New D969 Coils
04-10-2015, 04:38 AM
#26
Registered
Thread Starter
...It's really obviously upside down......I don't think anyone had that question....
And really? There's no way at all to invert the signal? Really? He said there's none? An invert function is the only way to do it? Wow, what has the world come to?
If he can't figure out how to flip the signal going into the such a simple oscilloscope I'm seriously questioning if he really knows anything at all about what he's doing.
It's nothing against you Kent, it's just important to be critical of new things to make sure they're anything like what people claim they are.
And really? There's no way at all to invert the signal? Really? He said there's none? An invert function is the only way to do it? Wow, what has the world come to?
If he can't figure out how to flip the signal going into the such a simple oscilloscope I'm seriously questioning if he really knows anything at all about what he's doing.
It's nothing against you Kent, it's just important to be critical of new things to make sure they're anything like what people claim they are.
I'll admit I know nothing about coil performance and proven reliability so I have to take other people's research and word for it and the general consensus, hence why I am following the original thread with increased interest.
Also my name is not Kent, that is where I am from
04-10-2015, 04:45 AM
#27
Registered
Thread Starter
What are you saying is Bullshit? The D585 package uses 8.5mm leads.
The D969 uses 10mm leads.
Are you saying that the coil itself is no different? What's your reasoning behind that?
Everyone seems to be so negative... If you are questioning the beneficial gains of these then why not post the question to Phil/Rotary Revs in the original forum so they can at least see why?
The D969 uses 10mm leads.
Are you saying that the coil itself is no different? What's your reasoning behind that?
Everyone seems to be so negative... If you are questioning the beneficial gains of these then why not post the question to Phil/Rotary Revs in the original forum so they can at least see why?
04-10-2015, 09:54 AM
#30
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
What are you saying is Bullshit? The D585 package uses 8.5mm leads.
The D969 uses 10mm leads.
Are you saying that the coil itself is no different? What's your reasoning behind that?
Everyone seems to be so negative... If you are questioning the beneficial gains of these then why not post the question to Phil/Rotary Revs in the original forum so they can at least see why?
The D969 uses 10mm leads.
Are you saying that the coil itself is no different? What's your reasoning behind that?
Everyone seems to be so negative... If you are questioning the beneficial gains of these then why not post the question to Phil/Rotary Revs in the original forum so they can at least see why?
It's not negativity, it is the truth. I go back and forth with these yahoos on the UK rx8club facebook page all the time, they never post any type of proof about jack ****. The company is likable and markets well, so people believe whatever they have to say and then just parrot that info all over other other social media sites.
Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 04-10-2015 at 10:51 AM.
04-10-2015, 10:50 AM
#31
It's not negativity, it is the truth. I go back and forth with these yahoos on the UK rx8club facebook page all the time, they never post any type of proof about jack ****. The company is likable and market well, so people believe whatever they have to say and then just parrot that info all over other other social media sites.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
