2004 Pontiac GTO
#76
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FamilyGuy
Hmmm... a few months back, I started a thread here asking why anyone uses Pushrod when DOHC is available. That section of your post is the best answer I've heard. I'm curious... why doesn't anyone use a pushrod V12 for the better balance?
Hmmm... a few months back, I started a thread here asking why anyone uses Pushrod when DOHC is available. That section of your post is the best answer I've heard. I'm curious... why doesn't anyone use a pushrod V12 for the better balance?
also, that lumpy, lopey idle which is characteristic of the impalance naturally found in a V8 is something that muscle people like anyways...
#77
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by wakeech
also, that lumpy, lopey idle which is characteristic of the impalance naturally found in a V8 is something that muscle people like anyways...
also, that lumpy, lopey idle which is characteristic of the impalance naturally found in a V8 is something that muscle people like anyways...
#79
Everyone keeps talking about how inefficient the GTO is - doesn't it get better gas mileage than the RX-8, despite weighing a whole lot more? I mean, I like the RX-8 more than the GTO, but the GTO gets 29 MPG on the highway. That's pretty impressive.
#80
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boulder/Denver, Colorado
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just read a review of the GTO in some Pontiac magazine of the rack and I'm pretty sure I read that it gets 18 mpg city driving... so that shouldn't relate to 29 mpg highway.
Oh BTW... the reviewer loved the performance of the new goat... and also loved the fit and finish of the interior. The only negative thing he had to say about the car was once again the styling.
However, I've been lurking on newagegto.com and those guys are saying that they're gonna change the styling pretty dramatically in the next model year. So we've got that to look forward to!!
Oh BTW... the reviewer loved the performance of the new goat... and also loved the fit and finish of the interior. The only negative thing he had to say about the car was once again the styling.
However, I've been lurking on newagegto.com and those guys are saying that they're gonna change the styling pretty dramatically in the next model year. So we've got that to look forward to!!
#81
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 17 mpg / 29 mpg
Automatic: : 16 mpg / 21 mpg
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/pont...h.0.3.Pontiac*
The low 6th gear allows for very low RPM highway cruising. That's why the 4-speed auto doesn't have the same mileage. Who wants to drive an auto anyway?
Manual: 17 mpg / 29 mpg
Automatic: : 16 mpg / 21 mpg
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/pont...h.0.3.Pontiac*
The low 6th gear allows for very low RPM highway cruising. That's why the 4-speed auto doesn't have the same mileage. Who wants to drive an auto anyway?
#82
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Strom
Who wants to drive an auto anyway?
Who wants to drive an auto anyway?
Btw for those of you who are doubting the performance of the GTO, a bone stock GTO will kill a RX-8, 350Z, and a G35 coupe. The GTO uses a LS! engine which was used in the C5 corvette, there are tuners like Lingenfelter Performance who have pumped that engine to put out 650 - 800+ hp, I am just waiting until that technology is put into the GTO - according to Lingenfelter, that should coming out this year.
- Mike
Last edited by GodWhomIsMike; 02-01-2004 at 10:00 PM.
#83
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FamilyGuy
How good is the interior and the sound system? It will be that, and to a lesser extent the crash protection and reliability, that will determine this car.
I mean, you can get something just as fast with the Evo or the WRX STI. Those are also AWD. So the GTO will have to offer a significantly better interior in order to be worth the extra few $K over either of those.
(Granted, most fans of big V8 sports cars do not cross shop with turbocharged 4 cylinders and vice versa.)
How good is the interior and the sound system? It will be that, and to a lesser extent the crash protection and reliability, that will determine this car.
I mean, you can get something just as fast with the Evo or the WRX STI. Those are also AWD. So the GTO will have to offer a significantly better interior in order to be worth the extra few $K over either of those.
(Granted, most fans of big V8 sports cars do not cross shop with turbocharged 4 cylinders and vice versa.)
Getting a V8 fan to go out and buy something like an Evo or STi, would be a harder sell than having a religious diehard changing religions.
- Mike
Last edited by GodWhomIsMike; 02-01-2004 at 10:11 PM.
#84
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GodWhomIsMike
A V8 fan would never ever think of driving a tarded up 4 cylinder. Also I'd take a GTO over either a Evo or STi, the GTO has cleaner lines and a more mature look IMHO. The GTO will be more confortable, better looking, and down right better sounding. But then again, your getting these opinions here from a V8 fan - :D
Getting a V8 fan to go out and buy something like an Evo or STi, would be a harder sell than having a religious diehard changing religions.
- Mike
A V8 fan would never ever think of driving a tarded up 4 cylinder. Also I'd take a GTO over either a Evo or STi, the GTO has cleaner lines and a more mature look IMHO. The GTO will be more confortable, better looking, and down right better sounding. But then again, your getting these opinions here from a V8 fan - :D
Getting a V8 fan to go out and buy something like an Evo or STi, would be a harder sell than having a religious diehard changing religions.
- Mike
V8 engines do sound better than anything else though.
#85
Free Autographed Pictures
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think i would rather have a corvette than a $10k tuned up GTO. On the GTO the styling is just plain ugly, the interior is nice but not on par w/ bmw, does not have corvette power (it is tuned down), and yes it may b fast, but i think if i was given mayb $2k in aftermarket to even costs my 8 could beat it around a track and possibly in the 1/4 mile.
#86
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rotarian_SC
I think i would rather have a corvette than a $10k tuned up GTO. On the GTO the styling is just plain ugly, the interior is nice but not on par w/ bmw, does not have corvette power (it is tuned down), and yes it may b fast, but i think if i was given mayb $2k in aftermarket to even costs my 8 could beat it around a track and possibly in the 1/4 mile.
I think i would rather have a corvette than a $10k tuned up GTO. On the GTO the styling is just plain ugly, the interior is nice but not on par w/ bmw, does not have corvette power (it is tuned down), and yes it may b fast, but i think if i was given mayb $2k in aftermarket to even costs my 8 could beat it around a track and possibly in the 1/4 mile.
The interior is not on par with BMW, but if you want a BMW with equivalent performance you will have to get an M3 - which costs a hell of a lot more. A $35,000 BMW 318 or 325 couldn't possibly keep pace with the GTO.
In the quarter mile or on a track, if you want to beat the GTO you could probably do it with an Lancer Evolution or WRX STI, and spend less money too. The GTO is not the best bang for your buck performance car.
#87
When you buy a Pontiac GTO, you're buying a luxury car that can hold its own with a Nissan 350Z on the track for about the same price. When you buy a Impreza or Lancer, you're buying an economy car that can beat a 350Z on the track for about the same price.
If you want luxury, go GTO.
If you want luxury, go GTO.
#88
Free Autographed Pictures
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#89
IMO, here is how the GTO should have looked.
#90
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This car stinks, even with its gas tank in the rear most position, the weight distribution is still 55/45. The US version has the gas tank raised and moved forward (bad for Cg, in both counts) The car has struts up front with trailing link steering and the rear has 1 semi-trailing arm and toe control link per side. Yuck. If this car had a modern (non obsolete) rear suspension, then the gas tank could be positioned under the rear seats and there would be room for decent sized mufflers in back flanking the full size spare wheel. And then the rear seats could fold too.
Try driving up Pike's Peak in this and an EVO (or anything else turbocharged)
If you live where the air pressure isn't 90% or better than sea level, then forced induction really helps out.
Try driving up Pike's Peak in this and an EVO (or anything else turbocharged)
If you live where the air pressure isn't 90% or better than sea level, then forced induction really helps out.
#91
I sell this car everyday here in Australia while it is badged as a Monaro, fun to drive, but have the quality and ergonomics of a car originally designed over 7 years ago.
Okay for the average joe but not to the standards of Jap or Euro buyers of hi-po coupes.
Monaro is to us Aussies what the Mustang is to you Yanks... it's a trip down nostalgia lane to the glory days when muscle and cubic inches ruled the world.
Therefore I can understand it being badged a GTO. It's simply aimed at the heartstrings of baby boomers who want to relive a small part of their childhood.
Not the worse car on the planet, but nowhere near the best either.
I'll take my "Jap-Crap" cars any day.
Okay for the average joe but not to the standards of Jap or Euro buyers of hi-po coupes.
Monaro is to us Aussies what the Mustang is to you Yanks... it's a trip down nostalgia lane to the glory days when muscle and cubic inches ruled the world.
Therefore I can understand it being badged a GTO. It's simply aimed at the heartstrings of baby boomers who want to relive a small part of their childhood.
Not the worse car on the planet, but nowhere near the best either.
I'll take my "Jap-Crap" cars any day.
#93
i dont know about everyone else....but i am glad to see manufacturers looking into the future instead of living in the past...the new GTO looks, sounds, and performs amazingly....people need to stop criticizing such a great car
#95
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Doug McGill Jr.
i dont know about everyone else....but i am glad to see manufacturers looking into the future instead of living in the past...the new GTO looks, sounds, and performs amazingly....people need to stop criticizing such a great car
i dont know about everyone else....but i am glad to see manufacturers looking into the future instead of living in the past...the new GTO looks, sounds, and performs amazingly....people need to stop criticizing such a great car
If GM called this thing something else, I don't know that anyone would complain about it. But they didn't do that, they brought back an old name plate and put it on a car that isn't connected to the legacy of the older car with that name in many ways at all.
#96
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Baller
Push-rods=GM=****
Push-rods=GM=****
Almost all LS1s put down 300+ WHP out of the factory. Just exhaust and headers will yield 35 HP. It is a compact, lightweight, and fuel efficent engine.
#98
Chicks dig me!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas!
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rx-7~rx-8
It's funny... car is built... and everyone says nagative shyt about the car.. think postive and screw the negative...
It's funny... car is built... and everyone says nagative shyt about the car.. think postive and screw the negative...
#99
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Baller
Push-rods=GM=****
Push-rods=GM=****
It's an old tech, but so is the wheel. It would be different if GM cars with pushrod engines had engine problems more ofen - but they don't. It would be a problem if they got bad gas mileage - but they don't. It would be a problem if they had poor performance - but they don't. Oh, a pushrod engine has to have larger cylinder displacement than a DOHC engine to get the same power output, but since the total engine weight is comparable because of the pushrod's smaller and lighter valvetrain the difference is meaningless.
My 3400 pound Impala with the 180 horsepower and 205 torque 3.4 liter pushrod V6 gets 24 mpg city, 30 mpg highway. That's pretty good.
#100
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FamilyGuy
GM uses pushrod V6s in most of their sedans. They have the same reliability, performance, and gas mileage of engines of comparable power outputs from other automakers. What's the problem?
It's an old tech, but so is the wheel. It would be different if GM cars with pushrod engines had engine problems more ofen - but they don't. My 3400 pound Impala with the 180 horsepower and 205 torque 3.4 liter pushrod V6 gets 24 mpg city, 30 mpg highway. That's pretty good.
GM uses pushrod V6s in most of their sedans. They have the same reliability, performance, and gas mileage of engines of comparable power outputs from other automakers. What's the problem?
It's an old tech, but so is the wheel. It would be different if GM cars with pushrod engines had engine problems more ofen - but they don't. My 3400 pound Impala with the 180 horsepower and 205 torque 3.4 liter pushrod V6 gets 24 mpg city, 30 mpg highway. That's pretty good.
and as for your claimed performance on that Impala, a girl i dated about uh.... a year and a half ago had one as a courtesy car while her other one was in the shop (oh, the fun that can be had in a canyonous back seat), and just drank gas like there was a hole in the tank...