (besides the Sti and Evo of today), it's probably the Ford RS200 or Cosworth Escort.
The Ford RS200 was such a badass machine. I think they squeezed something like 700whp out of that little 2.1 liter engine. Unfortunately, in street trim, it may be one of the ugliest cars to ever grace a showroom floor...



But in Rally trim...dayum it was mean...





Ike...Which Audi models were a result of homogolation? I know they've probably had at least a few honorable mentions in the mid 80's..
Old 10-07-2005, 01:50 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Here is a wicked page for WRC photos
http://www.jabbasworld.net/viewtopic...er=asc&start=0
you need to sign in, but it's worth it. Lots of other car pics too.

And, I'm still looking for WRC seasons on DVD if anyone knows where to get them.
Old 10-07-2005, 04:37 PM
  #14  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only homologation car audi had was the Audi Sport Quattro, it was pretty impressive.

http://www.quat.com/sqhome.html
Old 10-07-2005, 04:43 PM
  #15  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Here is a wicked page for WRC photos
http://www.jabbasworld.net/viewtopic...er=asc&start=0
you need to sign in, but it's worth it. Lots of other car pics too.

And, I'm still looking for WRC seasons on DVD if anyone knows where to get them.
Not DVD, but this Suby owner does some prettyv good highlight videos.

http://www.rallyvids.com/
Old 10-07-2005, 05:04 PM
  #16  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Didn't they sell the Cosworth over here under the name Xarati or something?

EDIT: haha, I was way off!! XR4Ti. Same thing?
Not the same thing but pretty cool little cars (they were the same as the Ford Sierra). I believe they had the same engine as the 4 cylinder turbo SVO Mustangs of the same era.

Last edited by IkeWRX; 10-07-2005 at 05:34 PM.
Old 10-07-2005, 05:08 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
nSanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Funny you say that's "what the Evo and STi should be", they would absolutely eat the Delta alive on any surface, as would a regular WRX. Hell even a stock STi or Evo would probably give an old group B S4 a run for its money around a tight rally course like you see today in the WRC. They're cool cars and I respect rally history more than anyone, but don't make them out to be something they're not. For those not in the know, the death of Lancia driver Henri Toivonen is in large part what led to group B being being banned in 1986.

If you want the best car that was made as a result of homologation (besides the Sti and Evo of today), it's probably the Ford RS200 or Cosworth Escort.
Lol the Ford RS200 WAS the reason for the banning of group B cars, after it ploughed straight into a wall of spectators.
Old 10-07-2005, 05:34 PM
  #18  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nSanity
Lol the Ford RS200 WAS the reason for the banning of group B cars, after it ploughed straight into a wall of spectators.
That played a part, but it wasn't until Toivonen's death that group B was cancelled. Had Toivonen lived in that crash group b may very well have continued for another year or two. However the banning was inevitable, the group B cars had become insane and many claimed they could out accelerate the F1 cars of the day. In fact Toivonen drove a Delta S4 on the Portuguese Grand Prix circuit and just a result of some hotlaps he would have qualified 6th for the grand prix that same year.
Old 10-07-2005, 06:24 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what would happen if they brought Group B back with a 1600cc displacement limit. Could one of these manufacturers manipulate a reliable WRC friendly 500whp+ out of a block that small. IMHO they should have restricted Group B with common sense handicaps rather than put it out to pasture. People loved the "no limts" and out-of-the-box approach manufacturers could use to showcase their cars and their engineering prowess.
Old 10-07-2005, 07:51 PM
  #20  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steiner
I wonder what would happen if they brought Group B back with a 1600cc displacement limit. Could one of these manufacturers manipulate a reliable WRC friendly 500whp+ out of a block that small. IMHO they should have restricted Group B with common sense handicaps rather than put it out to pasture. People loved the "no limts" and out-of-the-box approach manufacturers could use to showcase their cars and their engineering prowess.
That's essentially what the WRC is today. I'd say the WRC cars are pretty impressive even with all the limitations placed upon them.
Old 10-09-2005, 06:10 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Shiri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by globi
They're not exactly great in the reliability department.
I'd rather get a Mazda 323 GT-R:

Just as fast but more reliable. (I actually did have one and put 230,000 km on it without major issues, then lend it to a co-worker who then crashed it - never lend your car to anybody.)
You are correct to say that they are not reliable, however they are miles faster than the 323 GTR, which is a 7 second car at best (Deltas are anywhere from low 5s to high 5s).
Old 10-09-2005, 06:13 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Shiri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Funny you say that's "what the Evo and STi should be", they would absolutely eat the Delta alive on any surface, as would a regular WRX. Hell even a stock STi or Evo would probably give an old group B S4 a run for its money around a tight rally course like you see today in the WRC. They're cool cars and I respect rally history more than anyone, but don't make them out to be something they're not. For those not in the know, the death of Lancia driver Henri Toivonen is in large part what led to group B being being banned in 1986.

If you want the best car that was made as a result of homologation (besides the Sti and Evo of today), it's probably the Ford RS200 or Cosworth Escort.
Absolutely, the older AWD cars of yesterday cannot compete with the young guns from Japan. They are very brutal cars and difficult to drive.
Old 10-09-2005, 02:33 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shiri
You are correct to say that they are not reliable, however they are miles faster than the 323 GTR, which is a 7 second car at best (Deltas are anywhere from low 5s to high 5s).
Did it read that right? The Lancia Delta was a low 5 second 1/4 mile car? That at't be right.
Old 10-10-2005, 03:48 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
globi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shiri
You are correct to say that they are not reliable, however they are miles faster than the 323 GTR, which is a 7 second car at best (Deltas are anywhere from low 5s to high 5s).
I think you mix it up with the 323 GTX which was less powerful. The GTR did definitely not have 7 seconds from 0 to 60mph. The weight to power ratio of the Integrale Evo was 6.2kg/hp and the GTR had 6.3kg/hp, which is not even a 2% difference.
Old 10-12-2005, 07:39 AM
  #25  
tuj
Registered
 
tuj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Funny you say that's "what the Evo and STi should be", they would absolutely eat the Delta alive on any surface, as would a regular WRX. Hell even a stock STi or Evo would probably give an old group B S4 a run for its money around a tight rally course like you see today in the WRC. They're cool cars and I respect rally history more than anyone, but don't make them out to be something they're not.
Um, wait a second. You're saying the current production Evo and the STi would beat the Delta S4 group B car? No way. Certainly not on any surface. Just look at the Pike's Peak times. Even the WRC cars wouldn't beat a group B car on a fast, open course.

I'll concede that the WRC cars would be faster than group B on a modern rally stage due to the fact that the stages have a max allowable average speed of 120 kph. The WRC cars have superior suspension and torque, but the group B cars are 360 kg lighter and have 150+ more hp. But would the current production Evo and STi beat a group B car? I don't think so, even with their superior suspension.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Lancia Delta Integrale Evolution



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.