Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Infiniti G37 dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-21-2007, 01:44 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RX8-79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Infiniti G37 dyno results

The lastest weapon fired into the HP war....the G37; 287 hp @ 7300 rpm, 236 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm, versus 236 hp, 218 lb-ft, for the outgoing G35.





The G37's engine, however, blows that performance away. It's rated 37 horsepower higher, but the G37 we tested put 51 more horses [than the G35 coupe] to the rear wheels. Since this was measured on a chassis dyno, we can't know for sure how much of that increase is due to higher engine output versus lower driveline losses. However, since the drivelines are similar, we'd guess nearly all of this increase is brute force from the new motor. Think about it this way: If frictional losses are a constant percentage, you'd have to add 63 horsepower to the G35's engine to make it put 51 more to its wheels. This is a big, big jump in power.

The best news is that Infiniti wasn't exaggerating about its other claims: the new 3.7-liter is stronger than the 3.5 both at low revs and high revs. Its torque curve is flatter, too. Throttle response (if you can say that about a car without a throttle) is instantaneous, the 3.5's coarseness has been tamed, and I got an indicated 27 mpg - with the air conditioning switched on at 80 mph - on the way back from the dyno shop. So if there's any drawback to VVEL, we haven't seen it.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...niti_g37_dyno/
Old 05-21-2007, 01:52 PM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
damn...
Old 05-21-2007, 01:53 PM
  #3  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice torque shelf indeed
Old 05-21-2007, 01:55 PM
  #4  
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
CarAndDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow....the HP wars continue.
Old 05-21-2007, 02:12 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
More_Revs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NE Wisconsin
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, indeed....but I wonder how far would would this war go with the current gas price.
Old 05-21-2007, 02:37 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
SlowLude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry, innovation will kick in and they'll find a way around it. The beauty of competition in a free market.

Originally Posted by More_Revs
yes, indeed....but I wonder how far would would this war go with the current gas price.
Old 05-21-2007, 02:40 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow
Old 05-21-2007, 02:42 PM
  #8  
WedsSport Member
 
R888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada, TO
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is a shame that the automatic rx8 has 130whp
Old 05-21-2007, 02:49 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
MisplacedRotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: pflugerville, tx
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"and I got an indicated 27 mpg - with the air conditioning switched on at 80 mph - on the way back from the dyno shop. So if there's any drawback to VVEL, we haven't seen it."

hmm doesnt that suck so the g37 dynos @21 more hp at the wheels than we have at the crank and gets better gas mileage.... oh well.
Old 05-21-2007, 02:54 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
too bad the G37coupe became a fatass...
Old 05-21-2007, 04:48 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MisplacedRotors
"and I got an indicated 27 mpg - with the air conditioning switched on at 80 mph - on the way back from the dyno shop. So if there's any drawback to VVEL, we haven't seen it."

hmm doesnt that suck so the g37 dynos @21 more hp at the wheels than we have at the crank and gets better gas mileage.... oh well.
It's more like 55 hp more than the '8 has at the crank, but it's also a variant of an engine Nissan makes huge quantities of that they've had an additional 4 years to develop over the Renesis. This engine isn't even direct injected yet and it's putting out very good power and fuel economy numbers, Nissan's done a great job developing the VQ and pushing the limits of what they can do with engine while keeping it affordable. Hopefully Mazda continues to advance the rotary in the same way and put out an even better version of the engine at some point over the next few years.
Old 05-21-2007, 05:05 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
350zFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but atleast they're packing the *****/muscle to move that weight around though.

Originally Posted by r0tor
too bad the G37coupe became a fatass...
Old 05-21-2007, 06:23 PM
  #13  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to bad it doesn't look like the concept.
Old 05-21-2007, 06:31 PM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 350zFan
True, but atleast they're packing the *****/muscle to move that weight around though.
at only a few pounds short of 3,700lbs it hardly has any power to weight ratio advantage over the outgoing model and probably should have a V8 to haul its fatass around

Last edited by r0tor; 05-21-2007 at 06:38 PM.
Old 05-21-2007, 06:41 PM
  #15  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rotor
at only a few pounds short of 3,700lbs it now needs a V8 to haul its fatass around
Yep. I'd expect only a slightly faster car than the previous version. That's damn near the weight of the GTO and upcoming G8(both of which sport some real power, and high quality interiors, exteriors, and amenities at a comparable price), not to mention several luxury models from various brands (almost all of which do it better). And the premium price on the G series is hardly worth it in my opinion. But then I've never been much of a fan of Nissan. The VQxx does sound good though. The only saving grace for Nissan is the rwd chassis.
Old 05-21-2007, 06:55 PM
  #16  
RX8 HA HA
 
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gardena Cali 310
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i hope no one says

"well, we can get em on an autocross course or the twisties!"

oops..ahahaha thats teh gEy
Old 05-21-2007, 07:03 PM
  #17  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Originally Posted by XDEEDUBBX
i hope no one says

"well, we can get em on an autocross course or the twisties!"

oops..ahahaha thats teh gEy

No ****.

I wonder what a Stillen blower will do to that bad boy.
Old 05-21-2007, 07:17 PM
  #18  
Club Marbles Member
 
Raptor2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the 2008 RX-8 gets new colors.
Old 05-21-2007, 07:17 PM
  #19  
Doggie Style :)
 
LabDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r0tor
at only a few pounds short of 3,700lbs it hardly has any power to weight ratio advantage over the outgoing model and probably should have a V8 to haul its fatass around
Everything is realtive. 330 hp will do a good job hauling around 3,700 lbs. Each horsey will be moving only 11.2 lbs. Our RX-8s would be moving 13 lbs per hp. Considering the Renisis is overrated (power wise) and the VQ underrated the difference is probably greater. Who's the fatass now?

FWIW: Lotus Elise 1984 lbs and 190 hp. Just over 10 lbs per hp!
Old 05-21-2007, 07:58 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
weak!
Old 05-21-2007, 08:42 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
being a g35 owner i really like what they've done to the g37, its an improvement in almost every way. please remember that its not a pure sports car to begin with.

but to be honest, if im in the market to get a car next year or the year after, id probably go with the even more impressive 335i twin turbo coupe, unless the G37 is dramatically cheaper, like at least 5k cheaper. even though it has 30 less hp, the bmw is so much cheaper to tune.

Id be interesting to see how they fare stock vs stock, i imagine itd be close, they are around the same weight, bmw has more torque while infiniti has more power.

Last edited by playdoh43; 05-21-2007 at 08:50 PM.
Old 05-21-2007, 09:02 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
being a g35 owner i really like what they've done to the g37, its an improvement in almost every way. please remember that its not a pure sports car to begin with.

but to be honest, if im in the market to get a car next year or the year after, id probably go with the even more impressive 335i twin turbo coupe, unless the G37 is dramatically cheaper, like at least 5k cheaper. even though it has 30 less hp, the bmw is so much cheaper to tune.

Id be interesting to see how they fare stock vs stock, i imagine itd be close, they are around the same weight, bmw has more torque while infiniti has more power.
Edmunds Review

Automobile Review

Neither provides very detailed numbers, but the comments made on how the cars stack up are pretty interesting.
Old 05-21-2007, 09:07 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cool, nice reads pck. what im really looking forward to is when BMI race them at tsukuba
Old 05-21-2007, 09:56 PM
  #24  
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
 
lesper4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Fontana, CA.
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice numbers but i still like what i got.
Old 05-21-2007, 10:02 PM
  #25  
Registered Abuser
 
Socr8tes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by therm8
That's damn near the weight of the GTO and upcoming G8(both of which sport some real power, and high quality interiors, exteriors, and amenities at a comparable price)
High quality interiors?! Is there some special edition GTO I don't know about?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Infiniti G37 dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.