Notices
Canada Forum For our friends up North, eh!

Where are we now in hp ratings?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 07:41 AM
  #1  
delhi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 62
From: Home of the NIMBYs
Where are we now in hp ratings?

Hello RX-8 loving Canucks!

Just need an update as to where is the hp/tq and performance rating now with the rx-8? Last I checked in the fall it was 250hp...then went to somthing like 238hp... then 208hp at the dynos?! Feels Nortel all over again! :D
Anyways I need an update. Also what's new for 2005 models?

thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
You're confusing flywheel hp (the rated hp advertised by the manufacturers) with rear wheel hp (the number generated by the dynos). Mazda still rates the high-power engine at 238 hp (flywheel). Because of drivetrain losses (and interfering overprotective electronics), that seems to generate somewhere around 180 - 190 hp on the dynos.

Regards,
Gordon
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
Mr. Eccentric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Dept. 5, Ontario. Canada
The # at the wheels is really all that's important. More important is the power to weight ratio. Obviously it's going to be even better if it were 238 at the wheels, but the numbers for the 0-60 and 1/4 are decent enough that even down on power it's still enough engine to run with the chassis.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
delhi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 62
From: Home of the NIMBYs
how about when loaded up with people? Will it still pull away from a minivan?

kidding aside, anything new for 2005 rx8?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #5  
Mr. Eccentric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Dept. 5, Ontario. Canada
Originally posted by delhi
how about when loaded up with people? Will it still pull away from a minivan?

kidding aside, anything new for 2005 rx8?
The only thing that's going to save you from a minivan with the vehicle loaded up is torque, and without forced induction the Renesis isn't going to have it. Buyers should be aware that the performance is based on the car with only a driver in it. Even a single passenger makes my FC notable slower, under a 1/4 of a tank of gas even contributes to making the car much more responsive. That's the trade off with the rotary, smooth as glass but very weight sensitive. I still love it for what it's worth.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #6  
delhi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 62
From: Home of the NIMBYs
so rx-8 should be w/t rear seats following your reasoning. hmmm... bet by doing so and knocking those silly Saturn like doors, it may shave even more weight! Now wouldn't that be somethin'!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 01:56 PM
  #7  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
Originally posted by delhi
so rx-8 should be w/t rear seats following your reasoning. hmmm... bet by doing so and knocking those silly Saturn like doors, it may shave even more weight! Now wouldn't that be somethin'!
It sure would.. Mazda could call it an RX-7.. :p
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
fistofmeat
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Oct 7, 2016 12:15 PM
Sakebomb Garage
Sakebomb Garage
3
Oct 22, 2015 04:28 PM
Sakebomb Garage
Group Buy Center
1
Sep 12, 2015 08:18 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM.