View Full Version : 0-400m


ypwpat
08-08-2003, 07:00 AM
Hi guys i'm rather confused with the 0-400m timing. Can anyone tell me what is the 0.400m timing for RX8?

When i watch the Best Motoring, they drove it like 15'+
But i Australia Wheels magazine is 14'8''

why is that?

Cheers

P00Man
08-08-2003, 10:41 AM
cause best motoring cant drive!

0-400 is the 1/4 mile

if you can think back to your highschool days, if your out of hs that is, its one lap around the outdoor track
________
Love Help Forums (http://www.love-help.org/)

Skyline Maniac
08-08-2003, 12:03 PM
Originally posted by P00Man
cause best motoring cant drive!



What an idiotic comment.

Ike
08-08-2003, 04:59 PM
POOman, he's an Aussie, I'm sure he's pretty familiar with the metric system. However feet and inches seem to be a bit of an issue. By 14'8" I'm guessing you don't really mean 14.8 seconds.
Each publication will get different times, since there are different drivers, different conditions, and sometimes a variance between cars. It's that way with every car, it's nothing new. Just figure the car to be anywhere between 14.5 and 15.2 or so if it's really something that is important to you.


Ike

Skyline Maniac
08-09-2003, 02:00 PM
Don't know if anyone still cares.... but I cam back from the bookstore today and pulled some data off JDM publications on the RX-8.

Drivers Magazine, 06/20/03

RX8 Type S (250hp 6MT) RX-8 Type E (210hp 4AT)
0-100km ---------6.83------------9.10--------
0-400m ----------14.9-----------16.55--------

Raw data is not that useful by itself, so I pulled another magazine to put these numbers in perspective.

CG (Car Graphics) 06/03
---------RX-8 Type S--------G35C*--------350Z Touring*
0-100km -------6.5----------6.6-----------6.3------------
0-400m --------14.6--------14.6----------14.4-----------


Not to shabby~


G35C: Nissan Skyline Coupe 350GT
350Z Touring: Nissan Fairlady Z Type T

Lensman
08-09-2003, 04:03 PM
Originally posted by IkeWRX
However feet and inches seem to be a bit of an issue. By 14'8" I'm guessing you don't really mean 14.8 seconds.

I'm removing my previous post here because it was totally innaccurate on reflection. Sorry: it's been a long day and I should now engage my brain...:(

Ike
08-09-2003, 04:33 PM
I made a typo there, I meant to say I'm guessing you mean 14.8 seconds.

So you're saying that 14'8" could in fact translate into 14.8 seconds???

Ike

zoom44
08-09-2003, 04:44 PM
Originally posted by Skyline Maniac

Drivers Magazine, 06/20/03

RX8 Type S (250hp 6MT) RX-8 Type E (210hp 4AT)
0-100km ---------6.83------------9.10--------
0-400m ----------14.9-----------16.55--------

Raw data is not that useful by itself, so I pulled another magazine to put these numbers in perspective.

CG (Car Graphics) 06/03
---------RX-8 Type S--------G35C*--------350Z Touring*
0-100km -------6.5----------6.6-----------6.3------------
0-400m --------14.6--------14.6----------14.4-----------


Not to shabby~


[

so the JDM production RX-8 does not seem to have a power issue according to these 1/4 mile runs.

Lensman
08-09-2003, 04:44 PM
Originally posted by IkeWRX
I made a typo there, I meant to say I'm guessing you mean 14.8 seconds.

So you're saying that 14'8" could in fact translate into 14.8 seconds???

Ike

Errr, no. I was just not reading the posts very well. My mistake, sorry.