Notices
New Member Forum A place for new members to get their feet wet

fuel efficiency, rotary vs piston

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 08:19 PM
  #1  
choijw2's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
fuel efficiency, rotary vs piston

I tried to post this in general motor section but It did not let me and needs help as soon as possible

So I hear piston engine actually consumes more fuel at high rpm and i tried to find this online but I didnt find any thing really clear answers for me.

I wondered if anyone could help me if this is true, and if anyone have actually data that compares this.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 08:27 PM
  #2  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Originally Posted by choijw2
I tried to post this in general motor section but It did not let me and needs help as soon as possible

So I hear piston engine actually consumes more fuel at high rpm and i tried to find this online but I didnt find any thing really clear answers for me.

I wondered if anyone could help me if this is true, and if anyone have actually data that compares this.
You are in the New Member class. You need to be a member for 30 days (check) and have over 10 posts (oops) before you can become a regular member. Once this happens, you will be able to create new threads outside of the New Member forum.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 08:32 PM
  #3  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
The reasons and factors are highly varied. I recommend starting with research into the definition of Brake Specific Fuel Consumption. Additional reading would be into aerodynamic drag, drivetrain loss, fluid dynamics, thermal-dynamics, etc...
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:21 AM
  #4  
FC_13's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
I think that Automatic vs. Manual is also a factor with regards to fuel consumption.

Maybe it's all in my head...but I tend to coast around in neutral when I'm driving a manual car (say while cruising down a hill for example)

I always imagined this helped with fuel consumption because you're less likely to have "lead foot" if coasting.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:34 AM
  #5  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
Originally Posted by FC_13
Maybe it's all in my head...but I tend to coast around in neutral when I'm driving a manual car (say while cruising down a hill for example).
This is the worst thing you can do for fuel consumption. Grab your favorite obd2 data scanner, and start looking at your AFRs ... coast in neutral, then coast in gear. You will soon see why you are not doing yourself any good here.

Not to mention no driving school that I have ever seen or heard of will EVER reccomend you to coast in neutral.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 10:24 AM
  #6  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Automatic vs manual does matter, but not for that reason.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
38
May 14, 2024 06:57 AM
TJSiegrist
New Member Forum
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:29 AM
rxwilly8
New Member Forum
1
Sep 2, 2015 02:42 PM
nivong
Europe For Sale/Wanted
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:54 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.