Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Hymee gets Supercharged (Part 2)

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 02:39 AM
  #1826  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Originally Posted by rxeightr
Looking smoking good there my friend. So so close now - hang tough mate!
Ditto!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 04:08 AM
  #1827  
Mazdaspeed 88's Avatar
Limited
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Malaysia
Nice to see the progress of the installation.... ;-)
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 06:05 AM
  #1828  
Hymee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally Posted by alz0rz
interesting.
Goodly interesting, or badly interesting?

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #1829  
lafrad's Avatar
Wanna-be RX Owner.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Wow... fit and finish of the build looks great... especially for a kit that hasn't hit lots of cars yet.

But WOW thats a LOT of volume behind the MAF/TB... Are there any issues with that?
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #1830  
lafrad's Avatar
Wanna-be RX Owner.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Well, I didn't mean to kill the thread!
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 12:51 AM
  #1831  
dondo's Avatar
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,385
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
^ lol

shhhhhh, it's sleeping.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #1832  
speedy33's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Updates please!?
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 02:10 PM
  #1833  
tubingchamp's Avatar
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Originally Posted by speedy33
Updates please!?
I think it was supposed to ship last week?

So pretty soon I'm thinking...
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #1834  
tubingchamp's Avatar
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Bump!
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 04:58 PM
  #1835  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,638
Likes: 3,504
From: The Dark Side
I haven't heard from Hymee in weeks, either he's working like a mad man on this project or he as eaten by a rabid Kangaroo!
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 05:03 PM
  #1836  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Originally Posted by Jedi54
I haven't heard from Hymee in weeks, either he's working like a mad man on this project or he as eaten by a rabid Kangaroo!
said Kangaroo...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_FVD0BR2Mc
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 05:09 PM
  #1837  
speedy33's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
yeah no customer updates or something..
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #1838  
tubingchamp's Avatar
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
All you need to do is bug him..

He updated me May 7th.

Said it was going to ship in a week from then, but yeah

It won't be long!!!!!

Originally Posted by speedy33
yeah no customer updates or something..
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 10:31 PM
  #1839  
Aerohead's Avatar
Rotary Avi8r
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
He sent out a customer update late today. All dyno tuned and final updated pieces arriving this week. Hymee said for us to expect ~240hp at the wheels with his conservative street tune and 8-10psi. Higher power would require more aggressive dyno tuning and higher boost.

I'm just looking forward to the 60-70% torque boost at low RPM. He said peak rear wheel torque is ~225ft-lbs around 5000rpm with the blower, but it comes on very quickly at low rpm's.

Shouldn't be too much longer....
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 10:35 PM
  #1840  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,858
Likes: 1,808
From: Y-cat-o NZ
you SC guys be careful you don't wipe your ECU's brain when you install Protuner ...............
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #1841  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,638
Likes: 3,504
From: The Dark Side
Originally Posted by Aerohead
Hymee said for us to expect ~240hp at the wheels with his conservative street tune and 8-10psi.
Does anyone else think that's a bit low? I'm not knocking Mark's work, I'm a big fan of this kit but there's N/A cars that are at 210. (CRH).
The torque sounds fun but I would have figured 8-10 psi would give a bit more.

I'm curious to see one of these in action and what can be done when this thing gets pushed.
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #1842  
pgrothe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
Yeah, 240hp is a bit low considering the amount of money that we have to put on the kit.

If it's all we can get I will probably change my mind and take a closer look at what Pettit is doing, I think they are more close to 280hp.
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 02:10 PM
  #1843  
tubingchamp's Avatar
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Originally Posted by pgrothe
Yeah, 240hp is a bit low considering the amount of money that we have to put on the kit.

If it's all we can get I will probably change my mind and take a closer look at what Pettit is doing, I think they are more close to 280hp.
That's with a basic tune..

Did you not read the rest of the e-mail?

He said at 14PSI the engine can put out 340 at the fly (which is dyno proven).

The other number is Torque. 300 Nm, corrected at the Flywheel J Getting into diesel pulling power now, but with the nice bits of a rotary.
^^ That sounds nice too

I didn't sign up for this kit to blow by the turbo guys. I signed up because of the quality, finish, and how much of a perfectionist Mark is.

If we have an issue, I guarantee you he won't leave us dead in the water.

Less power, longer our engines will last anyways, right?
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #1844  
speedy33's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jedi54
Does anyone else think that's a bit low? I'm not knocking Mark's work, I'm a big fan of this kit but there's N/A cars that are at 210. (CRH).
The torque sounds fun but I would have figured 8-10 psi would give a bit more.

I'm curious to see one of these in action and what can be done when this thing gets pushed.
Yes its a bit low but i think its all about tuning..
pettit have 280-300whp at 8psi with testpipe.
i think boost = boost, at least with an SC.

but that is what i always thought when i see the 340hp dyno from hymee at 14psi! that is something about 290-300WHP on a real car!

why can pettit produce this at 8PSI???
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #1845  
tubingchamp's Avatar
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Originally Posted by speedy33
Yes its a bit low but i think its all about tuning..
pettit have 280-300whp at 8psi with testpipe.
i think boost = boost, at least with an SC.

but that is what i always thought when i see the 340hp dyno from hymee at 14psi! that is something about 290-300WHP on a real car!

why can pettit produce this at 8PSI???
I don't think they can.
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #1846  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Originally Posted by tubingchamp
That's with a basic tune..

Did you not read the rest of the e-mail?

He said at 14PSI the engine can put out 340 at the fly (which is dyno proven).
Check out my post here on what doesn't make sense...
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...postcount=2966

I don't want to clutter up his thread until he responds.


Originally Posted by tubingchamp
Less power, longer our engines will last anyways, right?
I'm not convinced that this isn't a contributing reason that S/Cs don't have the failure rate turbo's do (our engines)
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #1847  
tubingchamp's Avatar
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Check out my post here on what doesn't make sense...
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...postcount=2966

I don't want to clutter up his thread until he responds.

--
Not a dyno junky, nor do I really care honestly.. Numbers are numbers.. I plan on getting a bit closer to the higher number out of my engine though

Originally Posted by RIWWP
I'm not convinced that this isn't a contributing reason that S/Cs don't have the failure rate turbo's do (our engines)
What other reasons would there be?

Honestly, it's true that there is a higher failure rate with turboed engines. Because they make more power.

I just like the measures Mark has put into ours.. To reduce belt slippage, stop it from creating stress on the shaft, and the heat it puts out...

BTW, discharge temps at blower are getting up around 90+ Degrees C, but ambient on the discharge of the intercooler. If you put your hand on the cold side header tank, it feels just that: Cold Same for the boost pipe coming out of it. A bit of heat soak once it gets to the plenum. Also – that is not on the road, but with a bit of a fan going.
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #1848  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Originally Posted by tubingchamp
Not a dyno junky, nor do I really care honestly.. Numbers are numbers.. I plan on getting a bit closer to the higher number out of my engine though
I agree. I am not either. This kit is still what I see as ideal for our engines. Just saying that what Areohead posted above doesn't make much sense compared to his prior dyno sheets and changes since. Well, it does if he also limited the revs to ~6k, but I don't think he did. So just waiting for clarification.


Originally Posted by tubingchamp
What other reasons would there be?

Honestly, it's true that there is a higher failure rate with turboed engines. Because they make more power.

I just like the measures Mark has put into ours.. To reduce belt slippage, stop it from creating stress on the shaft, and the heat it puts out...
I'd say the total combined failure reasons are: (in my personal unqualified opinion with no actual experience)
- #1 installation, either poor installation, bad quality installation, or simply wrong installation (like no heat shield around the turbo, or the boost controller lines swapped)
- #2 tuning, either too risky, too aggressive, or just wrong
If you get past those 2 just fine, then you get to the inevitable:
- #3 more power. More power from the same engine = lower life span. Everyone agrees



Just most turbo failures don't get past the first 2
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #1849  
dondo's Avatar
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,385
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
you can go ask the pettit guys but they're getting 280-300 at 6-9PSI on the kit pulley and 300-330 on the bigger pulley at 11-13PSI (https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...postcount=6333). all to the wheels.
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 03:45 PM
  #1850  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Did Hymmee use E85 for the dyno pull?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 AM.