Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Track days, Cobalt Friction vs Carbotech

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-23-2009, 10:04 AM
  #26  
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Spin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Striker-7
It was downright scary to see the damage I'd done to those Hawks over just two days at WGI, when the same pad had lasted six days / three events and transiting 1,000 miles of B-roads / interstate with much less wear. After sitting down with a few other car owners, we decided it wasn't my braking technique so much as the difference between when I'd begun tracking at a braking-neutral course (VIR, two high-speed / no elevation change braking zones) to Watkins Glen (four high-speed / descending elevation braking zones and one flat heavy braking), plus gaining speed with experience.

In retrospect, those "enhanced street pads" never stood a chance. They had to endure much, much higher temperature and duration of braking than I'd ever used before, with a healthy engine to add further insult to injury.

Now I have to chime in with a question: Carbotech XP8 at all four corners as the next step up, or Hawk HP+, or the Cobalt? A fellow RX-8 owner/instructor at VIR favors the Carbotech brand, but I'm open to suggestion.
That's some hella wear on your pads! FYI - my long lasting pad recommendation, Cobalt XR2 front pic (XR5 rear not shown) installed on 7/18/08. Track hours and so you can gauge how hard used some ave. lap times. Since install - 9hrs Thunderbolt NJMP (1:43), 3hrs of Watkins Glen (2:25), 1.5hr NHMS (1:24), 1.3hr Monticello (1:28) - all in adv groups, plus DD - I never take them off. Looks like ~1/3 material used + or -. Stops like glue, lasts like... well judge for yourself. Hope that helps .

Old 09-23-2009, 11:13 AM
  #27  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tmak26b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used the Carbotech XP10 at VIR for 2 days, it didn't show much wear either. Car wasn't fast enough to put a hurting on the pads, it wouldn't surprise me if it can really last 10 track days. (I gauge one day as about 100 miles).

1:43 sounds like a good time at Thunderbolt, is that flat out onto the front straight or did they put cones to slow down the car to prevent them from running on the white rumble strip? When I was there, they had stupid cones there to prevent us from going flat out onto the front straight.
Old 09-23-2009, 11:47 AM
  #28  
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Spin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
That was with the turn 3 blocked and replaced with the 3-turn chicane. It slows you down, but made me happy as the Porsche guys hated it (and spun out alot with their tail-happy cars), while I thought it was just the most fun ever! We were just warned not to use the white rumble strips as you enter the front straight, so I did an extra late apex past the left cone to avoid it altogether. Besides I figured running off track at 100+ as you turn onto the straight wouldn't end well there in the loose dirt!

Previous I'd done the standard configuration with times shown below. Now after so much time with the T3 chicane config, I'm pretty sure I could improve on the std config when I go again and as I have stickier tires now.

Standard config 1:40.547 ave speed 77.53
T3 Chicane config 1:43.392 ave speed 75.42

Last edited by Spin9k; 09-23-2009 at 11:53 AM.
Old 09-23-2009, 12:08 PM
  #29  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tmak26b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ran it with the turn 3 chicane, but the last turn was blocked since I ran it the same weekend as the Star Mazda guys. We had to slow down to 92mph at the apex, I think most people do that at around 105? flat out?

Originally Posted by Spin9k
That was with the turn 3 blocked and replaced with the 3-turn chicane. It slows you down, but made me happy as the Porsche guys hated it (and spun out alot with their tail-happy cars), while I thought it was just the most fun ever! We were just warned not to use the white rumble strips as you enter the front straight, so I did an extra late apex past the left cone to avoid it altogether. Besides I figured running off track at 100+ as you turn onto the straight wouldn't end well there in the loose dirt!

Previous I'd done the standard configuration with times shown below. Now after so much time with the T3 chicane config, I'm pretty sure I could improve on the std config when I go again and as I have stickier tires now.

Standard config 1:40.547 ave speed 77.53
T3 Chicane config 1:43.392 ave speed 75.42
Old 06-03-2015, 06:44 PM
  #30  
pcs
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
pcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
resurrecting from the dead, but what I'm seeing is:

Carbotech XP10 (front) & XP8 (rear)

or

Cobalt XR2 (front) & XR5 (rear)


Does that sound about right? I'm looking to track my 8 again, just picked up a set of V710s for dirt cheap from tire-rack. Not sure how the tracks in Cali compare to the ones you guys are running, but I need to figure out a brake combo. I had previously been running HP+ on all 4 corners without much of an issue (Buttonwillow, WSIR, SOW, Laguna), granted those were on street tires...

Anyone have any new combinations of pads that they are liking more than the ones listed above that I should consider?

TIA,

PCS
Old 06-12-2015, 09:38 AM
  #31  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Black2010R3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BC
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Why do you think that you need less aggressive rear pads? I use Hawk DTC-60's at both ends and am very happy with them both on track and on the drives to and from the track where they make very little noise and don't have any bad behavior when cold.
Old 07-30-2015, 01:05 PM
  #32  
pcs
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
pcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not so sure I do anymore. Even the HP+ seem to work fine with the r-comps. I've been working on smoothing and evening out my braking, seems to be working just fine with less braking needed... I am getting some deposits on the rotor with the HP+, but not sure if that's from before or from the recent tracking with the r-comps on.

I know it's old tech, but it's cheap and it does the trick for the time being. Might play with Carbotechs XP10 or Hawk DTC-60s all the way around when the HP+ die...
Old 07-30-2015, 01:17 PM
  #33  
Water Foul
 
Steve Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,521
Received 257 Likes on 210 Posts
Originally Posted by Black2010R3
Why do you think that you need less aggressive rear pads? I use Hawk DTC-60's at both ends and am very happy with them both on track and on the drives to and from the track where they make very little noise and don't have any bad behavior when cold.
I posed this question to Carbotech when I ordered my last set of pads (XP10/XP8). The person on the other end of the line had several reasons for it--some of which seem counter-intuitive. The main 3 reasons are better modulation and braking control, ability to use the rear pads should the fronts go into ABS, and less upset to the car under heavy braking. Not sure how that last one works.

My next track day is in mid September, and I am planning to run Hawk DTC-30 front and HP Plus rear. Essentially, I am combining two nearly worn out sets of pads to squeeze a track day or two out of them. That is kind of the same idea. I'll see how it turns out.

As soon as those Hawks are finished off, I'll have the rotors turned and install the Carbotechs.
Old 08-01-2015, 09:13 AM
  #34  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Black2010R3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BC
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
With modern ABS you can probably get by with just about any pad combination, but it might not be ideal, as it's better to have the ABS not intervene. If one end's locking up too soon, then different pads can help get you a little better stopping performance by reducing the friction on that end, alleviating the early lockup. It's all complicated by heat, as one end will almost certainly be hotter than the other and friction levels of pads change with heat.
Old 08-04-2015, 08:04 PM
  #35  
pcs
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
pcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not getting lockup in the rear with the same pads all the way around, is anyone else having issues with too much brake in the rear?

on my rx7 that gets tracked, I ran into an issue where running Hawk Blues all the way around resulted in the tail locking up under hard braking before the fronts did, and switching to a compound with a lower coeff of friction in the rear seemed to help (i suppose I could always get a brake bias adjuster, haha)... never had this issue in the 8 - or at least have not yet.

On the flip side, if there's not enough brake in the rear compared to the fronts when running a staggered brake setup, i would assume that just cooks your fronts faster and ultimately limits your braking ability - so we basically want to be running as much brake in the rear as possible without locking them up prior to the front as much as possible, correct?

^as i think about this, seems like common sense... *facepalm*
Old 09-30-2015, 04:56 AM
  #36  
Registered
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
I've been using Hawk pads on BMW M3, Integra, Dodge SRT4, Miata. HP+ work well for street tires and beginner to intermediate driving ability. The Hawk Blue and Hawk DTC-60 are recommended for R-comps and advanced driving ability.

As others have mentioned, not dragging the brakes and braking firmly but briefly is one way to extend pad life. The other ways are to improve cooling to them and chose a pad material for the temperatures you are expecting.

I get almost 6 weekends of time trial competition out of the DTC-60 pads on my integra; granted it's a light weight, low power car with a wildwood brake kit. But they grab consistently and wear well.

JUST A HEADS UP- TireRack has the Hawk Blue and Hawk HP+ for a really good deal right now.

I just bought the RX-8 and will be testing it at Summit Point Shenandoah Circuit this weekend with Hawk Blues all around. Completely stock, 225/40/18 BFR Rivals and maxed front camber.
Old 09-30-2015, 04:59 AM
  #37  
Registered
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
The main 3 reasons are better modulation and braking control, ability to use the rear pads should the fronts go into ABS, and less upset to the car under heavy braking. Not sure how that last one works.
If your rear tires are being asked to do less braking (due to less friction from the less aggressive pad), your rear tires will have more available traction to keep the rear end in line. If the rear tires are actually asked to deliver everything they have under braking, no traction remains to keep the rear stable.

Old 09-30-2015, 08:59 AM
  #38  
1% evil, 99% hot gas.
iTrader: (21)
 
wankelbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Forest Hill, MD
Posts: 1,107
Received 129 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff
I've been using Hawk pads on BMW M3, Integra, Dodge SRT4, Miata. HP+ work well for street tires and beginner to intermediate driving ability. The Hawk Blue and Hawk DTC-60 are recommended for R-comps and advanced driving ability.
[...]
I get almost 6 weekends of time trial competition out of the DTC-60 pads on my integra; granted it's a light weight, low power car with a wildwood brake kit. But they grab consistently and wear well.

JUST A HEADS UP- TireRack has the Hawk Blue and Hawk HP+ for a really good deal right now.

I just bought the RX-8 and will be testing it at Summit Point Shenandoah Circuit this weekend with Hawk Blues all around. Completely stock, 225/40/18 BFR Rivals and maxed front camber.
You won't need DTC-60s for the RX-8. I run HP+ front and get 5 or 6 weekends on a set easy. Never any problems with fade, deposits, chunking, etc. and no break-in necessary. Slap them on and go. Even with a set of Hoosiers. Gentle on the rotors too as I've been running the same rotors for 3-4 years, 3 or so sets of pads. Shocking, really.

TireRack is selling HP+ for $111 plus shipping right now. EvilBay sellers have them for $96 delivered:
Hawk HB470N 643 HP Plus Brake Pads Mazda RX 8 2004 2009 | eBay I just bought another set a couple of weeks ago.

Congrats on the RX-8. I'll be instructing at the Shen this weekend, I'll look for you. Unfortunately I won't have my RX-8 as I have a serious vibration at-speed I've been unable to repair.
Old 09-30-2015, 11:52 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by wankelbolt
You won't need DTC-60s for the RX-8. I run HP+ front and get 5 or 6 weekends on a set easy. Never any problems with fade, deposits, chunking, etc. and no break-in necessary. Slap them on and go. Even with a set of Hoosiers. Gentle on the rotors too as I've been running the same rotors for 3-4 years, 3 or so sets of pads. Shocking, really.

TireRack is selling HP+ for $111 plus shipping right now. EvilBay sellers have them for $96 delivered:
Hawk HB470N 643 HP Plus Brake Pads Mazda RX 8 2004 2009 | eBay I just bought another set a couple of weeks ago.

Congrats on the RX-8. I'll be instructing at the Shen this weekend, I'll look for you. Unfortunately I won't have my RX-8 as I have a serious vibration at-speed I've been unable to repair.
I got the impression that HP+ would work with a stock RX8 based on he relatively low power, light weight, and amazing factory brakes, but the blues were only a few dollars more. I look forward to seeing how many weekends I get out of them compared to your experience with HP+.

It looks like we're REALLY going to be swamped out this weekend, and Shenandoah gets slick with rain. And there's not much runoff...

Regardless, I look forward to seeing you there as well!
Old 09-30-2015, 01:30 PM
  #40  
Water Foul
 
Steve Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,521
Received 257 Likes on 210 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff
If your rear tires are being asked to do less braking (due to less friction from the less aggressive pad), your rear tires will have more available traction to keep the rear end in line. If the rear tires are actually asked to deliver everything they have under braking, no traction remains to keep the rear stable.

Eh. I understand how all that works. I was just being flippant. But thanks for posting the traction circle. People need to see it as much as possible.

Here is a decent article on balancing brake pads and why one might want less aggressive pads on the rear.

MAZDASPEED Motorsports Development

BTW, now that I have driven on Carbotech pads, I will never look Hawk's way again. The difference in modulation and linearity is astounding. Reduced rotor wear is also nice.
Old 09-30-2015, 01:57 PM
  #41  
Registered
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
Eh. I understand how all that works. I was just being flippant. But thanks for posting the traction circle. People need to see it as much as possible.

Here is a decent article on balancing brake pads and why one might want less aggressive pads on the rear.

MAZDASPEED Motorsports Development

BTW, now that I have driven on Carbotech pads, I will never look Hawk's way again. The difference in modulation and linearity is astounding. Reduced rotor wear is also nice.
Thanks for that link!
Old 09-30-2015, 09:59 PM
  #42  
El Jefe
 
yomomspimp06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
kind of late to the party, but I picked up from blues for cheap a while back. did a few track days and I instantly loved them. My only complaint was under heavy braking the rear would tend to step out of line. I wouldn't hesitate to run them in the front again, but I will be switching to a less aggressive pad in the rear. Possibly an HP+.
I daily drove on them...My RPF1's hate me. I'm going to have to strip and powdercoat them soon. The brake dust ate through the finish.
Old 10-01-2015, 04:49 AM
  #43  
Registered
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by yomomspimp06
kind of late to the party, but I picked up from blues for cheap a while back. did a few track days and I instantly loved them. My only complaint was under heavy braking the rear would tend to step out of line. I wouldn't hesitate to run them in the front again, but I will be switching to a less aggressive pad in the rear. Possibly an HP+.
I daily drove on them...My RPF1's hate me. I'm going to have to strip and powdercoat them soon. The brake dust ate through the finish.
Yeah, the dust from the Blues is highly damaging to wheel finish, especially when it gets wet.

Sounds like my brake bias may be off a bit... i'll have to experiment with different compounds next go around.

But I've heard that powdercoating aluminum wheels is bad for them; reduces their strength. Maybe it's unsubstantiated, but i'd look into it.
Old 10-02-2015, 01:51 PM
  #44  
El Jefe
 
yomomspimp06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff

But I've heard that powdercoating aluminum wheels is bad for them; reduces their strength. Maybe it's unsubstantiated, but i'd look into it.
I powdercoat as a hobby/side hustle. I would say it's unsubstantiated due to the experience by myself and others on the track with coated wheels... I'm also not a metallurgist. So take that with a grain of salt
Old 10-02-2015, 03:13 PM
  #45  
1% evil, 99% hot gas.
iTrader: (21)
 
wankelbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Forest Hill, MD
Posts: 1,107
Received 129 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by yomomspimp06
I powdercoat as a hobby/side hustle. I would say it's unsubstantiated due to the experience by myself and others on the track with coated wheels... I'm also not a metallurgist. So take that with a grain of salt
How hot do you get the wheels? Annealing (softening) starts somewhere north of 750° F for aluminum, I think.
Old 10-02-2015, 03:14 PM
  #46  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Black2010R3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BC
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Powder coating wheels involves heating them, which could affect the strength, as a large part of the strength of an aluminum wheel is determined by the heat treatment it gets.

Without knowing everything in detail about the alloy, heat treatment, and powder coating process, I'd be very reluctant to powder coat aluminum wheels.
Old 10-03-2015, 12:24 AM
  #47  
El Jefe
 
yomomspimp06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by wankelbolt
How hot do you get the wheels? Annealing (softening) starts somewhere north of 750° F for aluminum, I think.
most of my colors are 400degrees at part metal temp for 10min or so

Originally Posted by Black2010R3
Powder coating wheels involves heating them, which could affect the strength, as a large part of the strength of an aluminum wheel is determined by the heat treatment it gets.

Without knowing everything in detail about the alloy, heat treatment, and powder coating process, I'd be very reluctant to powder coat aluminum wheels.
advice noted. wheels still hold up well so...
Old 10-03-2015, 10:09 AM
  #48  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Black2010R3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BC
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I had a quick look online and 400 degrees is well within the range of temperatures that WILL affect the properties of aluminum, in this case, "aging". Now 10 minutes is probably not long enough to make significant changes, it's something to keep in mind.
Old 10-03-2015, 11:49 AM
  #49  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
BTW, now that I have driven on Carbotech pads, I will never look Hawk's way again. The difference in modulation and linearity is astounding. Reduced rotor wear is also nice.
Someone else has seen the light
Old 10-03-2015, 07:23 PM
  #50  
El Jefe
 
yomomspimp06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Black2010R3
I had a quick look online and 400 degrees is well within the range of temperatures that WILL affect the properties of aluminum, in this case, "aging". Now 10 minutes is probably not long enough to make significant changes, it's something to keep in mind.
further research leads me to a new process I'll try. 375degree PMT for longer duration should yield the same results with little to no annealing of the aluminum... Thanks


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Track days, Cobalt Friction vs Carbotech



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.