Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2010 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #26  
PotatoSoup's Avatar
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #27  
Gauge's Avatar
Not Jeff Gordon
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: SE-GA
Nothing wrong with straight line speed...unless you live in the mountains lol
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #28  
NightmareX's Avatar
SPEED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Its coming theres no doubt about it.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #29  
PotatoSoup's Avatar
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Gauge
Nothing wrong with straight line speed...unless you live in the mountains lol
Nobody said there was anything wrong with straight-line speed. But when straight-line speed is the ONLY thing a car has going for it...fail.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #30  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.
Big- Yes
Stupid- How so?
Heavy- Yes, but it has the power to haul it.
Staright line Speed- Hell Yes

What's wrong with straight line speed if the handling is pretty decent. Just because a car is heavy doesn't mean it handles like a boat. Now can it handle as well as a RX-8, hell no, but who cares. It will provide the same kind of rush I got whenever I took an on ramp at crazy speeds. Though this will come in the form of neck snapping torque The Camaro is more then just about looks and speed, it's about the legacy of the badge.

Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
Nobody said there was anything wrong with straight-line speed. But when straight-line speed is the ONLY thing a car has going for it...fail.
I guess they already road tested the SS How about you wait for the data before jumping to conclusions.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #31  
PotatoSoup's Avatar
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
I could give a damn about mag numbers and bench racing. I care more about qualitative opinions and analysis from experienced drivers like Randy Pobst.

Let me know when he rates the Camaro as one of the top 5 best-handling cars. Until then, there's always 5thgen.org if you're looking for people who share your love of the Transmarobird.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 04:08 PM
  #32  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Originally Posted by devildog1679
What's wrong with straight line speed if the handling is pretty decent. Just because a car is heavy doesn't mean it handles like a boat. Now can it handle as well as a RX-8, hell no, but who cares. It will provide the same kind of rush I got whenever I took an on ramp at crazy speeds. Though this will come in the form of neck snapping torque The Camaro is more then just about looks and speed, it's about the legacy of the badge.
Weight is important to making a car handle. A heavier car can't transition from a straight to a corner or from a corner to another corner like a lighter car can. It's mass resists the ability to turn more. It can only match a light car in a continuous corner, like a skid pad.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #33  
PotatoSoup's Avatar
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Don't get me started on the "legacy of the badge" when it comes to the Camaro. Everbody seems to point to the original model in that respect, which was a decent car for it day.

But everyone conveniently seems to forget the past 30 years of the Camaro, during which time it was blessed with hokey styling, crappy quality, and questionable performance. Oh yeah, the 4-cylinder Camaro from the 1980s that could do 0-60 in...never. Yeah, that's the kind of "badge legacy" I want in my next car.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #34  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
I could give a damn about mag numbers and bench racing. I care more about qualitative opinions and analysis from experienced drivers like Randy Pobst.

Let me know when he rates the Camaro as one of the top 5 best-handling cars. Until then, there's always 5thgen.org if you're looking for people who share your love of the Transmarobird.
There are plenty of people on this board that appreciate the Camaro, there is nothing wrong with appreciating another car other then the 8. I loved my 8 but these two cars appease different parts of the soul.

If I'm not mistaken you were the only person to post a negative comment, while everyone else was trying to add substance to the thread.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #35  
dynamho's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 7
From: Norwood, NJ
WTF? Brake weights on the Camaro?

http://jalopnik.com/5222908/2010-che...-brake-weights
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:11 PM
  #36  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Brother just put a deposit down on his Camaro. He got the fully loaded V6 LT2 with RS package. The RS on the V6 comes with midnight silver 20 inch wheels which are to die for. Car came to 31 k which is pretty decent.

Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #37  
Aznxkaiser's Avatar
Evolution Theory
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Shoulda gotten the V8
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #38  
Transam kid 01's Avatar
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
From: Hillsdale, NJ
nice, but 31k for the 6banger...ouch. Although it will kick the crap out of an RX8 in a straight line lol. congrats
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #39  
kvndoom's Avatar
The Slow and the Serious
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Communistwealth of Virginia
Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser
Shoulda gotten the V8
I could live with 300 horses under the hood.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #40  
ferg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 974
Likes: 1
From: south florida
im not feeling the ss, stay with an rx8
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #41  
mscamp02's Avatar
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 1
From: morehead, Ky
Wtf

Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.
ok so get a mustang for just about the same price as a new camaro and have over 100hp less....and thats your "proper sports car??? I mean seriously
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #42  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by thecow135
who would care?

Bandit
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #43  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser
Shoulda gotten the V8
An extra 7k for the V8 with the same options. Considering the V6 is 306 hp and 28 mpg highway, tough to cough that kinda dough up. He couldn't afford it. Guess he preferred pimpin it with options versus straight-on power .
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 04:57 PM
  #44  
mscamp02's Avatar
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 1
From: morehead, Ky
^just get no options and get the ss1 package...30999 msrp

I could live with no options in a 400+ rwd sports car brand new for 31k...but maybe thats just me
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #45  
Transam kid 01's Avatar
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
From: Hillsdale, NJ
Originally Posted by mscamp02
^just get no options and get the ss1 package...30999 msrp

I could live with no options in a 400+ rwd sports car brand new for 31k...but maybe thats just me
this
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #46  
Aznxkaiser's Avatar
Evolution Theory
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Seriously lol Why buy a muscle car for interior and luxury over V8 POWAA?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #47  
REsuperD's Avatar
zoom zoom
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: CA
the thing is HUGE. looked good as a show car, should've trimmed the size a bit for production. more sports car, less poser/toy
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #48  
mscamp02's Avatar
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 1
From: morehead, Ky
^I kinda like it being a boat.....but then again I havent really seen one in person so I really cant say yet
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #49  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Some people don't care as much about straight line performance.

Like some RX8 owners.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #50  
warren(silver-roxy-8)'s Avatar
no sleep til it spools
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 502
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Texas
it's pretty heavy, you'd expect the camaro to be a lot lighter in weight than the challenger...not just a little lighter
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.