Notices
Australia/New Zealand Forum They come from The Land Down Under.

Questions for Mazda

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #26  
sco's Avatar
sco
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Well written timbo... also don't forget US are running 5W20 not 5W30 as we have here.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #27  
timbo's Avatar
rock-->o<--hard place
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
sco, I think part of the problem is that people read the US and Aus sections almost interchangeably, but the conditions are quite different. And I'm not sure it's right to be running 5W20 in Las Vegas or Phoenix in summer, vs Chicago or Detroit, in winter
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #28  
DMRH's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by Wildcard
If my car has 177kW at the flywheel, why does it only dyno 113kW?

That's the only question I want answered!
Due to frictional loses a certain percentage of power is lost transmitting from the engine to the tyres. Via a manual gearbox expect a 20%- 25% power loss, an automatic would chew even more.........
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #29  
Wildcard's Avatar
NT Rotorhead
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Katherine, NT
Originally Posted by DMRH
Due to frictional loses a certain percentage of power is lost transmitting from the engine to the tyres. Via a manual gearbox expect a 20%- 25% power loss, an automatic would chew even more.........
I know... and that's my point. The RX-8 should not be losing 36% from the flywheel to the rear tyres, but that is what the dyno numbers are telling us, if 177 is correct.

I'm not trying to hijack this thread, I'm just saying that I'd like to know WTF is really going on!!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #30  
MACCAA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Funny isn't it how people believe dyno figures without question,but not manufactures figures.A dyno is only useful to compare mods from a baseline figure.If you go to 5 different dynos,you will likely get 5 different figures,with some large variations.
I have seen cars gain 25+kw at the wheels by going to a different dyno a month apart.
Performace figures recorded by magazines are consistent with Mazda's claims.

Last edited by MACCAA; Sep 5, 2005 at 11:17 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 01:57 AM
  #31  
Tim Tam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Canberra
Originally Posted by Wildcard
I know... and that's my point. The RX-8 should not be losing 36% from the flywheel to the rear tyres, but that is what the dyno numbers are telling us, if 177 is correct.
Try running premium fuel, you 91 octane bandit! That'd be it for sure. :D

Last edited by Tim Tam; Sep 6, 2005 at 02:06 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 02:02 AM
  #32  
timbo's Avatar
rock-->o<--hard place
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
:D :D ROFLMAO! :D :D

Wildcard -- in all honesty -- you deserved that!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 05:15 AM
  #33  
RXP33D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
He'd try, but not when fuel just hit another all time high and blew a hole in my pocket!

91 OCTANE = $$1.40/L
98 = $$1.55/L
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 05:26 AM
  #34  
DMRH's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by Tim Tam
Try running premium fuel, you 91 octane bandit! That'd be it for sure. :D
As if thats going to make a difference. Almost every user knows by now that octane has practically no effect on a rotary until its artificially compressed to over 1-bar boost.

Pistons, yes. Rotaries, no

Must I type the Curtis Wright engineering paper to prove this....??
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #35  
Tim Tam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Canberra
Originally Posted by DMRH
Must I type the Curtis Wright engineering paper to prove this....??
No, you must not. Instead, you must switch on your sense of humour.

Hey, has anyone tried mixing ethanol with premium to reduce fuel costs? Wildcard, see if you still run OK on that!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #37  
Wildcard's Avatar
NT Rotorhead
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Katherine, NT
Actually, my 113kW dyno run was on 98 octane, because it was not long after I had bought the car.

I probably had that coming though....
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #38  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
I think I'm gonna switch to normal unleaded. Save some $$ at least.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #39  
Tim Tam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Canberra
Dave, surely a bright spark like you could rig up some sort of steam generator to power you from A to B? ( as if lawyers can't afford the price of fuel!!!)
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 12:18 AM
  #40  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by Tim Tam
Dave, surely a bright spark like you could rig up some sort of steam generator to power you from A to B? ( as if lawyers can't afford the price of fuel!!!)
Yeah Tim, that's right. You got me.

Just excuse me while I struggle out from under this diamond encrusted desk and go pee in my solid gold dunny.

Meanwhile, there's developers and 'consultants' starving in the gutters. Humph, hope they don't dare begging from me on my way to wherever Charles is waiting with the Bentley. :D
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mr. GrandGame
New Member Forum
6
Sep 9, 2025 10:41 PM
05TR1CH
New Member Forum
14
Apr 18, 2023 04:56 AM
M RX 8
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
Aug 5, 2015 06:45 PM
MolecularConcept
New Member Forum
15
Aug 5, 2015 04:43 PM
Rx8Lovin
New Member Forum
4
Jul 25, 2015 08:39 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.