Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

I may have to change my user name...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-03-2005, 11:30 AM
  #26  
Ike
Blue By You
Thread Starter
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8-TX
What is it about the Evo that you like the most? Handling, isn't it?
Can you change rack & pinion ratios / disable the assist on the soobie, and there you have you go-cart! :p
The quick steering is wonderful, though I wonder if it can be a little scary day to day it's so responsive... What I really want is an 05 STi, it handles great as well but the steering will never be as fast. The 05 STi had some little tweaks that made a big difference about the few gripes that people had about the car. The tranny and clutch are very very strong in the STi and Subaru really seems to put effort into making things better and adjusting for each model year. The 02 WRX tranny had some issues, they improved on that in the MY03, while Mitsubishi has kept the same shitty clutch in the Evo for 3 model years.

I could go out and get my 05 STi today, but that 100 or so dollars more a month towards my car would be less money I have towards the house I want to buy in the next year. Priorities suck! I could get an Evo and have the same or a lower payment than what I have now and that's where a lot of the temptation is coming from.

Omni, the 8 handles great, but I still feel the STi and Evo are a step above, they're also nice during the midwest winters. If Mazda ever comes out with a factory FI car that isn't inching towards 40k I would certainly consider one. Aftermarket FI on a car just doesn't appeal to me for a daily driver, as soon as you do that it becomes a heavily modded car and I don't care what kind of car it is, that will lead to more problems at some point. If I were to get an RX-8 I don't think I'd consider used (probably the thinking I should have with the Evo). Lastly, the current turbo applications aren't doing much for me, the kind of HP they're putting down can be ecplipsed with me putting about 1k in mods on my car. Not that I'm just doing it for the speed, there is certainly give and take with every car.
Old 02-03-2005, 11:39 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The WRX and EVO are the same thing. An $8000 car with $10,000 worth of go fast crap slapped on. Back in the 80's they were called Camaros. How about you actually get a nice car. They are both the cheapest of econo boxes with some go fast parts. I'm pretty happy people like you exist. It allows for an economic class system where people like me can become financially independant on the backs of the stupid.

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Stopped by a Mitsubishi dealer today since I noticed a white Evo sitting near the showroom. Well it turns out they had a few used ones on the lot as well so I'm getting numbers hashed out for a used one (04 silver with 5k miles) and the white 05 which I guess is still from their first shipment of 05s.

I don't know what the hell to do, I still love my WRX but I love the way the Evo handles, but that's only if the Mitsubishi warranty nightmares don't ever happen to me. The notoriously weak clutch on the Evo scares me, the financial difficulties of Mitsubishi do to a lesser degree. Then there is the fact that parts of me would really rather have an 05 STi but financially I just don't want to take on that burden since I'd be looking at 3-5k more for the STi new + I believe higher insurance than the Evo.

The other part of me just wants to mod the hell out of my WRX, warranty is up soon and it's finally worth more than what I owe.

Looks - STi or my WRX
Cost - My current WRX
Potential hp - Evo
Reliability - Subaru
Not dealing with a jackass company - Subaru
Handling - Evo
Daily driver - My WRX then STi
Interior - Tossup
Handling - Evo with a slight edge over an STi


I know this is a decision that only I can make but what I really need is for someone to talk me out of getting a new car! :p Must resist temptation... must... resist... I'll know more Sat. and I'll let you know in case any of you actually give a damn what car I drive.
Old 02-03-2005, 11:45 AM
  #28  
Registered
 
Luftwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sandy Eggo
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Dude... These cars are not like Camaros...
Old 02-03-2005, 11:51 AM
  #29  
yes, I bite
 
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shazam
The WRX and EVO are the same thing. An $8000 car with $10,000 worth of go fast crap slapped on. Back in the 80's they were called Camaros. How about you actually get a nice car. They are both the cheapest of econo boxes with some go fast parts. I'm pretty happy people like you exist. It allows for an economic class system where people like me can become financially independant on the backs of the stupid.
Dude, you came from an Audi TT, and you're throwing stones? Har Har Har.
Old 02-03-2005, 11:56 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My wife sure did have one. She loved it. The quality of the car, lack of rattleing, thickness of panels, panel gap, quality, carpet material, plastic grade, leather quality were top notch. The big problem with the car was the legacy suspension geometry that made it handle poorly (golf platform). which was not a concern of my wife. But, this is in no way a cheap car qualit wise. Clearly the Evo and WRX run in fear when a can opener is near by. No matter how fast they are, they are just recycled Kirin cans.

Cars are about compromises. But, you should never just give up on quality. It really defines who you are. A lower class punk that is willing to sit in a trash can to harrass people on the road by street racing.

Originally Posted by Speed-ER doc
Dude, you came from an Audi TT, and you're throwing stones? Har Har Har.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:03 PM
  #31  
Ike
Blue By You
Thread Starter
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rodrigo67
first I understand the need to just get something new or different but I think there are some things you really need to take a hard look at.

I never really liked rally cars but understand and appreciate what they are and what they can do. The Sti, Evo, and Srt all have amazing drivetrains but...and I know how you feel about this...the srt is not just a neon, but it is a chrysler product, same goes for the evo, it's not a lancer but it is a mitsu. If I had a chioce of the 3, the subaru would be my pick based on reliability and subaru support.

You alreay know the little quirks and idiosyncrocies of your wrx, you know the capabilities and limitations of the wrx, you know all the little frustrations that come on every car. The Evo is a big unknown. You don't know how it was broken in, you don't know what type of issues that are common on this car and if mitsu will take care of it, you don't even know if mitsu will be around.

If you are the type of guy that can rip out an engine, rebuild it and pop it back in over a weekend, maybe the evo's for you, but from your past posts it sounds like this car will be used as your daily driver, and the wrx is just more reliable. If mitsu was on more solid ground and you were talking about a new Evo, I would say go for it, but you are talking about a big investment just for something different.

So, mod up your wrx ( for a fraction of the cost of this used evo), and since you were going to keep the evo stock, you'll be running the wrx faster and cheaper.

If I were to ask your advise on trading my 8, which is almost paid for, in for a used turbo 8 which may or may not void the warrenty, which will definitely be faster but have unknown reliability, and other unknown issues plus starting payments all over again. What would you advise be? That should be your answer...

I don't think I was clear with my first post, I'd most like end up with a white 05 with 6 miles on it, though the 04 with 5k miles did intrigue me for saving a few grand. But most of your points come across regardless.

I also have no intentions what so ever of keeping the Evo stock should I get one :p When I got my WRX the plan was to gradually work up to 300whp once my warranty was up. If I had an Evo I'd probably have a goal of 450whp or so but could get to that 300whp point much easier and cheaper. I know 300whp WRXs are still pretty good daily drivers and know of one person that put nearly 100k miles on his stage 4 WRX with only having to worry about your basic wear items. The reliabily of a 400+whp Evo and daily driveabilty I'm just not sure on. Either way I'm still tossing caution to the wind when it comes to reliability.

RX-8pilot, the one used one I'd consider is the one with 5k miles, funny thing is all 3 of the used Evos there have brand new all seasons on them Which he tried to point out as a perk, but christ, when you take 2k worth of tires off a car and put $400 a set Continental all seasons I'm thinking they should knock another gand off the price for that alone. I'd also be curious to see what those tires looked like after 5k miles and the sales guy kind of got a little flustered when I asked him if they still had the Advans it came in with.

LNWLF, that's just what I'm trying to figure out... Is this clutch thing blown out of proportion like so many other car problems on the net, or is it a serious concern <shrugs> I have read a few stories of people going through a couple clutches in under 10k miles But then I've also read stories of people going through two trannys in their WRX in less than 40k miles, but I've personally met over 20 WRX owners and not a single one has had to replace a tranny. It can be pretty tough to sift through the BS on the net sometimes.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:05 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by shazam
It really defines who you are.
A car does not define who you are in the least. People who think that are pretty sorry individuals.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:07 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The car doesn't, but your decisions do. And driving in a fast trash can is a pretty compelling statement.

Originally Posted by BlueEyes
A car does not define who you are in the least. People who think that are pretty sorry individuals.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:12 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by shazam
The car doesn't, but your decisions do. And driving in a fast trash can is a pretty compelling statement.
Not really. If I see someone driving one of these "trash cans" the only thing I assume , and sometimes incorrectly, is that they enjoy performance cars.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:13 PM
  #35  
yes, I bite
 
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm gonna go get some popcorn now.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:17 PM
  #36  
Ike
Blue By You
Thread Starter
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shazam
My wife sure did have one. She loved it. The quality of the car, lack of rattleing, thickness of panels, panel gap, quality, carpet material, plastic grade, leather quality were top notch. The big problem with the car was the legacy suspension geometry that made it handle poorly (golf platform). which was not a concern of my wife. But, this is in no way a cheap car qualit wise. Clearly the Evo and WRX run in fear when a can opener is near by. No matter how fast they are, they are just recycled Kirin cans.

Cars are about compromises. But, you should never just give up on quality. It really defines who you are. A lower class punk that is willing to sit in a trash can to harrass people on the road by street racing.

Sorry man, I buy cars for how they drive and perform first and foremost, not for their high quality plastic and carpeting. If I want an unreliable, heavy, poor handling, underpowered car made from top notch materials I'll go get myself a TT. I had an A4 parked in my driveway for nearly two years, and it stayed parked quite often because it bored me to tears when I drove it. Mushy clutch, mushy shifter, cushy seat, mushy suspension... You can keep your high quality cars What the hell does street racing have to do with any of this, I had more track time at the age of 12 than you will ever have in your life. I like fast cars because I enjoy them and grew up racing on road courses, it has nothing to do with wanting to show someone up on a public road.

Now would some kind mod like to ban Shift_Zoom 8 again? What is this, like the 7th or 8th time? You're a freaking psycho man.

Last edited by IkeWRX; 02-03-2005 at 12:29 PM.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:17 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This isn't a performance car. It's a modern day camero. I've spent a fair amount of time a Laugna Seca with the BMW club. I've driven Evo's, WRX's (not STI) and one of the club members miatas was much more of a performance driving experience from a feedback perspective. The evo and WRX were sloppy and lack dynamic feedback that a properly engineered high quility car, like my M coupe I still track does. Quit frankly, everything I disliked about my S4 from a performance perspective, is missing in the Evo and WRX as well. They just also happen to be garbage. But, that S4 sure was fast.

There is a difference between a faster trashcan and a performance car.

Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Not really. If I see someone driving one of these "trash cans" the only thing I assume , and sometimes incorrectly, is that they enjoy performance cars.

Last edited by shazam; 02-03-2005 at 12:21 PM.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:19 PM
  #38  
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
czr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Not really. If I see someone driving one of these "trash cans" the only thing I assume , and sometimes incorrectly, is that they enjoy performance cars.
But he's right a car is sort of a representation of yourself.. like your clothes or the way you present yourself. Out of all the cars out there you have choices...

I like the name IkeSTI myself.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:26 PM
  #39  
Ike
Blue By You
Thread Starter
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shazam
This isn't a performance car. It's a modern day camero. I've spent a fair amount of time a Laugna Seca with the BMW club. I've driven Evo's, WRX's (not STI) and one of the club members miatas was much more of a performance driving experience from a feedback perspective. The evo and WRX were sloppy and lack dynamic feedback that a properly engineered high quility car, like my M coupe I still track does. Quit frankly, everything I disliked about my S4 from a performance perspective, is missing in the Evo and WRX. They ust also happen to be garbage. But, that S4 sure was fast.

There is a difference between a faster trashcan and a performance car.
You've clearly never driven an Evo, and I doubt you've ever driven a car on a track. No one in their right mind would ever say the Evo is sloppy and lacks "dynamic feedback". If in fact you're aren't full of BS, then don't bother going to the track anymore because you're hopeless.

On that note, you're now ignored, just like past incarnations of you have been.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:26 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not whoever the person you are referring to is. You have a lot of nerver thinking that I'm crapping up this place. Believe me, this board would be a lot better without you. I think the planet would be too.

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Now would some kind mod like to ban Shift_Zoom 8 again? What is this, like the 7th or 8th time? You're a freaking psycho man.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:28 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd encourage you to come to the next BMW club event at Laguna Seca. Say Hi. I'm the guy in the Purple Eddie Munster Mobile with the white roll cage.

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
You've clearly never driven an Evo, and I doubt you've ever driven a car on a track. No one in their right mind would ever say the Evo is sloppy and lacks "dynamic feedback". If in fact you're aren't full of BS, then don't bother going to the track anymore because you're hopeless.

On that note, you're now ignored, just like past incarnations of you have been.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:29 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by czr
But he's right a car is sort of a representation of yourself.. like your clothes or the way you present yourself. Out of all the cars out there you have choices...

I like the name IkeSTI myself.
No, he is wrong. If you judge someones character by their clothes and their car, it speaks only to your character flaws.

These cars are fun to drive period. That's what they were designed for and that's what they deliver.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:35 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The next time you see a guy in a camero with a neck thicker then his head, make sure you don't judge him. Same thing goes for the kid in the ricer trashcan. Right.... Welcome to the real world.

Originally Posted by BlueEyes
No, he is wrong. If you judge someones character by their clothes and their car, it speaks only to your character flaws.

These cars are fun to drive period. That's what they were designed for and that's what they deliver.

Last edited by shazam; 02-03-2005 at 12:38 PM.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:38 PM
  #44  
Ike
Blue By You
Thread Starter
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
No, he is wrong. If you judge someones character by their clothes and their car, it speaks only to your character flaws.

These cars are fun to drive period. That's what they were designed for and that's what they deliver.
In my line of work the people of importance don't even see my car, it's usually thousands of miles away. I don't buy a car to be seen in, nor do any of the people I deal with. I thought that attitude went away once people realized how silly power suits and power lunches were, but I guess some people are still clinging to their Reagan years...
Old 02-03-2005, 12:41 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Sir,

Thank you for financing my high standard of living in Northern and Sourthern, Ca. My vacation property in Kaneoho also is appreciated. If it wasn't for being able to leverage your poor decisicons to my advantage I would not be able to have my high standard of living on your back.



Originally Posted by IkeWRX
In my line of work the people of importance don't even see my car, it's usually thousands of miles away. I don't buy a car to be seen in, nor do any of the people I deal with. I thought that attitude went away once people realized how silly power suits and power lunches were, but I guess some people are still clinging to their Reagan years...
Old 02-03-2005, 12:45 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by shazam
The next time you see a guy in a camero with a nech thicker then his head, make sure you don't judge him. Same thing goes for the kid in the ricer trashcan. Right.... Welcome to the real world.
The real world, what's that?
Is it the place where ignorant people subscribe to popular sterotypes because they're too stupid and lazy to see past appearances? Hey, I live their now. Lot's of people think that way, including yourself, doesn't make it right.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:53 PM
  #47  
Listen to Zoom44
 
Tirminyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Overland Park
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's where their judgment is clouded by **** because their head is up their ***.

How a simple thread got turned into a **** stain by some ***.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:53 PM
  #48  
Registered
 
Luftwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sandy Eggo
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I liked this thread better an hour ago...
Old 02-03-2005, 12:55 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
me too, then *SHAZAAAAM* it went all to hell.
Old 02-03-2005, 12:56 PM
  #50  
Listen to Zoom44
 
Tirminyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Overland Park
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luftwaffle
I liked this thread better an hour ago...
Agreed.

Back On Topic- Keep the Rex man!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: I may have to change my user name...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.