Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2014 Miata

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 04:46 PM
  #1  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
2014 Miata

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...ta-future-cars

Wow...turbo from factory? I'm really liking what Mazda has been doing! Hopefully we'll see some news about a new rotary as well?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I'll take a larger NA four banger over a really small displacement turbocharged engine any day. But that is probably where some weight savings is. It looks like a Z4, but we shall see if it ever gets produced.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:15 PM
  #3  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
yeah i saw the 300lb savings and was like :0 does look like a beamer...id drive it though.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:27 PM
  #4  
SPHINX144's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Tx
Looks great, but I don't dig the tiny 4 cylinder engine. At least it should be a 2.0 turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:29 PM
  #5  
shazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: Montreal,QC
holyshit, hope they make a mazdaspeed version! Wish the base model would be non turbo and keep the turbo for the mazdaspeed, still crazy how it's gonna be 300lbs less... damn.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
comebackqid's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 997
Likes: 18
From: California
if only that 1.3 were some sort of 13b! like a S2 engine. but sounds crazy a 1.3 liter piston engine. meh.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #7  
ShinkaEvo's Avatar
Triangular Bee Hive
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Socal, LA
I'll be all over it if it gets produced.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
LifeAfterRx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 782
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Wouldn't that be something if car and driver were wrong and Mazda really meant a 1.3L Turbo'd rotary engine?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #9  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by LifeAfterRx8
Wouldn't that be something if car and driver were wrong and Mazda really meant a 1.3L Turbo'd rotary engine?
haha! it does say 4 cylinder...but hey lets hope thats a typo
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 06:16 PM
  #10  
LifeAfterRx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 782
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Jake33
haha! it does say 4 cylinder...but hey lets hope thats a typo
It's hard to believe they'd put an engine that small into a sports car though unless if it's a rotary. The Mazda 2 even has a 1.5L.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 08:19 PM
  #11  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
hmmmm......interesting
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 08:38 PM
  #12  
hornbm's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 503
Likes: 17
From: Bothell, WA
Originally Posted by LifeAfterRx8
It's hard to believe they'd put an engine that small into a sports car though unless if it's a rotary. The Mazda 2 even has a 1.5L.
perhaps you missed the turbo part.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:13 PM
  #13  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
but dont you think thats a little too small for a turbo application?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:37 PM
  #14  
hornbm's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 503
Likes: 17
From: Bothell, WA
turbo IS the reason it would be so small. Consider it capacity on demand. Small engine for cruising, some added boost for get up and go.

Alot of manufactures are following this trend; lower the displacement and add boost. The new Miata is a special extreme example because of it being very light weight.

You need to took at total power output rather than just pure displacement.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #15  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
The 1.3 Turbo four banger reminds me of the old school Honda city that had a 1.3L turbo. It was weak too.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:52 PM
  #16  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
yeah i guess 167hp for 2200lbs isnt that bad at all...honda city arent those the japanese version of geo metro?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 10:15 PM
  #17  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
using 2300 hp puts it at @13.5 hp/lbs and would put it in the 6 second 0-60 time, shave a couple or 3 hundredths off at 2200lbs...

Last edited by zoom44; Mar 29, 2012 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:00 PM
  #18  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
Awesome. I'll bet the 1.3l turbo will have much better midrange torque than the existing N/A 2.0. If they can really pull 300 lbs out it will be a fantastic drive. I'll probably buy one. A great answer to the Toybaru.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:04 PM
  #19  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
damn thats sorta quick then...haha toybaru
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:11 PM
  #20  
Old Rotor's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
And Zoom with a 300HP turbo 13b.....
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:29 PM
  #21  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
Another thing I like about the turbo is the hope of easy tuning, like the MS Miata had. If it could be bumped to an honest 200 hp it would be quite quick.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #22  
Jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dudemanbro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
id prob buy one if it could be easily tuned. it looks damn good, i just hope they make a hardtop version as well
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2012 | 12:33 AM
  #23  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
167 hp with 2200 body is fast.

and I won't be surprised if it can go up to 200hp easily

and if you strip the body with lighter parts, it should have no problem go down to 2000 lbs, 200 hp. damn.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2012 | 06:59 AM
  #24  
77mjd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by nycgps
167 hp with 2200 body is fast.

and I won't be surprised if it can go up to 200hp easily

and if you strip the body with lighter parts, it should have no problem go down to 2000 lbs, 200 hp. damn.
That would be nice...getting into Lotus territory.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2012 | 07:09 AM
  #25  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 66
Maybe, just maybe, I can stop the inaccurate rumors regarding the next generation MX-5 on THIS FORUM. The likelihood that Mazda will use a turbocharged engine of any displacement on it is about nil. They will use a Skyativ G engine. The only turbocharged engines Mazda is speaking of presently are diesel and that will not be used in the MX-5.

Paul.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.