Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

2004 M/T Dynamic Damper Heat Shield Replacement Recall

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #1  
Razz1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
2004 M/T Dynamic Damper Heat Shield Replacement Recall

What's this and how long has this been out?

I know about the other two recalls for the lower arm and thermal heat fuel, but what problem is the damper suppose to cause?

2004 M/T Dynamic Damper Heat Shield Replacement Recall
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #2  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Originally Posted by Razz1
What's this and how long has this been out?
2/2004 Having had the 2005 recalls done the odds that the 2004 were not are very low.

http://www.finishlineperformance.com...per_recall.pdf
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
Razz1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
The PDF does not list the problems with the current damper and it's effects on the car.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #4  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Recall Date:
FEB 17, 2004
Summary:
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES WITH MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS, THE HEAT INSULATOR MAY BE CRACKED CAUSING ABNORMAL NOISE.
Consequence:
CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE CAN CAUSE THE INSULATOR TO COME OFF AND COULD POSE A HAZARD TO FOLLOWING VEHICLES.
Remedy:
DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE HEAT INSULATOR. THE RECALL BEGAN MARCH 5, 2004. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT MAZDA AT 1-800-222-5500.
Potential Units Affected:
12000
Notes:
MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN OPERATIONS 1704B

Recall info can be found all over the net via Google FYI

EDIT: More info attached.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
RCDNN-04V075-1708.pdf (80.7 KB, 291 views)

Last edited by expo1; Jun 7, 2006 at 05:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
there are no problems with the "current " dampner heat shield since the current one replaced the defective part
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #6  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
oh and its 2 years old
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #7  
khoney's Avatar
FX8TED on my RX-8
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
I have a question on this recall that relates to drivetrain alignment, which my service guy said is critical on the M/T vehicles. The recall states that the power plant frame should be adjusted so that the distance between the bottom of the front tunnel member and the bottom of the power plant frame is 55-57mm.

I can come up with two different measurements on my vehicle. If I measure from the rear side of the front tunnel member, I get a distance that is about 3-4mm greater than if I measure from the front side of the front tunnel member. This seems to be due to a step in the frame, where there feels like there is a welded seam. Since this measurement affects the drivetrain alignment, I want to be sure it is correct, because I'm wondering if this is where my idle vibration came from (which I've had for 40K miles - ever since I had the dynamic damber recall performed). Does anyone know what the correct measurement position should be?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
measured from the hole in the front crossmember... and it is very important.

you need a manual to figure it out...


they are avaible online..

beers
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #9  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
This might help. But the dealer should be the one to deal with this anyway so why spend your time in this?
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
PP.pdf (322.4 KB, 228 views)
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 12:08 AM
  #10  
khoney's Avatar
FX8TED on my RX-8
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
That's interesting... Your PDF document I assume is from the service manual? The TSB says the measurement should be between 55 and 57mm - quite a bit tighter than the original spec. I wonder if they determined the alignment was more critical than originally determined?

I don't want to take the car in if the measurement is correct - it's a logistical pain in the butt for me.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 12:18 AM
  #11  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by khoney
That's interesting... Your PDF document I assume is from the service manual? The TSB says the measurement should be between 55 and 57mm - quite a bit tighter than the original spec. I wonder if they determined the alignment was more critical than originally determined?

I don't want to take the car in if the measurement is correct - it's a logistical pain in the butt for me.

interesting..

i had not noticed the 55 to 57mm.. i know that after the motor install the tech noticed the vibration.. and i said ppf...

the adjustment was made.. and it went away, but i wonder what measurement was used.. i have a bit of a rattle in my shifter that was not there before...

btw, get under the car stick a pen through the hole. mark it and then measure it..

quick and easy..

beers
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duren1
Mountain For Sale/Wanted
3
Jan 11, 2017 09:07 AM
Redheddude222
New Member Forum
13
Aug 24, 2015 09:14 AM
Mr.Durden
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
4
Aug 12, 2015 02:21 PM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Aug 11, 2015 07:07 PM
Ryosuke-
Series I Tech Garage
12
Jul 24, 2015 12:51 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.