Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2010 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-17-2009, 02:08 PM
  #26  
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
PotatoSoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.
Old 02-17-2009, 02:43 PM
  #27  
Not Jeff Gordon
 
Gauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SE-GA
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing wrong with straight line speed...unless you live in the mountains lol
Old 02-17-2009, 03:06 PM
  #28  
SPEED
 
NightmareX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its coming theres no doubt about it.
Old 02-17-2009, 03:16 PM
  #29  
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
PotatoSoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gauge
Nothing wrong with straight line speed...unless you live in the mountains lol
Nobody said there was anything wrong with straight-line speed. But when straight-line speed is the ONLY thing a car has going for it...fail.
Old 02-17-2009, 03:23 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
devildog1679's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.
Big- Yes
Stupid- How so?
Heavy- Yes, but it has the power to haul it.
Staright line Speed- Hell Yes

What's wrong with straight line speed if the handling is pretty decent. Just because a car is heavy doesn't mean it handles like a boat. Now can it handle as well as a RX-8, hell no, but who cares. It will provide the same kind of rush I got whenever I took an on ramp at crazy speeds. Though this will come in the form of neck snapping torque The Camaro is more then just about looks and speed, it's about the legacy of the badge.

Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
Nobody said there was anything wrong with straight-line speed. But when straight-line speed is the ONLY thing a car has going for it...fail.
I guess they already road tested the SS How about you wait for the data before jumping to conclusions.
Old 02-17-2009, 04:02 PM
  #31  
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
PotatoSoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I could give a damn about mag numbers and bench racing. I care more about qualitative opinions and analysis from experienced drivers like Randy Pobst.

Let me know when he rates the Camaro as one of the top 5 best-handling cars. Until then, there's always 5thgen.org if you're looking for people who share your love of the Transmarobird.
Old 02-17-2009, 04:08 PM
  #32  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by devildog1679
What's wrong with straight line speed if the handling is pretty decent. Just because a car is heavy doesn't mean it handles like a boat. Now can it handle as well as a RX-8, hell no, but who cares. It will provide the same kind of rush I got whenever I took an on ramp at crazy speeds. Though this will come in the form of neck snapping torque The Camaro is more then just about looks and speed, it's about the legacy of the badge.
Weight is important to making a car handle. A heavier car can't transition from a straight to a corner or from a corner to another corner like a lighter car can. It's mass resists the ability to turn more. It can only match a light car in a continuous corner, like a skid pad.
Old 02-17-2009, 04:11 PM
  #33  
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
PotatoSoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't get me started on the "legacy of the badge" when it comes to the Camaro. Everbody seems to point to the original model in that respect, which was a decent car for it day.

But everyone conveniently seems to forget the past 30 years of the Camaro, during which time it was blessed with hokey styling, crappy quality, and questionable performance. Oh yeah, the 4-cylinder Camaro from the 1980s that could do 0-60 in...never. Yeah, that's the kind of "badge legacy" I want in my next car.
Old 02-18-2009, 12:39 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
devildog1679's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
I could give a damn about mag numbers and bench racing. I care more about qualitative opinions and analysis from experienced drivers like Randy Pobst.

Let me know when he rates the Camaro as one of the top 5 best-handling cars. Until then, there's always 5thgen.org if you're looking for people who share your love of the Transmarobird.
There are plenty of people on this board that appreciate the Camaro, there is nothing wrong with appreciating another car other then the 8. I loved my 8 but these two cars appease different parts of the soul.

If I'm not mistaken you were the only person to post a negative comment, while everyone else was trying to add substance to the thread.
Old 04-22-2009, 02:06 PM
  #35  
Registered
 
dynamho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwood, NJ
Posts: 1,963
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
WTF? Brake weights on the Camaro?

http://jalopnik.com/5222908/2010-che...-brake-weights
Old 04-28-2009, 05:11 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
wantan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brother just put a deposit down on his Camaro. He got the fully loaded V6 LT2 with RS package. The RS on the V6 comes with midnight silver 20 inch wheels which are to die for. Car came to 31 k which is pretty decent.

Old 04-28-2009, 05:15 PM
  #37  
Evolution Theory
 
Aznxkaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shoulda gotten the V8
Old 04-28-2009, 05:18 PM
  #38  
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
 
Transam kid 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice, but 31k for the 6banger...ouch. Although it will kick the crap out of an RX8 in a straight line lol. congrats
Old 04-28-2009, 05:19 PM
  #39  
The Slow and the Serious
 
kvndoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser
Shoulda gotten the V8
I could live with 300 horses under the hood.
Old 04-28-2009, 05:39 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
ferg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: south florida
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
im not feeling the ss, stay with an rx8
Old 04-28-2009, 05:49 PM
  #41  
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
mscamp02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morehead, Ky
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wtf

Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.
ok so get a mustang for just about the same price as a new camaro and have over 100hp less....and thats your "proper sports car??? I mean seriously
Old 04-28-2009, 05:53 PM
  #42  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by thecow135
who would care?

Bandit
Old 04-29-2009, 04:31 PM
  #43  
Registered
 
wantan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser
Shoulda gotten the V8
An extra 7k for the V8 with the same options. Considering the V6 is 306 hp and 28 mpg highway, tough to cough that kinda dough up. He couldn't afford it. Guess he preferred pimpin it with options versus straight-on power .
Old 04-29-2009, 04:57 PM
  #44  
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
mscamp02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morehead, Ky
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^just get no options and get the ss1 package...30999 msrp

I could live with no options in a 400+ rwd sports car brand new for 31k...but maybe thats just me
Old 04-29-2009, 05:33 PM
  #45  
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
 
Transam kid 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mscamp02
^just get no options and get the ss1 package...30999 msrp

I could live with no options in a 400+ rwd sports car brand new for 31k...but maybe thats just me
this
Old 04-29-2009, 05:36 PM
  #46  
Evolution Theory
 
Aznxkaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seriously lol Why buy a muscle car for interior and luxury over V8 POWAA?
Old 04-29-2009, 06:33 PM
  #47  
zoom zoom
 
REsuperD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the thing is HUGE. looked good as a show car, should've trimmed the size a bit for production. more sports car, less poser/toy
Old 04-29-2009, 06:46 PM
  #48  
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
mscamp02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morehead, Ky
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^I kinda like it being a boat.....but then again I havent really seen one in person so I really cant say yet
Old 04-29-2009, 07:15 PM
  #49  
Registered
 
wantan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some people don't care as much about straight line performance.

Like some RX8 owners.
Old 04-29-2009, 07:58 PM
  #50  
no sleep til it spools
 
warren(silver-roxy-8)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
it's pretty heavy, you'd expect the camaro to be a lot lighter in weight than the challenger...not just a little lighter


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.