300zx what do you guys think
I say get it i had the pleasure of driving my uncles for about a year while he was on leave it was a twin turbo and the power was just insane on that car no major issues handles great(not as great as the rx8) but never the less its a great car wish i still had it
Had a 1992 NA with over 225000 miles when I bought it. I only owned it for about 6 months. Ran great, super fun to drive, just a little heavy. I would say 'underpowered', but on this forum . . .not too many people worry about power.
They did have a tendency to juice head gaskets if you ran them hot. But then again, any car running hot will destroy something sooner or later.
The VG engine line was not as good as the new VQ's, nor did they rev as high, but with proper maintenance you can keep them running for a long long time.
I say if the price is decent . . go for it!
They did have a tendency to juice head gaskets if you ran them hot. But then again, any car running hot will destroy something sooner or later.
The VG engine line was not as good as the new VQ's, nor did they rev as high, but with proper maintenance you can keep them running for a long long time.
I say if the price is decent . . go for it!
wrong forum... https://www.rx8club.com/forumdisplay.php?f=49
A friend of mine had one, great car lots of fun. had a few issues with it that he worked on himself, the only negative he said was that the engine was hard to work on (big motor small space.) overall great car and i konw there are forums for the 300zx.
GL with the decision...
http://www.300zxclub.com/
GL with the decision...
http://www.300zxclub.com/
Registered
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
wrong forum... https://www.rx8club.com/forumdisplay.php?f=49
Nice! The 90's Z remains a guilty pleasure of mine...always wanted a 2+2 but they seemed hard to find. I almost bought an na 2 seater, but it was a liitle too worn for my tastes. If it's clean go for it!
had a 90 na around 165000 miles for a year then sold it to a friend. never had any problems with it. i now have a 95 convertible na. i really like the handling of my 95 cuz it feels a lot lighter than my old 90. don't know how the 2+2 drive but i think there's not much diff.
Yep, and I'm not a big fan of what happens to the roofline on the 2+2 model. I don't think the 2+2's are half as popular, which explains the good price for a car that is thats in good condition
if it's mint it should be well taken-care of. my cousin recently scored an na z32. it's got a couple problems, but it was sitting for half a year. we've been fixing it up and it drives great from what i think.
I think it is amazing how good they still look considering the design is 20 years old now! (the first ones arrived in dealers in 1989)
Anyway, a while back I was trying to find a 2+2 for a daily driver when I still had my RX-7. (all 2+2's are non-turbo btw) Keep in mind that this is definitely a large, heavy GT car. But for a daily driver I think it is very good, I would have bought one but couldn't find a clean one at the time...
Anyway, a while back I was trying to find a 2+2 for a daily driver when I still had my RX-7. (all 2+2's are non-turbo btw) Keep in mind that this is definitely a large, heavy GT car. But for a daily driver I think it is very good, I would have bought one but couldn't find a clean one at the time...
My understanding is that that engine is a superior design to the line that became today's VQ. Due to cost, Nissan went to a simpler, cheaper design with some compromises, which is the VQ. I'm not sure what all those changes were but I read about them a long time ago.



