Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Quick question

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 06:44 AM
  #1  
jer2911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 203
Likes: 20
From: Anderson, South Carolina
Quick question

For the ones who've recalibrated their tune. When you have to replace the engine, do you have to switch back to one of the older tunes or just tweak the latest one you've developed?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 07:22 AM
  #2  
200.mph's Avatar
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 3,364
From: BALLS DEEP
being that every rotary is hand built and no two are the same i would say a retune would be the way to go. are you tuning with a cobb? did mm tune it? if so i would go back to his base tune and go from there but im sure someone will have more info for you
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 03:33 PM
  #3  
bwilk's Avatar
Ultra Noob
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 268
Likes: 76
From: British Columbia
I would personally go back to a stock tune. Then run through calibration for MAF/injectors. That's what Kane preached, because you don't really know what your sensors are doing. The calibration for your individual sensors will be different, not so much the tune(assuming stock-ish engine).

There are particular AFRs that produce best torque/power under different circumstances. Most people who aren't super into tuning/FI/porting shoot for Rich Best Torque because it's an optimal point that's considered "safe". If you can get your sensors and injectors calibrated so that the ECU can hit it's target AFRs, it's really just a matter of setting the targets for the AFR. That would be the part that is the "tune", and I wouldn't expect it to have nearly as much variation as the calibration between engines since the RBT point doesn't actually change that much per engine.

I think RBT is somewhere around 12.2 or something. A search will get you the actual value.

Disclaimer: I'm a hobby tuner, not a professional. This is not my day job, and I only do very little modifications to my own vehicle. I don't want to mislead anyone, so if anyone sees information that is wrong, or would like to clarify anything please let me know and I'll correct it.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 05:53 PM
  #4  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
The VE of the new engine will be different, a new tune is definitely needed. Or just go back to the stock tune.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
bwilk's Avatar
Ultra Noob
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 268
Likes: 76
From: British Columbia
9k, does the VE of a stock engine really change that much?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 11:21 PM
  #6  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
Originally Posted by bwilk
9k, does the VE of a stock engine really change that much?
it's well within the adjustment parameters of the stock ECU 😎
Reply



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.