2007 GT500 officially rates at 500hp!!
#4
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Seriously though, that's a lot of power. It was rumored to be priced around 45K right?
0-60 sub 4 secs??
#5
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by camaro194
Isnt Ford axing the SVT department?
Also, that price is not close to that of the Camaro/Challenger...thats Vette territory.
Also, that price is not close to that of the Camaro/Challenger...thats Vette territory.
SVT is not being killed.
Well, the only Camaro that would have that much power would be an SS version which would definitely sell in the same price range. The Challenger with a 425 hp Hemi would definitely be $40K plus......considering all the other SRT8 versions are over $40K. A 500 hp GT500 will probably be faster than the C6 Vette in 0-60 and 1/4 mile.......so why shouldn't it cost as much?
#7
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Will it have a solid axle or independent rear suspension? I bet it'll be a hair as faster than the standard C6.
#8
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cleoent
Doubt it. It will be heavier.
We'll have to wait until Ford releases the spec for vehicle weight to find out. All I know is that the GT500 has a 100hp advantage over the C6. The Mustang GT weighs 3,518lbs and the C6 weighs 3,179.
#10
Originally Posted by bascho
We'll have to wait until Ford releases the spec for vehicle weight to find out. All I know is that the GT500 has a 100hp advantage over the C6. The Mustang GT weighs 3,518lbs and the C6 weighs 3,179.
I think with the 100hp advantage it will be faster then a c6 @ 400hp.
#11
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fanman
Solid Rear Axle from what I am hearing, and seen in interviews with Ford Execs & Shelby.
The solid axle has been working just fine in the various racing segments.
#12
Just because something works 'just fine', doesn't mean other alternatives wouldn't work better. However, I realize the target audience of this car and I understand why they choose the solid rear.
#13
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Just because something works 'just fine', doesn't mean other alternatives wouldn't work better. However, I realize the target audience of this car and I understand why they choose the solid rear.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 5.4L DOHC is huge and heavy. Now it has an iron crankcase and a blower. Sheesh, if that lump weighs less than 650 lbs I would be surprised. I'll take a 485 lb / 400 hp LS2 engine anyday. Better yet how about a 500 lb / 500 hp LS7.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure on the durability of the new Z06 engine. They had an ATI SC'ed car but blew up the motor. Not sure if it was the tune or the fact that motor is pushing out everything it can already. I have a video with a guy putting in tons of nitrous on it, but long term reliability of that engine on the juice is ???
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LS7 has got to be pretty strong, it has lots of Ti and forged parts throughout and cast iron sleeves for reinforcement in the cylinder chambers. But it's compression is like 11.0:1, which doesn't really lend it to too much boost.
edit, here's a link with details:
http://www.corvettemuseum.com/specs/2006/
edit, here's a link with details:
http://www.corvettemuseum.com/specs/2006/
#18
Ex- member.
Originally Posted by bascho
SVT is not being killed.?
Ford scrapped the adrenaline truck project and note that they removed any SVT badging on the GT500. I read an article (this month motortrend) that said they have very little projects open and may possibly get scrapped to save money.
#19
Pistons are Over Rated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So is this before or after they fixed the crank shaft problem where it would break and uses a 26lb balancer?
http://www.blueovalnews.com/index.ph..._articleid=237
http://www.blueovalnews.com/index.ph..._articleid=237
#20
Originally Posted by Red Devil
The LS7 has got to be pretty strong, it has lots of Ti and forged parts throughout and cast iron sleeves for reinforcement in the cylinder chambers. But it's compression is like 11.0:1, which doesn't really lend it to too much boost.
edit, here's a link with details:
http://www.corvettemuseum.com/specs/2006/
edit, here's a link with details:
http://www.corvettemuseum.com/specs/2006/
http://www.lingenfelter.com/Lingenfe...boCorvette.htm
800 hp
#21
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Why should the Camaro have to bring something?
The Camaro will "compete" with the GT (in the way that the old F-bods "competed" with the old GTs....ie stomped all over them ). The base model C6 should be plenty for the GT500 considering curb weights.
And just try getting a GT500 for MSRP anytime in the first couple years.
The Camaro will "compete" with the GT (in the way that the old F-bods "competed" with the old GTs....ie stomped all over them ). The base model C6 should be plenty for the GT500 considering curb weights.
And just try getting a GT500 for MSRP anytime in the first couple years.
#22
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
or Challenger is really going to have to 'bring it' now.
Congrats to Ford for bringing a 40-45K 500HP sports car into the world (the more the better) but as stated they will probably be going for 55K and in the end of the day I don't think a Mustang is worth that price...no matter how much HP they stick in it.
Come on Ford, spend some money making the GT lighter, better quality interior, and more fuel efficent instead of pricing it into rich only land.
No offense Basho...o buddy o pal, but I'd rather have the C6 than the GT500.
If GM can pull off a Z28 LS4 330HP 3300 pound car sold for 25K and make the new Camaro look like the concept, I think they would have a smash hit. If anything...let the SS chase the GT500...but keep us normal folk within reach with the Midgrade model V8's.
Heck...stick a SC/Turbo on the LS4 and add some internal hardware (unlike our Renesis that has no such cost effective ability) and I'd bet you would be hitting high 400HP if not reach the 500HP level at a much lower price if sold at 25K that is.
#23
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by adrian-1
There's a strong chance that it may.
Ford scrapped the adrenaline truck project and note that they removed any SVT badging on the GT500. I read an article (this month motortrend) that said they have very little projects open and may possibly get scrapped to save money.
Ford scrapped the adrenaline truck project and note that they removed any SVT badging on the GT500. I read an article (this month motortrend) that said they have very little projects open and may possibly get scrapped to save money.
The Adrenalin was pushed back a year to 2008......it wasn't killed. We usually get an e-mail about every vehicle that is being killed. SVT doesn't have badges on the GT500 because Shelby allowd his name to be used for this project. Adding SVT to the name would make it waay to long......not to mention Shelby sounds better
#24
.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
As just stated by therm8, I actually suggest that GM not chase after the GT500 (with the next Camaro) for the simple fact that these cars were originally made to be affordable to most people and at the rate the Mustang is going with the GT500 they are going against all that history.
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Come on Ford, spend some money making the GT lighter, better quality interior, and more fuel efficent instead of pricing it into rich only land.
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
No offense Basho...o buddy o pal, but I'd rather have the C6 than the GT500.
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
If GM can pull off a Z28 LS4 330HP 3300 pound car sold for 25K and make the new Camaro look like the concept, I think they would have a smash hit. If anything...let the SS chase the GT500...but keep us normal folk within reach with the Midgrade model V8's.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Apalachin, NY
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Congrats to Ford for bringing a 40-45K 500HP sports car into the world (the more the better) but as stated they will probably be going for 55K and in the end of the day I don't think a Mustang is worth that price...no matter how much HP they stick in it.